Plea decision-making: the influence of attorney expertise, trustworthiness, and recommendation

References

• Alschuler, A. W. (1975). The defense attorney’s role in plea bargaining. The Yale Law Journal, 84(6), 1179–1134. Retrieved from https://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1981&context=journal_articles
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Bar Association. (2015). ABA criminal justice standards for the defense function, 4th ed. Retrieved from https://www.americanbar.org/groups/criminal_justice/standards/DefenseFunctionFourthEdition.html#1.2
   Google Scholar
• Bannister, B. D. (1986). Performance outcome feedback and attributional feedback: Interactive effects on recipient responses. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71(2), 203–210. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.71.2.203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beeman, M. (2018). National indicators of quality indigent defense. Washington, DC: National Legal Aid & Defender Association. Retrieved from http://www.nlada.org/sites/default/files/pictures/2018-03-08%20Quality%20Indicators%20Project%20covered.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Bibas, S. (2004). Plea bargaining outside the shadow of a trial. Harvard Law Review, 117, 2463–2547. doi: 10.2307/4093404
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blumberg, A. (1967). The practice of law as a confidence game: Organizational cooptation of a profession. Law and Society Review, 1(2), 15–40. doi: 10.2307/3052933
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boccaccini, M. T., & Brodsky, S. L. (2002). Attorney-client trust among convicted criminal defendants: Preliminary examination of the attorney-client trust scale. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 20, 69–87. doi: 10.1002/bsl.469
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bochner, S., & Insko, C. A. (1966). Communicator discrepancy, source credibility, and opinion change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 4(6), 614–621. doi: 10.1037/h0021192
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bordens, K. S., & Bassett, J. (1985). The plea bargaining process from the defendant's perspective: A field investigation. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 6(2), 93–110. doi: 10.1207/s15324834basp0602_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boykin v. Alabama, 395 U.S. 238. (1969).
   Google Scholar
• Brady v. United States, 397 U.S. 742, 756-58. (1970).
   Google Scholar
• Brewer v. Williams, 430 U.S. 387. (1977).
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, C. M., Moore, J., Maier, W., & Gaffney, M. (2015). Unnoticed, untapped, and underappreciated: Clients’ perceptions of their public defenders. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 33(6), 751–770. doi:10.1002/bsl.2182.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cialdini, R. B., & Goldstein, N. J. (2004). Social influence: Compliance and conformity. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 591–621. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.142015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, T. H., & Reaves, B. A. (2006). Felony defendants in large urban counties, 2002. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Statistics. Retrieved from https://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/fdluc09.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Devine, D. J., Clayton, L. D., Dunford, B. B., Seying, R., & Pryce, J. (2001). Jury decision making: 45 years of empirical research on deliberating groups. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 7(3), 622–727. doi: 10.1037//1076-8971.7.3.622
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durose, M. R., & Langan, P. A. (2007). Felony Sentences in State Courts, 2004. Bureau of Justice Statistics Bulletin. Retrieved from https://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/fssc04.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175–191. doi: 10.3758/BF03193146
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Findley, J. D., & Sales, B. D. (2012). The science of attorney advocacy: How courtroom behavior affects jury decision making. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Flemming, R. B. (1986). Client games: Defense attorney perspectives on their relations with criminal clients. American Bar Foundation Research Journal, 11(2), 253–277. doi: 10.1111/j.1747-4469.1986.tb00241.x
   Google Scholar
• Fountain, E. N., & Woolard, J. L. (2018). How defense attorneys consult with juvenile clients about plea bargains. Psychology Public Policy and Law, 24(2), 192–203. doi: 10.1037/law0000158
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenfield, S. H. (2015, August 25). Jailhouse lawyer, the unicorn in the next cell [Blog post]. Simple Justice: A Criminal Defense Blog. Retrieved from https://blog.simplejustice.us/2015/08/25/jailhouse-lawyers-the-unicorn-in-the-next-cell/
   Google Scholar
• Hahn, P. W., & Clayton, S. D. (1996). The effects of attorney presentation style, attorney gender, and juror gender on juror decisions. Law and Human Behavior, 20(5), 533–554. doi: 10.1007/BF01499040
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hauser, D. J., Paolacci, G., & Chandler, J. J. (2018). Common concerns with mturk as a participant pool: Evidence and solutions. In F. Kardes, P. Herr, & N. Schwarz (Eds.), Handbook in research methods in Consumer Psychology. doi: 10.31234/osf.io/uq45c
   Google Scholar
• Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Henderson, K. S., & Levett, L. M. (2018). Investigating predictors of true and false guilty pleas. Law and Human Behavior, 42(5), 427–441. doi: 10.1037/lhb0000297
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoge, S. K., Bonnie, R. J., Poythress, N., & Monahan, J. (1992). Attorney-client decision-making in criminal cases: Client competence and participation as perceived by their attorneys. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 10(3), 385–394. doi: 10.1002/bsl.2370100308
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hovland, C., & Weiss, W. (1951). The influence of source credibility on communication effectiveness. The Public Opinion Quarterly, 15(4), 635–650. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org.proxy.lib.pdx.edu/stable/2745952
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• https://ucr.fbi.gov/crime-in-the-u.s/2016/crime-in-the-u.s.-2016/topic-pages/tables/table-21
   Google Scholar
• Kramer, G. M., Wolbransky, M., & Heilbrun, K. (2007). Plea bargaining recommendations by criminal defense attorneys: Evidence strength, potential sentence, and defendant preference. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 25, 575–585. doi:10.1002/ bsl.759
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lafler v. Cooper, 132 S. Ct. 1376. (2012).
   Google Scholar
• Larson, B. A., & Brodsky, S. L. (2010). When cross-examination offends: How men and women assess intrusive questioning of male and female expert witnesses. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 40(4), 811–830. doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2010.00599.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linz, D. G., & Penrod, S. (1984). Increasing attorney persuasiveness in the courtroom. Law & Psychology Review, 8(1), 1–47.
   Google Scholar
• Malloy, L., Shulman, E., & Cauffman, E. (2014). Interrogations, confessions, and guilty pleas among serious adolescent offenders. Law and Human Behavior, 38(2), 181–193. doi: 10.1037/lhb0000065
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCoy v. Louisiana, S. Ct. 16–8255. (2018).
   Google Scholar
• McGinnies, E. (1968). Studies in persuasion: IV. Source credibility and involvement as factors in persuasion with students in Taiwan. Journal of Social Psychology, 74(2), 171–180. doi: 10.1080/00224545.1968.9924843
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGinnies, E., & Ward, C. D. (1980). Better liked than right: Trustworthiness and expertise as factors in credibility. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 6(3), 467–472. doi:10.1177%2F014616728063023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMann v. Richardson, 397 U.S. 759, 768-74. (1970).
   Google Scholar
• Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 466. (1966).
   Google Scholar
• Missouri v. Frye, 132 S. Ct. 1399. (2012).
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, K. A. (2018, April). Perceptions of Justice: Views of Jailed Defendants on Procedural and Distributive Justice. Paper presented at a dissertation defense at the University at Albany, SUNY, Albany, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Parker v. North Carolina, 397 U.S. 790, 794-98. (1970).
   Google Scholar
• Pierce, C. S., & Brodsky, S. L. (2002). Trust and understanding in the attorney-juvenile relationship. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 20, 89–107. doi: 10.1002/bsl.478
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pornpitakpan, C. (2004). The persuasiveness of source credibility: A critical review of five decades’ evidence. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 34(2), 243–281. doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2004.tb02547.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powell v. Alabama, 287 U.S. 45. (1932).
   Google Scholar
• Poythress, N. G., Bonnie, R. J., Hoge, S. K., Monahan, J., & Oberlander, L. B. (1994). Client abilities to assist counsel and make decisions in criminal cases. Law and Human Behavior, 18(4), 437–452. doi: 10.1007/BF01499049
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Redlich, A. D., Bibas, S., Edkins, V. A., & Madon, S. (2017). The psychology of defendant plea decision making. American Psychologist, 72(4), 339–352. doi: 10.1037/a0040436
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Redlich, A. D., & Shteynberg, R. V. (2016). To plead or not to plead: A comparison of juvenile and adult true and false plea decisions. Law and Human Behavior, 40(6), 611–625. Retrieved from https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/lhb0000205
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Redlich, A. D., Summers, A., & Hoover, S. (2010). Self-reported false confessions and false guilty pleas among offenders with mental illness. Law and Human Behavior, 34, 79–90. doi: 10.1007/s10979-009-9194-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saxe, D. B., & Kuvin, S. F. (1974). Notes on the attorney-client relationship: A psycholegal overview. The Journal of Psychiatry & Law, 2(2), 209–216. doi:10.1177%2F009318537400200206
   Google Scholar
• Schechtman, E., Shinar, D., & Compton, R. C. (1999). The relationship between drinking habits and safe driving behaviors. Transportation Research, 2(1), 15–26. doi: 10.1016/S1369-8478(99)00004-2
   Google Scholar
• Schroeder, P., Meyers, M., & Kostyniuk, L. (2013). National survey on distracted driving attitudes and behaviors – 2012. (Report No. DOT HS 811 729). Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. Retrieved from https://www.nhtsa.gov/sites/nhtsa.dot.gov/files/811729.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Sheehan, K. B. (2018). Crowdsourcing research: Data collection with Amazon’s Mechanical Turk. Communication Monographs, 85(1), 140–156. doi: 10.1080/03637751.2017.1342043
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sternthal, B., Dholakia, R., & Leavitt, C. (1978). The persuasive effect of source credibility: Tests of cognitive response. Journal of Consumer Research, 4(4), 252–260. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/2488816
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 104 S. Ct. 2052, 80 L. Ed. 2d 674. (1984).
   Google Scholar
• Tor, A., Gazal-Ayal, O., & Garcia, S. (2010). Fairness and the willingness to accept plea bargain offers. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 7(1), 97–116. doi: 10.1111/j.1740-1461.2009.01171.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viljoen, J., Klaver, J., & Roesch, R. (2005). Legal decisions of preadolescent and adolescent defendants: Predictors of confessions, pleas, communication with attorneys, and appeals. Law and Human Behavior, 29(3), 253–277. doi: 10.1007/s10979-005-3613-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, J. S. (1966). The new role of defense counsel under Escobedo and Miranda. American Bar Association Journal, 52(12), 1117–1121. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/25723851
   Google Scholar