References
- Abel, M. H., & Watters, H. (2005). Attributions of guilt and punishment as functions of physical attractiveness and smiling. The Journal of Social Psychology, 145(6), 687–702. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3200/SOCP.145.6.687-703
- Ægisdóttir, S., White, M. J., Spengler, P. M., Maugherman, A. S., Anderson, L. A., Cook, R. S., Nichols, C. N., Lampropoulos, G. K., Walker, B. S., Cohen, G., & Rush, J. D. (2006). The meta-analysis of clinical judgment project: Fifty-six years of accumulated research on clinical versus statistical prediction. The Counseling Psychologist, 34(3), 341–382. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000005285875
- Alicke, M. D., & Zell, E. (2009). Social attractiveness and blame. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 39(9), 2089–2105. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2009.00517.x
- Alper, M., & Durose, M. R. (2019). Recidivism of sex offenders released from state prison: A 9-year follow-up (2005-14) (NCJ 251773). Bureau of Justice Statistics. https://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/rsorsp9yfu0514.pdf
- Barbaree, H. E., Seto, M. C., Langton, C. M., & Peacock, E. J. (2001). Evaluating the predictive accuracy of six risk assessment instruments for adult sex offenders. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 28(4), 490–521. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/009385480102800406
- Batastini, A. B., Hoeffner, C. E., Vitacco, M. J., Morgan, R. D., Coaker, L. C., & Lester, M. E. (2019a). Does the format of the message affect what is heard? A two-part study on the communication of violence risk assessment data. Journal of Forensic Psychology Research and Practice, 19(1), 44–71. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/24732850.2018.1538474
- Batastini, A. B., Vitacco, M. J., Coaker, L. C., & Lester, M. E. (2019b). Communicating violence risk during testimony: Do different formats lead to different perceptions among jurors? Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 25(2), 92–106. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/law0000196
- Bertrams, A., & Dickhäuser, O. (2010). University and school students’ motivation for effortful thinking: Factor structure, reliability, and validity of the German Need for Cognition scale. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 26(4), 263–268. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000035
- Boccaccini, M. T., Murrie, D. C., & Turner, D. B. (2014). Jurors’ views on the value and objectivity of mental health experts testifying in sexually violent predator trials. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 32(4), 483–495. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.2129
- Boccaccini, M. T., Rice, A. K., Helmus, L. M., Murrie, D. C., & Harris, P. B. (2017). Field validity of Static-99/R scores in a statewide sample of 34,687 convicted sexual offenders. Psychological Assessment, 29(6), 611–623. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000377
- Boccaccini, M. T., Turner, D. B., Murrie, D. C., Henderson, C. E., & Chevalier, C. (2013). Do scores from risk measures matter to jurors? Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 19(2), 259–269. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031354
- Cacioppo, J. T., & Petty, R. E. (1982). The need for cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42(1), 116–131. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.42.1.116
- Cacioppo, J. T., Petty, R. E., Feinstein, J. A., & Jarvis, W. B. G. (1996). Dispositional differences in cognitive motivation: The life and times of individuals varying in need for cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 119(2), 197–253. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.119.2.197
- Cacioppo, J. T., Petty, R. E., & Kao, C. F. (1984). The efficient assessment of need for cognition. Journal of Personality Assessment, 48(3), 306. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa4803_13
- Cacioppo, J. T., Petty, R. E., & Morris, K. J. (1983). Effects of need for cognition on message evaluation, recall, and persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45(4), 805–818. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.45.4.805
- Carlsmith, K. M., Monahan, J., & Evans, A. (2007). The function of punishment in the “civil” commitment of sexually violent predators. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 25(4), 437–448. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.761
- Casler, K., Bickel, L., & Hackett, E. (2013). Separate but equal? A comparison of participants and data gathered via Amazon’s MTurk, social media, and face-to-face behavioral testing. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(6), 2156–2160. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.05.009
- Chevalier, C. S., Boccaccini, M. T., Murrie, D. C., & Varela, J. G. (2015). Static-99R reporting practices in sexually violent predator cases: Does norm selection reflect adversarial allegiance? Law and Human Behavior, 39(3), 209–218. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000114
- Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). L. Erlbaum Associates.
- D’Agostino, P. R., & Fincher-Kiefer, R. (1992). Need for cognition and the correspondence bias. Social Cognition, 10(2), 151–163. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.1992.10.2.151
- Denes-Raj, V., & Epstein, S. (1994). Conflict between intuitive and rational processing: When people behave against their better judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66(5), 819–829. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.66.5.819
- Edens, J. F., Smith, S. T., Magyar, M. S., Mullen, K., Pitta, A., & Petrila, J. (2012). “Hired guns,” “charlatans,” and their “voodoo psychobabble”: Case law references to various forms of perceived bias among mental health expert witnesses. Psychological Services, 9(3), 259–271. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028264
- Ellman, I. M., & Ellman, T. (2015). “Frightening and high”: The supreme court’s crucial mistake about sex crime statistics. Constitutional Commentary, 30(3), 495–508. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2616429
- Epstein, S. (1993). Implications of cognitive-experiential self-theory for personality and developmental psychology. In D. C. Funder, R. D. Parke, C. Tomlinson-Keasey, & K. Widaman (Eds.), Studying lives through time: Personality and development (pp. 399–438). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/10127-033
- Fanniff, A. M., Otto, R. K., & Petrila, J. (2010). Competence to proceed in SVP commitment hearings: Irrelevant or fundamental due process right? Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 28(5), 647–670. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.957
- Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A., & Lang, A.-G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G*power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41(4), 1149–1160. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149
- Feng, C., Wang, H., Lu, N., Chen, T., He, H., Lu, Y., & Tu, X. M. (2014). Log-transformation and its implications for data analysis. Shanghai Archives of Psychiatry, 26(2), 105–109. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1002-0829.2014.02.009
- Gilbert, D. T., Pelham, B. W., & Krull, D. S. (1988). On cognitive busyness: When person perceivers meet persons perceived. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(5), 733–740. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.54.5.733
- Grove, W. M., & Meehl, P. E. (1996). Comparative efficiency of informal (subjective, impressionistic) and formal (mechanical, algorithmic) prediction procedures: The clinical–statistical controversy. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 2(2), 293–323. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8971.2.2.293
- Gunnell, J. J., & Ceci, S. J. (2010). When emotionality trumps reason: A study of individual processing style and juror bias. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 28(6), 850–877. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.939
- Guthrie, C., Rachlinski, J. J., & Wistrich, A. J. (2001). Inside the judicial mind. Cornell Law Review, 86(4), 777–830. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.257634
- Guy, L. S., & Edens, J. F. (2003). Juror decision-making in a mock sexually violent predator trial: Gender differences in the impact of divergent types of expert testimony. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 21(2), 215–237. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.529
- Hanson, R. K., Harris, A. J. R., Helmus, L., & Thornton, D. (2014). High-risk sex offenders may not be high risk forever. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 29(15), 2792–2813. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260514526062
- Hanson, R. K., & Morton-Bourgon, K. E. (2005). The characteristics of persistent sexual offenders: A meta-analysis of recidivism studies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 73(6), 1154–1163. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.73.6.1154
- Hanson, R. K., & Morton-Bourgon, K. E. (2009). The accuracy of recidivism risk assessments for sexual offenders: A meta-analysis of 118 prediction studies. Psychological Assessment, 21(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014421
- Hanson, R. K., & Thornton, D. (1999). Static 99: Improving actuarial risk assessments for sex offenders (No. 1999–02). Solicitor General Canada.
- Harris, A. J., & Hanson, R. K. (2004). Sex offender recidivism: A simple question (No. 2004–03; p. 29). Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness Canada.
- Harris, A. J., Phenix, A., Hanson, R. K., & Thornton, D. (2003). STATIC-99 Coding Rules Revised—2003. http://www.static99.org/pdfdocs/static-99-coding-rules_e.pdf
- Haugtvedt, C. P., Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1992). Need for cognition and advertising: Understanding the role of personality variables in consumer behavior. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 1(3), 239–260. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S1057-7408(08)80038-1
- Hawes, S. W., Boccaccini, M. T., & Murrie, D. C. (2013). Psychopathy and the combination of psychopathy and sexual deviance as predictors of sexual recidivism: Meta-analytic findings using the psychopathy checklist—revised. Psychological Assessment, 25(1), 233–243. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030391
- Hayes, A. F. (2018). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis (2nd ed.). Guilford Press.
- Helmus, L., Thornton, D., Hanson, R. K., & Babchishin, K. M. (2012). Improving the predictive accuracy of static-99 and static-2002 with older sex offenders: Revised age weights. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 24(1), 64–101. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1079063211409951
- Hildebrand, M., de Ruiter, C., & de Vogel, V. (2004). Psychopathy and sexual deviance in treated rapists: Association with sexual and nonsexual recidivism. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 16(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/107906320401600101
- Hilton, N. Z., Harris, G. T., Rawson, K., & Beach, C. A. (2005). Communicating violence risk information to forensic decision makers. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 32(1), 97–116. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854804270630
- Hilton, N. Z., Scurich, N., & Helmus, L.-M. (2015). Communicating the risk of violent and offending behavior: Review and introduction to this special issue. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 33(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.2160
- Jaccard, J. J., & Turrisi, R. (2003). Interaction effects in multiple regression (2nd ed.). Sage.
- Jackson, R. L., & Hess, D. T. (2007). Evaluation for civil commitment of sex offenders: A survey of experts. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 19(4), 425–448. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11194-007-9062-3
- Jackson, R. L., Rogers, R., & Shuman, D. W. (2004). The adequacy and accuracy of sexually violent predator evaluations: Contextualized risk assessment in clinical practice. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 3(2), 115–129. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/14999013.2004.10471201
- Janus, E. S. (2013). Preventive detention of sex offenders: The American experience versus international human rights norms. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 31(3), 328–343. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.2059
- Janus, E. S., & Prentky, R. A. (2003). Forensic use of actuarial risk assessment with sex offenders: Accuracy, admissibility and accountability. American Criminal Law Review, 40(4), 1443–1499.
- Janus, E. S., & Prentky, R. A. (2008). Sexual predator laws: A two-decade retrospective. Federal Sentencing Reporter, 21(2), 90–97. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1525/fsr.2008.21.2.90
- Kansas v. Hendricks, 521 U.S. 346. (1997.
- Katz-Schiavone, S. M., Levenson, J. S., & Ackerman, A. R. (2008). Myths and facts about sexual violence: Public perceptions and implications for prevention. Journal of Criminal Justice and Popular Culture, 15(3), 291–311.
- Knighton, J. C., Murrie, D. C., Boccaccini, M. T., & Turner, D. B. (2014). How likely is “likely to reoffend” in sex offender civil commitment trials? Law and Human Behavior, 38(3), 293–304. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000079
- Koeppel, B. (2019, June 4). Modern-day gulag in the Golden State. The Washington Spectator. https://washingtonspectator.org/koeppel-gulags/
- Krauss, D. A., Cook, G. I., & Klapatch, L. (2018). Risk assessment communication difficulties: An empirical examination of the effects of categorical versus probabilistic risk communication in sexually violent predator decisions. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 36(5), 532–553. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.2379
- Krauss, D. A., & Lee, D. H. (2003). Deliberating on dangerousness and death: Jurors’ ability to differentiate between expert actuarial and clinical predictions of dangerousness. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 26(2), 113–137. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0160-2527(02)00211-X
- Krauss, D. A., Lieberman, J. D., & Olson, J. (2004). The effects of rational and experiential information processing of expert testimony in death penalty cases. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 22(6), 801–822. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.621
- Krauss, D. A., McCabe, J. G., & Lieberman, J. D. (2012). Dangerously misunderstood: Representative jurors’ reactions to expert testimony on future dangerousness in a sexually violent predator trial. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 18(1), 18–49. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024550
- Krauss, D. A., & Sales, B. D. (2001). The effects of clinical and scientific expert testimony on juror decision making in capital sentencing. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 7(2), 267–310. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037//1076-8971.7.2.267
- Krauss, D. A., & Scurich, N. (2014). The impact of case factors on jurors’ decisions in a sexual violent predator hearing. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 20(2), 135–145. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/law0000007
- Krivacska, J. (2011). Reliability of sex-offense risk assessments at civil commitment: Threshold levels in New Jersey SVP proceedings. Open Access Journal of Forensic Psychology, 3(1), 107–145.
- Landy, D., & Aronson, E. (1969). The influence of the character of the criminal and his victim on the decisions of simulated jurors. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 5(2), 141–152. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(69)90043-2
- Langan, P. A., Schmitt, E. L., & Durose, M. R. (2003). Recidivism of sex offenders released from prison in 1994 (NCJ 198281). U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics. https://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/rsorp94.pdf
- Levenson, J. S., Brannon, Y. N., Fortney, T., & Baker, J. (2007). Public perceptions about sex offenders and community protection policies. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 7(1), 137–161. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-2415.2007.00119.x
- Leys, C., Ley, C., Klein, O., Bernard, P., & Licata, L. (2013). Detecting outliers: Do not use standard deviation around the mean, use absolute deviation around the median. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49(4), 764–766. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2013.03.013
- Lieberman, J. D. (2002). Head over the heart or heart over the head? Cognitive experiential self-theory and extralegal heuristics in juror decision making. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32(12), 2526–2553. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2002.tb02755.x
- Lieberman, J. D., & Krauss, D. A. (2009). The effects of labelling, expert testimony, and information processing mode on juror decisions in SVP civil commitment trials. Journal of Investigative Psychology & Offender Profiling, 6(1), 25–41. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/jip.91
- Lieberman, J. D., Krauss, D. A., Kyger, M., & Lehoux, M. (2007). Determining dangerousness in sexually violent predator evaluations: Cognitive–experiential self-theory and juror judgments of expert testimony. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 25(4), 507–526. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.771
- Liptak, A. (2017, March 6). Did the Supreme Court base a ruling on a myth? The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2017/03/06/us/politics/supreme-court-repeat-sex-offenders.html
- Liu, J. Z., & Li, X. (2019). Legal techniques for rationalizing biased judicial decisions: Evidence from experiments with real judges. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 16(3), 630–670. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/jels.12229
- Lu, Y., Freeman, N. J., & Sandler, J. C. (2015). Predictors of the sex offender civil commitment trial outcomes in New York State. Law and Human Behavior, 39(5), 514–524. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000143
- Lynch, M., & Haney, C. (2009). Capital jury deliberation: Effects on death sentencing, comprehension, and discrimination. Law and Human Behavior, 33(6), 481–496. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10979-008-9168-2
- Martin, L. L., Seta, J. J., & Crelia, R. A. (1990). Assimilation and contrast as a function of people’s willingness and ability to expend effort in forming an impression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59(1), 27–37. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.59.1.27
- McCabe, J. G., Krauss, D. A., & Lieberman, J. D. (2010). Reality check: A comparison of college students and a community sample of mock jurors in a simulated sexual violent predator civil commitment. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 28(6), 730–750. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.902
- McKune v. Lile, 536 U.S. 24. (2002). https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/536/24/case.pdf
- Meade, A. W., & Craig, S. B. (2012). Identifying careless responses in survey data. Psychological Methods, 17(3), 437–455. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028085
- Michelini, R. L., & Snodgrass, S. R. (1980). Defendant characteristics and juridic decisions. Journal of Research in Personality, 14(3), 340–350. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0092-6566(80)90017-3
- Miller, H. A., Amenta, A. E., & Conroy, M. A. (2005). Sexually violent predator evaluations: Empirical evidence, strategies for professionals, and research directions. Law and Human Behavior, 29(1), 29–54. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10979-005-1398-y
- Miller, S. L., & Brodsky, S. L. (2011). Risky business: Addressing the consequences of predicting violence. The Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 39(3), 396–401. PMID: 21908757
- Murrie, D. C., Boccaccini, M. T., Turner, D. B., Meeks, M., Woods, C., & Tussey, C. (2009). Rater (dis)agreement on risk assessment measures in sexually violent predator proceedings: Evidence of adversarial allegiance in forensic evaluation? Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 15(1), 19–53. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014897
- National District Attorneys Association. (2012). Sex offender civil commitment laws. https://ndaa.org/wp-content/uploads/Sex-Offender-Civil-Commitment-April-2012.pdf
- Nhan, J., Polzer, K., & Ferguson, J. (2012). “More Dangerous than Hitmen”: Judicial Perceptions of Sexual Offenders. 5, 14.
- Nijman, H., Merckelbach, H., & Cima, M. (2009). Performance intelligence, sexual offending and psychopathy. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 15(3), 319–330. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13552600903195057
- Nisbett, R. E., & Wilson, T. D. (1977). The halo effect: Evidence for unconscious alteration of judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35(4), 250–256. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.35.4.250
- Osberg, T. M. (1987). The convergent and discriminant validity of the Need for Cognition scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 51(3), 441. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa5103_11
- Paolacci, G., & Chandler, J. (2014). Inside the Turk: Understanding Mechanical Turk as a participant pool. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 23(3), 184–188. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721414531598
- Pennycook, G., Trippas, D., Handley, S. J., & Thompson, V. A. (2014). Base rates: Both neglected and intuitive. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 40(2), 544–554. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034887
- Phenix, A., Fernandez, Y., Harris, A. J. R., Helmus, M., Hanson, R. K., & Thornton, D. (2016a). Static-99R Coding Rules Revised – 2016 (No. 2017-R012). Public Safety Canada. http://www.static99.org/pdfdocs/Coding_manual_2016_v2.pdf
- Phenix, A., Helmus, L. M., & Hanson, R. K. (2016). Static-99R & Static-2002R evaluators’ workbook. http://www.static99.org/pdfdocs/Evaluators_Workbook_2016-10-19.pdf
- Phenix, A., & Jackson, R. L. (2015). Evaluations for sexual offender civil commitment. In R. L. Jackson & R. Roesch (Eds.), Learning forensic assessment: Research and practice (2nd ed., pp. 162–201). Routledge.
- Porter, S., Brinke, L., & Wilson, K. (2009). Crime profiles and conditional release performance of psychopathic and non-psychopathic sexual offenders. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 14(1), 109–118. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1348/135532508X284310
- Rassin, E. (2020). Context effect and confirmation bias in criminal fact finding. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 25(n/a). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/lcrp.12172
- Reysen, S. (2005). Construction of a new scale: The Reysen likability scale. Social Behavior and Personality, 33(2), 201–208. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2005.33.2.201
- Richardson, D., & Campbell, J. L. (1982). Alcohol and rape: The effect of alcohol on attributions of blame for rape. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 8(3), 468–476. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167282083013
- Robinson, P. H., Jackowitz, S. E., & Bartels, D. M. (2012). Extralegal punishment factors: A study of forgiveness, hardship, good deeds, apology, remorse, and other such discretionary factors in assessing criminal punishment. Vanderbilt Law Review, 65(3), 735–826. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1798725
- Sadowski, C. J., & Gulgoz, S. (1992). Internal consistency and test-retest reliability of the Need for Cognition scale. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 74(2), 610. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.1992.74.2.610
- Scurich, N., & Krauss, D. A. (2013). The effect of adjusted actuarial risk assessment on mock-jurors’ decisions in a sexual predator commitment proceeding. Jurimetrics, 53(4), 395–414.
- Scurich, N., & Krauss, D. A. (2014). The presumption of dangerousness in sexually violent predator commitment proceedings. Law, Probability and Risk, 13(1), 91–104. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/lpr/mgt015
- Shestowsky, D., & Horowitz, L. M. (2004). How the need for cognition scale predicts behavior in mock jury deliberations. Law and Human Behavior, 28(3), 305–337. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1023/B:LAHU.0000029141.46850.fb
- Sreenivasan, S., Weinberger, L. E., & Garrick, T. (2003). Expert testimony in sexually violent predator commitments: Conceptualizing legal standards of “mental disorder” and “likely to reoffend.”. The Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 31(4), 471–485. PMID: 14974803
- Stark, J. S., Bentley, R. J., Lowther, M. A., & Shaw, K. M. (1991). The student goals exploration: Reliability and concurrent validity. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 51(2), 413–422. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164491512015
- Turner, D. B., Boccaccini, M. T., Murrie, D. C., & Harris, P. B. (2015a). Jurors report that risk measure scores matter in sexually violent predator trials, but that other factors matter more: Importance of risk measures to SVP jurors. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 33(1), 56–73. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.2154
- Turner, S., Chamberlain, A. W., Jannetta, J., & Hess, J. (2015). Does GPS improve recidivism among high risk sex offenders? Outcomes for California’s GPS pilot for high risk sex offender parolees. Victims & Offenders, 10(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/15564886.2014.953236
- Varela, J. G., Boccaccini, M. T., Cuervo, V. A., Murrie, D. C., & Clark, J. W. (2014). Same score, different message: Perceptions of offender risk depend on static-99R risk communication format. Law and Human Behavior, 38(5), 418–427. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000073
- Verplanken, B. (1991). Persuasive communication of risk information: A test of cue versus message processing effects in a field experiment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17(2), 188–193. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/014616729101700211
- Walters, G. D., Kroner, D. G., DeMatteo, D., & Locklair, B. R. (2014). The impact of base rate utilization and clinical experience on the accuracy of judgments made with the HCR-20. Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice, 14(4), 288–301. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/15228932.2014.941726
- Witt, P. H., & DeMatteo, D. (2019). Sexually violent predator laws: Historical development and evolution. In W. O'Donohue & D. Bromberg (Eds.) Sexually violent predators: A clinical science handbook (pp. 9–20). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04696-5_2
- Zolfo, M. (2018). Commitment through fear: Mandatory jury trials and substantive due process violations in the civil commitment of sex offenders in Illinois. Chicago-Kent Law Review, 93(2), 593–627. https://scholarship.kentlaw.iit.edu/cklawreview/vol93/iss2/12