Detailed information mitigates confidence inflation

References

• Bell, B. E., & Loftus, E. F. (1988). Degree of detail of eyewitness testimony and mock juror judgements. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 18(14), 1171–1192. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1988.tb01200.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell, B. E., & Loftus, E. F. (1989). Trivial persuasion in the courtroom: The power of (a few) minor details. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56(5), 669–679. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.56.5.669
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bornstein, B. H., O’Bryant, S., & Zickafoose, D. J. (2008). Intuitions about arousal and eyewitness memory: Effects on mock juror’s judgments. Law & Psychology Review, 32, 109–133. https://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/lpsyr32&div=7&g_sent=1&casa_token=t-Sndy4h2BYAAAAA:6Pf5Ycys_GZRAagIi80ICpFKvMS2pUtJqCeh-z4HtzoHNyDWKEt13IMD1f6EaNl_p90E-OmXdctb&collection=journals
   Google Scholar
• Bradfield, A., & McQuiston, D. E. (2004). When does evidence of eyewitness confidence inflation affect judgements in a criminal trial? Law and Human Behavior, 28(4), 369–387. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:LAHU.0000039331.54147.ff
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradfield, A. L., & Wells, G. L. (2000). The perceived validity of eyewitness identification testimony: A test of the five Biggers criteria. Law and Human Behavior, 24(5), 581–594. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005523129437
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cash, D. K., & Lane, S. M. (2017). Context influences interpretation of eyewitness confidence statements. Law and Human Behavior, 41(2), 180–190. https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000216
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clancy, D., & Bull, R. (2015). The effect on mock-juror Decision-making of power-of-Speech within eyewitness testimony and Types of Scientific evidence. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 22(3), 425–435. https://doi.org/10.1080/13218719.2014.960029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dodson, C. S., & Dobolyi, D. G. (2015). Misinterpreting eyewitness expressions of confidence: The featural justification effect. Law and Human Behavior, 39(3), 266–280. https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000120
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dodson, C. S., & Dobolyi, D. G. (2017). Judging guilt and accuracy: Highly confident eyewitnesses are discounted when they provide featural justifications. Psychology, Crime & Law, 23(5), 487–508. https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2017.1284220
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douglass, A. B., & Jones, E. E. (2013). Confidence inflation in eyewitnesses: Seeing is not believing. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 18(1), 152–167. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8333.2011.02031.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garrett, B. L. (2011). Convicting the innocent: Where criminal prosecutions go wrong. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gilbert, J. A. E., & Fisher, R. P. (2006). The effects of varied retrieval cues on reminiscence in eyewitness memory. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 20(6), 723–739. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1232
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Japanese Ministry of Justice. (2013). In Japanese. http://www.moj.go.jp/content/001180941.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Jones, E. E., Williams, K. D., & Brewer, N. (2008). "I had a confidence epiphany!": Obstacles to combating post-identification confidence inflation.. Law and Human Behavior, 32(2), 164–176. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10979-007-9101-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langer, E., Blank, A., & Chanowitz, B. (1978). The mindlessness of ostensibly thoughtful action: The role or “placebic” information in interpersonal interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36(6), 635–642. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.36.6.635
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindsay, D. S. (1994). Memory source monitoring and eyewitness testimony. In D. F. Ross, J. D. Read, & M. P. Toglia (Eds.), Adult eyewitness testimony: Current trends and developments (pp. 27–55). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Loftus, E. F. (1975). Leading questions and the eyewitness report. Cognitive Psychology, 7(4), 560–572. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(75)90023-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magnussen, S., Melinder, A., Stridbeck, U., & Raja, A. Q. (2010). Beliefs about factors affecting the reliability of eyewitness testimony: A comparison of judges, jurors and the general public. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 24(1), 122–133. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1550
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neil v. Biggers. (1972). 409 U.S. 188.
   Google Scholar
• Reyes, R. M., Thompson, W. C., & Bower, G. H. (1980). Judgmental biases resulting from differing availabilities of arguments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39(1), 2–12. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.39.1.2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rouder, J. N., Morey, R. D., Speckman, P. L., & Province, J. M. (2012). Default Bayes factors for ANOVA designs. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 56(5), 356–374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmp.2012.08.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rouder, J. N., Speckman, P. L., Sun, D., Morey, R. D., & Iverson, G. (2009). Bayesian t tests for accepting and rejecting the null hypothesis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16(2), 225–237. https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.16.2.225
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shedler, J., & Manis, M. (1986). Can the availability heuristic explain vividness effects? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(1), 26–36. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.1.26
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagenmakers, E.-J., Marsman, M., Jamil, T., Ly, A., Verhagen, J., Love, J., Selker, R., Gronau, Q. F., Šmíra, M., Epskamp, S., Matzke, D., Rouder, J. N., & Morey, R. D. (2018). Bayesian inference for psychology: Part I: Theoretical advantages and practical ramifications. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 25(1), 35–57. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-017-1343-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagenmakers, E.-J., Wetzels, R., Borsboom, D., & Van Der Maas, H. L. J. (2011). Why psychologists must change the way they analyze their data: The case of psi: comment on Bem (2011). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100(3), 426–432. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022790
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wells, G. L., & Leippe, M. R. (1981). How do triers of fact infer the accuracy of eyewitness identifications? Using memory for peripheral detail can be misleading. Journal of Applied Psychology, 66(6), 682–687. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.66.6.682
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wise, R. A., Pawlenko, N. B., Safer, M. A., & Meyer, D. (2009). What US prosecutors and defence attorneys know and believe about eyewitness testimony. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 23(9), 1266–1281. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1530
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wise, R. A., & Safer, M. A. (2010). A comparison of what U.S. judges and students know and believe about eyewitness testimony. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 40(6), 1400–1422. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2010.00623.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wixted, J. T., Mickes, L., Clark, S. E., Gronlund, S. D., & Roediger, H. L. III. (2015). Initial eyewitness confidence reliably predicts eyewitness identification accuracy. American Psychologist, 70(6), 515–526. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0039510
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wixted, J. T., & Wells, G. L. (2017). The relationship between eyewitness confidence and identification accuracy: A new synthesis. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 18(1), 10–65. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100616686966
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar