A Model of Web Site Quality Assessment

References

• Athanasou, J. 1999. A framework for evaluating the effectiveness of technology assisted learning. Virtual University Journal 2, no. 1:13–21.
   Google Scholar
• Badri, M. A. 1999. Combining the analytic hierarchy process and goal programming for global facility location—allocation problem. International Journal of Production Economics 62: 237–248.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauer, C., and A. Scharl. 2000. Quantitative evaluation of web site content and structure. Internet Research 10, no. 1: 31–44.
   Google Scholar
• Beck, S. 2005. Evaluation Criteria: The Good, the Bad and the Ugly: or, why It's a Good Idea to Evaluate Web Sources. Available at http://lib.nmsu.edu/instruction/evalcrit.html (accessed in October 2005).
   Google Scholar
• Borges, J. A., I. Morales, and N. Rodriguez. 1998. Page design guidelines developed through usability testing. In Human Factors and Web Development, ed. C. Forsythe, E. Grose, and J. Ratner. N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associate Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Bramley, P. 1999. Evaluating effective management learning. Journal of European Industrial Training 23, no. 3: 145–153.
   Google Scholar
• Cosmote. 2004. Official Web site of Cosmote. Available at http://www.cosmote.gr (accessed in October 2005).
   Google Scholar
• Davies, M. 2000. Using an analytic hierarchy process in advertising creativity. Creativity and Innovation Management 9, no. 2: 100–108.
   Google Scholar
• Derek, A. and R. Tanniru. 2000. Analysis of customer satisfaction data. Milwaukee: American Society for Quality, Quality Press.
   Google Scholar
• Expert Choice. 2003. Official Web site of the provider of the Expert Choice software. Available at http://www.expertchoice.com/ (accessed in October 2005).
   Google Scholar
• Forman, E. 1985. Decision support for executive decision-makers information strategy. The Executive's Journal (Summer): 4–14.
   Google Scholar
• Frankfort-Nachmias, C., and D. Nachmias. 1992. Research methods in social sciences. London: St. Martin's Press Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Gattorna, L., and W. Walters. 1996. Managing the supply chain: A strategic perspective. Great Britain: Macmillan Business.
   Google Scholar
• Gauch, S., and Z. Xand. 2000. Incorporating quality metrics in centralized/distributed information retrieval on the World Wide Web. The 23rd Annual International ACM/SIGIR Conference Athens: 288–295.
   Google Scholar
• Grose, E., C. Forsythe, and J. Rather. 1998. Using web and traditional style guides to design web interfaces. In Human Factors and Web Development, edited by C. Forsythe, E. Grose, J. Ratner. N. J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associate Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, R., and L. Hickman. 1999. Imagic and textual components of web page design: The role of gender in subjective ratings. Virtual University journal 2, no. 2: 50–53.
   Google Scholar
• Hong, Liu, and Raj Nigam. 1981. Analytic hierarchy process applied to evaluation of financial modeling software. The 1st International Conference on Decision Support Systems Proceedings. Atlanta.
   Google Scholar
• Hwang, G. J., T. Huang, and J. Tseng. 2004. A group-decision approach for evaluating education web sites. Computers & Education 42, no. 1: 65–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IADAS. 2003. The International Academy of Digital Arts and Sciences. The webby awards 2003 judging criteria. Available at http://www.webbyawards.com/judging/criteria.html (accessed in October 2005).
   Google Scholar
• ISO. 1998a. International Organization for Standardization, ISO/IEC 14598–3, Information Technology—Software Product Evaluation — Part 3: Process for Developers, Software Engineering: Draft.
   Google Scholar
• ISO. 1998b. International Organization for Standardization, ISO/IEC FCD 9126–1.2. Information Technology—Software Product Quality, Part 1: Quality Model: Draft.
   Google Scholar
• Ivory, M. Y., R. R. Sinha, and M. A. Hearst. 2001. Empirically validated web page design metrics. The ACM SIGCHI 2001 Conference: Human Factors in Computing Systems. Seattle: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Kanerva, A., K. Keeker, K. Risden, and E. Schuh. 1997. Web usability research at Microsoft Corporation. In Human Factors and Web Development, ed. E Grose, C. Forsythe, and J. Ratner. N. J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Khorramsahahgol, R., and V. Moustakis. 1988. Delphic hierarchy process (DHP): A methodology for priority setting derived from the Delphi method and analytical hierarchy process. European Journal of Operational Research 37, no. 3: 347–354.
   Google Scholar
• Korpela, J., and A. Lehmusvaara. 1999. A customer-oriented approach to warehouse network evaluation and design. International Journal of Production Economics 59, no 1–3: 135–146.
   Google Scholar
• Kritzenberger, H., and M. Herczeg. 2001. A task and scenario based analysis model for user-centred systems. The 9th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Losavio, F. 2002. Quality models to design software architecture. Journal of Object Technology (April): 165–178.
   Google Scholar
• Mitrovic, N., and E. Mena. 2003. Improving user interface usability using mobile agents, interactive systems. In Proceedings of Design, Specification, and Verification, The 10th International Workshop DSV-IS 2003. Portugal: Springer Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Nielsen, J. 2002. Designing web usability: The practice of simplicity. Indianapolis: New Riders Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Ramanathan, R. 2001. A note on the use of the analytic hierarchy process for environmental impact assessment. Journal of Environmental Management 63, no. 1:27–35.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ratner, J., E. M. Grose, and C. Forsythe. 1996. Characterization and assessment of HTML style guides. In Proceedings of ACM CHI 96 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Available at http://www.acm.org/sigchi/chi96/proceedings/index.htm (accessed in October 2005).
   Google Scholar
• Saaty, T. 1977. A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 15, no. 3: 234–281.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saaty, T. 1986. Axiomatic foundation of the analytic hierarchy process. Management Science (January): 841–855.
   Google Scholar
• Salmeron, J. L., and I. Herrero. 2005. An AHP-based methodology to rank critical success factors of executive information systems. Computer Standards & Interfaces 28, no. 1:1–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shneiderman, B. 1992. Designing the user interface: Strategies for effective human-computer interaction. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Sloane, E. B., M. J. Liberatore, R. L. Nydick, W. Luo, and Q. Chung. 2003. Using the analytic hierarchy process as a clinical engineering tool to facilitate an iterative, multidisciplinary, microeconomic health technology assessment. Computers & Operations Research (September): 1447–1465.
   Google Scholar
• SPSS 2003. Official Web site of the provider of the SPSS software. Available at http://www.spss.com/ (accessed in October 2005).
   Google Scholar
• TIM. 2004. Official Web site of TIM. Available at http://www.tim.com.gr/ (accessed in October 2005).
   Google Scholar
• Virpi, R., and A. Kaikkonen. 2003. Acceptable download times in the mobile internet. The 10th International Conference on Human-Computer interaction, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Vodafone, 2004. Official Web site of Vodafone. Available at http://www.vodafone.gr (accessed in October 2005).
   Google Scholar
• Vora, P. 1998. Human factors methodology for designing web sites. In Human Factors and Web Development, ed. E. Grose, C. Forsythe, and J. Ratner. N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Webber, A., B. Apostolou, and M. Hassell. 1996. The sensitivity of the analytic hierarchy process to alternative scale and cue presentations. European Journal of Operational Research 96, no. 2: 351–362.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wind, Y., and T. Saaty. 1980. Marketing applications of the analytic hierarchy process. Management Science (July): 641–658.
   Google Scholar