Mindsets of criminality: predicting punitive and rehabilitative attitudes

References

• Alexander, M. (2012). The new Jim Crow: Mass incarceration in the age of colorblindness. The New Press.
   Google Scholar
• Alicke, M. D. (2000). Culpable control and the psychology of blame. Psychological Bulletin, 126(4), 556–574. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.126.4.556
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Babij, A., Burnette, J. L., & Hoyt, C. L. (February, 2022). Mindsets of mental illness: Are there double-edged sword effects of growth mindsets on prejudice? Poster presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology (SPSP), San Francisco, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Brookman, R., Wiener, K., DeSoto, W., & Tajalli, H. (2022). Racial animus and its association with punitive sentencing and crime types: Do Australian community attitudes reflect the United States’? Journal of Criminology, 55(1) 23-46, https://doi.org/10.1177/26338076211051785
   Google Scholar
• Burnette, J. L., Forsyth, R. B., Desmarais, S. L., & Hoyt, C. L. (2019). Mindsets of addiction: Implications for treatment intentions. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 38(5), 367–394. https://doi.org/10.1521/jscp.2019.38.5.367
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burnette, J. L., Hoyt, C. L., Dweck, C. S., & Auster-Gussman, L. (2017). Weight beliefs and messages: Mindsets predict body-shame and anti-fat attitudes via attributions. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 47(11), 616–624. https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12464
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burton, A. L., Cullen, F. T., Burton, V. S., Graham, A., Butler, L. C., & Thielo, A. J. (2020). Belief in redeemability and punitive public opinion: “Once a criminal, always a criminal” revisited. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 47(6), 712–732. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854820913585
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carroll, J. S., Perkowitz, W. T., Lurigio, A. J., & Weaver, F. M. (1987). Sentencing goals, causal attributions, ideology, and personality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(1), 107–118. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.52.1.107
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caruso, G. D. (2020). Justice without retribution: An epistemic argument against retributive criminal punishment. Neuroethics, 13(1), 13–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12152-018-9357-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheung, B. Y., & Heine, S. J. (2015). The double-edged sword of genetic accounts of criminality. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 41(12), 1723–1738. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167215610520
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiu, C., Hong, Y., & Dweck, C. S. (1997). Lay dispositionism and implicit theories of personality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73(1), 19–30. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.73.1.19
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cochran, J. K., Boots, D. P., & Heide, K. M. (2003). Attribution styles and attitudes toward capital punishment for juveniles, the mentally incompetent, and the mentally retarded. Justice Quarterly, 20(1), 65–93. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418820300095461
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cochran, J. K., & Sanders, B. A. (2009). The gender gap in death penalty support: An exploratory study. Journal of Criminal Justice, 37(6), 525–533. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2009.09.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cullen, F. T., Clark, G. A., Cullen, J. B., & Mathers, R. A. (1985). Attribution, salience, and attitudes toward criminal sanctioning. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 12(3), 305–331. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854885012003003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darley, J. M., Carlsmith, K. M., & Robinson, P. H. (2000). Incapacitation and just deserts as motives for punishment. Law and Human Behavior, 24(6), 659–683. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005552203727
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Kraker-Pauw, E., Van Wesel, F., Krabbendam, L., & Van Atteveldt, N. (2017). Teacher mindsets concerning the malleability of intelligence and the appraisal of achievement in the context of feedback. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01594
   Google Scholar
• de Vel-Palumbo, M., Howarth, L., & Brewer, M. B. (2019). ‘Once a sex offender always a sex offender’? Essentialism and attitudes towards criminal justice policy. Psychology, Crime & Law, 25(5), 421–439. https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2018.1529234
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dodd, S. (2017). The punitive woman? Gender differences in public attitudes toward parole among an Australian sample. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 62(10), 3006–3022. doi:10.1177/0306624 (17739560)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duckitt, J. (2009). Punishment attitudes: Their social and psychological bases. In M. Oswald, S. Bieneck, & J. Hupfeld-Heinemann (Eds.), Social psychology of punishment of crime (pp. 75–92). Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Dweck, C. S. (2000). Self-theories: Their role in motivation, personality, and development. Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eubanks, V. (2019). Automating inequality: How high-tech tools profile, police, and punish the poor. St. Martin’s Press.
   Google Scholar
• Frost, N. A. (2010). Beyond public opinion polls: Punitive public sentiment & criminal justice policy. Sociology Compass, 4(3), 156–168. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9020.2009.00269.x
   Google Scholar
• Gervey, B. M., Chiu, C. Y., Hong, Y.-Y., & Dweck, C. S. (1999). Differential use of person information in decisions about guilt versus innocence: The role of implicit theories. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25(1), 17–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167299025001002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gil-White, F. J. (2001). Are ethnic groups biological “species” to the human brain? Current Anthropology, 42(4), 515–553. https://doi.org/10.1086/321802
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, S., Weiner, B., & Zucker, G. S. (1997). An attributional analysis of punishment goals and public reactions to O. J. Simpson. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23(4), 331–346. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167297234001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gromet, D. M., & Darley, J. M. (2011). Political ideology and reactions to crime victims: Preferences for restorative and punitive responses. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 8(4), 830–855. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-1461.2011.01242.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gudjonsson, G. H., & Singh, K. K. (1989). The revised Gudjonsson blame attribution inventory. Personality and Individual Differences, 10(1), 67–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(89)90179-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harper, C. A., & Bartels, R. M. (2017). The influence of implicit theories and offender characteristics on judgements of sexual offenders: A moderated mediation analysis. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 23(2), 139–150. https://doi.org/10.1080/13552600.2016.1250963
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harper, C. A., & Bartels, R. M. (2018). Implicit theories and offender representativeness in judgments about sexual crime. Sexual Abuse, 30(3), 276–295. https://doi.org/10.1177/1079063216658019
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haslam, N., & Ernst, D. (2002). Essentialist beliefs about mental disorders. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 21(6), 628–644. https://doi.org/10.1521/jscp.21.6.628.22793
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes, A. F. (2018). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach (2nd ed.). Guilford Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Hetey, R. C., & Eberhardt, J. L. (2014). Racial disparities in incarceration increase acceptance of punitive policies. Psychological Science, 25(10), 1949–1954. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797614540307
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirschfeld, L. A. (1996). Race in the making: Cognition, culture, and the child’s construction of human kinds. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hitlin, P. (2016). Research in the crowdsourcing age: A case study. Pew Research Center. https://assets.pewresearch.org/wpcontent/uploads/sites/14/2016/07/PI_2016.07.11_Mechanical-Turk_FINAL.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Hogan, M. J., Chiricos, T., & Gertz, M. (2005). Economic insecurity, blame, and punitive attitudes. Justice Quarterly, 22(3), 392–412. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418820500219144
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoyt, C. L., & Burnette, J. L. (2013). Gender bias in leader evaluations. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39(10), 1306–1319. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167213493643
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoyt, C. L., & Burnette, J. L. (2020). Growth mindset messaging in stigma-relevant contexts: Harnessing benefits without costs. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 7(2), 157–164. https://doi.org/10.1177/2372732220941216
   Google Scholar
• Hoyt, C. L., Burnette, J. L., Billingsley, J., Babij, A., & Becker, W. (2022). Mindsets of poverty: Implications for stigma and redistributive policy support. Journal of Applied Social Psychology..
   Google Scholar
• Kroner, D. G., & Mills, J. F. (2004). The criminal attribution inventory. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 39(4), 15–29. https://doi.org/10.1300/J076v39n04_02
   Google Scholar
• Lau, G. D. M., Tyson, G. A., & Bond, M. H. (2009). To punish or to rehabilitate: Sentencing goals as mediators between values, axioms and punitiveness towards offenders. Journal of Psychology in Chinese Societies, 10(1), 57–84.
   Google Scholar
• Ling, S., Umbach, R., & Raine, A. (2019). Biological explanations of criminal behavior. Psychology, Crime & Law, 25(6), 626–640. https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2019.1572753
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Litman, L., Robinson, J., & Abberbock, T. (2017). TurkPrime.com: A versatile crowdsourcing data acquisition platform for the behavioral sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 49(2), 433–442. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-016-0727-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maffly-Kipp, J., Rivera, G. N., Schlegel, R. J., & Vess, M. (2022). The effect of true self-attributions on the endorsement of retributive and restorative justice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 48(8), 1284-1297, https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672211027473
   Google Scholar
• Martin, J., & Cushman, F. (2016). When we don’t blame people for their bad deeds. Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/2016/02/when-we-dont-blame-people-for-their-bad-deeds.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, J. W., & Heiphetz, L. (2021). “Internally wicked”: investigating how and why essentialism influences punitiveness and moral condemnation. Cognitive Science, 45(6), Article e12991, https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12991
   Google Scholar
• Maruna, S., & King, A. (2009). Once a criminal, always a criminal?: ‘redeemability’ and the psychology of punitive public attitudes. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 15(1-2), 7–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10610-008-9088-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKee, I. R., & Feather, N. T. (2008). Revenge, retribution, and values: Social attitudes and punitive sentencing. Social Justice Research, 21(2), 138–163. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-008-0066-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molden, D. C., & Dweck, C. S. (2006). Finding “meaning” in psychology: A lay theories approach to self-regulation, social perception, and social development. American Psychologist, 61(3), 192–203. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.61.3.192
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moss, S. A., Lee, E., Berman, A., & Rung, D. (2019). When do people value rehabilitation and restorative justice over the punishment of offenders? Victims & Offenders, 14(1), 32–51. https://doi.org/10.1080/15564886.2018.1539688
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peleg-Koriat, I., Weimann-Saks, D., & Halperin, E. (2020). The moderating role of psychological distance on the impact of malleability beliefs on public attitudes toward punishment. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 59(7), 416–432. https://doi.org/10.1080/10509674.2020.1784349
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pirlott, A. G., & MacKinnon, D. P. (2016). Design approaches to experimental mediation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 66, 29–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2015.09.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pratt, J. (2007). Penal populism: Key ideas in criminology. Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.
   Google Scholar
• Prentice, D. A., & Miller, D. T. (2006). Essentializing differences between women and men. Psychological Science, 17(2), 129–135. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01675.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rade, C. B., Desmarais, S. L., & Burnette, J. L. (2018). An integrative theoretical model of public support for ex-offender reentry. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 62(8), 2131–2152. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X17714110
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rattan, A. (2019). Confronting prejudice and discrimination. Confronting Prejudice and Discrimination, 121–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-814715-3.00008-4
   Google Scholar
• Rattan, A., & Dweck, C. S. (2018). What happens after prejudice is confronted in the workplace? How mindsets affect minorities’ and women’s outlook on future social relations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 103(6), 676–687. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000287
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rhodes, M., Leslie, S. J., & Tworek, C. M. (2012). Cultural transmission of social essentialism. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(34), 13526–13531. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1208951109
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson, P. H., & Darley, J. M. (1995). Justice, liability, and blame: Community views and the criminal law. New York Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Rothbart, M., & Taylor, M. (1992). Category labels and social reality: Do we view social categories as natural kinds? In G. R. Semin, & K. Fiedler (Eds.), Language, interaction and social cognition (pp. 11–36). Sage Publications, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Ryazanov, A. A., & Christenfeld, N. J. S. (2018). Incremental mindsets and the reduced forgiveness of chronic failures. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 76, 33–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2017.12.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlenker, B. R., Britt, T. W., Pennington, J., Murphy, R., & Doherty, K. (1994). The triangle model of responsibility. Psychological Review, 101(4), 632–652. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.101.4.632
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaver, K. G. (1975). An introduction to attribution processes. Winthrop.
   Google Scholar
• Shaver, K. G. (1985). The attribution of blame: Causality, responsibility, and blameworthiness. Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Tam, K. P., Shu, T.-M., Ng, H. K. S., & Tong, Y. Y. (2013). Belief about immutability of moral character and punitiveness toward criminal offenders. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 43(3), 603–611. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2013.01041.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tulley, M., & Chiu, L. H. (1995). Student teachers and classroom discipline. The Journal of Educational Research, 88(3), 164–171. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.1995.9941295
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiner, B. (1985). An attributional theory of achievement motivation and emotion. Psychological Review, 92(4), 548–573. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.92.4.548
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeager, D. S., & Dweck, C. S. (2020). What can be learned from growth mindset controversies? American Psychologist, 75(9), 1269–1284. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000794
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar