144
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Assessing recidivism risk with criminal thinking and prior arrests: do risk factors accumulate or interact?

Received 12 Dec 2022, Accepted 27 Apr 2023, Published online: 09 May 2023

References

  • Aguinis, H., Beaty, J. C., Boik, R. J., & Pierce, C. A. (2005). Effect size and power in assessing moderating effects of categorical variables using multiple regression: A 30-year review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(1), 94–107. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.90.1.94
  • Andrews, D. A., & Bonta, J. (1995). The Level of Service Inventory-Revised. Multi-Health Systems.
  • Bonta, J., & Andrews, D. (2017). The psychology of criminal conduct (6th ed.). Routledge.
  • Bourke, A., Boduszek, D., & Hyland, P. (2013). The role of criminal cognitions and personality traits in non-violent recidivism: Empirical investigation within a prison sample. Journal of Criminal Psychology, 3(1), 40–48. https://doi.org/10.1108/20093821311307758
  • Caudill, J. W., & Trulson, C. R. (2022). Comparing official measures of recidivism in juvenile justice. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 48, 319–344. Online first. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12103-022-09672-x
  • Caudy, M. S., Durso, J. M., & Taxman, F. S. (2013). How well do dynamic needs predict recidivism? Implications for risk assessment and risk reduction. Journal of Criminal Justice, 41(6), 458–466. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2013.08.004
  • Caudy, M. S., Falk, J. B., Stuewig, J. B., Wooditch, A., Martinez, A., Maass, S., Tangney, J. P., & Taxman, F. S. (2015). Does substance misuse moderate the relationship between criminal thinking and recidivism? Journal of Criminal Justice, 43(1), 12–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2014.11.001
  • Farrington, D. P., Ttofi, M. M., & Piquero, A. R. (2016). Risk, promotive, and protective factors in youth offending: Results from the Cambridge study in delinquent development. Journal of Criminal Justice, 45, 63–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2016.02.014
  • Gendreau, P., Little, T., & Goggin, C. (1996). A meta-analysis of the predictors of adult offender recidivism: What works!. Criminology; An interdisciplinary Journal, 34(4), 575–608. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.1996.tb01220.x
  • Gonsalves, V. M., Scalora, M. J., & Huss, M. T. (2009). Prediction of recidivism using the Psychopathy Checklist-Revised and the Psychological Inventory of Criminal Thinking Styles within a forensic sample. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 36(7), 741–756. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854809335688
  • Hanson, R. K. (2009). The psychological assessment of risk for crime and violence. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie Canadienne, 50(3), 172–182. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015726
  • Harris, G. T., & Rice, M. E. (2015). Progress in violence risk assessment and communication: Hypothesis versus evidence. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 33(1), 128–145. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.2157
  • Harris, G. T., Rice, M. E., & Quinsey, V. L. (1993). Violent recidivism of mentally disordered offenders: The development of a statistical prediction instrument. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 20(4), 315–335. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854893020004001
  • Harris, P. B., Boccaccini, M. T., & Rice, A. K. (2017). Field measures of psychopathy and sexual deviance as predictors of recidivism among sexual offenders. Psychological Assessment, 29(6), 639–651. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000394
  • IBM. (2019). IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows (Version 26.0). IBM Corporation.
  • Kingsnorth, R. F., MacIntosh, R. C., & Sutherland, S. (2002). Criminal charge or probation violation? Prosecutorial discretion and implications for research in criminal court processing. Criminology; An interdisciplinary Journal, 40(3), 553–578. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2002.tb00966.x
  • Lewin, K. (1952). Field theory in social science: Selected theoretical papers by Kurt Lewin. Tavistock.
  • Lipsey, M. W., Landenberger, N. A., & Wilson, S. J. (2007, August). Effects of cognitive-behavioral programs for criminal offenders. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 6. https://doi.org/10.4073/csr.2007.6
  • Lloyd, C. D., Hanby, L. J., & Serin, R. C. (2014). Rehabilitation group coparticipants’ risk levels are associated with offenders’ treatment performance, treatment change, and recidivism. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 82(2), 298–311. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035360
  • Looman, J., Morphett, N. A. C., & Abracen, J. (2013). Does consideration of psychopathy and sexual deviance add to the predictive validity of the Static-99R? International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 57(8), 939–965. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624(12444839
  • Lussier, P., & Davies, G. (2011). A person-oriented perspective on sexual offenders, offending trajectories, and risk of recidivism. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 17(4), 530–561. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024388
  • McClelland, G. H., & Judd, C. M. (1993). Statistical difficulties in detecting interactions and moderator effects. Psychological Bulletin, 114(2), 376–390. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.114.2.376
  • Meehl, P. E. (1954). Clinical versus statistical prediction: A theoretical analysis and review of the evidence. University of Minnesota Press.
  • Nunes, K. L., Hermann, C. A., Malcom, J. R., & Lavoie, K. (2013). Childhood sexual victimization, pedophilic interest, and sexual recidivism. Child Abuse and Neglect, 37(9), 703–711. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2013.01.008
  • Onifade, E., Petersen, J., Bynum, T. S., & Davidson, W. S. (2011). Multiple recidivism prediction: Incorporating neighborhood socioeconomic ecology in juvenile justice risk assessment. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 38(8), 840–853. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854811407026
  • Ousey, G. C., & Wilcox, P. (2007). The interaction of antisocial propensity and life-course varying predictors of delinquent behavior: Differences by method of estimation and implications for theory. Criminology; An interdisciplinary Journal, 45(2), 313–354. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2007.00080.x
  • Parent, G., Laurier, C., Guay, J.-P., & Fredette, C. (2016). Explaining the frequency and variety of crimes through the interaction of individual and contextual risk factors. Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice, 58(4), 465–501. https://doi.org/10.3138/cjccj.2015e11
  • Pearson, F. S., & Lipton, D. S. (1999). A meta-analytic review of the effectiveness of corrections-based treatment for drug abuse. The Prison Journal, 79(4), 384–410. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032885599079004003
  • Pratt, T. C., & Turanovic, J. J. (2012). Going back to the beginning: Crime as a process. In J. M. McGloin, C. J. Sullivan, & L. W. Kennedy (Eds.), When crime appears: The role of emergence (pp. 39–52). Routledge.
  • Rice, M. E., & Harris, G. T. (2005). Comparing effect sizes in follow-up studies: ROC area, Cohen’s d, and r. Law and Human Behavior, 29(5), 615–620. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10979-005-6832-7
  • Simpson, A. I. F., Gerritsen, C., Maheandiran, M., Adamo, V., Vogel, T., Fulham, L., Kitt, T., Forrester, A., & Jones, R. M. (2022). A systematic review of reviews of correctional menteal health services using the STAIR framework. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 12, 747202. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2021.747202
  • Steinberg, L., Cauffman, E., & Monahan, K. C. (2015, March). Psychosocial maturity and desistance from crime in a sample of serious juvenile offenders. Juvenile Justice Bulletin. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
  • Sterzer, P., Stadler, C., Krebs, A., Kleinschmidt, A., & Poustka, F. (2005). Abnormal neural responses to emotional visual stimuli in adolescents with conduct disorder. Biological Psychiatry, 57(1), 7–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2004.10.008
  • Sullivan, C. J., McGloin, J. M., & Kennedy, L. W. (2012). Moving past the person or the context: Thinking about crime as an emergent phenomenon. In J. M. McGloin, C. J. Sullivan, & L. W. Kennedy (Eds.), When crime appears: The role of emergence (pp. 3–16). Routledge.
  • Wallner, S., Stemmler, M., & Reinecke, J. (2020). The contributions of propensity, delinquent peers, low parental supervision, and empathy to the emergence of antisocial behavior in childhood and adolescence: Testing developmental path models combining psychological- and sociological-criminological approaches. International Journal of Developmental Science, 14(3–4), 99–112. https://doi.org/10.3233/dev-200285
  • Walters, G. D. (1995). The Psychological Inventory of Criminal Thinking Styles: Part I. Reliability and preliminary validity. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 22(3), 307–325. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854895022003008
  • Walters, G. D. (1999). Short-term outcome of inmates participating in the lifestyle change program. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 26(3), 322–337. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854899026003003
  • Walters, G. D. (2003). Changes in criminal thinking and identity in novice and experienced prison inmates: Prisonization revisited. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 30(4), 399–421. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854803253137
  • Walters, G. D. (2005). Recidivism in released lifestyle change program participants. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 32(1), 50–68. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854804270628
  • Walters, G. D. (2012). Criminal thinking and recidivism: Meta-analytic evidence on the predictive and incremental validity of the Psychological Inventory of Criminal Thinking Styles (PICTS). Aggression and Violent Behavior, 17(3), 272–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2012.02.010
  • Walters, G. D., Deming, A., & Casbon, T. (2015). Predicting recidivism in sex offenders with the Psychological Inventory of Criminal Thinking Styles (PICTS). Assessment, 22(2), 167–177. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191114539384
  • Walters, G. D., & Lowenkamp, C. T. (2016). Predicting recidivism with the Psychological Inventory of Criminal Thinking Styles (PICTS) in community-supervised male and female federal offenders. Psychological Assessment, 28(6), 652–659. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000210
  • Webster, C. D., Douglas, K. S., Eaves, D., & Hart, S. D. (1997). HCR-20: Assessing risk for violence (Version 2). Mental Health, Law and Policy Institute, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia.
  • Wilson, D. B., Bouffard, L. A., & MacKenzie, D. L. (2005). A quantitative review of structured, group-oriented, cognitive-behavioral programs for offenders. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 32(2), 172–204. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854804272889

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.