Asylum claims based on sexual orientation: a review of psycho-legal issues in credibility assessments

References

• A, B, C v Staatssecretaris van Veiligheid En Justitie, C-148/13 to C-150/13 (Court of Justice of the European Union December 2, 2014).
   Google Scholar
• X, Y, and Z v. Minister voor Immigratie en Asiel, C-199/12 – C-201/12 (Court of Justice of the European Union November 7, 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Akin, D. (2015). Assessing sexual orientation-based persecution. Lambda Nordica, 20(1), 17–42. http://hdl.handle.net/11250/2629963
   Google Scholar
• Akin, D. (2017). Queer asylum seekers: Translating sexuality in Norway. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 43(3), 458–474. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2016.1243050
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderton, C. L., Pender, D. A., & Asner-Self, K. K. (2011). A review of the religious identity/sexual orientation identity conflict literature: Revisiting festinger’s cognitive dissonance theory. Journal of LGBT Issues in Counseling, 5(3–4), 259–281. https://doi.org/10.1080/15538605.2011.632745
   Google Scholar
• Andrade, V. L., Danisi, C., Dustin, M., Ferreira, N., & Held, N. (2020). Queering asylum in Europe: A survey report. https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/kn6af.
   Google Scholar
• Asanovic, B. (2018). Still falling short: The standard of Home Office decision-making in asylum claims based on sexual orientation and gender identity. https://uklgig.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/Still-Falling-Short.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Baillot, H., Cowan, S., & Munro, V. E. (2013). Second-hand emotion? Exploring the contagion and impact of trauma and distress in the asylum Law context. Journal of Law and Society. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6478.2013.00639.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, C., & Thomas, F. (2013). Seeking asylum in the UK: Lesbian perspectives. Forced Migration Review, 42, 25–28. https://ezp.sub.su.se/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=aph&AN=87468936&site=eds-live&scope=site
   Google Scholar
• Berg, L., & Millbank, J. (2009). Constructing the personal narratives of lesbian, gay and bisexual asylum claimants. Journal of Refugee Studies, 22(2), 195–223. https://doi.org/10.1093/jrs/fep010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berlit, U., Doerig, H., & Storey, H. (2015). Credibility assessment in claims based on persecution for reasons of religious conversion and homosexuality: A practitioners approach. International Journal of Refugee Law, 27(4), 649–666. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijrl/eev053
   Google Scholar
• Bögner, D., Herlihy, J., & Brewin, C. R. (2007). Impact of sexual violence on disclosure during home office interviews. British Journal of Psychiatry, 191(1), 75–81. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.bp.106.030262
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bohmer, C., & Shuman, A. (2007). Rejecting refugees: Political asylum in the 21st century (pp. 1–304). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203937228.
   Google Scholar
• Bohmer, C., & Shuman, A. (2018). Political asylum deceptions: The culture of suspicion (pp. 1–204). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67404-9
   Google Scholar
• Cass, V. C. (1979). Homosexual identity formation: A theoretical model. Journal of Homosexuality, 4(3), 219–235. https://doi.org/10.1300/J082v04n03_01
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi, V. (2010). Living discreetly: A catch 22 in refugee status determinations on the basis of sexual orientation. Brooklyn Journal of International Law, 36(1), 5.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (2001). Questions of credibility: Omissions, discrepancies and errors of recall in the testimony of asylum seekers. International Journal of Refugee Law, 13(3), 293–309. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijrl/13.3.293
   Google Scholar
• Connely, E. (2014). Queer, beyond a reasonable doubt: Refugee experiences of ‘passing’ into ‘membership of a particular social group. UCL migration research unit working papers.
   Google Scholar
• Cory, C. (2019). The LGBTQ asylum seeker: Particular social groups and authentic queer identities. Georgetown Journal of Gender and the Law, 20(3), 577. https://www.law.georgetown.edu/gender-journal/in-print/volume-20-issue-3-symposium-2019/the-lgbtq-asylum-seeker-particular-social-groups-and-authentic-queer-identities/
   Google Scholar
• Cox, W. T. L., Devine, P. G., Bischmann, A. A., & Hyde, J. S. (2016). Inferences about sexual orientation: The roles of stereotypes, faces, and the Gaydar myth. The Journal of Sex Research, 53(2), 157–171. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2015.1015714
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawson, J., & Gerber, P. (2017). Assessing the refugee claims of LGBTI people: Is the DSSH model useful for determining claims by women for asylum based on sexual orientation? International Journal of Refugee Law, 29(2), 292–322. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijrl/eex022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Bruyckere, V. (2018). Somewhere over the rainbow: On the use of psychological tests to determine asylum seekers’ sexual orientation and the impact on the right to private life (case C-473/16, 25 January 2018). Croatian Yearbook of European Law and Policy, 14(1), 256–272. https://doi.org/10.3935/cyelp.14.2018.311
   Google Scholar
• Dhoest, A. (2019). Learning to be gay: LGBTQ forced migrant identities and narratives in Belgium. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 45(7), 1075–1089. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2017.1420466
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diamond, L. M. (2000). Sexual identity, attractions, and behavior among young sexual-minority women over a 2-year period. Developmental Psychology, 36(2), 241–250. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.36.2.241
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dowd, R., Hunter, J., Liddell, B., Mcadam, J., Nickerson, A., & Bryant, R. (2018). Filling gaps and verifying facts: Assumptions and credibility assessment in the Australian refugee review tribunal. International Journal of Refugee Law, 30(1), 71–103. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijrl/eey017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dror, I. E. (2020). Cognitive and human factors in expert decision making: Six fallacies and the eight sources of bias. Analytical Chemistry, 92(12), 7998–8004. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.0c00704
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dustin, M. (2018). Many rivers to cross: The recognition of LGBTQI asylum in the UK. International Journal of Refugee Law, 30(1), 104–127. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijrl/eey018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dustin, M., & Ferreira, N. (2021). Improving SOGI asylum adjudication: Putting persecution ahead of identity. Refugee Survey Quarterly, 40(3), 315–347. https://doi.org/10.1093/rsq/hdab005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eliason, M. J., & Schope, R. (2007). Shifting sands or solid foundation? Lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender identity formation. In I. H. Meyer, & M. E. Northridge (Eds.), The health of sexual minorities (pp. 3–26). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-31334-4_1
   Google Scholar
• European Asylum Support Office. (2014). EASO practical guide: Personal interview. https://easo.europa.eu/sites/default/files/public/EASO-Practical-Guide-Personal-Interview-EN.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Ferri, F. (2018). Assessing credibility of asylum seekers’ statements on sexual orientation: Lights and shadows of the F judgment. European Papers, 3(2), 875–884. https://doi.org/10.15166/2499-8249/232
   Google Scholar
• Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford University Press. https://books.google.fi/books?hl=sv&lr=&id=voeQ-8CASacC&oi=fnd&pg=PA1&dq=festinger+1957&ots=9z5bPvqbxv&sig=WwkTcki8lZxK6qi9p7ryMQMtp3Y&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=festinger1957&f=false.
   Google Scholar
• Garr-Schultz, A., & Gardner, W. (2019). “It’s just a phase”: Identity denial experiences, self-concept clarity, and emotional well-being in bisexual individuals. Self and Identity, 20(00), 528–544. https://doi.org/10.1080/15298868.2019.1625435
   Google Scholar
• Gómez, Á. (2002). If my group stereotypes others, others stereotype my group … and we know. Concept, research lines and future perspectives of meta-stereotypes. Revista de Psicología Social, 17(3), 253–282. https://doi.org/10.1174/02134740260372982
   Google Scholar
• Granhag, P. A., Strömwall, L. A., & Hartwig, M. (2005). Granting asylum or not? Migration board personnel’s beliefs about deception. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 31(1), 29–50. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183042000305672
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray, L. M. (2010). Failing the grade: Home Office initial decisions on lesbian and gay claims for asylum. https://www.yumpu.com/en/document/read/47058222/failing-the-grade
   Google Scholar
• Greatrick, A. (2019). “Coaching” queer: Hospitality and the categorical imperative of LGBTQ asylum seeking in Lebanon and Turkey. Migration and Society, 2(1), 98–106. https://doi.org/10.3167/arms.2019.020110
   Google Scholar
• Guhan, R., & Liebling-Kalifani, H. (2011). The experiences of staff working with refugees and asylum seekers in the United Kingdom: A grounded theory exploration. Journal of Immigrant & Refugee Studies, 9, 205–228. https://doi.org/10.1080/15562948.2011.592804
   Google Scholar
• Gustafsson Grønningsaeter, A. (2017). Establishing a sexual identity: The Norwegian immigration authorities’ practice in sexuality-based asylum cases. In Out & proud? LGBTI asylum in Europe (pp. 1–17). https://www.coc.nl/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/Norwegian-practices-Andrea-Gustafsson-Gronningsaeter.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Gyulai, G. (Ed.). (2013). Credibility assessment in asylum procedures. A multidisciplinary training manual (Vol. 1). Hungarian Helsinki Committee.
   Google Scholar
• Hanna, F. (2005). Punishing masculinity in gay asylum claims. Yale Law Journal, 114(4), 913–920. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4135797
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, J. I., Cook, S. W., & Kashubeck-West, S. (2008). Religious attitudes, internalized homophobia, and identity in gay and lesbian adults. Journal of Gay & Lesbian Mental Health, 12(3), 205–225. https://doi.org/10.1080/19359700802111452
   Google Scholar
• Hedlund, D., & Wimark, T. (2019). Unaccompanied children claiming asylum on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity. Journal of Refugee Studies, 32(2), 257–277. https://doi.org/10.1093/jrs/fey026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herlihy, J., Gleeson, K., & Turner, S. (2010). What assumptions about human behaviour underlie asylum judgments? International Journal of Refugee Law, 22(July), 351–366. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijrl/eeq027
   Google Scholar
• Herlihy, J., Scragg, P., & Turner, S. (2002). Discrepancies in autobiographical memories—implications for the assessment of asylum seekers: Repeated interviews study. BMJ, 324(7333), 324–327. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.324.7333.324
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hersh, N. (2015). Challenges to assessing same-sex relationships under refugee law in Canada. McGill Law Journal, 60(3), 527–571. https://doi.org/10.7202/1032678ar
   Google Scholar
• Hertoghs, M., & Schinkel, W. (2018). The state’s sexual desires: The performance of sexuality in the Dutch asylum procedure. Theory and Society, 47(6), 691–716. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-018-9330-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hinger, S. (2010). Finding the fundamental: Shaping identity in gender and sexual orientation based asylum claims. Columbia Journal of Gender and Law, 19(2), 367–408. https://doi.org/10.1525/sp.2007.54.1.23
   Google Scholar
• Horowitz, J. L., & Newcomb, M. D. (2001). A multidimensional approach to homosexual identity. Journal of Homosexuality, 42, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1300/J082v42n02_01
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Human Dignity Trust. (2021). Map of countries that criminalise LGBT people. https://www.humandignitytrust.org/lgbt-the-law/map-of-criminalisation/
   Google Scholar
• International Commission of Jurists. (2016). Refugee status claims based on sexual orientation and gender identity – A practitioner’s guide. https://www.icj.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/Universal-PG-11-Asylum-Claims-SOGI-Publications-Practitioners-Guide-Series-2016-ENG.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Jansen, S. (2014). Good practices related to LGBTI asylum applicants in Europe. https://www.ilga-europe.org/resources/ilga-europe-reports-and-other-materials/good-practices-related-lgbti-asylum-applicants
   Google Scholar
• Jansen, S. (2019). Pride or shame? Assessing LGBTI asylum applications in the Netherlands following the XYX and ABC Judgments. COC Netherlands. https://www.refworld.org/docid/5c6eb3344.html
   Google Scholar
• Jansen, S., & Spijkerboer, T. (2011). Fleeing homophobia: Asylum claims related to sexual orientation and gender identity in Europe. COC Netherlands. http://www.refworld.org/pdfid/4ebba7852.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Jubany, O. (2017). Screening asylum in a culture of disbelief: Truths, denials and skeptical borders. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40748-7
   Google Scholar
• Kagan, M. (2003). Is truth in the eye of the beholder? Objective credibility assessment in refugee status determination. Georgetown Immigration Law Journal, 17, 367–415. https://scholars.law.unlv.edu/facpub/633/
   Google Scholar
• Koçak, M. (2020). Who is “queerer” and deserves resettlement?: Queer asylum seekers and their deservingness of refugee status in Turkey. Middle East Critique, 29(1), 29–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/19436149.2020.1704506
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korkman, J., Pakkanen, T., & Laajasalo, T. (2017). Child forensic interviewing in Finland: Investigating suspected child abuse at the forensic psychology unit for children and adolescents. In S. Johansson, K. Stefansen, E. Bakketeig, & A. Kaldal (Eds.), Collaborating against child abuse: Exploring the Nordic Barnahus model (pp. 145–164). Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58388-4_7
   Google Scholar
• LaViolette, N. (2015). Sexual orientation, gender identity and the refugee determination process in Canada. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2276049
   Google Scholar
• Lidén, M. (2018). Confirmation bias in criminal cases. Uppsala University. https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/record.jsf?pid=diva2%3A1237959&dswid=-1964
   Google Scholar
• Maegherman, E., Veldhuizen, T. V., Amsterdam, V. U., & Horselenberg, R. (2018). Dropping the anchor: The use of plausibility in credibility assessments. Oxford Monitor of Forced Migration, 7(2), 37–55. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/331383215_Dropping_the_anchor_the_use_of_plausibility_in_credibility_assessments
   Google Scholar
• Malcolm, J. P. (2008). Heterosexually married men who have sex with men: Marital separation and psychological adjustment. Journal of Sex Research, 45(4), 350–357. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224490802398316
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonald, D. (2014). Freedom to be: Assessing the claims of LGBTQ asylum seekers. Socio-Legal Review, 10, 35–52. https://www.academia.edu/6817108/Freedom_To_Be_Assessing_the_Claims_of_LGBTQ_Asylum_Seekers
   Google Scholar
• McGhee, D. (2000). Accessing homosexuality: Truth, evidence and the legal practices for determining refugee status – the case of Ioan Vraciu. Body & Society, 6(1), 29–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/1357034X00006001003
   Google Scholar
• Memon, A. (2012). Credibility of asylum claims: Consistency and accuracy of autobiographical memory reports following trauma. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 26(5), 677–679. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.2868
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Millbank, J. (2009a). From discretion to disbelief: Recent trends in refugee determinations on the basis of sexual orientation in Australia and the United Kingdom. The International Journal of Human Rights, 13(11), 391–414. https://doi.org/10.1080/13642980902758218
   Google Scholar
• Millbank, J. (2009b). ‘The ring of truth’: A case study of credibility assessment in particular social group refugee determinations. International Journal of Refugee Law, 21(1), 1–33. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijrl/een040
   Google Scholar
• Milne, B., Shaw, G., & Bull, R. (2008). Investigative interviewing: The role of research. Applying Psychology to Criminal Justice, 65–80, https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470713068.ch4
   Google Scholar
• Mohr, J. J., Chopp, R. M., & Wong, S. J. (2013). Psychotherapists’ stereotypes of heterosexual, gay, and bisexual men. Journal of Gay & Lesbian Social Services, 25(1), 37–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10538720.2013.751885
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, D. A. (2006). Not gay enough for the government: Racial and sexual stereotypes in sexual orientation asylum cases. Law & Sexuality: A Review of Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender Legal Issues, 15, 135–162. http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/lsex15&id=141&div=&collection=journals
   Google Scholar
• Mulé, N. J. (2020). Safe haven questioned: Proof of identity over persecution of SOGIE asylum seekers and refugee claimants in Canada. Journal of Immigrant & Refugee Studies, 18(2), 207–223. https://doi.org/10.1080/15562948.2019.1639238
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray, D. A. B. (2016). Queer forms: Producing documentation in sexual orientation refugee cases. Anthropological Quarterly, 89(2), 465–484. https://doi.org/10.1353/anq.2016.0035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nickerson, R. S. (1998). Confirmation bias: A ubiquitous phenomenon in many guises. Review of General Psychology, 2(2), 175–220. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.2.2.175
   Google Scholar
• O’Leary, B. (2008). “We cannot claim any particular knowledge of the ways of homosexuals, still less of Iranian homosexuals … ”: The particular problems facing those who seek asylum on the basis of their sexual identity. Feminist Legal Studies, 16(1), 87–95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10691-007-9080-z
   Google Scholar
• Pietkiewicz, I. J., & Kołodziejczyk-Skrzypek, M. (2016). Living in sin? How gay catholics manage their conflicting sexual and religious identities. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 45(6), 1573–1585. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-016-0752-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Posselt, M., Baker, A., Deans, C., & Procter, N. (2020). Fostering mental health and well-being among workers who support refugees and asylum seekers in the Australian context. Health & Social Care in the Community, 28(5), 1658–1670. https://doi.org/10.1111/hsc.12991
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powell, M. B., Hughes-Scholes, C. H., & Sharman, S. J. (2012). Skill in interviewing reduces confirmation bias. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling, 9(2), 126–134. https://doi.org/10.1002/jip.1357
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raj, S. (2013). Protecting the persecuted: Sexual orientation and gender identity refugee claims. https://www.academia.edu/4217667/Protecting_the_Persecuted_Sexual_Orientation_and_Gender_Identity_Refugee_Claims
   Google Scholar
• Rehaag, S. (2008). Patrolling the borders of sexual orientation: Bisexual refugee claims in Canada. McGill Law Journal, 53, 59–102. https://digitalcommons.osgoode.yorku.ca/scholarly_works/2226/
   Google Scholar
• Rehaag, S. (2009). Bisexuals need not apply: A comparative appraisal of refugee law and policy in Canada, the United States, and Australia. The International Journal of Human Rights, 13(2–3), 415–436. https://doi.org/10.1080/13642980902758226
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, H., Fox, S., & Herlihy, J. (2015). The importance of looking credible: The impact of the behavioural sequelae of post-traumatic stress disorder on the credibility of asylum seekers. Psychology, Crime & Law, 21(2), 139–155. https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2014.951643
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savin-Williams, R. C. (2011). Identity development among sexual-minority youth. In S. Schwartz, K. Luyckx, & V. Vignoles (Eds.), Handbook of identity theory and research (pp. 671–689). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-7988-9_28
   Google Scholar
• Scavone, H. (2013). Queer evidence: The peculiar evidentiary burden faced by asylum applicants with cases based on sexual orientation and identity. Elon Law Review, 5(2), 389–414. https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v56.60
   Google Scholar
• Schick, V., Rosenberger, J. G., Herbenick, D., Calabrese, S. K., & Reece, M. (2012). Bidentity: Sexual behavior/identity congruence and women’s sexual, physical and mental well-being. Journal of Bisexuality, 12(2), 178–197. https://doi.org/10.1080/15299716.2012.674855
   Google Scholar
• Schuck, K. D., & Liddle, B. J. (2001). Religious conflicts experienced by lesbian, gay, and bisexual individuals. Journal of Gay & Lesbian Psychotherapy, 5(2), 63–82. https://doi.org/10.1300/J236v05n02_07
   Google Scholar
• Skrifvars, J., Korkman, J., Sui, V., van Veldhuizen, T., & Antfolk, J. (2020). An analysis of question style and type in official Finnish asylum interview transcripts. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling, 17(3), 333–348. https://doi.org/10.1002/jip.1557
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skrifvars, J., Sui, V., Antfolk, J., van Veldhuizen, T., & Korkman, J. (2021). Psychological assumptions underlying credibility assessments in Finnish asylum determinations. Psyarxiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/aeut9
   Google Scholar
• Southam, K. (2011). Who am I and who do you want me to be? Effectively defining a lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender social group in asylum applications. Chicago-Kent Law Review, 86(3), 1363–1387. https://scholarship.kentlaw.iit.edu/cklawreview/vol86/iss3/13
   Google Scholar
• Spirig, J. (2018). Like cases alike or asylum lottery? Inconsistency in judicial decision making at the Swiss Federal Administrative Court. University of Zurich. https://doi.org/10.5167/uzh-157718
   Google Scholar
• Topel, K. D. (2017). “So, what should I ask him to prove that he’s gay?”: How sincerity, and not stereotype, should dictate the outcome of an LGB asylum claim in the United States. Iowa Law Review, 102(5), 2357–2384. https://ilr.law.uiowa.edu/print/volume-102-issue-5/so-what-should-i-askhim-to-prove-that-hes-gay-how-sincerity-and-not-stereotype-should-dictate-the-outcome-of-an-lgb-asylum-claim-in-the-united-states/
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tschalaer, M. (2020). Between queer liberalisms and Muslim masculinities: LGBTQI+ Muslim asylum assessment in Germany. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 43(7), 1265–1283. https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.2019.1640378
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tskhay, K. O., & Rule, N. O. (2013). Accuracy in categorizing perceptually ambiguous groups: A review and meta-analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 17(1), 72–86. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868312461308
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UNHCR. (2012). Guidelines on international protection no. 9: Claims to refugee status based on sexual orientation and/or gender identity within the context of article 1(A)2 of the 1951 Convention and/or 1967 Protocol relating to the status of refugees. https://www.unhcr.org/509136ca9.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• UNHCR. (2013). Beyond proof. Credibility assessment in EU asylum systems. https://www.unhcr.org/protection/operations/51a8a08a9/full-report-beyond-proof-credibility-assessment-eu-asylum-systems.html
   Google Scholar
• UNHCR. (2019). Handbook on procedures and criteria for determining refugee status under the 1951 Convention and the 1967 protocol relating to the status of refugees. https://www.unhcr.org/publications/legal/5ddfcdc47/handbook-procedures-criteria-determining-refugee-status-under-1951-convention.html
   Google Scholar
• UNHCR. (2021). Figures at a glance. https://www.unhcr.org/figures-at-a-glance.html
   Google Scholar
• United Nations. (1951). The 1951 convention relating to the status of refugees. https://www.unhcr.org/4ca34be29.pdf
   Google Scholar
• van Veldhuizen, T. S. (2017). Where I come from and how I got here: Assessing credibility in asylum cases (Issue 2017). https://doi.org/10.26481/dis.20170922tsv
   Google Scholar
• van Veldhuizen, T. S., Horselenberg, R., Stel, M., Landström, S., Granhag, P. A., & van Koppen, P. J. (2017). The provenance of émigrés: The validity of measuring knowledge of places. Psychology, Crime & Law, 23(6), 553–574. https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2017.1284219
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Veldhuizen, T. S., Maas, R. P. A. E., Horselenberg, R., & van Koppen, P. J. (2018). Establishing origin: Analysing the questions asked in asylum interviews, Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 25(2), 283–302. https://doi.org/10.1080/13218719.2017.1376607
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vine, J. (2014). An investigation into the Home Office’s handling of asylum claims made on the grounds of sexual orientation. Open Government Licence. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/547330/Investigation-into-the-Handling-of-Asylum-Claims_Oct_2014.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Vrij, A., Hope, L., & Fisher, R. P. (2014). Eliciting reliable information in investigative interviews. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1(1), 129–136. https://doi.org/10.1177/2372732214548592
   Google Scholar
• Walker, K. (2000). Sexuality and refugee status in Australia. International Journal of Refugee Law, 12(2), 175–211. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijrl/12.2.175
   Google Scholar
• Yoshida, K. (2013). Missing the mark: Decision making on lesbian, gay (bisexual, trans and intersex) asylum Claims. https://uklgig.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/Missing-the-Mark.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Zapf, P. A., & Dror, I. E. (2017). Understanding and mitigating bias in forensic evaluation: Lessons from forensic science. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 16(3), 227–238. https://doi.org/10.1080/14999013.2017.1317302
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar