References
- Andrews, S. J., & Lamb, M. E. (2016). How do lawyers examine and cross-examine children in Scotland? Applied Cognitive Psychology, 30, 953–971. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3286
- Andrews, S. J., & Lamb, M. E. (2019). Lawyers’ question content and children’s responses in Scottish criminal courts. Psychology, Crime and Law. Advance online publication. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2019.1611829
- Andrews, S. J., Lamb, M. E., & Lyon, T. D. (2015). Question types, responsiveness and self-contradictions when prosecutors and defense attorneys question alleged victims of child sexual abuse. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 29, 253–261. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3103
- Brock, P., Fisher, R. P., & Cutler, B. C. (1999). Examining the cognitive interview in a double test paradigm. Psychology, Crime and Law, 5, 29–45. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/10683169908414992
- Clifford, B. R., & George, R. (1996). A field evaluation of training in three methods of witness/victim investigative interviewing. Psychology, Crime and Law, 2, 231–248. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/10683169608409780
- Cohen, J. (1960). A coefficient for agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20, 37–46. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/001316446002000104
- Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
- Davies, G. M., Westcott, H. L., & Horan, N. (2000). The impact of questioning styles on the content of investigative interviews with suspects child abuse victims. Psychology, Crime and Law, 6, 81–97. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10683160008410834.
- Evans, K. (1995). Advocacy in court. A beginner’s guide. London, UK: Blackstone Press Limited.
- Fisher, R. P. (1995). Interviewing victims and witnesses of crime. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 1, 732–764. doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8971.1.4.732
- Fisher, R. P., & Geiselman, R. E. (1992). Memory enhancing techniques for investigative interviewing: The cognitive interview. Springfield, IL: Thomas.
- Fisher, R. P., Geiselman, R. E., & Raymond, D. S. (1987). Critical analysis of police interview techniques. Journal of Police Science and Administration, 15, 177–185.
- Gibbons, J. (2003). Forensic linguistics: An introduction to language in the justice system. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
- Gilbert, J. A. E., & Fisher, R. P. (2006). The effects of varied retrieval cues on reminiscence in eyewitness memory. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 20, 723–739. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1232
- Glissan, J. L. (1991). Cross-examination practice and procedure: An Australian perspective (2nd ed.). Sydney, Australia: Butterworths.
- Griffiths, A., & Milne, R. (2006). Will it all end in tiers? Police interviews with suspects in Britain. In T. A. Williamson (Ed.), Investigative interviewing: Rights, research, regulation (pp. 167–189). Devon: Willan.
- Hanna, K., Davies, E., Crothers, C., & Henderson, E. (2012). Questioning child witnesses in New Zealand’s criminal justice system: Is cross-examination fair? Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 19, 530–546. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/13218719.2011.615813
- Hanna, K., & Henderson, E. (2018). ‘[expletive], that was confusing, wasn’t it?’ defence lawyers’ and intermediaries’ assessment of the language used to question a child witness. International Journal of Evidence and Proof, 22, 411–427. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1365712718796527
- Henkel, L. A. (2014). Do older adults change their eyewitness reports when re-questioned? The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 69, 356–365. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbt071
- Hill v. Hamilton-Wentworth Regional Police Services Board. (2007). 3 SCR 129.
- Kebbell, M. R., Deprez, S., & Wagstaff, G. F. (2003). The direct and cross-examination of complainants and defendants in rape trials: A quantitative analysis of question type. Psychology, Crime and Law, 9, 49–59. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316021000057677 doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/10683160308139
- Kebbell, M. R., Hatton, C., & Johnson, S. D. (2004). Witnesses with intellectual disabilities in court: What questions are asked and what influence do they have? Legal and Criminological Psychology, 9, 23–35. doi: https://doi.org/10.1348/135532504322776834
- Kebbell, M. R., & Johnson, S. D. (2000). Lawyers’ questioning: The effect of confusing questions on witness confidence and accuracy. Law and Human Behavior, 24, 629–641. doi: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005548102819
- Klemfuss, J. Z., Quas, J. A., & Lyon, T. D. (2014). Attorneys’ questions and childrens’ productivity in child sexual abuse criminal trials. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 28, 780–788. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3048
- Lamb, M. E., Hershkowitz, I., Orbach, Y., & Esplin, P. W. (2008). Tell me what happened: Structured investigative interviews of child victims and witnesses. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons Inc.
- Lamer, A. (2006). The Lamer commission of inquiry pertaining to the cases of: Ronald Dalton, Gregory Parsons and Randy Druken. St. John’s, NL: Office of the Queen’s Printer.
- Landis, R., & Koch, G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33, 159–174. doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/2529310
- Loftus, E. F. (1979). Eyewitness testimony. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
- Loftus, E. F. (2005). Planting misinformation in the human mind: A 30-year investigation of the malleability of memory. Learning and Memory, 12, 361–366. doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/lm.94705
- Milne, R., & Bull, R. (2003). Investigative interviewing: Psychology and practice. Chichester: Wiley.
- Morley, I. (2009). The devil’s advocate: A short polemic on how to be seriously good in court. London: Sweet and Maxwell.
- Myklebust, T., & Alison, L. J. (2000). The current state of police interviews with children in Norway: How discrepant are they from models based on current issues in memory and communication? Psychology, Crime and Law, 6, 331–351. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/10683160008409810
- Neath, I., & Surprenant, A. M. (2003). Human memory (Second ed.). Toronto: Thomson Wadsworth.
- Oxburgh, G., Myklebust, T., & Grant, T. (2010). The question of question types in police interviews: A review of the literature from a psychological and linguistic perspective. International Journal of Speech, Language, and the Law: Forensic Linguistics, 17, 45–66. doi:https://doi.org/10.1558/ijsll.v17il.45 doi: https://doi.org/10.1558/ijsll.v17i1.45
- Pennington, N., & Hastie, R. (1986). Evidence evaluation in complex decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 242–258. doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.2.242
- Pennington, N., & Hastie, R. (1988). Explanation-based decision making: Effects of memory structure on judgement. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 14, 521–533. doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.14.3.521
- Perry, N., McAuliff, B., Tam, P., Claycomb, L., Dostal, C., & Flanagan, C. (1995). When lawyers question children: Is justice served? Law and Human Behavior, 19, 609–629. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01499377
- Poole, D. A., & White, L. T. (1991). Effects of question repetition on the eyewitness testimony of children and adults. Developmental Psychology, 27, 975–986. doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.27.6.975
- Powell, M. B., Fisher, R. P., & Wright, R. (2005). Investigating interviewing. In N. Brewer, & K. Williams (Eds.), Psychology and law: An empirical perspective (pp. 11–42). New York, NY: Guilford.
- R. v. Forbes. (2006). TCC 377 (CanLII).
- R. v. Klaus. (2017). ABQB 537 (CanLII).
- R. v. Morgan. (2013). ONSC 6462, [2013] O.J. No. 5827.
- R. v. Sterling. (1995). CanLII 4037 (SK CA).
- Scrivner, E., & Safer, M. A. (1988). Eyewitnesses show hypermnesia for details about a violent event. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73, 371–377. doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.73.3.371
- Simon, D. (2004). A third view of the black box: Cognitive coherence in legal decision making. University of Chicago Law Review, 71, 511–586.
- Simons, D. J., & Chabris, C. F. (2011). What people believe about how memory works: A representative survey of the U.S. Population. PLoS One, 6, e22757. Retrieved from .http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10 doi: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0022757
- Snook, B., & Keating, K. (2011). A field study of adult witness interviewing practices in a Canadian police organization. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 16, 160–172. doi: https://doi.org/10.1348/135532510X497258
- Snook, B., Luther, K., Quinlan, H., & Milne, R. (2012). Let ‘em talk! A field study of police questioning practices of suspects and accused persons. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 39, 1328–1339. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854812449216
- St-Yves, M. (2014). Investigative interviewing: The essentials. Toronto: Thomson Reuters Canada Limited.
- Stone, M. (1995). Cross-examination in criminal trials (2nd ed.). London: Butterworths.
- Turtle, J. W., & Yuille, J. C. (1994). Lost but not forgotten details: Repeated eyewitness recall leads to reminiscence but not hypermnesia. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 260–271. doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.79.2.260
- Wellman, F. L. (1997). The art of cross examination. New York, NY: Touchstone.
- Westera, N., Zydervelt, S., Kaladelfos, A., & Zajac, R. (2017). Sexual assault complainants on the stand: A historical comparison of courtroom questioning. Psychology, Crime and Law, 23, 15–31. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2016.1217334
- Wright, A. M., & Alison, L. J. (2004). Questioning sequences in Canadian police interviews: Constructing and confirming the course of events? Psychology, Crime and Law, 10, 137–154. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316031000099120
- Zajac, R., & Cannan, P. (2009). Cross-examination of sexual assault complainants: A developmental comparison. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 16, S36–S54. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/13218710802620448
- Zajac, R., Gross, J., & Hayne, H. (2003). Asked and answered: Questioning children in the courtroom. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 10, 199–209. doi: https://doi.org/10.1375/pplt.2003.10.1.199
- Zaragoza, M. S., Belli, R. S., & Payment, K. E. (2006). Misinformation effects and the suggestibility of eyewitness memory. In M. Garry, & H. Hayne (Eds.), Do justice and let the sky fall: Elizabeth F. Loftus and her contributions to science, law, and academic freedom (pp. 35–63). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.