1,145
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Review Article

The role of video background cues in the virtual court: a psychological perspective

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Received 25 Oct 2022, Accepted 03 Jun 2023, Published online: 17 Jun 2023

References

  • Allbritton, D. W., McKoon, G., & Gerrig, R. J. (1995). Metaphor-based schemas and text representations: Making connections through conceptual metaphors. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21(3), 612–625. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.21.3.612
  • Alter, A. L., & Oppenheimer, D. M. (2009). Uniting the tribes of fluency to form a metacognitive nation. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 13(3), 219–235. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868309341564
  • Ambady, N., & Rosenthal, R. (1992). Thin slices of expressive behavior as predictors of interpersonal consequences: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 111(2), 256–274. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.111.2.256
  • Anderson, R. C., & Pichert, J. W. (1978). Recall of previously unrecallable information following a shift in perspective. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 17(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(78)90485-1
  • Ariturk, D., Crozier, W. E., & Garrett, B. L. (2020, November). Virtual criminal courts. The University of Chicago Law Review Online. https://lawreviewblog.uchicago.edu/2020/11/16/covid-ariturk/
  • Aviezer, H., Trope, Y., & Todorov, A. (2012a). Body cues, not facial expressions, discriminate between intense positive and negative emotions. Science, 338(6111), 1225–1229. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1224313
  • Aviezer, H., Trope, Y., & Todorov, A. (2012b). Holistic person processing: Faces with bodies tell the whole story. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103(1), 20–37. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027411
  • Bailenson, J. N. (2021). Nonverbal overload: A theoretical argument for the causes of Zoom fatigue. Technology, Mind, and Behavior, 2(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1037/tmb0000030
  • Bailenson, J. N., Beall, A. C., Loomis, J., Blascovich, J., & Turk, M. (2005). Transformed social interaction, augmented gaze, and social influence in immersive virtual environments. Human Communication Research, 31(4), 511–537. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2005.tb00881.x
  • Bandes, S. A., & Feigenson, N. (2020). Virtual trials: Necessity, invention, and the evolution of the courtroom. Buffalo Law Review, 68(5), 1275–1352. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3683408
  • Bandes, S. A., & Feigenson, N. (2021). Empathy and remote legal proceedings. Southwestern Law Review, 51(1), 20–39. https://heinonline.org/HOL/P?h=hein.journals/swulr51&i=28
  • Begg, I. M., Anas, A., & Farinacci, S. (1992). Dissociation of processes in belief: Source recollection, statement familiarity, and the illusion of truth. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 121(4), 446–458. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.121.4.446
  • Bild, E., Redman, A., Newman, E. J., Muir, B. R., Tait, D., & Schwarz, N. (2021). Sound and credibility in the virtual court: Low audio quality leads to less favorable evaluations of witnesses and lower weighting of evidence. Law and Human Behavior, 45(5), 481–495. https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000466
  • Bransford, J. D., & Johnson, M. K. (1972). Contextual prerequisites for understanding: Some investigations of comprehension and recall. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 11(6), 717–726. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(72)80006-9
  • Brown-Iannuzzi, J. L., Hoffman, K. M., Payne, B. K., & Trawalter, S. (2014). The invisible man: Interpersonal goals moderate inattentional blindness to African Americans. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143(1), 33–37. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031407
  • Brunswik, E. (1956). Perception and the representative design of psychological experiments (2nd ed.). University of California Press. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1956-06685-000
  • Chaiken, S. (1980). Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39(5), 752–766. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.39.5.752
  • Collins, A. M., & Loftus, E. F. (1975). A spreading-activation theory of semantic processing. Psychological Review, 82(6), 407–428. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.82.6.407
  • County Court of Victoria. (2021). A short guide to video conferencing etiquette. https://www.countycourt.vic.gov.au/going-court/virtual-hearings
  • Darley, J. M., & Gross, P. H. (1983). A hypothesis-confirming bias in labeling effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44(1), 20–33. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.44.1.20
  • Derksen, D. G., Giroux, M. E., Connolly, D. A., Newman, E. J., & Bernstein, D. M. (2020). Truthiness and law: Nonprobative photos bias perceived credibility in forensic contexts. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 34(6), 1335–1344. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3709
  • Devine, D. J., Buddenbaum, J., Houp, S., Studebaker, N., & Stolle, D. P. (2009). Strength of evidence, extraevidentiary influence, and the liberation hypothesis: Data from the field. Law and Human Behavior, 33(2), 136–148. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10979-008-9144-x
  • Devine, D. J., & Caughlin, D. E. (2014). Do they matter? A meta-analytic investigation of individual characteristics and guilt judgments. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 20(2), 109–134. https://doi.org/10.1037/law0000006
  • Ehrlinger, J., Gilovich, T., & Ross, L. (2005). Peering into the bias blind spot: People’s assessments of bias in themselves and others. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31(5), 680–692. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167204271570
  • Elek, J. K., Ware, L. J., & Ratcliff, J. J. (2012). Knowing when the camera lies: Judicial instructions mitigate the camera perspective bias. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 17(1), 123–135. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8333.2010.02000.x
  • Fauville, G., Luo, M., Queiroz, A. C. M., Bailenson, J. N., & Hancock, J. (2021). Nonverbal mechanisms predict Zoom fatigue and explain why women experience higher levels than men. SSRN Electronic Journal, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3820035
  • Feigenson, N. (2010). Visual evidence. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 17(2), 149–154. https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.17.2.149
  • Feigenson, N., & Spiesel, C. (2011). The juror and courtroom of the future. In C. Henderson, & J. Epstein (Eds.), The future of evidence (pp. 113–136). American Bar Association. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2145562
  • Fejfar, M. C., & Hoyle, R. H. (2000). Effect of private self-awareness on negative affect and self-referent attribution: A quantitative review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4(2), 132–142. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327957PSPR0402_02
  • Fenn, E., Newman, E. J., Pezdek, K., & Garry, M. (2013). The effect of nonprobative photographs on truthiness persists over time. Acta Psychologica, 144(1), 207–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2013.06.004
  • Finders, M., Muñoz, J., & Mohamoud, B. (2021, May 6). Think twice, Minnesota teachers, about a ‘cameras on’ rule for remote students. TwinCities Pioneer Press. https://www.twincities.com/2021/05/06/finders-mun%CC%83oz-mohamoud-think-twice-minnesota-teachers-about-a-cameras-on-rule-for-remote-students/
  • Fingerman, K. L., Kim, Y. K., Zhang, S., Ng, Y. T., & Birditt, K. S. (2021). Late life in the living room: Room décor, functional limitations, and personality. The Gerontologist, 62(4), 519–529. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnab093
  • Fosslien, L., & Duffy, M. W. (2020, April 29). How to combat Zoom fatigue. Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/2020/04/how-to-combat-zoom-fatigue
  • García, E., Weiss, E., & Engdahl, L. (2020, April 17). Access to online learning amid coronavirus is far from universal, and children who are poor suffer from a digital divide. Working Economics Blog. https://www.epi.org/blog/access-to-online-learning-amid-coronavirus-and-digital-divide/
  • Garry, M., Manning, C. G., Loftus, E. F., & Sherman, S. J. (1996). Imagination inflation: Imagining a childhood event inflates confidence that it occurred. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 3(2), 208–214. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03212420
  • Garry, M., Strange, D., Bernstein, D. M., & Kinzett, T. (2007). Photographs can distort memory for the news. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 21(8), 995–1004. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1362
  • Gerrie, M. P., Belcher, L. E., & Garry, M. (2006). ‘‘Mind the gap’: False memories for missing aspects of an event. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 20(5), 689–696. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1221
  • Gillath, O., Bahns, A. J., Ge, F., & Crandall, C. S. (2012). Shoes as a source of first impressions. Journal of Research in Personality, 46(4), 423–430. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2012.04.003
  • Goethe, O., Sørum, H., & Johansen, J. (2021). The effect or non-effect of virtual versus non-virtual backgrounds in digital learning. In T. Ahram, & R. Taiar (Eds.), Lecture notes in networks and systems: Vol. 319. Human interaction, emerging technologies and future systems (pp. 274–281). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-85540-6_35
  • Goldin-Meadow, S., Nusbaum, H., Kelly, S. D., & Wagner, S. (2001). Explaining math: Gesturing lightens the load. Psychological Science, 12(6), 516–522. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00395
  • Gosling, S. D., Ko, S. J., Mannarelli, T., & Morris, M. E. (2002). A room with a cue: Personality judgments based on offices and bedrooms. Personality Processes and Individual Differences, 82(3), 379–398. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.82.3.379
  • Granot, Y., Balcetis, E., Schneider, K. E., & Tyler, T. R. (2014). Justice is not blind: Visual attention exaggerates effects of group identification on legal punishment. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143(6), 2196–2208. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037893
  • Granot, Y., Feigenson, N., Balcetis, E., & Tyler, T. (2018). In the eyes of the law: Perception versus reality in appraisals of video evidence. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 24(1), 93–104. https://doi.org/10.1037/law0000137
  • Hans, V. P. (2022). Virtual juries. DePaul Law Review, 71(2), 301–330. https://heinonline.org/HOL/P?h=hein.journals/deplr71&i=315
  • Hansen, K., Gerbasi, M., Todorov, A., Kruse, E., & Pronin, E. (2014). People claim objectivity after knowingly using biased strategies. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 40(6), 691–699. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167214523476
  • Harris, P. B., & Brown, B. B. (1996). The home and identity display: Interpreting resident territoriality from home exteriors. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 16(3), 187–203. https://doi.org/10.1006/jevp.1996.0016
  • Harris, P. B., & Sachau, D. (2005). Is cleanliness next to godliness? The role of housekeeping in impression formation. Environment and Behavior, 37(1), 81–101. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916504266803
  • Henkel, L. A. (2012). Seeing photos makes us read between the lines: The influence of photos on memory for inferences. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 65(4), 773–795. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2011.628400
  • Horgan, T. G., Herzog, N. K., & Dyszlewski, S. M. (2019). Does your messy office make your mind look cluttered? Office appearance and perceivers’ judgments about the owner's personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 138, 370–379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2018.10.018
  • Hwang, A. H.-C., Wang, C. Y., Yang, Y.-Y., & Won, A. S. (2021, October). Hide and seek: Choices of virtual backgrounds in video chats and their effects on perception [Paper presentation]. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, New York, NY, United States. https://doi.org/10.1145/3476044.
  • Ingram, R. E., Cruet, D., Johnson, B. R., & Wisnicki, K. S. (1988). Self-focused attention, gender, gender role, and vulnerability to negative affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55(6), 967–978. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.55.6.967
  • Jacoby, L. L., Woloshyn, V., & Kelley, C. (1989). Becoming famous without being recognized: Unconscious influences of memory produced by dividing attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 118(2), 115–125. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.118.2.115
  • Johnson, E. (2017). Messy versus clean primary environments: Personality judgments of dorm room residents. The Red River Psychology Journal, 1, 1–10. https://www.mnstate.edu/academics/majors/psychology/journal/issues/
  • Jones, K. A., Crozier, W. E., & Strange, D. (2018). Objectivity is a myth for you but not for me or police: A bias blind spot for viewing and remembering criminal events. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 24(2), 259–270. https://doi.org/10.1037/law0000168
  • Kahan, D. M., Hoffman, D. A., Braman, D., Evans, D., & Rachlinski, J. J. (2012). ‘They saw a protest’: Cognitive illiberalism and the speech conduct distinction. Stanford Law Review, 64(4), 851–906. https://www.jstor.org/stable/41511108
  • Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. Macmillan.
  • Keogh, A., Pillay, A., CLayton, J., & Attiwill, R. (2020). The dos and don’ts of virtual hearings [Webinar]. Supreme Court of Victoria. https://www.supremecourt.vic.gov.au/about-the-court/publications/the-dos-and-donts-of-virtual-hearings-webinar
  • Kleider-Offutt, H. M., Clevinger, A. M., & Bond, A. D. (2016). Working memory and cognitive load in the legal system: Influences on police shooting decisions, interrogation, and jury decisions. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 5(4), 426–433. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2016.04.008
  • Kleiman, T., Sher, N., Elster, A., & Mayo, R. (2015). Accessibility is a matter of trust: Dispositional and contextual distrust blocks accessibility effects. Cognition, 142, 333–344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2015.06.001
  • Kleinke, C. L. (1986). Gaze and eye contact: A research review. Psychological Bulletin, 100(1), 78–100. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.100.1.78
  • Krans, B., Nylund, A., Bamford, D., Ervo, L., Ferrand, F., Galič, A., Hau, W., Fenoll, J. N., Petersen, C. S., Piché, C., Rylski, P., Silvestri, E., Sorabji, J., Vėbraitė, V., & Zaneti, Jr, H. (2020). Civil justice and Covid-19 (No. 5). Septentrio Reports. https://doi.org/10.7557/sr.2020.5.
  • Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Conceptual metaphor in everyday language. The Journal of Philosophy, 77(8), 453–486. https://doi.org/10.2307/2025464
  • Lassiter, G. D., Beers, M. J., Geers, A. L., Handley, I. M., Munhall, P. J., & Weiland, P. E. (2002). Further evidence of a robust point-of-view bias in videotaped confessions. Current Psychology, 21(3), 265–288. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-002-1018-7
  • Lee, S. W., & Schwarz, N. (2014). Metaphor in judgment and decision making. In M. J. Landau, M. D. Robinson, & B. P. Meier (Eds.), The power of metaphor: Examining its influence on social life (pp. 85–108). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/14278-005
  • Legg, M., & Song, A. (2021). The courts, the remote hearing and the pandemic: From action to reflection. University of New South Wales Law Journal, 44(1), 126–166. https://doi.org/10.53637/ZATE4122
  • Levinson, J. D., & Young, D. (2009). Different shades of bias: Skin tone, implicit racial bias, and judgments of ambiguous evidence. West Virginia Law Review, 112(2), 307–350. https://heinonline.org/HOL/P?h=hein.journals/wvb112&i=307
  • Lieberman, J. D., & Arndt, J. (2000). Understanding the limits of limiting instructions: Social psychological explanations for the failures of instructions to disregard pretrial publicity and other inadmissible evidence. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 6(3), 677–711. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8971.6.3.677
  • MacDonald, S. C., & Enns, J. T. (2012). The role of photographic clarity and blur in guiding visual attention. Journal of Vision, 12(9), 1002–1002. https://doi.org/10.1167/12.9.1002
  • Macrae, C. N., Bodenhausen, G. V., Milne, A. B., Thorn, T. M., & Castelli, L. (1997). On the activation of social stereotypes: The moderating role of processing objectives. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 33(5), 471–489. https://doi.org/10.1006/jesp.1997.1328
  • Maddux, W. W., Barden, J., Brewer, M. B., & Petty, R. E. (2005). Saying no to negativity: The effects of context and motivation to control prejudice on automatic evaluative responses. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 41(1), 19–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2004.05.002
  • McKay, C. (2018). The pixelated prisoner: Prison video links, court ‘appearance’ and the justice matrix. Taylor & Francis Group.
  • Merry, S. (2013). "Eye see you”: How criminal defendants have utilized the nerd defense to influence jurors’ perceptions. Journal of Law and Policy, 21(2), 725–776. https://heinonline.org/HOL/P?h=hein.journals/jlawp21&i=737
  • Muir, B. R., Newman, E. J., & Schwarz, N. (2022, November 17–20). Messy background, messy mind: Consequences of background on perceptions of witnesses [Poster presentation]. Psychonomics Society, Boston, Massachusetts, USA & Online. https://www.psychonomic.org/page/2022AnnualMeeting
  • Naumann, L. P., Vazire, S., Rentfrow, P. J., & Gosling, S. D. (2009). Personality judgments based on physical appearance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35(12), 1661–1671. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167209346309
  • Newman, E. J., Garry, M., Bernstein, D. M., Kantner, J., & Lindsay, D. S. (2012). Nonprobative photographs (or words) inflate truthiness. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 19(5), 969–974. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-012-0292-0
  • Newman, E. J., & Zhang, L. (2021). Truthiness: How non-probative photos shape belief. In R. Greifeneder, M. E. Jaffé, E. J. Newman, & N. Schwarz (Eds.), The psychology of fake news: Accepting, sharing and correcting misinformation (pp. 90–114). Routledge.
  • Nir, E., & Musial, J. (2022). Zooming in: Courtrooms and defendants’ rights during the COVID-19 pandemic. Social & Legal Studies, 31(5), 725–745. https://doi.org/10.1177/09646639221076099
  • Oppenheimer, D. M. (2004). Spontaneous discounting of availability in frequency judgment tasks. Psychological Science, 15(2), 100–105. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0963-7214.2004.01502005.x
  • Oppenheimer, D. M., & Monin, B. (2009). Investigations in spontaneous discounting. Memory & Cognition, 37(5), 608–614. https://doi.org/10.3758/MC.37.5.608
  • Payne, B. K., Jacoby, L. L., & Lambert, A. J. (2004). Memory monitoring and the control of stereotype distortion. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40(1), 52–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1031(03)00069-6
  • Pennington, N., & Hastie, R. (1986). Evidence evaluation in complex decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(2), 242–258. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.2.242
  • Pennington, N., & Hastie, R. (1988). Explanation-based decision making: Effects of memory structure on judgment. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 14(3), 521–533. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.14.3.521
  • Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 19, 123–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60214-2
  • Pichert, J. W., & Anderson, R. C. (1977). Taking different perspectives on a story. Journal of Educational Psychology, 69(4), 309–315. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.69.4.309
  • Pronin, E. (2007). Perception and misperception of bias in human judgment. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11(1), 37–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2006.11.001
  • Pronin, E., Gilovich, T., & Ross, L. (2004). Objectivity in the eye of the beholder: Divergent perceptions of bias in self versus others. Psychological Review, 111(3), 781–799. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.111.3.781
  • Pronin, E., Lin, D. Y., & Ross, L. (2002). The bias blind spot: Perceptions of bias in self versus others. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28(3), 369–381. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167202286008
  • Remote Courts Worldwide. (2022). Remote courts worldwide. https://remotecourts.org/
  • Roediger, II, H. L., & McDermott, B. K. (1995). Creating false memories: Remembering words not presented in lists. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21(4), 803–814. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.21.4.803
  • Ross, L., & Ward, A. (1996). Naive realism in everyday life: Implications for social conflict and misunderstanding. In E. S. Reed, E. Turiel, & T. Brown (Eds.), Values and knowledge 1st ed. (pp. 103–135). Psychology Press.
  • Rossner, M. (2021). Remote rituals in virtual courts. Journal of Law and Society, 48(3), 334–361. https://doi.org/10.1111/jols.12304
  • Rossner, M., Tait, D., McKimmie, B., & Sarre, R. (2017). The dock on trial: Courtroom design and the presumption of innocence. Journal of Law and Society, 44(3), 317–344. https://doi.org/10.1111/jols.12033
  • Ruva, C. L., Sykes, E., Smith, K. D., Deaton, L. R., & Erdem, S. (2022). Battling bias: Can two implicit bias remedies reduce juror racial bias? Psychology, Crime & Law, 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2022.2115494.
  • Sanson, M., Crozier, W. E., & Strange, D. (2020). Court case context and fluency-promoting photos inflate the credibility of forensic science. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 228(3), 221–225. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000415
  • Schubert, T. W. (2005). Your highness: Vertical positions as perceptual symbols of power. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.89.1.1
  • Schul, Y., Mayo, R., & Burnstein, E. (2004). Encoding under trust and distrust: The spontaneous activation of incongruent cognitions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86(5), 668–679. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.86.5.668
  • Schul, Y., Mayo, R., & Burnstein, E. (2008). The value of distrust. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44(5), 1293–1302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2008.05.003
  • Schwarz, N. (2015). Metacognition. In M. Mikulincer, P. R. Shaver, E. Borgida, & J. A. Bargh (Eds.), APA handbook of personality and social psychology: Attitudes and social cognition (Vol. 1, pp. 203–229). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/14341-006
  • Schwarz, N., & Newman, E. J. (2017). How does the gut know truth? Psychological Science Agenda, 31(8), 1–8. https://www.apa.org/science/about/psa/2017/08/gut-truth
  • Scigliano, E. (2021, April 13). Zoom court is changing how justice is served. The Atlantic. https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2021/05/can-justice-be-served-on-zoom/618392/
  • Sherman, J. W., & Frost, L. A. (2000). On the encoding of stereotype-relevant information under cognitive load. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26(1), 26–34. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167200261003
  • Sherman, S. J., Cialdini, R. B., Schwartzman, D. F., & Reynolds, K. D. (1985). Imagining can heighten or lower the perceived likelihood of contracting a disease. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 11(1), 118–127. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167285111011
  • Silva, R. R., Koch, M.-L., Rickers, K., Kreuzer, G., & Topolinski, S. (2019). The tinder™ stamp: Perceived trustworthiness of online daters and its persistence in neutral contexts. Computers in Human Behavior, 94, 45–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.12.041
  • Simons, D. J., & Chabris, C. F. (1999). Gorillas in our midst: Sustained inattentional blindness for dynamic events. Perception, 28(9), 1059–1074. https://doi.org/10.1068/p281059
  • Spinney, L. (2022, February 19). Zoom trials and kitten lawyers: Inside the e-justice revolution. The New Statesman. https://www.newstatesman.com/science-tech/2022/02/zoom-trials-and-kitten-lawyers-inside-the-e-justice-revolution
  • Tait, D., & Tay, V. (2019). Virtual court study: Report of a pilot test 2018. Western Sydney University. https://doi.org/10.26183/5d01d1418d757
  • Thomson Reuters Institute. (2021, April 21). The art of virtual trials: Presenting your case in a remote environment. Thomson Reuters. https://www.thomsonreuters.com/en-us/posts/legal/virtual-trials-presenting-your-case/
  • Thornburg, E. G. (2021). Observing online courts: Lessons from the pandemic. SSRN Electronic Journal, 54(3), 181–244. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3696594
  • Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1989). Rational choice and the framing of decisions. The Journal of Business, 59(4), S251–S278. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2352759
  • Wegener, D. T., Kerr, N. L., Fleming, M. A., & Petty, R. E. (2000). Flexible corrections of juror judgments: Implications for jury instructions. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 6(3), 629–654. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8971.6.3.629
  • Wegener, D. T., & Petty, R. E. (1997). The flexible correction model: The role of naïve theories of bias in bias correction. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 29, 141–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60017-9
  • Willis, J., & Todorov, A. (2006). First impressions: Making up your mind after a 100-ms exposure to a face. Psychological Science, 17(7), 592–598. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01750.x
  • Winter, B., Daguna, J., & Matlock, T. (2018). Metaphor-enriched social cognition and spatial bias in the courtroom. Metaphor and the Social World, 8(1), 81–99. https://doi.org/10.1075/msw.17001.win
  • Wolf, S., & Montgomery, D. A. (1977). Effects of inadmissible evidence and level of judicial admonishment to disregard on the judgments of mock jurors. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 7(3), 205–219. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1977.tb00746.x
  • Yi, Y. (1990). The effects of contextual priming in print advertisements. Journal of Consumer Research, 17(2), 215–222. https://doi.org/10.1086/208551
  • Zebrowitz, L. A., & Montepare, J. M. (2008). Social psychological face perception: Why appearance matters. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2(3), 1497–1517. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2008.00109.x
  • Zhang, L., Atari, M., Schwarz, N., Newman, E. J., & Afhami, R. (2022). Conceptual metaphors, processing fluency, and aesthetic preference. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 98, 104247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2021.104247
  • Zoom Support. (2022, September 29). Zoom virtual background system requirements. https://support.zoom.us/hc/en-us/articles/360043484511-Zoom-Virtual-Background-system-requirements