References
- American Education Research Association (AERA), American Psychological Association (APA), & National Council on Measurement in Education (NCME). (2014). Standards for educational and psychological testing.
- Barnett, G. D., Wakeling, H., Mandeville-Norden, R., & Rakestrow, J. (2013). Does change in psychometric test scores tell us anything about risk of reconviction in sexual offenders? Psychology, Crime & Law, 19(1), 85–110. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2011.607820
- Beardslee, W. R., Chien, P. L., & Bell, C. C. (2011). Prevention of mental disorders, substance abuse, and problem behaviors: A developmental perspective. Psychiatric Services, 62(3), 247–254. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1176/ps.62.3.pss6203_0247
- Beckerman, H., Roebroeck, M. E., Lankhorst, G. J., Becher, J. G., Bezemer, P. D., & Verbeek, A. L. M. (2001). Smallest real difference, a link between reproducibility and responsiveness. Quality of Life Research: An International Journal of Quality of Life Aspects of Treatment, Care & Rehabilitation, 10(7), 571–578. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013138911638
- Borum, R., Bartel, P., & Forth, A. (2002). Manual for the structured assessment for violence risk in youth (SAVRY). Psychological Assessment Resources.
- Borum, R., Bartel, P., & Forth, A. (2006). Manual for the structured assessment for violence risk in youth (SAVRY). Psychological Assessment Resources.
- Chu, C. M., Goh, M. L., & Chong, D. (2016). The predictive validity of SAVRY ratings for assessing youth offenders in Singapore: A comparison with YLS/CMI ratings. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 43(6), 793–810. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854815616842
- Chu, C. M., Xu, X., Li, D., Ruby, K., & Chng, G. S. (2020). The utility of the SAPROF-YV ratings for predicting recidivism in male youth offenders. Manuscript submitted for review.
- Chu, C. M., & Zeng, G. (2017). The assessment and management of youth offenders in Singapore: The implementation of the risk, needs, and responsivity framework. In H. C. O. Chan & M. Y. S. Ho (Eds.), Psycho-criminological perspective of criminal justice in Asia: Research and practices in Hong Kong, Singapore, and beyond (pp. 200–218). Routledge.
- Chua, J. R. Z. H., Chu, C. M., Yim, G., Chong, D., & Teoh, J. (2014). Implementation of the risk-need-Responsivity framework within the juvenile justice agencies in Singapore. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 21(6), 877–889. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13218719.2014.918076
- Cicchetti, D. V. (1994). Guidelines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology. Psychological Assessment, 6(4), 284–290. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.6.4.284
- Coie, J. D., Watt, N. F., West, S. G., Hawkins, J. D., Asarnow, J. R., Markman, H. J., Ramey, S. L., Shure, M. B., & Long, B. (1993). The science of prevention: A conceptual framework and some directions for a National research program. American Psychologist, 48(10), 1013–1022. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.48.10.1013
- Criminal Procedure Code. (2012). 68 Singapore statues.
- de Vries Robbé, M., Geers, M., Stapel, M., Hilterman, E., & de Vogel, V. (2015). SAPROF youth version: Guidelines for the assessment of protective factors for violence risk in juveniles. Vander Hoeven Kliniek part of De Forensische Zorgspecialisten.
- DeLong, E. R., DeLong, D. M., & Clarke-Pearson, D. L. (1988). Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: A nonparametric approach. Biometrics, 44(3), 837–845. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/2531595
- Freeman, J., Walters, R., Ingram, W., Slade, A., Hobart, J., & Zajicek, J. (2013). Evaluating change in mobility in people with multiple sclerosis: Relative responsiveness of four clinical measures. Multiple Sclerosis Journal, 19(12), 1632–1639. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1352458513482373
- Geisinger, K. F. (2013). Reliability. In K. F. Geisinger, B. A. Bracken, J. F. Carlson, J. C. Hansen, N. R. Kuncel, S. P. Reise, & M. C. Rodriguez (Eds.), APA handbook of testing and assessment in psychology (pp. 21–42). American Psychological Association.
- Heffernan, R., & Ward, T. (2017). A comprehensive theory of dynamic risk and protective factors. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 37, 129–141. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2017.10.003
- Heffernan, R., Wegerhoff, D., & Ward, T. (2019). Dynamic risk factors: Conceptualization, measurement, and evidence. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 48, 6–16. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2019.06.004
- Hogan, N. R., & Olver, M. E. (2016). Assessing risk for aggression in forensic psychiatric inpatients: An examination of five measures. Law and Human Behavior, 40(3), 233–243. https://doi.org/http://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000179
- Hoge, R. D., & Andrews, D. A. (2011). Youth Level of Service/Case Management Inventory 2.0 (YLS/CMI 2.0): User’s manual. Multi-Health Systems.
- Hunsley, J., & Mash, E. J. (2005). Introduction to the special section on developing guidelines for the evidence-based assessment (EBA) of adult disorders. Psychological Assessment, 17(3), 251–255. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.17.3.251
- Husted, J. A., Cook, R. J., Farewell, V. T., & Gladman, D. D. (2000). Methods for assessing responsiveness: A critical review and recommendations. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 53(5), 459–468. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0895-4356(99)00206-1
- Jacobson, N. S., & Truax, P. (1991). Clinical significance: A statistical approach to defining meaningful change in psychotherapy research. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 59(1), 12–19. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.59.1.12
- Kerby, D. S. (2014). The simple difference formula: An approach to teaching nonparametric correlation. Comprehensive Psychology, 3(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2466/11.IT.3.1
- Klepfisz, G., O’Brien, K., & Daffern, M. (2014). Violent offenders’ within-treatment change in anger, criminal attitudes, and violence risk: Associations with violent recidivism. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 13(4), 348–362. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/14999013.2014.951107
- Koh, L. L., Day, A., Klettke, B., Daffern, M., & Chu, C. C. (2020). The predictive validity of youth violence risk assessment tools: A systematic review. Psychology, Crime & Law, 26(8), 776–796. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2020.1734200
- Lenz, A. S., & Wester, K. L. (2017). Development and Evaluation of assessments for Counseling professionals. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 50(4), 201–209. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/07481756.2017.1361303
- Lewis, K., Olver, M. E., & Wong, S. C. P. (2013). The violence risk scale: Predictive validity and linking changes in risk with violent recidivism in a sample of high-risk offenders with psychopathic traits. Assessment, 20(2), 150–164. https://doi.org/http://doi.org/10.1177/1073191112441242
- Mastromanna, B., Brookstein, D. M., Oglogg, J. R. P., Campbell, R., Chu, C. C., & Daffern, M. (2018). Assessing change in dynamic risk factors in forensic psychiatric inpatients: Relationship with psychopathy and recidivism. The Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology, 29(2), 323–336. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/14789949.2017.1377277
- McNemar, Q. (1947). Note on the sampling error of the difference between correlated proportions or percentages. Psychometrika, 12(2), 153–157. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02295996
- Michel, S. F., Riaz, M., Webster, C., Hart, S. D., Levander, S., Müller-Isberner, R., Tiihonen, J., Repo-Tiihonen, E., Tuninger, E., & Hodgins, S. (2013). Using the HCR-20 to predict aggressive behavior among men with schizophrenia living in the community: Accuracy of prediction, general and forensic settings, and dynamic risk factors. The International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 12(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/14999013.2012.760182
- Mossman, D. (1994). Assessing predictions of violence: Being accurate about accuracy. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 62(4), 783–792. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.62.4.783
- National Youth Council Singapore. (2019). Youth Statistics in Brief 2019. Retrieved January 30, 2020 from https://www.nyc.gov.sg/en/initiatives/resources/youth-statistics-in-brief/
- Norman, G. R., Stratford, P., & Regehr, G. (1997). Methodological problems in the retrospective computation of responsiveness to change: The lesson of Cronbach. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 50(8), 869–879. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0895-4356(97)00097-8
- O’Brien, K., & Daffern, M. (2017). Treatment gain in violent offenders: The relationship between proximal outcome, risk reduction and violent recidivism. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 24(2), 224–258. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13218719.2016.1209804
- Prochaska, J. O., DiClemente, C. C., & Norcross, J. C. (1992). In search of how people change: Applications to addictive behaviors. American Psychologist, 47(9), 1102–1114. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.47.9.1102
- Rice, M. E., & Harris, G. T. (2005). Comparing effect sizes in follow-up studies: ROC area, Cohen’s d, and r. Law and Human Behavior, 29(5), 615–620. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10979-005-6832-7
- Singapore Department of Statistics. (2019). Population trends. Retrieved January 30, 2020, from https://www.singstat.gov.sg/modules/infographics/population
- Stockdale, K. C. (2008). The validity and reliability of the violence risk scale-youth version (VRS-YV).
- Stratford, P. W., Binkey, J. M., & Riddle, D. L. (1996). Health status measures: Strategies and analytic methods for assessing change scores. Physical Therapy, 76(10), 1109–1123. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/76.10.1109
- Stratford, P. W., & Riddle, D. L. (2005). Assessing sensitivity to change: Choosing the appropriate change coefficient. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 3(23), 23–27. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-3-23
- Viljoen, J. L., Gray, A. L., Shaffer, C., Latzman, N. E., Scalora, M. J., & Ullman, D. (2017a). Changes in J-SOAP-II and SAVRY scores over the course of residential, cognitive-behavioral treatment for adolescent sexual offending. Sexual Abuse, 29(4), 342–374. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1079063215595404
- Viljoen, J. L., Shaffer, C. S., Gray, A. L., & Douglas, K. S. (2017b). Are adolescent risk assessment tools sensitive to change? A framework and examination of the SAVRY and the YLS/CMI.. Law and Human Behavior, 41(3), 244–257. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000238
- Vose, B., Smith, P., & Cullen, F. T. (2013). Predictive validity and the impact of change in total LSI-R score on recidivism. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 40(12), 1383–1396. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854813508916
- Ward, T., & Fortune, C. A. (2016). From dynamic risk factors to causal processes: A methodological framework. Psychology, Crime & Law, 22(1–2), 190–202. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2015.1117080
- Wong, S., Lewis, K., Stockdale, K., & Gordon, A. (2004–2011). The Violence Risk Scale-Youth version. University of Saskatchewan.
- Zhou, Y. Q., Gan, D. Z. Q., Hoo, E. C. C., Chong, D., & Chu, C. M. (2018). Evaluating the violence prevention program: Group and individual changes in aggression, anger, self-control, and empathy. The Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology, 29(2), 265–287. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/14789949.2017.1375541