Criminal thinking as a moderator of the perceived certainty–offending relationship: age variations

References

• Allison, P. D. (2012). Handling missing data by maximum likelihood. SAS Global Forum 2012 (Paper 312–2012). Cary, NC: SAS Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Arnett, J. J. (2000). Emerging adulthood: A theory of development from the late teens through the twenties. American Psychologist, 55, 469–480. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.55.5.469
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A., Barbarnelli, C., Caprara, G. V., & Pastorelli, C. (1996). Mechanisms of moral disengagement in the exercise of moral agency. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 364–374. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.71.2.364
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beccaria, C. (1986). On crimes and punishments ( D. Young, Trans). Indianapolis, IN: Hackett. (Original work published 1764 ).
   Google Scholar
• Bellemare, M. F., Masaki, T., & Pepinsky, T. B. (2017). Lagged explanatory variables and the estimation of causal effect. The Journal of Politics, 79, 949–963. doi: 10.1086/690946
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bentham, J. (1907). An introduction to the principles of morals and legislation. Oxford: Clarendon Press. (Original work published 1789 ).
   Google Scholar
• Bersani, B. E., Laub, J. H., & Nieuwbeerta, P. (2009). Marriage and Desistance from Crime in the Netherlands: Do Gender and Socio-Historical Context Matter? Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 25, 3–24. doi: 10.1007/s10940-008-9056-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cole, D. A., & Maxwell, S. E. (2003). Testing mediational models with longitudinal data: Questions and tips in the use of structural equation modeling. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 112, 558–577. doi: 10.1037/0021-843X.112.4.558
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elwert, F., & Winship, C. (2014). Endogenous selection bias: The problem of conditioning on a collider variable. Annual Review of Sociology, 40, 31–53. doi: 10.1146/annurev-soc-071913-043455
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fagan, J., & Piquero, A. R. (2007). Rational choice and developmental influences on recidivism among adolescent felony offenders. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 4, 715–748. doi: 10.1111/j.1740-1461.2007.00105.x
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Farrington, D. P. (1973). Self-reports of deviant behavior: Predictive and stable? Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 64, 99–110. doi: 10.2307/1142661
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friesen, L. (2012). Certainty of punishment versus severity of punishment: An experimental investigation. Southern Economic Journal, 79, 399–421. doi: 10.4284/0038-4038-2011.152
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gottfredson, M. R. (2011). Sanctions, situations, and agency in control theories of crime. European Journal of Criminology, 8, 128–143. doi: 10.1177/1477370810392968
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenland, S. (2003). Quantifying biases in causal models: Classical confounding versus collider-stratification bias. Epidemiology, 14, 300–306.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawken, A., & Kleiman, M. (2009). Managing drug involved probationers with swift and certain sanctions: Evaluating Hawaii’s HOPE. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice, U.S. Department of Justice.
   Google Scholar
• Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Hill, J. M., Blokland, A. A. J., & van der Geest, V. R. (2016). Desisting from crime in emerging adulthood: Adult roles and the maturity gap. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 53, 506–535. doi: 10.1177/0022427816628586
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hindelang, M. J., Hirschi, T., & Weis, J. G. (1981). Measuring delinquency. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hirschi, T., & Gottfredson, M. (1983). Age and the explanation of crime. American Journal of Sociology, 89, 552–584. doi: 10.1086/227905
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirtenlehner, H., & Hardie, B. (2016). On the conditional relevance of controls: An application of situational action theory to shoplifting. Deviant Behavior, 37, 315–331. doi: 10.1080/01639625.2015.1026764
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirtenlehner, H., Pauwels, L. J. R., & Mesko, G. (2014). Is the effect of perceived deterrence on juvenile offending contingent on the level of self-control? Results from three countries. British Journal of Criminology, 54, 128–150. doi: 10.1093/bjc/azt053
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huizinga, D., Esbensen, F., & Weihar, A. (1991). Are there multiple paths to delinquency? Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 82, 83–118. doi: 10.2307/1143790
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IBM. (2016). IBM SPSS statistics for windows, version 24.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Keele, L., & Kelly, N. J. (2006). Dynamic models for dynamic theories: The ins and outs of lagged dependent variables. Political Analysis, 14, 186–205. doi: 10.1093/pan/mpj006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Killias, M., Scheidegger, D., & Nordenson, P. (2009). The effects of increasing the certainty of punishment: A field experiment on public transportation. European Journal of Criminology, 6, 387–400. doi: 10.1177/1477370809337881
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landenberger, N. A., & Lipsey, M. W. (2005). The positive effects of cognitive-behavioral programs for offenders: A meta-analysis of factors associated with effective treatment. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 1, 451–476. doi: 10.1007/s11292-005-3541-7
   Google Scholar
• Larkin, P. J. (2015). Swift, certain, and fair punishment: 24/7 Sobriety and HOPE: Creative approaches to alcohol- and illicit drug-using offenders. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 105, 39–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, H., Sullivan, C. J., & Barnes, J. C. (2018). Maturity of judgment and perceptual deterrence. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 45, 1762–1781. doi: 10.1177/0093854818789723
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipsey, M. W. (2009). The primary factors that characterize effective interventions with juvenile offenders: A meta-analytic overview. Victims and Offenders, 4, 124–147. doi: 10.1080/15564880802612573
   Google Scholar
• Loughran, T. A., Brame, R., Fagan, J., Piquero, A. R., Mulvey, E. P., & Schubert, C. A. (2015, August). Studying deterrence among high-risk adolescents. In Juvenile justice bulletin. Washington, DC: Office of Justice Programs, U.S. Department of Justice.
   Google Scholar
• Loughran, T. A., Pogarsky, G., Piquero, A. R., & Paternoster, R. (2012). Re-examining the functional form of the certainty effect in deterrence theory. Justice Quarterly, 29, 712–741. doi: 10.1080/07418825.2011.583931
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lussier, P., McCuish, E., & Corrado, R. R. (2015). The adolescence–adulthood transition and desistance from crime: Examining the underlying structure of desistance. Journal of Developmental and Life-Course Criminology, 1, 87–117. doi: 10.1007/s40865-015-0007-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mendes, S. M. (2004). Certainty, severity, and their relative deterrent effects: Questioning the implications of the role of risk in criminal deterrence policy. Policy Studies Journal, 32, 59–74. doi: 10.1111/j.0190-292X.2004.00053.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mulvey, E. P. (2012, November). The pathways to desistance study: Design and methods. Paper presented at the American Society of Criminology Annual Meeting, Chicago, IL. Retrieved from http://citation.allacademic.com/meta/p574246_index.html
   Google Scholar
• Muthén, B., & Muthén, L. (1998–2017). Mplus user’s guide (8th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén and Muthén.
   Google Scholar
• Nagin, D. S. (1998). Criminal deterrence research at the outset of the twenty-first century. Crime and Justice, 23, 1–42. doi: 10.1086/449268
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagin, D. S. (2013). Deterrence in the twenty-first century. Crime and Justice, 42, 199–263. doi: 10.1086/670398
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagin, D. S., & Paternoster, R. (1994). Personal capital and social control: The deterrence implications of individual differences in criminal offending. Criminology; An interdisciplinary Journal, 32, 581–606.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagin, D., & Pogarsky, G. (2001). Integrating celerity, impulsivity, and extra-legal sanction threats into a model of general deterrence: Theory and evidence. Criminology; An interdisciplinary Journal, 39, 865–892.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Research Council. (2013). Reforming juvenile justice: A developmental approach. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ndrecka, M., Bechtel, K., Lowenkamp, C. T., & Latessa, E. J. (2009). Effectiveness of juvenile cognitive behavioral and family-oriented interventions—A meta-analysis. In B. Glick (Ed.), Cognitive behavioral interventions for at-risk youth (pp. 14-1–14-16). Kingston, NJ: Civic Research Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Paternoster, R., Brame, R., Mazerolle, P., & Piquero, A. (1998). Using the correct statistical test for the equality of regression coefficients. Criminology; An interdisciplinary Journal, 36, 859–866.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pickett, J. T. (2018). Using behavioral economics to advance deterrence research and improve crime policy: Some illustrative experiments. Crime and Delinquency, 64, 1636–1659. doi: 10.1177/0011128718763136
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pickett, J. T., Roche, S. P., & Pogarsky, G. (2018). Toward a bifurcated theory of emotional deterrence. Criminology; An interdisciplinary Journal, 56, 27–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piquero, A. R., Paternoster, R., Pogarsky, G., & Loughran, T. (2011). Elaborating the individual difference component in deterrence theory. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 7, 335–360. doi: 10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-102510-105404
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pratt, T. C., & Cullen, F. T. (2005). Assessing macro-level predictors and theories of crime: A meta-analysis. Crime and Justice, 32, 373–450. doi: 10.1086/655357
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pratt, T. C., & Turanovic, J. J. (2018). Celerity and deterrence. In D. S. Nagin, F. T. Cullen, & C. L. Jonson (Eds.), Deterrence, choice, and crime: Contemporary perspectives. Advances in criminological theory (Vol. 23, pp. 187–210). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Saltzman, L., Paternoster, R., Waldo, G. P., & Chiricos, T. G. (1982). Deterrent and experiential effects: The problem of causal order in perceptual deterrence research. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 19, 172–189. doi: 10.1177/002242788201900203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schepers, D., & Reinecke, J. (2018). Conditional relevance of controls: A simultaneous test of the influences of self-control and deterrence on criminal behavior in the context of situational action theory. European Journal of Criminology, 15, 77–92. doi: 10.1177/1477370817732191
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Boston: Mifflin.
   Google Scholar
• Sweeten, G. (2012). Scaling criminal offending. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 28, 533–557. doi: 10.1007/s10940-011-9160-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, K. J., Loughran, T. A., & Piquero, A. R. (2013). Do individual characteristics explain variation in sanction risk updating among serious juvenile offender? Advancing the logic of differential deterrence. Law and Human Behavior, 37, 10–21. doi: 10.1037/h0093990
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Gelder, J.-L., & De Vries, R. E. (2012). Traits and states: Integrating personality and affect into a model of criminal decision making. Criminology; An interdisciplinary Journal, 50, 637–671.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walters, G. D. (1995). The Psychological Inventory of Criminal Thinking Styles (PICTS). Part I: Reliability and preliminary validity. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 22, 307–325. doi: 10.1177/0093854895022003008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walters, G. D. (2016). Friends, cognition, and delinquency: Proactive and reactive criminal thinking as mediators of the peer influence and peer selection effects among male delinquents. Justice Quarterly, 33, 1055–1079. doi: 10.1080/07418825.2015.1039048
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walters, G. D. (2017a). Measuring low self-control and reactive criminal thinking in the NLSY–child sample: One construct or two? American Journal of Criminal Justice, 42, 314–328. doi: 10.1007/s12103-016-9365-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walters, G. D. (2017b). Modelling the criminal lifestyle: Theorizing at the edge of chaos. London: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Walters, G. D., & Morgan, R. D. (2019). Certainty of punishment and criminal thinking: Do the rational and non-rational parameters of a student’s decision to cheat on an exam interact? Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 30, 276–295. doi: 10.1080/10511253.2018.1488982
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walters, G. D., Morgan, R. D., & Scanlon, F. (2019). The moderating effect of criminal thinking on certainty of apprehension in decisions to engage in antisocial behavior: Replication and extension. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 64, 805–813. doi: 10.1111/1556-4029.13905
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walters, G. D., & Yurvati, E. (2017). Testing the construct validity of the PICTS proactive and reactive scores against six putative measures of proactive and reactive criminal thinking. Psychology, Crime & Law, 23, 1–14. doi: 10.1080/1068316X.2016.1217335
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watkins, A. M., Huebner, B. M., & Decker, S. H. (2008). Patterns of gun acquisition, carrying, and use among juvenile and adult arrestees: Evidence from a high-crime city. Justice Quarterly, 25, 674–700. doi: 10.1080/07418820801930118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weinberger, D. A., & Schwartz, G. E. (1990). Distress and restraint as superordinate dimensions of self-reported adjustment: A typological perspective. Journal of Personality, 58, 381–417. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1990.tb00235.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wikström, P.-O. H. (2014). Why crime happens: A situational action theory. In G. Manzo (Ed.), Analytic sociology: Actions and networks (pp. 74–94). New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, D. B., Bouffard, L. A., & MacKenzie, D. L. (2005). A quantitative review of structured, group-oriented, cognitive-behavioral programs for offenders. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 32, 172–204. doi: 10.1177/0093854804272889
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woolard, J., Fondacaro, M. R., & Slobogin, C. (2001). Informing juvenile justice policy: Directions for behavioral science research. Law and Human Behavior, 25, 13–24. doi: 10.1023/A:1005635808317
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, V. (2010, November). Deterrence in criminal justice: Evaluating certainty vs. severity of punishment. Washington, DC: The Sentencing Project.
   Google Scholar