Perceived utility of community notification for sexually violent persons (SVP) on supervised release

References

• Ackerman, A., Sacks, M., & Greenberg, D. (2012). Legislation targeting sex offenders: Are recent policies effective in reducing rape? Justice Quarterly, 29(6), 858–887. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2011.566887
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ambroziak, G., Vincent, S. R., Kahn, R. E., Munt, J. C., & Thornton, D. (2023). Recidivism and violations among sexually violent persons on supervised release. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 29(1), 93–105. https://doi.org/10.1037/law0000364
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). American Psychiatric Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.books.9780890425596
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, A. L., & Sample, L. L. (2008). Public awareness and action resulting from sex offender community notification laws. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 19(4), 371–396. https://doi.org/10.1177/0887403408316705
   Google Scholar
• Bonta, J., & Andrews, D. A. (2007). Risk-need-responsivity model for offender assessment and rehabilitation. Rehabilitation, 6(1), 1–22.
   Google Scholar
• Brannon, Y. N., Levenson, J. S., Fortney, T., & Baker, J. N. (2007). Attitudes about community notification: A comparison of sexual offenders and the non-offending public. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 19(4), 369–379. https://doi.org/10.1177/107906320701900403
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, S., Deakin, J., & Spencer, J. (2008). What people think about the management of sex offenders in the community. The Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 47(3), 259–274. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2311.2008.00519.x
   Google Scholar
• Bruning, J. L., & Kintz, B. L. (1977). Computational handbook of statistics (2nd ed.). Scott, Foresman and Company.
   Google Scholar
• Calobrisi, E. A., & Knight, R. A. (2022). Comparison of community and expert samples in the perceived risk of individuals who have sexually offended. Sexual Abuse. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/107906322211391
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caputo, A. A., & Brodsky, S. L. (2004). Citizen coping with community notifications of released sex offenders. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 22(2), 239–252. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.566
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Efron, B., & Tibshirani, R. J. (1993). An introduction to the bootstrap. Chapman & Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Finn, P. (1997). Sex offender community notification. National Justice of Justice. U. S. Department of Justice.
   Google Scholar
• Gesser, N. (2021). What you expect is not what you get: The antitherapeutic impact of sex offender community notification meetings on the community. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 27(3), 432–447. https://doi.org/10.1037/law0000303
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanson, R. K., Bourgon, G., Helmus, L., & Hodgson, S. (2009). A meta-analysis of the effectiveness of treatment for sexual offenders: Risk, need, and responsivity (User Report, 1).
   Google Scholar
• Harper, C. A., Hogue, T. E., & Bartels, R. M. (2017). Attitudes towards sexual offenders: What do we know, and why are they important? Aggression and Violent Behavior, 34, 201–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2017.01.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helmus, L., Hanson, R. K., Thornton, D., Babchishin, K. M., & Harris, A. J. (2012). Absolute recidivism rates predicted by static-99R and static-2002R sex offender risk assessment tools vary across samples: A meta-analysis. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 39(9), 1148–1171. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854812443648
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koon-Magnin, S. (2015). Perceptions of and support for sex offender policies: Testing Levenson, Brannon, Fortney, and Baker’s findings. Journal of Criminal Justice, 43(1), 80–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2014.12.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lasher, M. P., & McGrath, R. J. (2012). The impact of community notification on sex offender reintegration: A quantitative review of the research literature. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 56(1), 6–28. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X10387524
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levenson, J. S., Brannon, Y. N., Fortney, T., & Baker, J. (2007). Public perceptions about sex offenders and community prevention policies. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 7(1), 137–161. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-2415.2007.00119.x
   Google Scholar
• Levenson, J. S., & Cotter, L. P. (2005). The effect of Megan’s Law on sex offender registration. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 21(91), 49–66. https://doi.org/10.1177/1043986204271676
   Google Scholar
• Mercado, C. C., Alvares, S., & Levenson, J. (2008). The impact of specialized sex offender legislation on community reentry. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 20(20), 188–205. https://doi.org/10.1177/1079063208317540
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sandler, J. C., Freeman, N. J., & Socia, K. M. (2008). Does a watched pot boil? A time-series analysis of New York state’s sex offender registration and notification law. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 14(4), 284–302. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013881
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spoo, S., Kaylor, L. E., Schaaf, S., Rosselli, M., Laake, A., Johnson, C., & Jelic, E. L. (2018). Victims’ attitude toward sex offenders and sex offender legislation. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 62(11), 3385–3407. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X17740537
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• State v. Smalley, WI. Ct. of App. (2007). https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case = 7455075745193791502&q = 2007+WI+App+219&hl = en&as_sdt = 4,50&as_vis = 1
   Google Scholar
• Tewksbury, R., & Lees, M. (2006). Perceptions of sex offender registration: Collateral consequences and community experiences. Sociological Spectrum, 26(3), 309–334. https://doi.org/10.1080/02732170500524246
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wechsler, D. (1997). Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale – third edition. Psychological Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Wechsler, D. (2008). Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale – fourth edition. Pearson Assessment.
   Google Scholar
• Zevitz, R. G. (2006). Sex offender community notification: Its role in recidivism and offender reintegration. Criminal Justice Studies, 19(2), 193–208. https://doi.org/10.1080/14786010600764567
   Google Scholar
• Zevitz, R. G., Crim, D., & Farkas, M. A. (2000a). Sex offender community notification: Examining the importance of neighborhood meetings. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 18(2–3), 393–408. https://doi.org/10.1002/1099-0798(200003/06)18:2/3<393::AID-BSL381>3.0.CO;2-O
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zevitz, R. G., Crim, D., & Farkas, M. A. (2000b). Sex offender community notification: Managing high risk criminals or exacting further vengeance. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 18(2–3), 375–391. https://doi.org/10.1002/1099-0798(200003/06)18:2/3<375::AID-BSL380>3.0.CO;2-N
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zevitz, R. G., & Farkas, M. (2000). Sex offender community notification: Assessing the impact in Wisconsin. National Justice of Justice. U. S. Department of Justice.
   Google Scholar
• Zgoba, K. M., & Mitchell, M. M. (2021). The effectiveness of sex offender registration and notification: A meta-analysis of 25 years of findings. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 19(1), 71–96. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-021-09480-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar