‘Tell me what just happened’: the effect of immediate recall on adult memory for instances of a repeated event

References

• Birdsey, E., & Snowball, L. (2013). Reporting violence to police: A survey of victims attending domestic violence services. Crime and Justice Statistics, Bureau Brief, iss. 9. https://www.women.nsw.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file.
   Google Scholar
• Brainerd, C. J., & Reyna, V. F. (2002). Fuzzy-trace theory and false memory. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11(5), 164–169. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.00192
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brainerd, C. J., & Reyna, V. F. (2004). Fuzzy-trace theory and memory development. Developmental Review, 24(4), 396–439. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2004.08.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bransford, J. D., & Johnson, M. K. (1972). Contextual prerequisites for understanding: Some investigations of comprehension and recall. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 11(6), 717–726. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(72)80006-9
   Google Scholar
• Carpenter, S. K. (2009). Cue strength as a moderator of the testing effect: The benefits of elaborative retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35(6), 1563–1569. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017021
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan, J. C. K., & LaPaglia, J. A. (2011). The dark side of testing memory: Repeated retrieval can enhance eyewitness suggestibility. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 17(4), 418–432. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025147
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan, J. C. K., Thomas, A. K., & Bulevich, J. B. (2009). Recalling a witnessed event increases eyewitness suggestibility. Psychological Science, 20(1), 66–73. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02245.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cochran, K. J., Greenspan, R. L., Bogart, D. F., & Loftus, E. F. (2016). Memory blindness: Altered memory reports lead to distortion in eyewitness memory. Memory & Cognition, 44(5), 717–726. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-016-0594-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connolly, D., & Lindsay, D. (2001). The influence of suggestions on children’s reports of a unique experience versus an instance of a repeated experience. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 15(2), 205–223. https://doi.org/10.1002/1099-0720(200103/04)15:2<205::AID-ACP698>3.0.CO;2-F
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cullen, H.J., Paterson, H.M., & van Golde, C. (2022). Does experiencing inattentional blindness for crime influence eyewitness recall?. Memory, 30(2), 206–216. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2021.2002906
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danby, M. C., Sharman, S. J., Brubacher, S. P., & Powell, M. B. (2019). The effects of episode similarity on children’s reports of a repeated event. Memory (Hove, England), 27(4), 561–567. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2018.1529798
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deck, S., & Paterson, H. M. (2021b). Adults’ ability to particularise an occurrence of a repeated event. Applied Cognitive Psychology, Advance online publication, https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3792
   Google Scholar
• Deck, S. L., & Paterson, H. M. (2021a). Adults also have difficulty recalling one instance of a repeated event. Applied Cognitive Psychology, Advance online publication, https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3736
   Google Scholar
• Dilevski, N., Paterson, H. M., & van Golde, C. (2020). Investigating the effect of emotional stress on adult memory for single and repeated events. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 26(4), 425–441. https://doi.org/10.1037/law0000248
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dilevski, N., Paterson, H. M., & van Golde, C. (2021a). Adult memory for instances of a repeated emotionally stressful event: Does retention interval matter? Memory (Hove, England), 29(1), 98–116. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2020.1860227
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dilevski, N., Paterson, H. M., & van Golde, C. (2022). ‘Tell me about the time you remember the best’: The effect of a remember best prompt on adults’ reports of a repeated emotionally stressful event. Psychology, Crime & Law, Advance online publication, https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2022.2027945
   Google Scholar
• Dilevski, N., Paterson, H. M., Walker, S. A., & van Golde, C. (2021b). Adult memory for specific instances of a repeated event: A preliminary review. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, https://doi.org/10.1080/13218719.2020.1837031
   Google Scholar
• Ebbesen, E. B., & Rienick, C. B. (1998). Retention interval and eyewitness memory for events and personal identifying attributes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83(5), 745–762. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.83.5.745
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farrer, M. J., & Goodman, G. S. (1992). Developmental changes in event memory. Child Development, 63(1), 173–187. https://doi.org/10.2307/1130911
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A., & Lang, A. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G*power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41(4), 1149–1160. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fivush, R. (1997). Event memory in early childhood. In N. Cowan (Ed.), The development of memory in childhood (pp. 139–161). Psychology Press/Erlbaum (UK) Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Fivush, R., Hudson, J., & Nelson, K. (1984). Children’s long-term memory for a novel event: An exploratory study. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 30(3), 303–316.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frenda, S. J., Nichols, R. M., & Loftus, E. F. (2011). Current issues and advances in misinformation research. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20(1), 20–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721410396620
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gabbert, F., Hope, L., & Fisher, R. P. (2009). Protecting eyewitness evidence: Examining the efficacy of a self-administered interview tool. Law and Human Behavior, 33(4), 298–307. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10979-008-9146-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gabbert, F., Hope, L., Fisher, R. P., & Jamieson, K. (2012). Protecting against misleading post-event information with a self-administered interview. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 26(4), 568–575. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.2828
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gittins, C. B., Paterson, H. M., & Sharpe, L. (2015). How does immediate recall of a stressful event affect psychological response to it? Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 46, 19–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbtep.2014.07.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hope, L., Gabbert, F., & Fisher, R. P. (2011). From laboratory to the street: Capturing witness memory using the self-administered interview. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 16(2), 211–226. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8333.2011.02015.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hope, L., Gabbert, F., Fisher, R. P., & Jamieson, K. (2014). Protecting and enhancing eyewitness memory: The impact of an initial recall attempt on performance in an investigative interview. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 28(3), 304–313. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.2984
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horry, R., Hughes, C., Sharma, A., Gabbert, F., & Hope, L. (2021). A meta-analytic review of the self-administered interview©: quantity and accuracy of details reported on initial and subsequent retrieval attempts. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 35(2), 428–444. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3753
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hudson, J., Fivush, R., & Kuebli, J. (1992). Scripts and episodes: The development of event memory. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 6(6), 483–505. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.2350060604
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hudson, J. A., & Mayhew, E. M. Y. (2008). The development of memory for recurring events. In M. Courage, & N. Cowan (Eds.), The development of memory in infancy and childhood (pp. 69–92). Psychology Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203934654.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, M., Hashtroudi, S., & Lindsay, D. (1993). Source monitoring. Psychological Bulletin, 114(1), 3–28. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.114.1.3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kebbell, M. R., & Milne, R. (1998). Police officers’ perceptions of eyewitness performance in forensic investigations. The Journal of Social Psychology, 138(3), 323–330. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224549809600384
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koriat, A., & Goldsmith, M. (1996). Monitoring and control processes in the strategic regulation of memory accuracy. Psychological Review, 103(3), 490–517. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.103.3.490
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krix, A.C., Sauerland, M., Gabbert, F., & Hope, L. (2014). Providing eyewitnesses with initial retrieval support: What works at immediate and subsequent recall? Psychology, Crime & Law, 20(10), 1005–1027. https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2014.902456
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loftus, E. F. (2005). Planting misinformation in the human mind: A 30-year investigation of the malleability of memory: Figure 1. Learning & Memory, 12(4), 361–366. https://doi.org/10.1101/lm.94705
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma, J., Paterson, H. M., & Temler, M. (2021). The effects of immediate recall and subsequent retrieval strategy on eyewitness memory. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, https://doi.org/10.1080/13218719.2021.1976303
   Google Scholar
• Mackay, T. L., & Paterson, H. M. (2015). How does timing of recall affect eyewitness memory and psychological distress? Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology, 30(4), 242–253. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11896-014-9156-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacLean, C. L., Coburn, P. I., Chong, K., & Connolly, D. L. (2018). Breaking script: Deviations and postevent information in adult memory for a repeated event. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 32(4), 474–486. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3421
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahé, A., Corson, Y., Verrier, N., & Payoux, M. (2015). Misinformation effect and centrality. European Review of Applied Psychology, 65(3), 155–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erap.2015.03.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDaniel, M. A., Kowitz, M. D., & Dunay, P. K. (1989). Altering memory through recall: The effects of cue-guided retrieval processing. Memory & Cognition, 17(4), 423–434. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03202614
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDaniel, M. A., & Masson, M. E. J. (1985). Altering memory representations through retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 11(2), 371–385. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.11.2.371
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMahon, M., & McGorrery, P. (2020). Criminalising coercive control: An introduction. In M. McMahon, & P. McGorrery (Eds.), Criminalising coercive control (pp. 3–32). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-0653-6.
   Google Scholar
• Modecki, K. L., Minchin, J., Harbaugh, A. G., Guerra, N. G., & Runions, K. C. (2014). Bullying prevalence across contexts: A meta-analysis measuring cyber and traditional bullying. Journal of Adolescent Health, 55(5), 602–611. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2014.06.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, K. N., & Lampinen, J. M. (2016). The use of recollection rejection in the misinformation paradigm. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 30(6), 992–1004. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3291
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, K. N., Lampinen, J. M., Gallo, D. A., Adams, E. J., & Bridges, A. J. (2018). Children’s use of memory editing strategies to reject source misinformation. Child Development, 89(1), 219–234. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12716
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nielsen, M. B., Matthiesen, S. B., & Einarsen, S. (2010). The impact of methodological moderators on prevalence rates of workplace bullying. A meta-analysis. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 83(4), 955–979. https://doi.org/10.1348/096317909X481256
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Odinot, G., & Wolters, G. (2006). Repeated recall, retention interval and the accuracy–confidence relation in eyewitness memory. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 20(7), 973–985. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1263
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paterson, H. M., Eijkemans, H., & Kemp, R. I. (2015). Investigating the impact of delayed administration on the efficacy of the self-administered interview. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 22(2), 307–317. https://doi.org/10.1080/13218719.2014.947670
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paterson, H. M., & Kemp, R. I. (2006). Comparing methods of encountering post-event information: The power of co-witness suggestion. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 20(8), 1083–1099. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1261
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paterson, H. M., van Golde, C., Devery, C., Cowdery, N., & Kemp, R. (2018). IWitnessed: Capturing contemporaneous accounts to enhance witness evidence. Current Issues in Criminal Justice, 29(3), 273–281. https://doi.org/10.1080/10345329.2018.12036102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paz-Alonso, P., & Goodman, G. (2008). Trauma and memory: Effects of post-event misinformation, retrieval order, and retention interval. Memory (Hove, England), 16(1), 58–75. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658210701363146
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powell, M., Roberts, K. P., Ceci, S., & Hembrooke, H. (1999). The effects of repeated experience on children’s suggestibility. Developmental Psychology, 35(6), 1462–1477. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.35.6.1462
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Price, H., & Connolly, D. (2004). Event frequency and children’s suggestibility: A study of cued recall responses. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 18(7), 809–821. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1059
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Price, H., Connolly, D., & Gordon, H. (2016). Children who experienced a repeated event only appear less accurate in a second interview than those who experienced a unique event. Law and Human Behavior, 40(4), 362–373. https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000194
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roebers, C. M., & Schneider, W. (2000). The impact of misleading questions on eyewitness memory in children and adults. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 14(6), 509–526. https://doi.org/10.1002/1099-0720(200011/12)14:6<509::AID-ACP668>3.0.CO;2-W
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roediger, H. L., & Butler, A. C. (2011). The critical role of retrieval practice in long-term retention. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15(1), 20–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2010.09.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roediger, H. L., & Karpicke, J. D. (2006a). The power of testing memory: Basic research and implications for educational practice. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1(3), 181–210. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6916.2006.00012.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roediger, H. L., & Karpicke, J. D. (2006b). Test-Enhanced learning. Psychological Science, 17(3), 249–255. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01693.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubínová, E., Blank, H., Koppel, J., Dufková, E., & Ost, J. (2022). Repeated recall of repeated events: Accuracy and consistency. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2021.09.003
   Google Scholar
• Rubínová, E., Blank, H., Koppel, J., & Ost, J. (2021). Schema and deviation effects in remembering repeated unfamiliar stories. British Journal of Psychology, 112(1), 180–206. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12449
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubínová, E., Blank, H., Ost, J., & Fitzgerald, R. (2020a). Structured word-lists as a model of basic schemata: Deviations from content and order in a repeated event paradigm. Memory (Hove, England), 28(3), 309–322. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2020.1712421
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubínová, E., & Kontogianni, F. (2022). Sources and destinations of misattributions in recall of instances of repeated events. Memory & Cognition, Advance online publication, https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-022-01300-7
   Google Scholar
• Schank, R., & Abelson, R. (2013). Scripts, plans, goals and understanding: An inquiry into human knowledge structures. L. Erlbaum Associates. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203781036.
   Google Scholar
• Shaw, J. S., Bjork, R. A., & Handal, A. (1995). Retrieval-induced forgetting in an eyewitness-memory paradigm. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2(2), 249–253. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03210965
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slackman, E., & Nelson, K. (1984). Acquisition of an unfamiliar script in story form by young children. Child Development, 55(2), 329–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/1129946
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stark, E. (2012). Looking beyond domestic violence: Policing coercive control. Journal of Police Crisis Negotiations, 12(2), 199–217. https://doi.org/10.1080/15332586.2012.725016
   Google Scholar
• Stille, L., Norin, E., & Sikström, S. (2017). Self-delivered misinformation - merging the choice blindness and misinformation effect paradigms. PloS One, 12(3), e0173606–e0173606. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0173606
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Theunissen, T., Meyer, T., Memon, A., & Weinsheimer, C. (2017). Adult eyewitness memory for single versus repeated traumatic events. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 31(2), 164–174. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3314
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woiwod, D., Fitzgerald, R., Sheahan, C., Price, H., & Connolly, D. (2019). A meta-analysis of differences in children’s reports of single and repeated events. Law and Human Behavior, 43(1), 99–116. https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000312
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, A. M., & Holliday, R. E. (2007). Enhancing the recall of young, young-old and old-old adults with cognitive interviews. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 21(1), 19–43. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1260
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, D. B., Self, G., & Justice, C. (2000). Memory conformity: Exploring misinformation effects when presented by another person. British Journal of Psychology, 91(2), 189–202. https://doi.org/10.1348/000712600161781
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, D. B., & Stroud, J. N. (1998). Memory quality and misinformation for peripheral and central objects. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 3(2), 273–286. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8333.1998.tb00366.x
   Google Scholar
• Yeong, S., & Poynton, S. (2017). Evaluation of the 2015 Domestic Violence Evidence-in-Chief (DVEC) reforms. Crime and Justice Statistics, Bureau Brief, iss. 205. https://www.bocsar.nsw.gov.au/Publications/CJB/2017-Report-Evaluation-of-the-2015-Domestic-Violence-Evidence-in-Chief-DVEC-reforms-CJB206.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Zapf, D., Escartin, J., Scheppa-Lahyani, M., Einarsen, S. V., Hoel, H., & Vartia, M. (2020). Empirical findings on prevalence and risk groups of bullying in the workplace. In S. V. Einarsen, H. Hoel, D. Zapf, & C. L. Cooper (Eds.), Bullying and harassment in the workplace (pp. 105–162). CRC Press.
   Google Scholar