Keep it simple: Concise instructions may help jurors devalue eyewitness courtroom confidence when evaluating suspect guilt

References

• Baguley, C. M., McKimmie, B. M., & Masser, B. M. (2017). Deconstructing the simplification of jury instructions: How simplifying the features of complexity affects jurors’ application of instructions. Law and Human Behavior, 41(3), 284–304. https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000234
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradfield, A., & McQuiston, D. E. (2004). When does evidence of eyewitness confidence inflation affect judgments in a criminal trial? Law and Human Behavior, 28(4), 369–387. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:LAHU.0000039331.54147.ff
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brewer, N., & Burke, A. (2002). Effects of testimonial inconsistencies and eyewitness confidence on mock-juror judgments. Law and Human Behavior, 26(3), 353–364. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015380522722
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlson, C. A., Dias, J. L., Weatherford, D. R., & Carlson, M. A. (2017). An investigation of the weapon focus effect and the confidence–accuracy relationship for eyewitness identification. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 6(1), 82–92. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0101806
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlson, C. A., Lockamyeir, R. F., Jones, A. R., & Hemby, J. A. (2022). How potential jurors evaluate eyewitness confidence and decision time statements across identification procedures and for different eyewitness decisions. Psychology, Crime & Law, 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2022.2038156
   Google Scholar
• Carlson, M. A., Carlson, C. A., & Fitzsimmons, C. (in press). The sleepy eyewitness: Self-reported sleep predicts eyewitness memory. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, https://doi.org/10.1037/mac0000076
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed). Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Cutler, B. L., Penrod, S. D., & Dexter, H. R. (1989). The eyewitness, the expert psychologist, and the jury. Law and Human Behavior, 13(3), 311–332. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01067032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cutler, B. L., Penrod, S. D., & Stuve, T. E. (1988). Juror decision making in eyewitness identification cases. Law and Human Behavior, 12(1), 41–55. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01064273
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deck, S. L., & Paterson, H. M. (2021). Eyewitnesses who engage in immediate recall are not perceived as more credible. Psychology, Crime, & Law. Advance online publication.
   Google Scholar
• Dillon, M. K., Jones, A. M., Bergold, A. N., Hui, C. Y., & Penrod, S. D. (2017). Henderson instructions: Do they enhance evidence evaluation? Journal of Forensic Psychology Research and Practice, 17(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/15228932.2017.1235964
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dodson, C. S., & Dobolyi, D. G. (2016). Confidence and eyewitness identifications: The cross-race effect, decision time and accuracy. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 30(1), 113–125. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3178
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dodson, C. S., Garrett, B. L., Kafadar, K., & Yaffe, J. (2020). Eyewitness identification speed: Slow identifications from highly confident eyewitnesses hurt perceptions of their testimony. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 10(2), 259–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2020.08.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ecker, U. K. H., Lewandowsky, S., Cook, J., Schmid, P., Fazio, L. K., Brashier, N., Kendeou, P., Vraga, E. K., & Amazeen, M. A. (2022). The psychological drivers of misinformation belief and its resistance to correction. Nature Reviews Psychology, 1(1), 13–29. http://doi.org/10.1038/s44159-021-00006-y
   Google Scholar
• Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A. G., & Buchner, A. (2007). GPower 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox, S. G., & Walters, H. A. (1986). The impact of general versus specific expert testimony and eyewitness confidence upon mock juror judgment. Law and Human Behavior, 10(3), 215–228. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01046211
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garrett, B. L. (2011). Convicting the innocent: Where criminal prosecutions go wrong. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Garrett, B. L., Crozier, W., Modjadidi, K., Liu, A., Kafadar, K., Yaffe, J., & Dodson, C. (2022). Sensitizing jurors to eyewitness confidence using “Reason-Based”. Judicial Instructions Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, http://doi.org/10.1037/mac0000035
   Google Scholar
• Garrett, B. L., Liu, A., Kafadar, K., Yaffe, J., & Dodson, C. S. (2020). Factoring the role of eyewitness evidence in the courtroom. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 17(3), 556–579. https://doi.org/10.1111/jels.12259
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giacona, A. M., Lampinen, J. M., & Anastasi, J. S. (2021). Estimator variables can matter even for high-confidence lineup identifications made under pristine conditions. Law and Human Behavior, 45(3), 256–270. https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000381
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, A. M., Bergold, A. N., Dillon, M. K., & Penrod, S. D. (2017). Comparing the effectiveness of Henderson instructions and expert testimony: Which safeguard improves jurors’ evaluations of eyewitness evidence? Journal of Experimental Criminology, 13(1), 29–52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-016-9279-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, A. M., & Penrod, S. (2018). Improving the effectiveness of the Henderson instruction safeguard against unreliable eyewitness identification. Psychology, Crime & Law, 24(2), 177–193. https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2017.1390113
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, E. E., Williams, K. D., & Brewer, N. (2008). I had a confidence epiphany!”: Obstacles to combating post-identification confidence inflation. Law and Human Behavior, 32(2), 164–176. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10979-007-9101-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Key, K. N., Neuschatz, J. S., Gronlund, S. D., Deloach, D., Wetmore, S. A., McAdoo, R. M., & McCollum, D. (2022). High eyewitness confidence is always compelling: That’s a problem. Psychology, Crime & Law, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2021.2007912
   Google Scholar
• Lockamyeir, R. F., Carlson, C. A., Jones, A. R., Carlson, M. A., & Weatherford, D. R. (2020). The effect of viewing distance on empirical discriminability and the confidence–accuracy relationship for eyewitness identification. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 34(5), 1047–1060. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3683
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mickes, L. (2015). Receiver operating characteristic analysis and confidence–accuracy characteristic analysis in investigations of system variables and estimator variables that affect eyewitness memory. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 4(2), 93–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2015.01.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MurdockJrB. B. (1962). The serial position effect of free recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64(5), 482–488. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0045106
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council. (2015). Identifying the culprit: Assessing eyewitness identification. The National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nelder, J. (1977). A reformulation of linear models. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (General), 140(1), 48–63. https://doi.org/10.2307/2344517
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palmer, S. E., Schloss, K. B., & Sammartino, J. (2013). Visual aesthetics and human preference. Annual Review of Psychology, 64(1), 77–107. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100504
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pawlenko, N. B., Safer, M. A., Wise, R. A., & Holfeld, B. (2013). A teaching aid for improving jurors’ assessments of eyewitness accuracy. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 27(2), 190–197. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.2895
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schweitzer, K., & Nuñez, N. (2021). The effect of evidence order on jurors’ verdicts: Primacy and recency effects with strongly and weakly probative evidence. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 35(6), 1510–1522. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3884
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Semmler, C., & Brewer, N. (2002). Effects of mood and emotion on juror processing and judgments. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 20(4), 423–436. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.502
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skalon, A., Roque, M. S., & Beaudry, J. L. (2020). An interdisciplinary and cross-national analysis of legal safeguards for eyewitness evidence. In M. K. Miller & B. H. Bornstein (Eds.), Advances in psychology and law (pp. 137–178). Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Slane, C. R., & Dodson, C. S. (2022). Eyewitness confidence and mock juror decisions of guilt: A meta-analytic review. Law and Human Behavior, 46(1), 45–66. https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000481
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smalarz, L., & Wells, G. L. (2014). Post-identification feedback to eyewitnesses impairs evaluators’ abilities to discriminate between accurate and mistaken testimony. Law and Human Behavior, 38(2), 194–202. https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000067
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steblay, N., Hosch, H. M., Culhane, S. E., & McWethy, A. (2006). The impact on juror verdicts of judicial instruction to disregard inadmissible evidence: A meta-analysis. Law and Human Behavior, 30(4), 469–492. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10979-006-9039-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tenney, E. R., MacCoun, R. J., Spellman, B. A., & Hastie, R. (2007). Calibration trumps confidence as a basis for witness credibility. Psychological Science, 18(1), 46–50. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01847.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wells, G. L., & Bradfield, A. L. (1998). “Good, you identified the suspect”: Feedback to eyewitnesses distorts their reports of the witnessing experience. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83(3), 360–376. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.83.3.360
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wells, G. L., Lindsay, R. C., & Ferguson, T. J. (1979). Accuracy, confidence, and juror perceptions in eyewitness identification. Journal of Applied Psychology, 64(4), 440–448. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.64.4.440
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wise, R. A., & Kehn, A. (2020). Can the effectiveness of eyewitness expert testimony be improved? Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 27(2), 315–330. https://doi.org/10.1080/13218719.2020.1733696
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wixted, J. T., Mickes, L., Brewin, C. R., Andrews, B., (2022). Doing right by the eyewitness evidence: A response to Berkowitz et al. Memory (Hove, England), 30(1), 73–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2021.1940206
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wixted, J. T., & Wells, G. L. (2017). The relationship between eyewitness confidence and identification accuracy: A new synthesis. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 18(1), 10–65. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100616686966
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, D. B., & Skagerberg, E. M. (2007). Postidentification feedback affects real eyewitnesses. Psychological Science, 18(2), 172–178. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01868.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar