Patterns in the use of best practices for eyewitness identifications in the field

References

• American Bar Association, C. J. S. (2004). Report to the house of delegates: Resolution adopting the American bar association statement of best practices for promoting the accuracy of eyewitness identification procedures.
   Google Scholar
• Beaudry, J. L., & Lindsay, R. C. L. (2006). Current identification procedure practices : A survey of ontario police officers. The Canadian Journal of Police & Security Services, 4(4), 178–183.
   Google Scholar
• Bertrand, M. I., Lindsay, R. C. L., Mansour, J. K., Beaudry, J. L., Kalmet, N., & Melsom, E. I. (2018). Examining how lineup practices of Canadian and U.S. Police officers adhere to their national best practice recommendations. Manitoba Law Journal, 41(3), 1–47. https://heinonline.org/HOL/P?h=hein.journals/manitob41&i=960
   Google Scholar
• Clark, S. E. (2005). A re-examination of the effects of biased lineup instructions in eyewitness identification. Law and Human Behavior, 29(5), 575–604. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10979-005-7121-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fawcett, J. M., Russell, E. J., Peace, K. A., & Christie, J. (2013). Of guns and geese: A meta-analytic review of the ‘weapon focus’ literature. Psychology, Crime & Law, 19(1), 35–66. https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2011.599325
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Findley, K. A. (2016). Implementing the lessons from wrongful convictions: An empirical analysis of eyewitness identification reform strategies. Mo. L. Rev, https://doi.org/10.3868/s050-004-015-0003-8
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, S. Z. (2007). Eyewitness identification reform in Massachusetts. Massachusetts Law Review. http://www.bu.edu/law/faculty/scholarship/workingpapers/2007.html
   Google Scholar
• Florida Department of Law Enforcement. (2011). Standards for Florida state and local law enforcement agencies in dealing with photographic or live lineups in eyewitness identification. https://www.flsheriffs.org/uploads/Eyewitness_RevisedFINALStandards6_15_11.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Garrett, B. L. (2014). Eyewitness identifications and police practices: A Virginia case study. Virginia Journal of Criminal Law, 2(1), 1–24.
   Google Scholar
• Garrett, B. L. (2019). Self-policing: Eyewitness identification policies in Virginia. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3381898
   Google Scholar
• Greathouse, S. M., & Kovera, M. B. (2009). Instruction bias and lineup presentation moderate the effects of administrator knowledge on eyewitness identification. Law and Human Behavior, 33(1), 70–82. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10979-008-9136-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greene, E., & Evelo, A. J. (2015). Cops and robbers (and eyewitnesses): a comparison of lineup administration by robbery detectives in the USA and Canada. Psychology, Crime & Law, 21(3), 297–313. https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2014.952236
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kovera, M. B., & Evelo, A. J. (2017). The case for double-blind lineup administration. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 23(4), 421–437. https://doi.org/10.1037/law0000139
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNabb, N. S., Farrell, B. R., & Brown, C. R. (2017). Voluntary adoption of evidence-based practices by local law enforcement: Eyewitness identification procedures in Arkansas, iowa, Missouri, and nebraska. Journal of Gender Race & Justice, 20(3), 509–541.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, G., Griswold, M., Kubu, B., Woods, D., Berryessa, C., Greene, K., & Berman, J. (2014). National Survey of Eyewitness Identification Procedure in Law Enforcement Agencies, 1994-2012. https://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34274.v1
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council. (2014). Identifying the culprit: Assessing eyewitness identification. The National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Norris, R. J., Bonventre, C. L., Redlich, A. D., Acker, J. R., & Lowe, C. (2017). Preventing wrongful convictions: An analysis of state investigation reforms. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 30(4), 597–626. https://doi.org/10.1177/0887403416687359
   Google Scholar
• Phillips, M. R., McAuliff, B. D., Kovera, M. B., & Cutler, B. L. (1999). Double-blind photoarray administration as a safeguard against investigator bias. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84(6), 940–951. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.84.6.940
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Police Executive Research Forum. (2013). A national survey of eyewitness identification procedures in law enforcement agencies. 126. http://www.policeforum.org/assets/docs/Free_Online_Documents/Eyewitness_Identification/anationalsurveyofeyewitnessidentificationproceduresinlawenforcementagencies2013.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Rodriguez, D. N., & Berry, M. A. (2013). Eyewitness science and the call for double-blind lineup administration. Journal of Criminology, 2013, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/530523
   Google Scholar
• Smith, A. M., & Cutler, B. L. (2013). Conclusion: Identification test reforms. In B. L. Cutler (Ed.), Reform of eyewitness identification procedures (pp. 203–219)). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/14094-010
   Google Scholar
• Steblay, N. M. (1997). Social influence in eyewitness recall: A meta-analytic review of lineup instruction effects. Law and Human Behavior, 21(3), 283–297. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024890732059
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Technical Working Group for Eyewitness Evidence. (1999). Eyewitness evidence: A guide for law enforcement. http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov.ny
   Google Scholar
• The Innocence Project. (2009). Reevaluating lineups: Why witnesses make mistakes and how to reduce the chance of a misidentification. https://www.innocenceproject.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/eyewitness_id_report-5.pdf
   Google Scholar
• United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit. (2019). 2019 report of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit task force on eyewitness identifications. Temple Law Review, 92(1), 1–119.
   Google Scholar
• Vallano, J. P., Slapinski, K. A., Steele, L. J., Briggs, A. P., & Pozzulo, J. D. (2019). Familiar eyewitness identifications: The current state of affairs. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 25(3), 128–146. https://doi.org/10.1037/law0000204
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wells, G. L. (1978). Applied eyewitness-testimony research: System variables and estimator variables. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36(12), 1546–1557. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.36.12.1546
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wells, G. L., Kovera, M. B., Douglass, A. B., Brewer, N., Meissner, C. A., & Wixted, J. T. (2020). Policy and procedure recommendations for the collection and preservation of eyewitness identification evidence. Law and Human Behavior, 44(1), 3–36. https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000359
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wells, G. L., Small, M., Penrod, S., Malpass, R. S., Fulero, S. M., & Brimacombe, C. A. E. (1998). Eyewitness identification procedures: Recommendations for lineups and photospreads. Law and Human Behavior, 22(6), 603–647. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025750605807
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wells, G. L., Steblay, N. K., & Dysart, J. E. (2015). Double-blind photo lineups using actual eyewitnesses: An experimental test of a sequential versus simultaneous lineup procedure. Law and Human Behavior, 39(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000096
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wise, R. A., Safer, M. A., & Maro, C. M. (2011). What U.S. Law enforcement officers know and believe about eyewitness factors, eyewitness interviews and identification procedures. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 25(3), 488–500. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1717
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wixted, J. T., Mickes, L., Dunn, J. C., Clark, S. E., & Wells, W. (2016). Estimating the reliability of eyewitness identifications from police lineups. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113(2), 304–309. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1516814112
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wixted, J. T., & Wells, G. L. (2017). The relationship between eyewitness confidence and identification accuracy: A new synthesis. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 18(1), 10–65. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100616686966
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wogalter, M. S., Malpass, R. S., & Burger, M. A. (1993). How police officers construct lineups: A national survey. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 37(9), 640–644. https://doi.org/10.1177/154193129303700927
   Google Scholar
• Wogalter, M. S., Malpass, R. S., & Mcquiston, D. E. (2004). A national survey of US police on preparation and conduct of identification lineups. Psychology, Crime & Law, 10(1), 69–82. https://doi.org/10.1080/10683160410001641873
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar