Stigmatizing ‘evildoers’: how beliefs about evil and public stigma explain criminal justice policy preferences

References

• Aronow, P. M., Baron, J., & Pinson, L. (2019). A note on dropping experimental subjects who fail a manipulation check. Political Analysis, 27(4), 572–589. doi:10.1017/pan.2019.5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker, J. O., & Booth, A. L. (2016). Hell to pay: Religion and punitive ideology among the American public. Punishment & Society, 18(2), 151–176. doi:10.1177/1462474516635886
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bastian, B., Bain, P., Buhrmester, M. D., Gómez, Á, Vázquez, A., Knight, C. G., & Swann, W. B., Jr. (2015). Moral vitalism: Seeing good and evil as real, agentic forces. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 41(8), 1069–1081. doi:10.1177/0146167215589819
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bastian, B., Denson, T. F., & Haslam, N. (2013). The roles of dehumanization and moral outrage in retributive justice. PLoS One, 8(4), e61842. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0061842
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumeister, R. F. (1997). Evil: Inside human violence and cruelty. Henry Holt.
   Google Scholar
• Berinsky, A. J., Margolis, M. F., & Sances, M. W. (2014). Separating the shirkers from the workers? Making sure respondents pay attention on self-administered surveys. American Journal of Political Science, 58(3), 739–753. doi:10.1111/ajps.12081
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berkowitz, L. (1999). Evil is more than banal: Situationism and the concept of evil. In Miller A. G. (Ed.), Perspectives on Evil and Violence (pp. 246–253). Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boas, T. C., Christenson, D. P., & Glick, D. M. (2020). Recruiting large online samples in the United States and India: Facebook, mechanical turk, and qualtrics. Political Science Research and Methods, 8(2), 232–250. doi:10.1017/psrm.2018.28
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, E. K., & Socia, K. M. (2017). Twenty-first century punitiveness: Social sources of punitive American views reconsidered. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 33(4), 935–959. doi:10.1007/s10940-016-9319-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burris, C. T., & Rempel, J. K. (2008). The devil you think you know: A psychology of evil. In Billias N. (Ed.), Territories of evil (pp. 13–28). Brill.
   Google Scholar
• Burris, C. T., & Rempel, J. K. (2011). “Just look at him”: Punitive responses cued by “evil” symbols. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 33(1), 69–80. doi:10.1080/01973533.2010.539961
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burton, A. L., Cullen, F. T., Burton, V. S., Jr., Graham, A., Butler, L. C., & Thielo, A. J. (2020). Belief in redeemability and punitive public opinion: “Once a criminal, always a criminal” revisited. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 47(6), 712–732. doi:10.1177/0093854820913585
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burton, A. L., Pickett, J. T., Jonson, C. L., Cullen, F. T., & Burton, V. S., Jr. (2021). Public support for policies to reduce school shootings: A moral-altruistic model. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 58(3), 269–305. doi:10.1177/0022427820953202
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, M., & Vollhardt, J. R. (2014). Fighting the good fight: The relationship between belief in evil and support for violent policies. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 40(1), 16–33. doi:10.1177/0146167213500997
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlsmith, K. M., Darley, J. M., & Robinson, P. H. (2002). Why do we punish? Deterrence and just deserts as motives for punishment. Journal of personality and social psychology, 83(2), 284–299. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.83.2.284
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carter, J. S., & Corra, M. (2016). Racial resentment and attitudes toward the use of force by police: An over-time trend analysis. Sociological Inquiry, 86(4), 492–511. doi:10.1111/soin.12136
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cawthorne, N. (2009). The world's ten most evil men-from twisted dictators to child killers. Kings Road Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Chandler, J., Rosenzweig, C., Moss, A. J., Robinson, J., & Litman, L. (2019). Online panels in social science research: Expanding sampling methods beyond Mechanical Turk. Behavior Research Methods, 51(5), 2022–2038. doi:10.3758/s13428-019-01273-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho, E., & Kim, S. (2015). Cronbach’s coefficient alpha: Well known but poorly understood. Organizational Research Methods, 18(2), 207–230. doi:10.1177/1094428114555994
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cortina, J. M. (1993). What is coefficient alpha? An examination of theory and applications. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(1), 98–104. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.78.1.98
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cullen, E. (2020). American evil: The psychology of serial killers. Waterside Press.
   Google Scholar
• Darley, J. M., Carlsmith, K. M., & Robinson, P. H. (2000). Incapacitation and just deserts as motives for punishment. Law and human behavior, 24(6), 659–683. doi:10.1023/A:1005552203727
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denver, M., Pickett, J. T., & Bushway, S. D. (2017). The language of stigmatization and the mark of violence: Experimental evidence on the social construction and use of criminal record stigma. Criminology; An interdisciplinary Journal, 55(3), 664–690. doi:10.1111/1745-9125.12145
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Vel-Palumbo, M., Howarth, L., & Brewer, M. B. (2019). Once a sex offender always a sex offender’? Essentialism and attitudes towards criminal justice policy. Psychology, Crime & Law, 25(5), 421–439. doi:10.1080/1068316X.2018.1529234
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durkheim, E. (1984). The division of labor in society. Free Press (Original work published 1893).
   Google Scholar
• Duxbury, S. W. (2021). Fear or loathing in the United States? Public opinion and the rise of racial disparity in mass incarceration, 1978–2015. Social Forces, 100(2), 427–453. doi:10.1093/sf/soaa112
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellison, C. G., Dowd-Arrow, B., Burdette, A. M., Gonzalez, P. E., Kelley, M. S., & Froese, P. (2021). Peace through superior firepower: Belief in supernatural evil and attitudes toward gun policy in the United States. Social Science Research, 99, 102595. doi:10.1016/j.ssresearch.2021.102595
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elsby, C., & Luzecky, R. (2017). Empathy and evil: Drug-dealing murderers are people too. Philosophy and Breaking Bad, 35–44. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-40343-4_3
   Google Scholar
• Enns, P. K. (2014). The public's increasing punitiveness and its influence on mass incarceration in the United States. American Journal of Political Science, 58(4), 857–872. doi:10.1111/ajps.12098
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fousiani, K., & van Prooijen, J. W. (2019). Reactions to offenders: Psychological differences between beliefs versus punishment. British Journal of Social Psychology, 58(4), 894–916. doi:10.1111/bjso.12320
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franscell, R. (2011). Delivered from evil: True stories of ordinary people who faced monstrous mass killers and survived. Fair Winds Press.
   Google Scholar
• Frum, D., & Perle, R. T. (2004). An end to evil: How to win the war on terror. Ballantine Books.
   Google Scholar
• Garland, D. (1990). Punishment and modern society: A study in social theory. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. (1963). Stigma: Notes on the management of spoiled identity. Penguin Books.
   Google Scholar
• Govrin, A. (2018). The cognition of severe moral failure: A novel approach to the perception of evil. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, Article 557. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00557
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, J., & Haidt, J. (2012). Sacred values and evil adversaries: A moral foundations approach. In M. Mikulincer & P. R. Shaver (Eds.), The social psychology of morality: Exploring the causes of good and evil (pp. 11–31). American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Greig, C. (2006). Evil serial killers: In the minds of monsters [Fully Illustrated]. Arcturus Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Gromet, D. M., Goodwin, G. P., & Goodman, R. A. (2016). Pleasure from another’s pain: The influence of a target’s hedonic states on attributions of immorality and evil. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 42(8), 1077–1091. doi:10.1177/0146167216651408
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haney, C. (2020). Criminality in context: The psychological foundations of criminal justice reform. American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Hayes, A. F. (2018). Partial, conditional, and moderated moderated mediation: Quantification, inference, and interpretation. Communication Monographs, 85(1), 4–40. doi:10.1080/03637751.2017.1352100
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heiphetz, L. (2020, January 29). Let’s stop talking about ‘evil’ criminals. The Crime Report. https://thecrimereport.org/2020/01/29/lets-stop-talking-about-evil-criminals/
   Google Scholar
• Hickert, A., Shi, L., & Silver, J. R. (2024). Is compassion the flip side of punitiveness? Incorporating COVID-19 crisis in experimental vignettes to examine support for visitation and vaccination in prison. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 20(1), 1–22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11292-022-09523-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirschfield, P. J., & Piquero, A. R. (2010). Normalization and legitimation: Modeling stigmatizing attitudes toward ex-offenders. Criminology; An interdisciplinary Journal, 48(1), 27–55. doi:10.1111/j.1745-9125.2010.00179.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hurt, C. (2009). Evil has a new name (and a new narrative): Bernard Madoff. Michigan State Law Review, 947–987.
   Google Scholar
• Jackl, H. M. (2023). The effects of language on the stigmatization and exclusion of returning citizens: Results from a survey experiment. Punishment & Society, 25(2), 471–499. doi:10.1177/14624745211059318
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kort-Butler, L. A. (2012). Rotten, vile, and depraved! Depictions of criminality in superhero cartoons. Deviant Behavior, 33(7), 566–581. doi:10.1080/01639625.2011.636718
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kotzian, P., Stoeber, T., Hoos, F., & Weissenberger, B. E. (2020). To be or not to be in the sample? On using manipulation checks in experimental accounting research. Accounting Research Journal, 33(3), 469–482. doi:10.1108/ARJ-06-2019-0128
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehmann, P. S., Pickett, J. T., & Denver, M. (2020). Public opinion on criminal records and employment: A test of competing theoretical models. Crime & Delinquency, 66(6-7), 995–1022. doi:10.1177/0011128719875699
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, J. W., & Heiphetz, L. (2021). “Internally wicked”: Investigating how and why essentialism influences punitiveness and moral condemnation. Cognitive Science, 45(6), e12991. doi:10.1111/cogs.12991
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martinez, B. C., Tom, J. C., & Baker, J. O. (2022). Flowing across with demonic hate: Belief in supernatural evil and support for stricter immigration policy. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 61(2), 408–432. doi:10.1111/jssr.12787
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montgomery, J. M., Nyhan, B., & Torres, M. (2018). How conditioning on posttreatment variables can ruin your experiment and what to do about it. American Journal of Political Science, 62(3), 760–775. doi:10.1111/ajps.12357
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olson, D. T. (2019). Evil desire: Recollections of a sex crimes detective. Genius Book Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Peyton, K., Huber, G. A., & Coppock, A. (2022). The generalizability of online experiments conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Experimental Political Science, 9(3), 379–394. doi:10.1017/XPS.2021.17
   Google Scholar
• Phillips, N. D. (2010). The Dark Knight: Constructing images of good vs. evil in an age of anxiety. In Deflem M. (Ed.), Popular culture, crime and social control (Vol. 14, pp. 25–44). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Pickett, J. T. (2019). Public opinion and criminal justice policy: Theory and research. Annual Review of Criminology, 2(1), 405–428. doi:10.1146/annurev-criminol-011518-024826
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pickett, J. T., & Baker, T. (2014). The pragmatic American: Empirical reality or methodological artifact? Criminology; An interdisciplinary Journal, 52(2), 195–222. doi:10.1111/1745-9125.12035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pickett, J. T., & Baker, T. (2017). Punishment and solidarity? An experimental test of the educative-moralizing effects of legal sanctions. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 13(2), 217–240. doi:10.1007/s11292-017-9287-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pickett, J. T., Mancini, C., & Mears, D. P. (2013). Vulnerable victims, monstrous offenders, and unmanageable risk: Explaining public opinion on the social control of sex crime. Criminology; An interdisciplinary Journal, 51(3), 729–759. doi:10.1111/1745-9125.12018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2004). SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36(4), 717–731. doi:10.3758/BF03206553
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40(3), 879–891. doi:10.3758/BRM.40.3.879
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Putra, I. E., Campbell-Obaid, M., & Suwartono, C. (2020). Beliefs about human nature as good versus evil influence intergroup attitudes and values. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 27(4), 576–587. doi:10.1037/pac0000469
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Revilla, M. A., Saris, W. E., & Krosnick, J. A. (2014). Choosing the number of categories in agree–disagree scales. Sociological Methods & Research, 43(1), 73–97. doi:10.1177/0049124113509605
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ricoeur, P. (1967). The symbolism of evil. Beacon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, J. V., & Stalans, L. J. (2000). Public opinion, crime, and criminal justice. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ross, L. (1977). The intuitive psychologist and his shortcomings: Distortions in the attribution process. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 10, 173–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60357-3.
   Google Scholar
• Rydberg, J., Cassidy, M., & Socia, K. M. (2018). Punishing the wicked: Examining the correlates of sentence severity for convicted sex offenders. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 34(4), 943–970. doi:10.1007/s10940-017-9360-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seto, C. H., & Said, I. (2022). Religious perceptions of crime and implications for punitiveness. Punishment & Society, 24(1), 46–68. doi:10.1177/1462474520960038
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shi, L., Silver, J. R., & Hickert, A. (2022). Conceptualizing and measuring public stigma toward people with prison records. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 49(11), 1676–1698. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/00938548221108932
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silver, J. R., & Berryessa, C. M. (2023). Remorse, perceived offender immorality, and lay sentencing preferences. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 19(2), 425–463.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silver, E., Goff, K., & Iceland, J. (2022). Social order and social justice: Moral intuitions, systemic racism beliefs, and Americans’ divergent attitudes toward Black Lives Matter and police. Criminology; An interdisciplinary Journal, 60(2), 342–369. doi:10.1111/1745-9125.12303
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silver, J. R., & Silver, E. (2017). Why are conservatives more punitive than liberals? A moral foundations approach. Law and Human Behavior, 41(3), 258–272. doi:10.1037/lhb0000232
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simms, L. J., Zelazny, K., Williams, T. F., & Bernstein, L. (2019). Does the number of response options matter? Psychometric perspectives using personality questionnaire data. Psychological Assessment, 31(4), 557–566. doi:10.1037/pas0000648
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ternovski, J., & Orr, L. (2022). A note on increases in inattentive online survey-takers since 2020. Journal of Quantitative Description: Digital Media, 2, 1–35. doi:10.51685/jqd.2022.002
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, A. J., & Pickett, J. T. (2020). Are relational inferences from crowdsourced and opt-in samples generalizable? Comparing criminal justice attitudes in the GSS and five online samples. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 36(4), 907–932. doi:10.1007/s10940-019-09436-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Unnever, J. D., Cochran, J. K., Cullen, F. T., & Applegate, B. K. (2010). The pragmatic American: Attributions of crime and the hydraulic relation hypothesis. Justice Quarterly, 27(3), 431–457. doi:10.1080/07418820902855362
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Unnever, J. D., & Cullen, F. T. (2010). The social sources of Americans’ punitiveness: A test of three competing models. Criminology; An interdisciplinary Journal, 48(1), 99–129. doi:10.1111/j.1745-9125.2010.00181.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• U.S. Census Bureau. (2022). “QuickFacts.” United States Census Bureau. https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/fact/table/US/PST045221
   Google Scholar
• van Prooijen, J. W., & van de Veer, E. (2010). Perceiving pure evil: The influence of cognitive load and prototypical evilness on demonizing. Social Justice Research, 23(4), 259–271. doi:10.1007/s11211-010-0119-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vasturia, D., Webster, R. J., & Saucier, D. A. (2018). Demons with firepower: How belief in pure evil relates to perceptions and punishments of gun violence perpetrators. Personality and Individual Differences, 122, 13–18. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2017.09.037
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webster, R. J., Morrone, N., Motyl, M., & Iyer, R. (2021a). Using trait and moral theories to understand belief in pure evil and belief in pure good. Personality and Individual Differences, 173, 110584. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2020.110584
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webster, R. J., & Saucier, D. A. (2013). Angels and demons are among us: Assessing individual differences in belief in pure evil and belief in pure good. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39(11), 1455–1470. doi:10.1177/0146167213496282
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webster, R. J., & Saucier, D. A. (2015). Demons are everywhere: The effects of belief in pure evil, demonization, and retribution on punishing criminal perpetrators. Personality and Individual Differences, 74, 72–77. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2014.09.041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webster, R. J., & Saucier, D. A. (2017). Angels everywhere? How beliefs in pure evil and pure good predict perceptions of heroic behavior. Personality and Individual Differences, 104, 387–392. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2016.08.037
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webster, R. J., Vasturia, D., & Saucier, D. A. (2021b). Demons with guns: How belief in pure evil relates to Attributional judgments for gun violence perpetrators. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 35(3), 809–818. doi:10.1002/acp.3795
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Welch, K. (2007). Black criminal stereotypes and racial profiling. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 23(3), 276–288. doi:10.1177/1043986207306870
   Google Scholar
• Wink, W. (1992). Engaging the powers: Discernment and resistance in a world of domination. Augsburg Fortress.
   Google Scholar
• Wozniak, K. H., Pickett, J. T., & Brown, E. K. (2022). Judging hardworking robbers and lazy thieves: An experimental test of act-vs. Person-Centered Punitiveness and Perceived Redeemability. Justice Quarterly, 39(7), 1565–1591.
   Google Scholar
• Yamamoto, S., & Maeder, E. M. (2019). Creating the punishment orientation questionnaire: An item response theory approach. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 45(8), 1283–1294. doi:10.1177/0146167218818485
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yankah, E. N. (2003). Good guys and bad guys: Punishing character, equality and the irrelevance of moral character to criminal punishment. Cardozo Law Review, 25, 1019–1067.
   Google Scholar
• Zack, E. S., Kennedy, J., & Long, J. S. (2019). Can nonprobability samples be used for social science research? A cautionary tale. Survey Research Methods, 13, 215–227. https://doi.org/10.18148/srm/2019.v13i2.7262
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar