Effect of expectations and retention interval on prospective person memory and vigilance

References

• Asdigian, N. L., Finkelhor, D., & Hotaling, G. (1995). Varieties of nonfamily abduction of children and adolescents. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 22(3), 215–232. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854895022003002
   Google Scholar
• Averell, L., & Heathcote, A. (2011). The form of the forgetting curve and the fate of memories. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 55(1), 25–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmp.2010.08.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191–215. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benjamin, A. S., Diaz, M., & Wee, S. (2009). Signal detection with criterion noise: Applications to recognition memory. Psychological Review, 116(1), 84–115. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014351
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berntsen, D. (1998). Voluntary and involuntary access to autobiographical memory. Memory (Hove, England), 6(2), 113–141. https://doi.org/10.1080/741942071
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boss, P. (2009). Ambiguous loss: Learning to live with unresolved grief. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brandimonte, M. A., & Passolunghi, M. C. (1994). The effect of cue-familiarity, cue-distinctiveness, and retention interval on prospective remembering. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47(3), 565–587. https://doi.org/10.1080/14640749408401128
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carr, D., Muschert, G. W., Kinney, J., Robbins, E., Petonito, G., Manning, L., & Brown, J. S. (2010). Silver alerts and the problem of missing adults with dementia. The Gerontologist, 50(2), 149–157. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnp102
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chance, J. E., & Goldstein, A. G. (1987). Retention interval and face recognition: Response latency measures. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 25(6), 415–418. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03334728
   Google Scholar
• Deffenbacher, K. A., Bornstein, B. H., McGorty, E. K., & Penrod, S. D. (2008). Forgetting the once-seen face: Estimating the strength of an eyewitness’s memory representation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 14(2), 139–150. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-898X.14.2.139
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeYoung, R., & Buzzi, B. (2003). Ultimate coping strategies: The differences among parents of murdered or abducted, long-term missing children. OMEGA-Journal of Death and Dying, 47(4), 343–360. https://doi.org/10.2190/QYTT-GC1X-MNLX-6WLU
   Google Scholar
• Ebbinghaus, H. (1885). Memory: A contribution to experimental psychology. Dover.
   Google Scholar
• Einstein, G. O., Holland, L. J., McDaniel, M. A., & Guynn, M. J. (1992). Age-related deficits in prospective memory: The influence of task complexity. Psychology and Aging, 7(3), 471–478. https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.7.3.471
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Einstein, G. O., & McDaniel, M. A. (1990). Normal aging and prospective memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16(4), 717–726. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.16.4.717
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Einstein, G. O., & McDaniel, M. A. (1996). Retrieval processes in prospective memory: Theoretical approaches and some new empirical findings. In M. Brandimonte, G. O. Einstein, & M. A. McDaniel (Eds.), Prospective memory: Theory and applications (pp. 115–142). Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Einstein, G. O., McDaniel, M. A., Manzi, M., Cochran, B., & Baker, M. (2000). Prospective memory and aging: Forgetting intentions over short delays. Psychology and Aging, 15(4), 671–683. https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.15.4.671
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Einstein, G. O., McDaniel, M. A., Thomas, R., Mayfield, S., Shank, H., Morrisette, N., & Breneiser, J. (2005). Multiple processes in prospective memory retrieval: Factors determining monitoring versus spontaneous retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 134(3), 327–342. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.134.3.327
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eistein, G. O., & McDaniel, M. A. (2008). Prospective memory and metamemory: The skilled use of basic attentional and memory processes. In A. S. Benjamin, & B. Ross (Eds.), The psychology of learning and motivation, Vol. 48 (pp. 145–173). Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Erdfelder, E., Faul, F., & Buchner, A. (1996). GPOWER: A general power analysis program. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 28(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03203630
   Google Scholar
• Ferguson, L., & Soave, V. (2021). # missing to# found: Exploring police Twitter use for missing persons investigations. Police Practice and Research, 22(1), 869–885. https://doi.org/10.1080/15614263.2020.1753516
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finkelhor, D., Hammer, H., & Sedlak, A. J. (2002). Non-family abducted children: National estimates and characteristics. National Incidence Studies of Missing, Abducted, Runaway, and Thrown Away Children. U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
   Google Scholar
• Finkelhor, D., Hotaling, G. T., & Sedlak, A. J. (1992). The abduction of children by strangers and nonfamily members: Estimating the incidence using multiple methods. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 7(2), 226–243. https://doi.org/10.1177/088626092007002008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading. Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Fisk, A. D., & Schneider, W. (1981). Control and automatic processing during tasks requiring sustained attention: A new approach to vigilance. Human Factors, 23(6), 737–750. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872088102300610
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fong, R., & Cardoso, J. B. (2010). Child human trafficking victims: Challenges for the child welfare system. Evaluation and Program Planning, 33(3), 311–316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2009.06.018
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gier, V. S., Kreiner, D. S., & Hudnell, W. J. (2012). AMBER alerts: Are school-type photographs the best choice for identifying missing children? Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology, 27(1), 9–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11896-011-9085-z
   Google Scholar
• Gier, V. S., Kreiner, D. S., & Lampinen, J. M. (2017). Factors affecting recognition of senior citizens in a silver alert. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology, 32(3), 185–196. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11896-016-9210-0
   Google Scholar
• Gipson, N. I., & Lampinen, J. M. (2020). Within lab familiarity through ambient images alone. Visual Cognition, 28(3), 165–179. https://doi.org/10.1080/13506285.2020.1749743
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenhalgh, M., & Shalev Greene, K. (2021). Impact of police cuts on missing person investigations. Centre for the Study of Missing Persons. University of Portsmouth. https://pure.port.ac.uk/ws/portalfiles/portal/28691081/Final_version.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Greif, G. L., & Hegar, R. L. (1991). Parents whose children are abducted by the other parent: Implications for treatment. American Journal of Family Therapy, 19(3), 215–225. https://doi.org/10.1080/01926189108250853
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grier, R. A., Warm, J. S., Dember, W. N., Matthews, G., Galinsky, T. L., Szalma, J. L., & Parasuraman, R. (2003). The vigilance decrement reflects limitations in effortful attention, not mindlessness. Human Factors, 45(3), 349–359. https://doi.org/10.1518/hfes.45.3.349.27253
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardin, G. (1968). The tragedy of the commons. Science, 162(3859), 1243–1248. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.162.3859.1243
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hautus, M. J. (1995). Corrections for extreme proportions and their biasing effects on estimated values of d′. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 27(1), 46–51. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03203619
   Google Scholar
• Heide, K. M., Beauregard, E., & Myers, W. C. (2009). Sexually motivated child abduction murders: Synthesis of the literature and case illustration. Victims and Offenders, 4(1), 58–75. https://doi.org/10.1080/15564880802561770
   Google Scholar
• Henderson, M., Henderson, P., & Kiernan, C. (2000). Missing persons: Incidence, issues and impacts. Australian Institute of Criminology: Trends and Issues in Crime and Criminal Justice, Number 144.
   Google Scholar
• Hicks, J. L., Marsh, R. L., & Russell, E. J. (2000). The properties of retention intervals and their effect on retaining prospective memories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26(5), 1160–1169. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.26.5.1160
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmes, L. (2016). Missing person appeals: A UK perspective. In S. Morewitz, & C. Sturdy-Colls (Eds.), Handbook of missing persons (pp. 19–35). Springer Nature.
   Google Scholar
• Hunt, D., Ioannou, M., & Synnott, J. (2021). Reporting missing children to the police: A qualitative exploration of the factors associated with contacting or not contacting the police. The Police Journal, 35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11896-019-09362-1.
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins, R., White, D., Van Montfort, X., & Burton, A. M. (2011). Variability in photos of the same face. Cognition, 121(3), 313–323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2011.08.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Juncu, S., Blank, H., Fitzgerald, R. J., & Hope, L. (2020). Do image variability and names in missing person appeals improve prospective person memory? Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 9(3), 410–418. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0101854
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lampinen, J. M., Arnal, J., & Hicks, J. L. (2009a). The effectiveness of supermarket posters in helping to find missing children. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 24(3), 406–423. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260508317184
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lampinen, J. M., Arnal, J. D., & Hicks, J. L. (2009b). Prospective person memory. In M. Kelley (Ed.), Applied memory (pp. 167–184). Hauppauge.
   Google Scholar
• Lampinen, J. M., Curry, C. R., & Erickson, W. B. (2016). Prospective person memory: The role of self-efficacy, personal interaction, and multiple images in recognition of wanted persons. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology, 31(1), 59–70. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11896-015-9164-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lampinen, J. M., Miller, J. T., & Dehon, H. (2012b). Depicting the missing: Prospective and retrospective person memory for age progressed images. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 26(2), 167–173. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1819
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lampinen, J. M., & Moore, K. N. (2016a). Prospective person memory in the search for missing persons. In S. Morewitz, & C. Sturdy-Colls (Eds.), Handbook of missing persons (pp. 145–162). Springer Nature.
   Google Scholar
• Lampinen, J. M., & Moore, K. N. (2016b). Missing person alerts: Does repeated exposure decrease their effectiveness? Journal of Experimental Criminology, 12(4), 587–598. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-016-9263-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lampinen, J. M., Peters, C. S., & Gier, V. S. (2012a). Power in numbers: The effect of target set size on prospective person memory in an analog missing child scenario. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 26(5), 702–708. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.2848
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lampinen, J. M., & Sweeney, L. N. (2014). Associated adults: Prospective person memory for family abducted children. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology, 29(1), 22–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11896-013-9120-3
   Google Scholar
• Lum, C., Koper, C. S., & Wu, X. (2022). Can we really defund the police? A nine-agency study of police response to calls for service. Police Quarterly, 25(3), 255–280. https://doi.org/10.1177/10986111211035002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDaniel, M. A., & Einstein, G. O. (2000). Strategic and automatic processes in prospective memory retrieval: A multiprocess framework. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 14(7), S127–S144. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.775
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDaniel, M. A., & Einstein, G. O. (2007). Prospective memory: An overview and synthesis of an emerging field. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Megreya, A. M., & Burton, A. M. (2008). Matching faces to photographs: Poor performance in eyewitness memory (without the memory). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 14(4), 364–372. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013464
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mickes, L., Moreland, M. B., Clark, S. E., & Wixted, J. T. (2014). Missing the information needed to perform ROC analysis? Then compute d′, not the diagnosticity ratio. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 3(2), 58–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2014.04.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, M. K., & Clinkinbeard, S. S. (2006). Improving the AMBER alert system: Psychology research and policy recommendations. Law & Psychology Review, 30, 1–21.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, K. N., & Lampinen, J. M. (2019). The role of attention and memory in search for missing persons. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 8(2), 189–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2019.01.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, K. N., Lampinen, J. M., Adams, E. J., Nesmith, B. L., & Burch, P. (2022). Prior experience with target encounter affects attention allocation and prospective memory performance. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 7.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Moore, K. N., Lampinen, J. M., & Provenzano, A. C. (2016). The role of temporal and spatial information cues in locating missing persons. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 30(4), 514–525. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3242
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, K. N., Provenzano, A. C., Erickson, W. B., & Lampinen, J. M. (2021). Methodological considerations in prospective person memory. In M. P. Toglia, A. M. Smith, & J. M. Lampinen (Eds.), Methods, measures, and theories in eyewitness identification tasks (pp. 65–82). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, K. N., Provenzano, A. C., & Lampinen, J. M. (2018). The role of context expectations and cost of reporting on prospective person memory performance. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 32(5), 635–640. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3426
   Google Scholar
• Mourtgos, S. M., Adams, I. T., & Nix, J. (2022). Elevated police turnover following the summer of George Floyd protests: A synthetic control study. Criminology & Public Policy, 21(1), 9–33. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9133.12556
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Crime Information Center. (2019). NCIC missing person and unidentified person statistics for 2019. https://www.fbi.gov/file-repository/2019-ncicmissing-person-and-unidentified-person-statistics.pdf/view
   Google Scholar
• O’Brien, F., & Thorley, C. (2021). Memory of people from missing person posters: The number of posters seen, the number of times they are seen, and the passage of time matter. Psychology, Crime & Law, 27(8), 779–795. https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2020.1850723
   Google Scholar
• Papesh, M. H., Heisick, L. L., & Warner, K. A. (2018). The persistent low-prevalence effect in unfamiliar face-matching: The roles of feedback and criterion shifting. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 24(3), 416–430. https://doi.org/10.1037/xap0000156
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pashley, V., Enhhus, E., & Leys, M. (2010). “Child Alert”: Public information dissemination of child disappearances. Brussels, Belgium: Child Focus.
   Google Scholar
• Police Executive Research Forum. (2019). The workforce crisis, and what police agencies are doing about it. Police Executive Research Forum, Washington, D.C. https://www.policeforum.org/assets/WorkforceCrisis.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Read, J. D., Lindsay, D. S., & Nichols, T. (1998). The relation between confidence and accuracy in eyewitness identification studies: Is the conclusion changing? In C. P. Thomson, D. Bruce, J. D. Read, D. Hermann, D. Payne, & M. P. Toglia (Eds.), Eyewitness memory: Theoretical and applied perspectives (pp. 107–130). Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, N. S., Rendell, P. G., Mcdaniel, M. A., Aberle, I., & Kliegel, M. (2010). Age and individual differences in prospective memory during a" Virtual Week": the roles of working memory, vigilance, task regularity, and cue focality. Psychology and Aging, 25(3), 595–605.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross, H. A., Russell, P. N., & Helton, W. S. (2014). Effects of breaks and goal switches on the vigilance decrement. Experimental Brain Research, 232(6), 1729–1737. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-014-3865-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sauer, J., Brewer, N., Zweck, T., & Weber, N. (2010). The effect of retention interval on the confidence–accuracy relationship for eyewitness identification. Law and Human Behavior, 34(4), 337–347. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10979-009-9192-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schetky, D. H., & Haller, L. H. (1983). Parental kidnapping. Journal of the American Academy of Child Psychiatry, 22(3), 279–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-7138(09)60378-2
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Senior, N., Gladstone, T., & Nurcombe, B. (1982). Child snatching: A case report. Journal of the American Academy of Child Psychiatry, 21(6), 579–583. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004583-198211000-00012
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shah, A. K., & Oppenheimer, D. M. (2008). Heuristics made easy: An effort-reduction framework. Psychological Bulletin, 134(2), 207–222. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.134.2.207
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shalev Greene, K., & Pakes, F. (2014). The cost of missing person investigations: Implications for current debates. Policing: A Journal of Policy and Practice, 8(1), 27–34. https://doi.org/10.1093/police/pat036
   Google Scholar
• Shepherd, J. W., Gibling, F., & Ellis, H. D. (1991). The effects of distinctiveness, presentation time and delay on face recognition. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 3(1), 137–145. https://doi.org/10.1080/09541449108406223
   Google Scholar
• Smith, A. M., Wells, G. L., Lindsay, R. C. L., & Penrod, S. D. (2017). Fair lineups are better than biased lineups and showups, but not because they increase underlying discriminability. Law and Human Behavior, 41(2), 127–145. https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000219
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, R. E. (2003). The cost of remembering to remember in event-based prospective memory: Investigating the capacity demands of delayed intention performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29(3), 347–361. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.29.3.347
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snodgrass, J. G., & Corwin, J. (1988). Pragmatics of measuring recognition memory: Applications to dementia and amnesia. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 117(1), 34–50. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.117.1.34
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sporer, S. L., & Horry, R. (2011). Recognizing faces from ethnic in-groups and out-groups: Importance of outer face features and effects of retention interval. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 25(3), 424–431. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1709
   Google Scholar
• Staugaard, S. R., & Berntsen, D. (2019). Retrieval intentionality and forgetting: How retention time and cue distinctiveness affect involuntary and voluntary retrieval of episodic memories. Memory & Cognition, 47(5), 893–905. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-019-00904-w
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sweeney, L. N., & Lampinen, J. M. (2012). The effect of presenting multiple images on prospective and retrospective person memory for missing children. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 1(4), 235–241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2012.08.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases: Biases in judgments reveal some heuristics of thinking under uncertainty. Science, 185(4157), 1124–1131. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.185.4157.1124
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warm, J. S., Parasuraman, R., & Matthews, G. (2008). Vigilance requires hard mental work and is stressful. Human Factors, 50(3), 433–441. https://doi.org/10.1518/001872008X312152
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weatherford, D. R., Erickson, W. B., Thomas, J., Walker, M. E., & Schein, B. (2020). You shall not pass: How facial variability and feedback affect the detection of low-prevalence fake IDs. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 5(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-019-0204-1
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wells, G. L., & Windschitl, P. D. (1999). Stimulus sampling and social psychological experimentation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25(9), 1115–1125. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672992512005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wetmore, S. A., McAdoo, R. M., Gronlund, S. D., & Neuschatz, J. S. (2017). The impact of fillers on lineup performance. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 2(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-017-0084-1
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wetmore, S. A., Neuschatz, J. S., Gronlund, S. D., Wooten, A., Goodsell, C. A., & Carlson, C. A. (2015). Effect of retention interval on showup and lineup performance. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 4(1), 8–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2014.07.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wickelgren, W. A. (1974). Single-trace fragility theory of memory dynamics. Memory & Cognition, 2(4), 775–780. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03198154
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolfe, J. M., Horowitz, T. S., & Kenner, N. M. (2005). Rare items often missed in visual searches. Nature, 435(7041), 439–440. https://doi.org/10.1038/435439a
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolfe, J. M., Horowitz, T. S., Van Wert, M. J., Kenner, N. M., Place, S. S., & Kibbi, N. (2007). Low target prevalence is a stubborn source of errors in visual search tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 136(4), 623–638. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.136.4.623
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar