3,575
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Detecting deception using comparable truth baselines

, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon &
Pages 567-583 | Received 06 Apr 2021, Accepted 04 Jan 2022, Published online: 22 Jan 2022

References

  • Amado, B. G., Arce, R., Farina, F., & Vilarino, M. (2016). Criteria-Based content analysis (CBCA) reality criteria in adults: A meta-analytic review. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 16(2), 201–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijchp.2016.01.002
  • Bogaard, G., Meijer, E. H., Vrij, A., & Merckelbach, H. (2016). Strong, but wrong: Lay people's and police officers’ beliefs about verbal and nonverbal cues to deception. PLoS ONE, 11(6), e0156615. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0156615
  • Bond, C. F., Jr., & DePaulo, B. M. (2006). Accuracy of deception judgments. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10(3), 214-234. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr1003_2
  • Bond, C. F., & DePaulo, B. M. (2008). Individual differences in judging deception: Accuracy and bias. Psychological Bulletin, 134(4), 477–492. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.134.4.477
  • Caso, L., Palena, N., Carlessi, E., & Vrij, A. (2019a). Police accuracy in truth/lie detection when judging baseline interviews, Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 26(6), 841-850. https://doi.org/10.1080/13218719.2019.1642258
  • Caso, L., Palena, N., Vrij, A., & Gnisci, A. (2019b). Observers’ performance at evaluating truthfulness when provided with comparable truth or small talk baselines, Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 26(4), 571-579. https://doi.org/10.1080/13218719.2018.1553471
  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed). Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale.
  • Davis, M., & Hadiks, D. (1995). Demeanor and credibility. Semiotica, 106(1-2), 5–54. https://doi.org/10.1515/semi.1995.106.1-2.5
  • DePaulo, B. M., Lindsay, J. J., Malone, B. E., Muhlenbruck, L., Charlton, K., & Cooper, H. (2003). Cues to deception. Psychological Bulletin, 129(1), 74–118. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.129.1.74
  • Ekman, P., & Friesen, W. V. (1974). Detecting deception from the body or face. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 29(3), 288–298. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0036006
  • Ewens, S., Vrij, A., Jang, M., & Jo, E. (2014). Drop the small talk when establishing baseline behaviour in interviews. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling, 11(3), 244–252. https://doi.org/10.1002/jip.1414
  • Hartwig, M., & Bond Jr, C. F. (2011). Why do lie-catchers fail? A lens model meta-analysis of human lie judgments. Psychological Bulletin, 137(4), 643–659. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023589
  • Hartwig, M., Granhag, P. A., & Strömwall, L. A. (2007). Guilty and innocent suspects’ strategies during police interrogations, Psychology, Crime & Law, 13(2), 213-227. https://doi.org/10.1080/10683160600750264
  • Hauch, V., Sporer, S. L., Masip, J., & Blandón-Gitlin, I. (2017). Can credibility criteria be assessed reliably? A meta-analysis of criteria-based content analysis. Psychological Assessment, 29(6), 819–834. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000426
  • Jarosz, A. F., & Wiley, J. (2014). What are the odds? A practical guide to computing and reporting Bayes factors. The Journal of Problem Solving, 7(1), 2–9. https://doi.org/10.7771/1932-6246.1167
  • Kashy, D. A., & DePaulo, B. M. (1996). Who lies? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(5), 1037–1051. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.70.5.1037
  • Lee, M. D., & Wagenmakers, E. J. (2013). Bayesian cognitive modeling: A practical course. Cambridge University Press.
  • Leins, D. A., Fisher, R. P., & Ross, S. J. (2013). Exploring liars’ strategies for creating deceptive reports. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 18(1), 141–151. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8333.2011.02041.x
  • Levine, T. R. (2014). Truth-Default theory (TDT). Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 33(4), 378-392. doi:10.1177/0261927X14535916
  • Luke, T. J. (2019). Lessons from pinocchio: Cues to deception may be highly exaggerated. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 14(4), 646-671. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691619838258
  • Mac Giolla, E., & Luke, T. J. (2021). Does the cognitive approach to lie detection improve the accuracy of human observers? Applied Cognitive Psychology, 35(2), 385–392. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp3777
  • Masip, J., Alonso, H., Garrido, E., & Antón, C. (2005a). Generalized communicative suspicion (GCS) among police officers: Accounting for the investigator bias Effect1. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 35(5), 1046–1066. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2005.tb02159.x
  • Masip, J., & Herrero, C. (2015). Police detection of deception: Beliefs about behavioral cues to deception are strong even though contextual evidence is more useful. Journal of Communication, 65(1), 125–145. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12135
  • Masip, J., Sporer, S. L., Garrido, E., & Herrero, C. (2005b). The detection of deception with the reality monitoring approach: A review of the empirical evidence. Psychology, Crime & Law, 11(1), 99–122. https://doi.org/10.1080/10683160410001726356
  • Meissner, C. A., & Kassin, S. M. (2002). "He's guilty!": Investigator bias in judgments of truth and deception. Law and Human Behavior, 26(5), 469–480. doi:10.1023/A:1020278620751
  • Merckelbach, H. (2004). Telling a good story: Fantasy proneness and the quality of fabricated memories. Personality and Individual Differences, 37(7), 1371–1382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2004.01.007
  • Moston, S., & Engelberg, T. (1993). Police questioning techniques in tape recorded interviews with criminal suspects. Policing and Society, 3(3), 223–237. https://doi.org/10.1080/10439463.1993.9964670
  • Nahari, G. (2017). Top-down processes in interpersonal reality monitoring assessments. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 23(2), 232–242. https://doi.org/10.1037/law0000110
  • Nahari, G., & Nisin, Z. (2019). Digging further into the speech of liars: Future research prospects in verbal lie detection. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 10, 56. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00056
  • Nahari, G., & Pazuelo, M. (2015). Telling a convincing story: Richness in detail as a function of gender and information. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 4(4), 363–367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2015.08.005
  • Narchet, F. M., Meissner, C. A., & Russano, M. B. (2011). Modeling the influence of investigator bias on the elicitation of true and false confessions. Law and Human Behavior, 35(6), 452–465. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10979-010-9257-x
  • Oberlader, V. A., Naefgen, C., Koppehele-Gossel, J., Quinten, L., Banse, R., & Schmidt, A. F. (2016). Validity of content-based techniques to distinguish true and fabricated statements: A meta-analysis. Law and Human Behavior, 40(4), 440–457. https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000193
  • Ormerod, T. C., & Dando, C. J. (2015). Finding a needle in a haystack: Toward a psychologically informed method for aviation security screening. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 144(1), 76–84. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000030
  • Palena, N., Caso, L., & Vrij, A. (2019). Detecting lies via a theme-selection strategy. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 2775. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02775
  • Palena, N., Caso, L., Vrij, A., & Orthey, R. (2018). Detecting deception through small talk and comparable truth baselines. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling, 15(2), 124–132. https://doi.org/10.1002/jip.1495
  • Schelleman-Offermans, K., & Merckelbach, H. (2010). Fantasy proneness as a confounder of verbal Lie detection tools. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling, 7(3), 247–260. https://doi.org/10.1002/jip.121
  • Stromwall, L. A., Hartwig, M., & Granhag, P. A. (2006). To act truthfully: Nonverbal behaviour and strategies during a police interrogation, Psychology, Crime & Law, 12(2), 207-219. doi:10.1080/10683160512331331328
  • Tomas, F., Dodier, O., & Demarchi, S. (2021). Baselining affects the production of deceptive narratives. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 35(1), 300–307. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3768
  • Verigin, B. L., Meijer, E. H., Bogaard, G., & Vrij, A. (2019a). Lie prevalence, lie characteristics and strategies of self-reported good liars. PLoS ONE, 14(12), e0225566. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0225566
  • Verigin, B. L., Meijer, E. H., & Vrij, A. (2021). A within-statement baseline comparison for detecting lies, Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 28(1), 94–103. https://doi.org/10.1080/13218719.2020.1767712
  • Verigin, B. L., Meijer, E. H., Vrij, A., & Zauzig, L. (2019b). The interaction of truthful and deceptive information, Psychology, Crime & Law, 26(4), 367–383. https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2019.1669596
  • Vrij, A. (2008a). Beliefs about nonverbal and verbal cues to deception. In A. Vrij (Ed.), Detecting lies and deceit (pp. 115–140). Wiley.
  • Vrij, A. (2008b). Nonverbal dominance versus verbal accuracy in Lie detection. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 35(10), 1323–1336. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854808321530
  • Vrij, A. (2016). Baselining as a Lie detection method. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 30(6), 1112–1119. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3288
  • Vrij, A. (2019). Deception and truth detection when analyzing nonverbal and verbal cues. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 33(2), 160–167. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3457
  • Vrij, A., Akehurst, L., Soukara, S., & Bull, R. (2002). Will the truth come out? The effect of deception, age, status, coaching, and social skills on CBCA scores. Law and Human Behavior, 26(3), 261–283. doi:10.1023/A:1015313120905
  • Vrij, A., Leal, S., & Fisher, R. P. (2018). Verbal deception and the model statement as a lie detection tool. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 9, 492. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00492
  • Wagenmakers, E. J., Love, J., Marsman, M., Jamil, T., Ly, A., Verhagen, J., Selker, R., Gronau, Q. F., Dropmann, D., Boutin, B., Meerhoff, F., Knight, P., Raj, A., van Kesteren, E. J., van Doorn, J., Smira, M., Epskamp, S., Etz, A., Matzke, D., de Jong, T., van den Bergh, D., Sarafoglou, A., Steingroever, H., Derks, K., Rouder, J. N., & Morey, R. D. (2018). Bayesian inference for psychology. Part II: Example applications with JASP. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 25(1), 58-76. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-017-1323-7