Are sad children more believable? A systematic review of the relationship between emotional demeanour of child victims and juror credibility judgements

References

• **Indicates that the study was included in the review.
   Google Scholar
• Crown Prosecution Service statistics (Witness Management System) released under a Freedom of Information request, September 2019.
   Google Scholar
• R v B [2010] EWCA Crim 4.
   Google Scholar
• Antrobus, E., McKimmie, B. M., & Newcombe, P. (2016). Mode of children's testimony and the effect of assumptions about credibility. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 23(6), 922–940. https://doi.org/10.1080/13218719.2016.1152927
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ask, K., & Landstrom, S. (2010). Why emotions matter: Expectancy violation and affective response mediate the emotional victim effect. Law and Human Behavior, 34(5), 392–401. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10979-009-9208-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baldry, A. C., & Winkel, F. W. (1998). Perceptions of the credibility and evidential value of victim and suspect statements in interviews. In J. Boros, I. Munnich, & M. Szegedi (Eds.), Psychology and criminal justice: International review of theory and practice (pp. 74–82). De Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Baldry, A. C., Winkel, F. W., & Enthoven, D. S. (1997). Paralinguistic and nonverbal triggers of biased credibility assessments of rape victims in Dutch police officers: An experimental study on ‘nonevidentiary bias’. In S. Redondo, V. Garrido, J. Perez, & R. Barabaret (Eds.), Advances in psychology and law: International contributions (pp. 163–174). De Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• **Bederian-Gardner, D., Goldfarb, D., & Goodman, G. S. (2017). Empathy's relation to appraisal of the emotional child victims. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 31(5), 488–499. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3345
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Block, S. D., Shestowsky, D., Segovia, D. A., Goodman, G. S., Schaaf, J. M., & Alexander, K. W. (2012). That never happened": adults’ discernment of children's true and false memory reports. Law & Human Behavior, 36(5), 365–374. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0093920
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bollingmo, G., Wessel, E., Sandvold, Y., Eilertsen, D. E., & Magnussen, S. (2009). The effect of biased and non-biased information on judgments of victims credibility. Psychology, Crime & Law, 15(1), 61–71. https://doi.org/10.1080/10683160802131107
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bornstein, B. H., Golding, J. M., Neuschatz, J., Kimbrough, C., Reed, K., Magyarics, C., & Luecht, K. (2009). Mock juror sampling issues in jury simulation research: A meta-analysis. Law and Human Behavior, 41(1), 13–28. https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000223
   Google Scholar
• Bosma, A. K., Mulder, E., Pemberton, A., & Vingerhoets, A. J. J. M. (2018). Observer reactions to emotional victims of serious crimes: Stereotypes and expectancy violations. Psychology, Crime & Law, 24(9), 957–977. https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2018.1467910
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bottoms, B. L., & Goodman, G. S. (1994). Perceptions of children's credibility in sexual assault cases. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 24(8), 702. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1994.tb00608.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bottoms, B. L., NysseCarris, K. L., Harris, T., & Tyda, K. (2003). Jurors’ perceptions of adolescent sexual assault victims who have intellectual disabilities. Law & Human Behavior, 27(2), 205–227. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022551314668
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bottoms, B. L., Peter-Hagene, L. C., Stevenson, M. C., Wiley, T. R. A., Mitchell, T. S., & Goodman, G. S. (2014). Explaining gender differences in jurors’ reactions to child sexual assault cases. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 32(6), 789–812. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.2147
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, D. A., & Lewis, C. N. (2013). Competence is in the eye of the beholder: Perceptions of intellectually disabled child witnesses. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 60(1), 3–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/1034912X.2013.75713
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brubacher, S. P., Poole, D. A., Dickinson, J. J., La Rooy, D., Szojka, Z. A., & Powell, M. B. (1912). Effects of interviewer familiarity and supportiveness on children’s recall across repeated interviews. Law and Human Behavior, 43(6), 507–516. https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000346
   Google Scholar
• Chaiken, S. (1980). Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39(5), 752–766. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.39.5.752
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connolly, D. A., Gagnon, N. C., & Lavoie, J. A. (2008). The effect of a judicial declaration of competence on the perceived credibility of children and defendants. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 13(2), 257–277. https://doi.org/10.1348/135532507X206867
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook, B. G., & Therrien, W. J. (2017). Null effects and publication bias in special education research. Behavioral Disorders, 42(4), 149–158. https://doi.org/10.1177/0198742917709473
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• **Cooper, A., Quas, J. A., & Cleveland, K. C. (2014). The emotional child victims: Effects on juror decision-making. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 32(6), 813–828. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.2153
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crane, L., Wilcock, R., Maras, K. L., Chui, W., Marti-Sanchez, C., & Henry, L. A. (2018). Mock juror perceptions of child witnesses on the autism spectrum: The impact of providing diagnostic labels and information about autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 50(5), 1509–1519. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-018-3700-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Critical Appraisal Skills Programme. (2019). CASP checklist for randomised control trials. https://casp-uk.net
   Google Scholar
• Dahl, J., Enemo, I., Drevland, G. C. B., Wessel, E., Eilertsen, D. E., & Magnussen, S. (2007). Displayed emotions and victims credibility: A comparison of judgements by individuals and mock juries. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 21(9), 1145–1155. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1320
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawtry, R. J., Cozzolino, P. J., & Callan, M. J. (2019). I blame therefore it was: Rape myth acceptance, victim blaming, and memory reconstruction. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 45(8), 1269–1282. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167218818475
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eaton, T. E., Ball, P. J., & O'Callaghan, M. G. (2001). Child-victims and defendant credibility: Child evidence presentation mode and judicial instructions. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 31(9), 1845–1858. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2001.tb00207.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights. (2017, February). Child-friendly Justice. https://fra.europa.eu/en/publication/2017/child-friendly-justice-childrens-view
   Google Scholar
• Evans, A. D., & Kang, L. E. (2013). Emergence of lying in very young children. Developmental Psychology, 49(10), 1958–1963. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031409
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher, B. S., Daigle, L. E., Cullen, F. T., & Turner, M. G. (2003). Reporting sexual victimization to the police and others: Results from a national-level study of college women. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 30(1), 6–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854802239161
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• **Golding, J. M., Fryman, H. M., Marsil, D. F., & Yozwiak, J. A. (2003). Big girls don't cry: The effect of child victims demeanour on juror decisions in a child sexual abuse trial. Child Abuse and Neglect, 27(11), 1311–1321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2003.03.001
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hackett, L., Day, A., & Mohr, P. (2008). Expectancy violation and perceptions of rape victim credibility. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 13(2), 323. https://doi.org/10.1348/135532507X228458
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hills, P. J., Pleva, M., Seib, E., & Cole, T. (2021). Understanding how university students use perceptions of consent, wantedness, and pleasure in labeling rape. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 50(1), 247–262. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-020-01772-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Honess, T. M., & Charman, E. A. (2002). Members of the jury - guilty of incompetence? The Psychologist, 15(2), 72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanan, L., & Plog, A. (2015). Trauma reactions in children: Information for parents and caregivers. National Association of School Psychologists Communique, 44(2), 27–28.
   Google Scholar
• Kaufmann, G., Drevland, G. C. B., Wessel, E., Overskeid, G., & Magnussen, S. (2002). The importance of being earnest: Displayed emotions and victims credibility. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 17(1), 21–34. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.842
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klippenstine, M. A., & Schuller, R. (2012). Perceptions of sexual assault: Expectancies regarding the emotional response of a rape victim over time. Psychology, Crime & Law, 18(1), 79–94. https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2011.589389
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landstrom, S., Ask, K., & Sommar, C. (2015). The emotional male victim: Effects of presentation mode on judged credibility. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 56(1), 99–104. https://doi.org/10.1111/sjop.12176
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landström, S., Ask, K., & Sommar, C. (2019). Credibility judgments in context: Effects of emotional expression, presentation mode, and statement consistency. Psychology, Crime & Law, 25(3), 279–297. https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2018.1519828
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landström, S., Ask, K., Sommar, C., & Willén, R. (2015). Children's testimony and the emotional victim effect. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 20(2), 365–383. https://doi.org/10.1111/lcrp.12036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• **Landstrom, S., Ask, K., & Sommar, C. (2015). The emotional male victim: Effects of presentation mode on judged credibility. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 56(1), 99–104. https://doi.org/10.1111/sjop.12176
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• La Rooy, D., Heydon, G., Korkman, J., Myklebust, T. (2016). Interviewing child witnesses. In G. Oxburgh, T. Myklebust, T. Grant, & R. Milne (Eds.), Communication in investigative and legal contexts: Integrated approaches from forensic psychology, linguistics and law enforcement (1st ed., pp. 55–79). John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118769133.ch4
   Google Scholar
• Lens, K. M. E., van Doorn, J., Pemberton, A., & Bogaerts, S. (2014). You shouldn't feel that way! extending the emotional victim effect through the mediating role of expectancy violation. Psychology, Crime & Law, 20(4), 326–338. https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2013.77796
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malloy, L. C., La Rooy, D. J., Lamb, M. E., & Katz, C. (2011). Developmentally sensitive interviewing for legal purposes. In M. Lamb E, D. La Rooy J, L. Malloy C, & C. Katz (Eds.), Children's testimony: A handbook of psychological research and forensic practice (2nd ed., pp. 1–15). Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Malsch, M. (2009). Democracy in the courts: Lay participation in European criminal justice systems. Farnham.
   Google Scholar
• Mandell, D. S., Walrath, C. M., Manteuffel, B., Sgro, G., & Pinto-Martin, J. (2005). The prevalence and correlates of abuse among children with autism served in comprehensive community-based mental health settings. Child Abuse & Neglect, 29(12), 1359–1372. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2005.06.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McAdams, D. P., & Jones, B. K. (2017). In E. M. Altmaier (Ed.), Chapter 1 - making meaning in the wake of trauma: Resilience and redemption. Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-803015-8.00001-2
   Google Scholar
• McAuliff, B. D., Lapin, J., & Michel, S. (2015). Support person presence and child victim testimony: Believe it or not. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 33(4), 508–527. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.2190
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• **Melinder, A., Burrell, L., Eriksen, M. O., Magnussen, S., & Wessel, E. (2016). The emotional child victims effect survives presentation mode. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 34(1), 113–125. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.2232
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mulder, M. R., & Winiel, F. W. (1996). Social workers’ and police officers’ perception of victim credibility: Perspective-taking and the impact of extra-evidential factors. Psychology, Crime & Law, 2(4), 307–319. https://doi.org/10.1080/10683169608409786
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neck, C. P., & Moorhead, G. (1992). Jury deliberations in the trial of U.S. v. John DeLorean: A case analysis of groupthink avoidance and an enhanced framework. Human Relations, 45(10), 1077–1091. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872679204501004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nightingale, N. N. (1993). Juror reactions to child victim witnesses: Factors affecting trial outcome. Law and Human Behavior, 17(6), 679–694. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01044689
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nitschke, F. T., McKimmie, B. M., & Vanman, E. J. (2019). A meta-analysis of the emotional victim effect for female adult rape complainants: Does complainant distress influence credibility? Psychological Bulletin, 145(10), 953–979. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000206
   Google Scholar
• Osman, S. L., & Davis, C. M. (1999). Predicting perceptions of date rape based on individual beliefs and female alcohol consumption. Journal of College Student Development, 40(6), 701.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pantell, R. H. (2017). The child victims in the courtroom. Pediatrics (Evanston), 139(3), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2016-4008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plotnikoff, J., & Woolfson, R. (2011). Young witnesses in criminal proceedings. A progress report on ‘measuring Up?’ (2009). Nuffield Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• **Regan, P., & Baker, S. (1998). The impact of child victims demeanour on perceived credibility and trial outcome in sexual abuse cases. Journal of Family Violence, 13(2), 187–195. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022845724226
   Google Scholar
• Rose, M. R., Nadler, J., & Clark, J. (2006). Appropriately upset? Emotion norms and perceptions of crime victims. Law and Human Behavior, 30(2), 203–219. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10979-006-9030-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross, D. F., Jurden, F. H., Lindsay, R. C. L., & Keeney, J. M. (2003). Replications and limitations of a two-factor model of child victims credibility. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 33(2), 418–431. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2003.tb01903.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross, L. (2018). From the fundamental attribution error to the truly fundamental attribution error and beyond: My research journey. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 13(6), 750–769. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691618769855
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmitt, S., Robjant, K., Elbert, T., & Koebach, A. (2021). To add insult to injury: Stigmatization reinforces the trauma of rape survivors – findings from the DR Congo. SSM - Population Health, 13, 100719–100719. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmph.2020.100719
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, G. (2013). In S. Frosh (Ed.), Working with trauma: Systematic approaches (1st ed.). England: Palgrave: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Talwar, V., & Crossman, A. M. (2012). Children’s lies and their detection: Implications for child victims testimony. Developmental Review, 32(4), 337–359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2012.06.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ullman, S. E., & Peter-Hagene, L. (2016). Longitudinal relationships of social reactions, PTSD, and revictimization in sexual assault survivors. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 31(6), 1074–1094. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260514564069
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voogt, A., Klettke, B., & Crossman, A. (2019). Measurement of victim credibility in child sexual assault cases: A systematic review. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 20(1), 51–66. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838016683460
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• **Wessel, E., Magnussen, S., & Melinder, A. M. D. (2013). Expressed emotions and perceived credibility of child mock victims disclosing physical abuse. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 27(5), 611–616. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.2935
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• **Wessel, E. M., Eilertsen, D. E., Langnes, E., Magnussen, S., & Melinder, A. (2016). Disclosure of child sexual abuse: Expressed emotions and credibility judgments of a child mock victim. Psychology, Crime and Law, 22(4), 331–343. https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2015.1109087
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winkel, F. W., & Koppelaar, L. (1991). Rape victims’ style of self-presentation and secondary victimization by the environment: An experiment. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 6(1), 29–40. https://doi.org/10.1177/088626091006001003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood, B., Orsak, C., Murphy, M., & Cross, H. J. (1996). Semi-structured child sexual abuse interviews: Interview and child characteristics related to credibility of disclosure. Child Abuse & Neglect, 20(1), 81–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/0145-2134(95)00118-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. (2003). Guidelines for medico-legal care of victims of sexual violence. World Health Organization. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/42788
   Google Scholar
• Wrede, O., Ask, K., & Strömwall, L. (2015). Sad and exposed, angry and resilient?: Effects of crime victims’ emotional expressions on perceived need for support. Social Psychology, 46(1), 55. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000221
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar