Moral foundations and criminality: comparing community members to prisoners and violent/non-violent offenders

References

• Atari, M., Lai, M. H. C., & Dehghani, M. (2020). Sex differences in moral judgements across 67 countries. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 287(1937), 20201201. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2020.1201
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atran, S., & Gómez, Á. (2018). What motivates devoted actors to extreme sacrifice, identity fusion, or sacred values? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 41, e193. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X18001565
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Augsburger, A., Neri, C., Bodenmann, P., Gravier, B., Jaquier, V., & Clair, C. (2022). Assessing incarcerated women’s physical and mental health status and needs in a Swiss prison: A cross-sectional study. Health & Justice, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40352-022-00171-z
   Google Scholar
• Austin, P. C. (2011). An introduction to propensity score methods for reducing the effects of confounding in observational studies. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 46(3), 399–424. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2011.568786
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Böhm, R., Thielmann, I., & Hilbig, B. E. (2018). The brighter the light, the deeper the shadow: Morality also fuels aggression, conflict, and violence. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 41, e98. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X18000031
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clifford, S., Iyengar, V., Cabeza, R., & Sinnott-Armstrong, W. (2015). Moral foundations vignettes: A standardized stimulus database of scenarios based on moral foundations theory. Behavior Research Methods, 47(4), 1178–1198. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-014-0551-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cross, N. (2010). Criminal law & criminal justice: An introduction. SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446288283
   Google Scholar
• Dahl, A. (2023). What we do when we define morality (And why we need to do it). Psychological Inquiry. Accepted. https://osf.io/y8mf7
   Google Scholar
• Decety, J., & Cowell, J. M. (2014). The complex relation between morality and empathy. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 18(7), 337–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2014.04.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fassin, D. (2012). A companion to moral anthropology. John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Fijnaut, C. (2017). Criminology and the criminal justice system. Intersentia. https://intersentia.com/en/shop/vakgebied/criminology/criminology-and-the-criminal-justice-system.html
   Google Scholar
• Fletcher, G. P. (1998). Basic concepts of criminal law. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Geldof, T., Popovic, D., Van Damme, N., Huys, I., & Van Dyck, W. (2020). Nearest neighbour propensity score matching and bootstrapping for estimating binary patient response in oncology: A monte carlo simulation. Scientific Reports, 10(1), 964. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-57799-w
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ginges, J., & Atran, S. (2009). What motivates participation in violent political action: Selective incentives or parochial altruism? Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1167(1), 115–123. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.04543.x
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Graham, J., & Haidt, J. (2012). Sacred values and evil adversaries: A moral foundations approach. In The social psychology of morality: Exploring the causes of good and evil (pp. 11–31). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/13091-001
   Google Scholar
• Graham, J., Haidt, J., Koleva, S., Motyl, M., Iyer, R., Wojcik, S.P., & Ditto, P.H. (2013). Moral foundations theory: The pragmatic validity of moral pluralism. In P. Devine & A. Plant (Eds.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 47, pp. 55–130). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-407236-7.00002-4
   Google Scholar
• Graham, J., Haidt, J., Motyl, M., Meindl, P., Iskiwitch, C., & Mooijman, M. (2018). Moral foundations theory: On the advantages of moral pluralism over moral monism. In K. Gray, & J. Graham (Eds.), Atlas of moral psychology (pp. 211–222). The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, J., Haidt, J., & Nosek, B. A. (2009). Liberals and conservatives rely on different sets of moral foundations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96(5), 1029–1046. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015141
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, J., Nosek, B. A., Haidt, J., Iyer, R., Koleva, S., & Ditto, P. H. (2011). Mapping the moral domain. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(2), 366–385. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021847
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haidt, J. (2001). The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychological Review, 108(4), 814–834. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.108.4.814
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haidt, J. (2012). The righteous mind: Why good people are divided by politics and religion. Pantheon/Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Henrich, J., Heine, S. J., & Norenzayan, A. (2010). Most people are not WEIRD. Nature, 466(7302), 29. https://doi.org/10.1038/466029a
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirschberger, G., & Pyszczynski, T. (2012). Killing with a clean conscience: Existential angst and the paradox of morality. In The social psychology of morality: Exploring the causes of good and evil (pp. 331–347). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/13091-018
   Google Scholar
• Holmes, O.W. (2009). The common law. Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674054011
   Google Scholar
• Jach, Ł, Paruzel-Czachura, M., Luke, A., & Jonason, P. K. (2023). How do the moral foundations attract the needle of a moral compass?: Relative scores as a supplementary method of measuring moral foundations. Personality and Individual Differences, 205, 112106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2023.112106
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jarmakowski-Kostrzanowski, T., & Jarmakowska-Kostrzanowska, L. (2016). The Polish adaptation of moral foundation questionnaire (MFQ-PL). Social Psychological Bulletin, 39, 489–508.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, K. A., Hewson, T., Sales, C. P., & Khalifa, N. (2019). A systematic review and meta-analysis of decision-making in offender populations with mental disorder. Neuropsychology Review, 29(2), 244–258. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11065-018-09397-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kho, M.E., Duffett, M., Willison, D.J., Cook, D.J., & Brouwers, M.C. (2009). Written informed consent and selection bias in observational studies using medical records: Systematic review. BMJ, 338(mar12 2), b866. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b866
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kivikangas, J. M., Fernández-Castilla, B., Järvelä, S., Ravaja, N., & Lönnqvist, J.-E. (2021). Moral foundations and political orientation: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 147(1), 55–94. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000308
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koleva, S. P., Graham, J., Iyer, R., Ditto, P. H., & Haidt, J. (2012). Tracing the threads: How five moral concerns (especially Purity) help explain culture war attitudes. Journal of Research in Personality, 46(2), 184–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2012.01.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marmor, A., & Sarch, A. (2001). The nature of law. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2015/entries/lawphil-nature/
   Google Scholar
• Marsh, I. (Ed.). (2006). Theories of crime. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203030516
   Google Scholar
• Međedović, J., & Vujičić, N. (2022). How dark is the personality of murderers? Psychopathy, machiavellianism, and sadism in homicide offenders. Personality and Individual Differences, 197, 111772. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2022.111772
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mikhail, J. (2007). Universal moral grammar: Theory, evidence, and the future. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11(4), 143–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2006.12.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milesi, P., Süssenbach, P., Bohner, G., & Megías, J. L. (2020). The interplay of modern myths about sexual aggression and moral foundations in the blaming of rape victims. European Journal of Social Psychology, 50(1), 111–123. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2622
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Institute of Corrections. (2015). World prison population list (11th ed.). https://nicic.gov/world-prison-population-listeleventh-edition
   Google Scholar
• Nuytiens, A., & Christiaens, J. (2016). Female pathways to crime and prison: Challenging the (US) gendered pathways perspective. European Journal of Criminology, 13(2), 195–213. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477370815608879
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paciello, M., Fida, R., Tramontano, C., Lupinetti, C., & Caprara, G. V. (2008). Stability and change of moral disengagement and its impact on aggression and violence in late adolescence. Child Development, 79(5), 1288–1309. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2008.01189.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paruzel-Czachura, M. (2016). Moral judgments and moral integrity—three empirical studies. In Dual-process theories in moral psychology: Interdisciplinary approaches to theoretical, empirical and practical considerations (pp. 159–184). Springer VS. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-12053-5
   Google Scholar
• Paruzel-Czachura, M. (2023). What is morality? Narrow and broad definition. Psychological Inquiry. Accepted. https://psyarxiv.com/k79bw
   Google Scholar
• Paruzel-Czachura, M., & Białek, M. (2022). Penitence congruity effect: Even murderers are seen as less immoral when expressing guilt and deontological beliefs. Psychology, Crime & Law. https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2022.2077944
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paruzel-Czachura, M., & Farny, Z. (2023). Psychopathic traits and utilitarian moral judgment revisited. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1461672231169105. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672231169105
   Google Scholar
• Saroglou, V., & Craninx, M. (2021). Religious moral righteousness over care: A review and a meta-analysis. Current Opinion in Psychology, 40, 79–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2020.09.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schein, C., & Gray, K. (2018). The theory of dyadic morality: Reinventing moral judgment by redefining harm. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 22(1), 32–70. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868317698288
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sedikides, C., Meek, R., Alicke, M. D., & Taylor, S. (2014). Behind bars but above the bar: Prisoners consider themselves more prosocial than non-prisoners. British Journal of Social Psychology, 53(2), 396–403. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12060
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silver, E., & Abell, L. (2016). Beyond harm and fairness: A study of deviance and morality. Deviant Behavior, 37(5), 496–508. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639625.2015.1060746
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silver, J. R., & Silver, E. (2021). The nature and role of morality in offending: A moral foundations approach. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 58(3), 343–380. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022427820960201
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skitka, L. J., & Mullen, E. (2002). The dark side of moral conviction. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 2(1), 35–41. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-2415.2002.00024.x
   Google Scholar
• Smith, I. H., Aquino, K., Koleva, S., & Graham, J. (2014). The moral ties that bind . . . Even to Out-groups: The interactive effect of moral identity and the binding moral foundations. Psychological Science, 25(8), 1554–1562. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797614534450
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Statista. (2021). Countries with the most prisoners 2021. https://www.statista.com/statistics/262961/countries-with-the-most-prisoners/
   Google Scholar
• Swavola, E., Riley, K., & Subramanian, R. (2016). Overlooked: Women and jails in an era of reform. Vera Institute of Justice.
   Google Scholar
• Szekér, S., & Vathy-Fogarassy, Á. (2020). Weighted nearest neighbours-based control group selection method for observational studies. PloS One, 15(7), e0236531. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236531
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, R., Newton, A., & Reeves, C. (2021). Exploring the relationship between morality and offending through the use of the Moral Foundations Questionnaire. Crime Prevention and Community Safety, 23(4), 381–399. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41300-021-00126-w
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vecina, M. L. (2014). The Five Moral Foundations Sacredness Scale in men in court-mandated treatment for violently abusing their partners. Personality and Individual Differences, 64, 46–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2014.02.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vecina, M. L., & Chacón, J. C. (2021). The extreme moral diversity of men convicted of violence against their partners: Four profiles based on the five moral foundations. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 36(15-16), 7393–7413. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260519835005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vecina, M. L., Marzana, D., & Paruzel-Czachura, M. (2015). Connections between moral psychology and intimate partner violence: Can IPV be read through moral psychology? Aggression and Violent Behavior, 22, 120–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2015.04.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waldron, R.J., Quarles, C.L., McElreath, D.H., Waldron, M.E., & Milstein, D.E. (2009). The criminal justice system: An introduction. Routledge.
   Google Scholar