A survey of US police on-the-scene and station witness interviews and recording practices

References

• Aamodt, M., & Custer, H. (2006). Who can best catch a liar? A meta-analysis of individual differences in detecting deception. Forensic Examiner, 15(1), 6–11.
   Google Scholar
• Akca, D., Larivière, C. D., & Eastwood, J. (2021). Assessing the efficacy of investigative interviewing training courses: A systematic review. International Journal of Police Science & Management, 23(1), 73–84. https://doi.org/10.1177/14613557211008470
   Google Scholar
• Baldwin, J. (1993). Police interview techniques: Establishing truth or proof? British Journal of Criminology, 33(3), 325–352. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.bjc.a048329
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bond, C. F., Jr., & & DePaulo, B. M. (2006). Accuracy of deception judgments. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10(3), 214–234. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr1003_2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chenier, K., Milne, R., Shawyer, A., & Snook, B. (2020). Police victim and witness interviewing in a Northern Canadian territory: Measuring perceptions and practice. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology, 37 (2), 258–270. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11896-020-09417-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke, C., & Milne, R. (2001). A national evaluation of the PEACE Investigative Interviewing Course (p. 187). Home office.
   Google Scholar
• Clifford, B. R., & George, R. (1996). A field evaluation of training in three methods of witness/victim investigative interviewing. Psychology, Crime & Law, 2(3), 231–248. https://doi.org/10.1080/10683169608409780
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dando, C., Wilcock, R., & Milne, R. (2009). The cCognitive Interview: The efficacy of a modified mental reinstatement of context procedure for frontline police investigators. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 23(1), 138–147. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1451
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dando, C. J., Geiselman, R. E., MacLeod, N., & Griffiths, A. (2015). Interviewing adult witnesses and victims. Communication in Investigative and Legal Contexts, 79–106. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118769133.ch5
   Google Scholar
• Dando, C. J., Wilcock, R., Behnkle, C., & Milne, R. (2011). Modifying the Cognitive Interview: Countenancing forensic application by enhancing practicability. Psychology, Crime & Law, 17(6), 491–511. https://doi.org/10.1080/10683160903334212
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisen, M. L., Quas, J. A., & Goodman, G. S. (2002). Memory and suggestibility in the forensic interview. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, J. R., & Fisher, R. P. (2011). Eyewitness memory: Balancing the accuracy, precision and quantity of information through metacognitive monitoring and control. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 25(3), 501–508. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1722
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher, R. P. (2010). Interviewing cooperative witnesses. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 15(1), 25–38. https://doi.org/10.1348/135532509(441891
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher, R. P., Brewer, N., & Mitchell, G. (2009). The relation between consistency and accuracy of eyewitness testimony: Legal versus cognitive explanations. In T. Williamson, R. Bull, & T. Valentine (Eds.), Handbook of psychology of investigative interviewing: Current developments and future directions (pp. 121–136). John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, R. P., & Geiselman, R. E. (1992). Memory enhancing techniques for investigative interviewing: The Cognitive Interview. Charles C Thomas Publisher.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, R. P., Geiselman, R. E., & Raymond, D. S. (1987). Critical analysis of police interview techniques. Journal of Police Science Administration, 15(3), 177–185.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher, R. P., & McCauley, M. R. (1995). Information retrieval: Interviewing witnesses. In N. Brewer (Ed.), Psychology and policing (pp. 81–99). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, R. P., Milne, R., & Bull, R. (2011). Interviewing cooperative witnesses. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20(1), 16–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721410396826
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher, R. P., Ross, S. J., & Cahill, B. S. (2010). Interviewing witnesses and victims. In P. A. Granhag (Ed.), Forensic psychology in context: Nordic and international approaches (pp. 56–74). Willan Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Geiselman, R. E., & Callot, R. (1990). Reverse versus forward recall of script-based texts. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 4(2), 141–144. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.2350040206
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ginet, M., & Py, J. (2001). A technique for enhancing memory in eye witness testimonies for use by police officers and judicial officials: The Cognitive Interview. Le Travail Humain, 64(2), 173. https://doi.org/10.3917/th.642.0173
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hauch, V., Sporer, S. L., Michael, S. W., & Meissner, C. A. (2014). Does training improve detection of deception? A meta-analysis. Communication Research, 43(3), 283–343. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650214534974
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirn Mueller, D., Schreiber Compo, N., Molina, J., Bryon, A., & Pimentel, P. S. (2015). Productive and counterproductive interviewing techniques: Do law enforcement investigators know the difference?. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 21(3), 295–308. https://doi.org/10.1037/law0000047
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hope, L., & Gabbert, F. (2019). Interviewing witnesses and victims. In N. Brewer & A. B. Douglass (Eds.), Psychological science and the law (pp. 130–156). The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hyman Gregory, A. (2009). Investigative interviewing and memory: How accurate are interviewers’ recollections of investigative interviews? [Doctoral dissertation]. Retrieved from FIU Electronic Theses and Dissertations. (199). https://doi.org/10.25148/etd.fi10022523.
   Google Scholar
• Hyman Gregory, A., Schreiber Compo, N., Vertefeuille, L., & Zambruski, G. (2011). A comparison of US police interviewers’ notes with their subsequent reports. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling, 8(2), 203–215. https://doi.org/10.1002/jip.139
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyman Gregory, A., Wolfs, A., & Schreiber Compo, N. (2022). Witness/victim interviewing: A survey of real-world investigators’ training and practices. Psychology, Crime & Law, 29(9), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2022.2043312
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inbau, F. E., Reid, J. E., Buckley, J. P., & Jayne, B. C. (2013). Criminal interrogations and confessions. Jones & Bartlett Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Kassin, S. M. (1997). The psychology of confession evidence. American Psychologist, 52(3), 221–233. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.52.3.221
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kassin, S. M., Drizin, S. A., Grisso, T., Gudjonsson, G. H., Leo, R. A., & Redlich, A. D. (2010). Police-induced confessions: Risk factors and recommendations. Law and Human Behavior, 34(1), 3–38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10979-009-9188-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kazdin, A. E. (2016). Closing the research–practice gap: How, why, and whether. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 23(2), 201–206. https://doi.org/10.1111/cpsp.12155
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kebbell, M. R., Milne, R., & Wagstaff, G. F. (1999). The Cognitive Interview: A survey of its forensic effectiveness. Psychology, Crime & Law, 5(1-2), 101–115. https://doi.org/10.1080/10683169908414996
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• La Rooy, D., Brubacher, S. P., Aromäki-Stratos, A., Cyr, M., Hershkowitz, I., Korkman, J., Myklebust, T., Naka, M., Peixoto, C. E., Roberts, K. P., Stewart, H., & Lamb, M. E. (2015). The NICHD protocol: A review of an internationally-used evidence-based tool for training child forensic interviewers. Journal of Criminological Research, Policy and Practice, 1(2), 76–89. https://doi.org/10.1108/jcrpp-01-2015-0001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• La Rooy, D., & Dando, C. (2010). Witness interviewing. In G. J. Towl & D. A. Crighton (Eds.), Forensic psychology (pp. 195–209). Wiley Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Launay, C., & Py, J. (2015). Methods and aims of investigative interviewing of adult witnesses: An analysis of professional practices. Pratiques Psychologiques, 21(1), 55–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prps.2014.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loftus, E. F. (1975). Leading questions and the eyewitness report. Cognitive Psychology, 7(4), 560–572. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(75)90023-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loftus, E. F., & Fathi, D. C. (1985). Retrieving multiple autobiographical memories. Social Cognition, 3(3), 280–295. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.1985.3.3.280
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loftus, E. F., Miller, D. G., & Burns, H. J. (1978). Semantic integration of verbal information into a visual memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 4(1), 19–31. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.4.1.19
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Luus, C. A., & Wells, G. L. (1994). The malleability of eyewitness confidence: Co-witness and perseverance effects. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79(5), 714. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.79.5.714
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacDonald, S., Snook, B., & Milne, R. (2017). Witness interview training: A field evaluation. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology, 32(1), 77–84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11896-016-9197-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mattison, M. L. A., Dando, C. J., & Ormerod, T. C. (2014). Sketching to remember: Episodic free recall task support for child witnesses and victims with Autism Spectrum Disorder. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 45(6), 1751–1765. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-014-2335-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCartney, C., & Shorter, L. (2023). ‘You don’t know what you’ve got ‘til it’s gone’: Police retention of investigative materials. International Journal of Police Science & Management, 26(1), 94–106. https://doi.org/10.1177/14613557231203493
   Google Scholar
• Meissner, C. A., & Lyles, A. M. (2019). Title IX investigations: The importance of training investigators in evidence-based approaches to interviewing. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 8(4), 387–397. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2019.07.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Memon, A., Meissner, C. A., & Fraser, J. (2010). The Cognitive Interview: A meta-analytic review and study space analysis of the past 25 years. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 16(4), 340–372. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020518
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Memon, A., & Stevenage, S. V. (1996). Interviewing witnesses: What works and what doesn’t. Psycholoquy, 7(6). https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2000-03268-001
   Google Scholar
• National Institute of Justice. (1999). Eyewitness evidence: A guide for law enforcement. US Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, National Institute of Justice.
   Google Scholar
• Neal, C. (2019). An evaluation of police interviewing methods: A psychological perspective [Honors thesis]. University of Nebraska-Lincoln.
   Google Scholar
• Paterson, H. M., Kemp, R. I., & Ng, J. R. (2011). Combating co-witness contamination: Attempting to decrease the negative effects of discussion on eyewitness memory. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 25(1), 43–52. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1640
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perfect, T. J., Andrade, J., & Eagan, I. (2011). Eye-closure reduces the cross-modal memory impairment caused by auditory distraction. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 37(4), 1008–1013. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022930
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schreiber Compo, N., Hyman Gregory, A., & Fisher, R. (2012). Interviewing behaviors in police investigators: A field study of a current US sample. Psychology, Crime & Law, 18(4), 359–375. https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316x.2010.494604
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharman, S. J., & Powell, M. B. (2012). A comparison of adult witnesses’ suggestibility across various types of leading questions. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 26(1), 48–53. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1793
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaw J. S., III, Garven, S., & Wood, J. M. (1997). Co-witness information can have immediate effects on eyewitness memory reports. Law and Human Behavior, 21(5), 503–523. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024875723399
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snook, B., House, J. C., MacDonald, S., & Eastwood, J. (2012). Police witness interview training, supervision, and feedback: A survey of Canadian police officers. Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice, 54(3), 363–372. https://doi.org/10.3138/cjccj.2011.E.13
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stephan, K. M. K. (2002). Research on police officers: Addressing the gap between research and practice [Doctoral dissertation]. University of Hawai'i at Manoa. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global.
   Google Scholar
• Swanner, J. K., Meissner, C. A., Atkinson, D. J., & Dianiska, R. E. (2016). Developing diagnostic, evidence-based approaches to interrogation. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 5(3), 295–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2016.07.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tkachenko, O., Hahn, H. J., & Peterson, S. L. (2017). Research–practice gap in applied fields: An integrative literature review. Human Resource Development Review, 16(3), 235–262. https://doi.org/10.1177/153448431770756
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vallano, J. P., & Compo, N. S. (2011). A comfortable witness is a good witness: Rapport-building and susceptibility to misinformation in an investigative mock-crime interview. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 25(6), 960–970. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.v25.6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vallano, J. P., Evans, J. R., Schreiber Compo, N., & Kieckhaefer, J. M. (2015). Rapport-building during witness and suspect interviews: A survey of law enforcement. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 29(3), 369–380. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.v29.3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vredeveldt, A., Hitch, G. J., & Baddeley, A. D. (2011). Eyeclosure helps memory by reducing cognitive load and enhancing visualization. Memory & Cognition, 39(7), 1253–1263. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-011-0098-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vredeveldt, A., & Penrod, S. D. (2013). Eye-closure improves memory for a witnessed event under naturalistic conditions. Psychology, Crime, & Law, 19(10), 893–905. https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2012.700313
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vredeveldt, A., Tredoux, C. G., Nortje, A., Kempen, K., Puljević, C., & Labuschagne, G. N. (2015). A field evaluation of the Eye-Closure Interview with witnesses of serious crimes. Law and Human Behavior, 39(2), 189–197. https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000113
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wise, R. A., Safer, M. A., & Maro, C. M. (2011). What U.S. law enforcement officers know and believe about eyewitness factors, eyewitness interviews and identification procedures. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 25(3), 488–500. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1717
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaragoza, M. S., Belli, R. F., & Payment, K. E. (2013). Misinformation effects and the suggestibility of eyewitness memory. In M. Garry & H. Hayne (Eds.), Do justice and let the sky fall (pp. 35–63). Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar