Addressing racial bias in parole decisions: A pre-registered study of the Five-Level Risk and Needs System of risk communication

References

• Ægisdóttir, S., White, M. J., Spengler, P. M., Maugherman, A. S., Anderson, L. A., Cook, R. S., Nichols, C. N., Lampropoulos, G. K., Walker, B. S., Cohen, G., & Rush, J. D. (2006). The meta-analysis of clinical judgment project: Fifty-six years of accumulated research on clinical versus statistical prediction. The Counseling Psychologist, 34(3), 341–382. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000005285875
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alberton, A., Gorey, K. M., Angell, G. B., & McCue, H. A. (2021). Structural violence perpetrated against indigenous peoples in Canadian criminal courts: Meta-analytic evidence of longstanding sentencing inequities. Critical Social Work, 22(1), 2–22. https://doi.org/10.22329/csw.v22i1.6896
   Google Scholar
• Angus Reid Institute. (2021). Diversity and Racism in Canada: Competing views deeply divide country along gender, generational lines. https://angusreid.org/diversity-racism-canada/
   Google Scholar
• Babchishin, K. M., Hanson, R. K., & Blais, J. (2015). Less is more: Using static-2002R subscales to predict violent and general recidivism among sexual offenders. Sexual Abuse, 28(3), 187–217. https://doi.org/10.1177/1079063215569544
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barbaree, H., Langton, C. M., & Peacock, E. J. (2006). Different actuarial risk measures produce different risk rankings for sexual offenders. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 18(4), 423–440. https://doi.org/10.1177/107906320601800408
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benegal, S. D., & Holman, M. R. (2021). Racial prejudice, education, and views of climate change. Social Science Quarterly, 102(4), 1907–1919. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.13004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blais, J., Babchishin, K. M., & Hanson, R. K. (2021). Improving our risk communication: Standardized risk levels for the BARR-2002R. Sexual Abuse, 34(6), 667–698. https://doi.org/10.1177/10790632211047185
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blais, J., & Forth, A. E. (2014). Prosecution-retained versus court-appointed experts: Comparing and contrasting risk assessment reports in preventative detention hearings. Law and Human Behavior, 38(6), 531–543. https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000082
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonta, J., & Andrews, D. A. (2007). Risk-need-responsivity model for offender assessment and rehabilitation. Rehabilitation, 6(1), 1–22. https://www.publicsafety.gc.ca/cnt/rsrcs/pblctns/rsk-nd-rspnsvty/index-en.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Bourgon, G., Mugford, R., Hanson, R. K., & Coligado, M. (2018). Offender risk assessment practices vary across Canada. Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice, 60(2), 167–205. https://doi.org/10.3138/cjccj.2016-0024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, B. (2014). Framing Canada’s aboriginal peoples: A comparative analysis of indigenous and mainstream television news. The Canadian Journal of Native Studies, 34(2), 41–64.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, S. (2019). Overrepresentation of Indigenous people in the Canadian criminal justice system: Causes and responses. Ottawa: Research and Statistics Division, Department of Justice Canada. https://www.justice.gc.ca/eng/rp-pr/jr/oip-cjs/oip-cjs-en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Clow, K. A., Lant, J. M., & Cutler, B. L. (2013). Perceptions of defendant culpability in pretrial publicity: The effects of defendant ethnicity and participant gender. Race and Social Problems, 5(4), 250–261. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12552-013-9102-1
   Google Scholar
• Coulter, D. J., Lloyd, C. D., & Serin, R. C. (2022). Combining static and dynamic recidivism risk information into the five-level risk and needs system: A New Zealand example. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 49(1), 77–97. https://doi.org/10.1177/00938548211033319
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• David, J. D., & Mitchell, M. (2021). Contacts with the police and the over-representation of indigenous peoples in the Canadian criminal justice system. Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice, 63(2), 23–45. https://doi.org/10.3138/cjccj.2020-0004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devine, D. J., & Caughlin, D. E. (2014). Do they matter? A meta-analytic investigation of individual characteristics and guilt judgments. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 20(2), 109–134. https://doi.org/10.1037/law0000006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Environics Institute. (2021). Canadian public opinion about Indigenous peoples and reconciliation. https://www.environicsinstitute.org/docs/default-source/default-document-library/fc2021-indigenous-peoples-final-sept-29eff0b14a7b6643acaf9adc0578f77572.pdf?sfvrsn=4896f294_0
   Google Scholar
• Evans, S. A., & Salekin, K. L. (2016). Violence risk communication: What do judges and forensic clinicians prefer and understand? Journal of Threat Assessment and Management, 3(3–4), 143–164. https://doi.org/10.1037/tam0000062
   Google Scholar
• Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A. G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G* power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forsterlee, R., Forsterlee, L., Horowitz, I. A., & King, E. (2006). The effects of defendant race, victim race, and juror gender on evidence processing in a murder trial. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 24(2), 179–198. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.675
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grove, W. M., Zald, D. H., Lebow, B. S., Snitz, B. E., & Nelson, C. (2000). Clinical versus mechanical prediction: A meta-analysis. Psychological Assessment, 12(1), 19–30. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.12.1.19
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gutierrez, L., Wilson, H. A., Rugge, T., & Bonta, J. (2013). The prediction of recidivism with aboriginal offenders: A theoretically informed meta-analysis. Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice, 55(1), 55–99. https://doi.org/10.3138/cjccj.2011.E.51
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hannah-Moffat, K., & Maurutto, P. (2010). Re-contextualizing pre-sentence reports: Risk and race. Punishment and Society, 12(3), 262–286. https://doi.org/10.1177/1462474510369442
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanson, R. K. (2009). The psychological assessment of risk for crime and violence. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie Canadienne, 50(3), 172–182. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015726
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanson, R. K., Babchishin, K. M., Helmus, L. M., Thornton, D., & Phenix, A. (2017). Communicating the results of criterion referenced prediction measures: Risk categories for the static-99R and static-2002R sexual offender risk assessment tools. Psychological Assessment, 29(5), 582–597. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000371
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanson, R. K., Bourgon, G., McGrath, R. J., Kroner, D., D’Amora, D. A., Thomas, S. S., & Tavarez, L. P. (2017). A five-level risk and needs system: Maximizing assessment results in corrections through the development of a common language. Justice Center Council of State Governments. https://saratso.org/pdf/A_Five_Level_Risk_and_Needs_System_Report.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Heilbrun, K., Philipson, J., Berman, L., & Warren, J. (1999). Risk communication: Clinicians’ reported approaches and perceived values. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 27(3), 397–406.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hilton, N. Z., Carter, A. M., Harris, G. T., & Sharpe, A. J. (2008). Does using nonnumerical terms to describe risk aid in violence risk communication? Clinician agreement and decision making. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 23(2), 171–188. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260507309337
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hogan, N. R. (2021). Critical considerations in the development and interpretation of common risk language. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 28(2), 218–234. https://doi.org/10.1080/13218719.2020.1767719
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hogan, N. R., & Sribney, C. L. (2019). Combining static-99R and STABLE-2007 risk categories: An evaluation of the five-level system for risk communication. Sexual Offender Treatment, 14(1), 1–14. http://www.sexual-offender-treatment.org/187.html
   Google Scholar
• Jung, S., Pham, A., & Ennis, L. (2013). Measuring the disparity of categorical risk among various sex offender risk assessment measures. The Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology, 24(3), 353–370. https://doi.org/10.1080/14789949.2013.806567
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D., Sibony, O., & Sunstein, C. R. (2021). Noise: A flaw in human judgment. Little, Brown, and Company.
   Google Scholar
• Kerr, N. L., Hymes, R. W., Anderson, A. B., & Weathers, J. E. (1995). Defendant-juror similarity and mock juror judgments. Law and Human Behavior, 19(6), 545–567. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01499374
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laprairie, C. (1996). Examining aboriginal corrections in Canada (Catalogue. No. JS5-1/14-1996E). Ottawa, ON: Ministry of the Solicitor General. https://www.publicsafety.gc.ca/cnt/rsrcs/pblctns/xmnngbrgnl-crrctns/xmnng-brgnl-crrctns-eng.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Lee, S. C., Hanson, R. K., & Blais, J. (2020). Predictive accuracy of the static-99R and static-2002R risk tools for identifying indigenous and white individuals at high risk for sexual recidivism in Canada. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie Canadienne, 61(1), 42–57. https://doi.org/10.1037/cap0000182
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maeder, E. M., & McManus, L. A. (2022). Mosaic or melting pot? Race and juror decision making in Canada and the United States. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 37(1–2), https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260520917512
   Google Scholar
• Maeder, E. M., Yamamoto, S., & McManus, L. A. (2015). Race salience in Canada: Testing multiple manipulations and target races. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 21(4), 442. https://doi.org/10.1037/law0000057
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marques, J. M., & Paez, D. (1994). The 'Black Sheep Effect': Social categorization, rejection of ingroup deviates, and perception of group variability. European Review of Social Psychology, 5, 37–68. https://doi.org/10.1080/14792779543000011
   Google Scholar
• Marques, J. M., Yzerbyt, V. Y., & Leyens, J.-P. (1988). The “Black Sheep Effect”: Extremity of judgments towards ingroup members as a function of group identification. European Journal of Social Psychology, 18(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420180102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mamede S, d. C.-F., de Faria, M. A., Franci, R. M. D., Nunes, D., Ribeiro, M. D. P. T., Biegelmeyer, L. M. C., Zwaan, J., & Schmidt, L., & G, H. (2020). ‘Immunising’ physicians against availability bias in diagnostic reasoning: A randomised controlled experiment. British Medical Journal Quality and Safety, 29(7), 550–559. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2019-010079
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGuire, M. M., & Murdoch, D. J. (2022). (In)-justice: An exploration of the dehumanization, victimization, criminalization, and over-incarceration of indigenous women in Canada. Punishment & Society, 24(4), 529–550. https://www.oci-bec.gc.ca/cnt/comm/press/press20200121-eng.aspx https://doi.org/10.1177/14624745211001685
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McManus, L., Maeder, E., & Yamamoto, S. (2018). The role of defendant race and racially charged media in Canadian mock juror decision making. Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice, 60(2), 266–295. https://doi.org/10.3138/cjccj.2017.0035.r1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Office of the Correctional Investigator (OCI) of Canada. (2012). Spirit matters: Aboriginal people and the corrections and conditional release Act. Office of the Correctional Investigator Canada. https://www.oci-bec.gc.ca/cnt/rpt/oth-aut/oth-aut20121022-eng.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Olver, M. E., Kelley, S. M., Kingston, D. A., Beggs Christofferson, S. M., Thornton, D., & Wong, S. C. (2021). Incremental contributions of static and dynamic sexual violence risk assessment: Integrating static-99R and VRS-SO common language risk levels. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 48(8), 1091–1110. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854820974400
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parole Board of Canada. (2019). 2017-2018 performance monitoring report. Government of Canada. https://www.canada.ca/en/parole-board/corporate/transparency/reporting-to-canadians/performance-monitoring-report/2017-2018.html
   Google Scholar
• Perley-Robertson, B., Maaike Helmus, L., & Forth, A. (2019). Predictive accuracy of static risk factors for Canadian indigenous offenders compared to non-indigenous offenders: Implications for risk assessment scales. Psychology, Crime & Law, 25(3), 248–278. https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2018.1519827
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pfeifer, J. E., & Ogloff, J. R. P. (2003). Mock juror ratings of guilt in Canada: Modern racism and ethnic heritage. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 31(3), 301–312. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2003.31.3.301
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Popping, R. (2015). Analyzing open-ended questions by means of text analysis procedures. Bulletin of Sociological Methodology, 128(1), 23–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/0759106315597389
   Google Scholar
• Rudin, J. (2005). Aboriginal peoples and the criminal justice system. Ipperwash Inquiry. https://www.attorneygeneral.jus.gov.on.ca/inquiries/ipperwash/policy_part/research/pdf/Rudin.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Scurich, N. (2018). The case against categorical risk estimates. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 36(5), 554–564. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.2382
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shepherd, S. M., & Lewis-Fernandez, R. (2016). Forensic risk assessment and cultural diversity: Contemporary challenges and future directions. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 22(4), 427. https://doi.org/10.1037/law0000102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh, J. P., Desmarais, S. L., Hurducas, C., Arbach-Lucioni, K., Condemarin, C., Dean, K., Doyle, M., Folino, J. O., Godoy-Cervera, V., Grann, M., Ho, R. M. Y., Large, M. M., Nielsen, L. H., Pham, T. H., Rebocho, M. F., Reeves, K. A., Rettenberger, M., de Ruiter, C., Seewald, K., & Otto, R. K. (2014). International perspectives on the practical application of violence risk assessment: A global survey of 44 countries. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 13(3), 193–206. https://doi.org/10.1080/14999013.2014.922141
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Statistics Canada. (2022a). Adult and youth correctional statistics, 2020/2021. Ottawa. https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/daily-quotidien/220420/dq220420c-eng.htm
   Google Scholar
• Statistics Canada. (2022b). Indigenous peoples reference guide. Ottawa. https://www12.statcan.gc.ca/census-recensement/2021/ref/98-500/009/98-500-x2021009-eng.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Tonry, M. (2014). Legal and ethical issues in the prediction of recidivism. Federal Sentencing Reporter, 26(3), 167–176. https://doi.org/10.1525/fsr.2014.26.3.167
   Google Scholar
• Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada. (2015). Honouring the truth, reconciling for the future: Summary of the final report of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada. Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada. https://ehprnh2mwo3.exactdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/Executive_Summary_English_Web.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Tewksbury, R. (2012). Stigmatization of sex offenders. Deviant Behavior, 33(8), 606–623. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639625.2011.636690
   Google Scholar
• Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science (American Association for the Advancement of Science), 185(4157), 1124–1131. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.185.4157.1124
   Google Scholar
• Vincent, G. M., & Viljoen, J. L. (2020). Racist algorithms or systemic problems? Risk assessments and racial disparities. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 47(12), 1576–1584. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854820954501
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallace, R. (2021). Warriors don’t sleep til noon”: colonial rhetoric and the framing of indigenous recipients of welfare in Canadian print news, 1990–2015. Politics, Groups, and Identities, 9(2), 300–318. https://doi.org/10.1080/21565503.2019.1629311
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, H. A., & Gutierrez, L. (2014). Does one size fit all?: A meta-analysis examining the predictive ability of the level of service inventory (LSI) with aboriginal offenders. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 41(2), 196–219. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854813500958
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zapf, P. A., & Dror, I. E. (2017). Understanding and mitigating bias in forensic evaluation: Lessons from forensic science. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 16(3), 227–238. https://doi.org/10.1080/14999013.2017.1317302
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar