References
- Alonso-Quecuty, M. L. (1992). Deception detection and reality monitoring: A new answer to an old question? In F. Lösel, D. Bender, & T. Bliesener (Eds.), Psychology and law: International perspectives (pp. 328–332). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
- Alonso-Quecuty, M. L. (1995). Detecting fact from fallacy in child and adult witness accounts. In G. Davies, S. Lloyd-Bostock, M. McMurran, & C. Wilson (Eds.), Psychology, law and criminal justice. International developments in research and practice (pp. 74–80). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
- Amado, B. G., Arce, R., Fariña, F., & Vilarino, M. (2016). Criteria-based content analysis (CBCA) reality criteria in adults: A meta-analytic review. International Journal#8232;of Clinical and Health Psychology, 16, 201–210. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijchp.2016.01.002
- Bell, K. L., & DePaulo, B. M. (1996). Liking and lying. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 18, 243–266. doi: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15324834basp1803_1
- Blair, J. P., Reimer, T. O., & Levine, T. R. (2018). The role of consistency in detecting deception: The superiority of correspondence over coherence. Communication Studies, 69, 483–498. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/10510974.2018.1447492
- Bogaard, G., Meijer, E. H., Vrij, A., & Merckelbach, H. (2016). Strong, but wrong: Lay people's and police officers’ beliefs about verbal and nonverbal cues to deception. PLoS One, 11, e0156615. doi: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0156615
- Bond, C. F., Jr., & DePaulo, B. M. (2006). Accuracy of deception judgments. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10, 214–234. doi: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr1003_2
- Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (2012). A model of behavioral self-regulation. In P. A. M. Van Lange, A. W. Kruglanski, & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of theories of social psychology, vol. 1 (pp. 505–525). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
- Clemens, F., Granhag, P. A., & Strömwall, L. A. (2013). Counter-interrogation strategies when anticipating questions on intentions. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling, 10, 125–138. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/jip.1387
- Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: L. Erlbaum Associates.
- Deeb, H., Vrij, A., Hope, L., Mann, S., Granhag, P. A., & Lancaster, G. L. J. (2017). Suspects’ consistency in statements concerning two events when different question formats are used. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling, 14, 74–87. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/jip.1464
- Deeb, H., Vrij, A., Hope, L., Mann, S., Granhag, P. A., & Strömwall, L. A. (2018). Police officers’ perceptions of statement inconsistency. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 45, 644–665. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854818758808
- DePaulo, B. M., Lindsay, J. J., Malone, B. E., Muhlenbruck, L., Charlton, K., & Cooper, H. (2003). Cues to deception. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 74–118. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-2909.129.1.74 doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.129.1.74
- Ericsson, K. A., & Simon, H. A. (1980). Verbal reports as data. Psychological Review, 87, 215–251. doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.87.3.215
- Ewens, S., Vrij, A., Jang, M., & Jo, E. (2014). Drop the small talk when establishing baseline behaviour in interviews. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling, 11, 244–252. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/jip.1414
- Fisher, R. P., Brewer, N., & Mitchell, G. (2009). The relation between consistency and accuracy of eyewitness testimony: Legal versus cognitive explanations. In R. Bull, T. Valentine, & T. Williamson (Eds.), Handbook of psychology of investigative interviewing: Current developments and future directions (pp. 121–136). Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
- Fiske, S. T., & Taylor, S. E. (2008). Social cognition: From brains to culture. Boston: McGraw-Hill.
- Frank, M. G., Yarbrough, J. D., & Ekman, P. (2006). Investigative interviewing and the detection of deception. In T. Williamson (Ed.), Investigative interviewing: Rights, research and regulation (pp. 229–255). Devon, UK: Willan Publishing.
- Gnisci, A., Caso, L., & Vrij, A. (2010). Have you made up your story? The effect of suspicion and liars’ strategies on reality monitoring. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 24, 762–773. doi:10.1002acp.1584 doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1584
- Granhag, P. A., & Strömwall, L. A. (2002). Repeated interrogations: Verbal and non-verbal cues to deception. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 16, 243–257. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.784
- Granhag, P. A., Strömwall, L. A., & Jonsson, A. C. (2003). Partners in crime: How liars in collusion betray themselves. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 33, 848–868. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2003.tb01928.x
- Hartwig, M., & Bond, C. F. (2011). Why do lie-catchers fail? A lens model meta-analysis of human lie judgments. Psychological Bulletin, 137, 643–659. doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023589
- Hartwig, M., Granhag, P. A., & Luke, T. (2014). Strategic use of evidence during investigative interviews: The state of the science. In D. C. Raskin, C. R. Honts, & J. C. Kircher (Eds.), Credibility assessment: Scientific research and applications (pp. 1–36). Oxford: Academic Press.
- Hartwig, M., Granhag, P. A., & Strömwall, L. A. (2007). Guilty and innocent suspects’ strategies during police interviews. Psychology, Crime and Law, 13, 213–227. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/10683160600750264
- Heimer, K., & Lauritsen, J. L. (2008). Gender and violence in the United States: Trends in offending and victimization. Understanding Crime Trends: Workshop Report. National Academy of Sciences, 45–80. doi: https://doi.org/10.17226/12472
- Inbau, F. E., Reid, J. E., Buckley, J. P., & Jayne, B. C. (2013). Criminal interrogation and confessions (5th ed.). Burlington, MA: Jones & Bartlett Learning.
- Jarosz, A. F., & Wiley, J. (2014). What are the odds? A practical guide to computing and reporting Bayes factors. The Journal of Problem Solving, 7, 2–9. doi: https://doi.org/10.7771/1932-6246.1167
- Jeffreys, H. (1961). Theory of probability. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
- Johnson, M. K., Bush, J. G., & Mitchell, K. J. (1998). Interpersonal reality monitoring: Judging the sources of other people’s memories. Social Cognition, 16, 199–224. doi:10.1521/ soco.1998.16.2.199 doi: https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.1998.16.2.199
- Johnson, M. K., & Raye, C. L. (1981). Reality monitoring. Psychological Review, 88, 67–85. doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.88.1.67
- Jundi, S., Vrij, A., Hope, L., Mann, S., & Hillman, J. (2013). Establishing evidence through undercover and collective intelligence interviewing. Psychology, Public Policy, & Law, 19, 297–306. doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033571
- Koo, T. K., & Li, M. Y. (2016). A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. Journal of Chiropractic Medicine, 15, 155–163. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012
- Leal, S., Vrij, A., Nahari, G., & Mann, S. (2016). Please be honest and provide evidence: Deterrents of deception in an online insurance fraud context. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 30, 768–774. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3252
- Lee, M. D., & Wagenmakers, E. J. (2013). Bayesian cognitive modeling: A practical course. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press.
- Leins, D., Fisher, R. P., & Ross, S. J. (2013). Exploring liars’ strategies for creating deceptive reports. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 18, 141–151. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8333.2011.02041.x
- Leins, D. A., Zimmerman, L. A., & Polander, E. N. (2017). Observers’ real-time sensitivity to deception in naturalistic interviews. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology, 32, 319–330. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11896-017-9224-2
- Masip, J., & Herrero, C. (2013). ‘What would you say if you were guilty?’ Suspects' strategies during a hypothetical behavior analysis interview concerning a serious crime. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 27, 60–70. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.2872
- Nahari, G., Vrij, A., & Fisher, R. P. (2012). Does the truth come out in the writing? SCAN as a lie detection tool. Law and Human Behavior, 36, 68–76. doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/h0093965
- Nahari, G., Vrij, A., & Fisher, R. P. (2014). The verifiability approach: Countermeasures facilitate its ability to discriminate between truths and lies, countermeasures facilitate its ability to discriminate between truths and lies. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 28, 122–128. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.2974
- Steller, M., & Köhnken, G. (1989). Criteria-based content analysis. In D. C. Raskin (Ed.), Psychological methods in criminal investigation and evidence (pp. 217–245). New York: Springer Publishing Company.
- Strömwall, L. A., Granhag, P. A., & Hartwig, M. (2004). Practicioners’ beliefs about deception. In L. A. Strömwall & P. A. Granhag (Eds.), The detection of deception in forensic contexts (pp. 229–250). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Undeutsch, U. (1967). Beurteilung der glaubhaftigkeit von aussagen [Evaluation of statement credibility/Statement validity assessment]. In U. Undeutsch (Ed.), Hand-buch der Psychologie ( Vol. 11: Forensische Psychologie, pp. 26–181). Göttingen: Hogrefe.
- Undeutsch, U. (1989). The development of statement reality analysis. In J. Yuille (Ed.), Credibility assessment (pp. 101–119). Dordrech: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
- U.S. Department of Justice. (2009). Practical implications of current domestic violence research: For law enforcement, prosecutors and judges. National Institute of Justice. Retrieved from http://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/225722.pdf
- Vredeveldt, A., van Koppen, P., & Granhag, P. A. (2014). The inconsistent Suspect: A systematic review of different types of consistency in truth tellers and liars. In R. Bull (Ed.), Investigative interviewing (pp. 189–207). New York, NY: Springer.
- Vrij, A. (2005). Criteria-based content analysis: A qualitative review of the first 37 studies. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 11, 3–41. doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8971.11.1.3
- Vrij, A. (2008a). Detecting lies and deceit: Pitfalls and opportunities, 2nd ed. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons.
- Vrij, A. (2008b). Nonverbal dominance versus verbal accuracy in lie detection: A plea to change police practice. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 35, 1323–1336. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854808321530
- Vrij, A. (2015). A cognitive approach to lie detection. In P. A. Granhag, A. Vrij, & B. Verschuere (Eds.), Deception detection: Current challenges and new approaches (pp. 205–229). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
- Vrij, A. (2016). Baselining as a lie detection method. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 30, 1112–1119. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3288
- Vrij, A., Granhag, P. A., & Mann, S. (2010). Good liars. The Journal of Psychiatry & Law, 38, 77–98. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/009318531003800105
- Vrij, A., Leal, S., Jupe, L., & Harvey, A. (2018). Within-subjects verbal lie detection measures: A comparison between total detail and proportion of complications. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 23, 265–279. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/lcrp.12126
- Wagenmakers, E. J., Love, J., Marsman, M., Jamil, T., Ly, A., Verhagen, J., … Morey, R. D. (2016). Bayesian inference for psychology. Part II: Example applications with JASP, 1–26. Retrieved from http://maartenmarsman.com/wpcontent/uploads/2017/04/WagenmakersEtAlPartII.pdf
- Wright, C., & Wheatcroft, J. M. (2017). Police officers’ beliefs about, and use of, cues to deception. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling, 14, 307–319. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/jip.1478