The Influence of Continuous Improvement Practices on Learning: An Empirical Study

References

• Argyris, C. 1977. Organizational learning and management information systems. Accounting, Organizations and Society 2, no. 2:113–123.
   Google Scholar
• Bessant, J., and D. Francis. 1999. Developing strategic continuous improvement capability. international Journal of Operations # Production Management 19, no. 11:1106–1119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhote, K. R., and A. K. Bhote. 2000. World class quality: Using design of experiments to make it happen. New York: American Management Association.
   Google Scholar
• Choo, A. S., K. W. Linderman, and R. G. Schroeder. 2007. Method and psychological effects on learning behaviors and knowledge creation in quality improvement projects. Management Science 53, no. 3:437–450.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Churchman, C. W. 1972. The design of inquiring systems: Basic concepts of systems and organizations. New York: Bencis.
   Google Scholar
• Cua, K. O., K. E. McKone, and R. G. Schroeder. 2001. Relationships between implementation of TQM, JIT, and TPM and manufacturing performance. Journal of Operations Management 19, no. 6:675–694.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edmondson, A. 1999. Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly 44, no. 2:350–353.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiol, C. M., and M. A. Lyles. 1985. Organizational learning. The Academy of Management Review 10, no. 4:803–813.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flynn, B. B., S. Sakakibara, and R. G. Schroeder. 1995. Relationship between JIT and TQM: Practices and performance. The Academy of Management Journal 38, no. 5:1325–1360.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forker, L. B. 1997. Factors affecting supplier quality performance. Journal of Operations Management 15, no. 4:243–269.
   Google Scholar
• Forker, L. B., and D. Mendez. 2001. An analytical method for benchmarking best peer suppliers. International Journal of Operations # Production Management 21, no. 1/2:195–209.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fornell, C., and D. F. Larcker. 1981. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of marketing research 18:39–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grant, R. M. 1996. Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal 17, no. 10:109–22.
   Google Scholar
• Hankel, A. 2012. Shift into high gear: Transport optimization project team uses DMAIC to improve efficiency, customer satisfaction. Quality Progress 45, no. 11:30–33.
   Google Scholar
• Imai, M. 1986. Kaizen: The key to Japan's competitive success. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Kolesar, P. J. 1994. What Deming told the Japanese in 1950. Quality Management Journal 2, no. 1:9–24.
   Google Scholar
• Lance, C. E., M. M. Butts, and L. C. Michels. 2006. The sources of four commonly reported cutoff criteria — What did they really say? Organizational Research Methods 9, no. 2:202–220.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linderman, K., R. G. Schoeder, S. Zaheer, C. Liedtke, and A. S. Choo. 2004. Integrating quality management practices with knowledge creation processes. Journal of Operations Management 22, no. 6:589–607.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linderman, K., R. G. Schroeder, and J. Sanders. 2010. A knowledge framework underlying process management. Decision Sciences 41, no. 4:689–719.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacDuffie, J. P. 1997. The road to “root cause:” Shop-floor problem-solving at three auto assembly plants. Management Science 43, no. 4:479–502.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKeown, B., and D. Thomas. 1998. Q methodology. Beverly Hill, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Menor, L. J., and A. V. Roth. 2007. New service development competence in retail banking: Construct development and measurement validation. Journal of Operations Management 25, no. 4:825–846.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitki, Y., A. B. R. Shani, and Z. Meiri. 1997. Organizational learning mechanisms and continuous improvement: A longitudinal study. Journal of Organizational Change Management 10, no. 5:426–446.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, G. C., and I. Benbasat. 1991. Development of an instrument to measure the perceptions of adopting an information technology innovation. Information systems research 2, no. 3:192–222.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mukherjee, A. S., M. A. Lapre, and L. N. van Wassenhove. 1998. Knowledge driven quality improvement. Management Science 44, no. 11:35–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nair, A. 2006. Meta-analysis of the relationship between quality management practices and firm performance — Implications for quality management theory development. Journal of Operations Management 24, no. 6:948–975.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nonaka, I. 1994. A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organization Science 5, no. 1:14–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nonaka, I., and H. Takeuchi. 1995. The knowledge-creating company: How Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Osterloh, M., and B. S. Frey. 2000. Motivation, knowledge transfer, and organizational forms. Organization Science 11, no. 5:538–550.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, S., J. L. Hartley, and D. Wilson. 2001. Quality management practices and their relationship to buyer's supplier ratings: A study in the Korean automotive industry. Journal of Operations Management 19, no. 6:695–712.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peng, D. X., R. G. Schroeder, and R. Shah. 2008. Linking routines to operations capabilities: A new perspective. Journal of Operations Management 26, no. 6:730–748.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podsakoff, P. M., S. B. MacKenzie, J.-Y. Lee, and N. P. Podsakoff. 2003. Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology 88, no. 5:879–903.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quality Progress. 2012. Quality measurements fall short, survey finds. Quality Progress 45, no. 11:13.
   Google Scholar
• Roth, A. V., R. G. Schroeder, X. Huang, and M. M. Kristal. 2008. Handbook of metrics for research in operations management: Multi-item measurement scales and objective items. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Rungtusanatham, M. 2001. Beyond improved quality: The motivational effects of statistical process control. Journal of Operations Management 19, no. 6:653–673.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sabherwal, R., and I. Becerra-Fernandez. 2003. An empirical study of the effect of knowledge management processes at individual, group, and organizational levels. Decision Sciences 34, no. 2:225–260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samson, D., and M. Terziovski. 1999. The relationship between total quality management practices and operational performance. Journal of Operations Management 17, no. 4:393–409.
   Google Scholar
• Schroeder, R. G., K. Linderman, C. Liedtke, and A. S. Choo. 2008. Six Sigma: Definition and underlying theory. Journal of Operations Management 26, no. 4:536–554.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shiba, S., and D. Walden. 2001. Four practical revolutions in management: Systems for creating unique organizational capability. New York: Productivity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sitkin, S. B., K. M. Sutcliffe, and R. G. Schroeder. 1994. Distinguishing control from learning in total quality management: A contingency perspective. The Academy of Management Review 19, no. 3:537–564.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sousa, R., and C. A. Voss. 2002. Quality management re-visited: A reflective review and agenda for future research. Journal of Operations Management 20, no. 1:91–109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stauffer, R., and D. Owens. 2012. Lasting impression: Quality management's positive impact on the economy. Quality Progress 45, no. 11:24–29.
   Google Scholar
• Vera, D., and M. Crossan. 2003. Organizational learning and knowledge management: Toward an integrative framework. In Handbook of Organizational Learning and Knowledge Management, edited by M. Easterby-Smith and A. Lyles. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Winter, S. G. 1994. Organizing for continuous improvement: Evolutionary theory meets the quality revolution. In Evolutionary Dynamics of Organizations, edited by J. A. C. Baum and J. V. Singh. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zu, X., L. D. Fredendall, and T. J. Douglas. 2008. The evolving theory of quality management: The role of Six Sigma. Journal of Operations Management 26, no. 5:630–650.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar