1,031
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Review

Lean six sigma in the public sector: overcoming persistent management challenges

&
Pages 58-75 | Received 16 Jul 2020, Accepted 02 Nov 2020, Published online: 01 Mar 2021

References

  • Alam, M. 2015. Resource allocation and service design in local government: A case study. International Journal of Public Sector Management 28 (1):29–41. http://www.emeraldinsight.com/doi/10.1108/IJPSM-01-2014-0013. doi: 10.1108/IJPSM-01-2014-0013.
  • Albliwi, S., J. Antony, and S. Abdul. 2015. A systematic review of lean six sigma for the manufacturing industry. Business Process Management Journal 21 (3):665–91. doi: 10.1108/BPMJ-03-2014-0019.
  • Alexander, P., J. Antony, and B. Rodgers. 2019. Lean six sigma for small- and medium-sized manufacturing enterprises: a systematic review. International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management 363 (3):378–397.
  • Ancarani, A. 2009. Supplier evaluation in local public services: Application of a model of value for customer. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management 15 (1):33–42. doi: 10.1016/j.pursup.2008.09.003.
  • Anderson, D. M., and G. Taggart. 2016. Organizations, policies, and the roots of public value failure: The case of for-profit higher education. Public Administration Review 76 (5):779–89. doi: 10.1111/puar.12606.
  • Anderson, S. 2012. Public, private, neither, both? Publicness theory and the analysis of healthcare organisations. Social Science & Medicine (1982) 74 (3):313–22. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.07.021.
  • Antony, J. 2015. Challenges in the deployment of LSS in the higher education sector. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management 64 (6):893–9. http://www.emeraldinsight.com/doi/10.1108/IJPPM-12-2014-0192. doi: 10.1108/IJPPM-12-2014-0192.
  • Antony, J., B. Rodgers, and E. A. Cudney. 2017. Lean six sigma for public sector organizations: Is it a myth or reality? International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management 34 (9):1402–11. doi: 10.1108/IJQRM-08-2016-0127.
  • Antony, J., B. Rodgers, and E. A. Cudney. 2019. Lean six sigma in policing services: Case examples, lessons learnt and directions for future research. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence 30 (5–6): 613–25. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/14783363.2017.1327319. doi: 10.1080/14783363.2017.1327319.
  • Antony, J., B. Rodgers, and E. V. V. Gijo. 2016. Can lean six sigma make UK public sector organisations more efficient and effective? International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management 65 (7):995–1002. http://www.emeraldinsight.com/doi/10.1108/IJPPM-03-2016-0069. doi: 10.1108/IJPPM-03-2016-0069.
  • Antony, J., N. Krishan, D. Cullen, and M. Kumar. 2012. Lean six sigma for higher education institutions (HEIs). International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management 61 (8):940–8. http://search.proquest.com.openathensproxy.aston.ac.uk/docview/1115341503?accountid=15390%5Cnhttp://openurl.ac.uk/ukfed:aston.ac.uk?genre=article&issn=17410401&volume=61&issue=8&date=2012-11-20&spage=940&title=International+Journal+of+Productivity+and+Per. doi: 10.1108/17410401211277165.
  • Antony, J., S. Gupta, V. Sunder M, and E. V. Gijo. 2018. Ten commandments of lean six sigma: A practitioners’ perspective. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management 67 (6):1033–44. doi: 10.1108/IJPPM-07-2017-0170.
  • Aqlan, F., and L. Al-Fandi. 2018. Prioritizing process improvement initiatives in manufacturing environments. International Journal of Production Economics 196:261–8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2017.12.004.
  • Arcidiacono, G., N. Costantino, and K. Yang. 2016. The AMSE lean six sigma governance model. International Journal of Lean Six Sigma 7 (3):233–66. http://www.emeraldinsight.com/doi/10.1108/IJLSS-06-2015-0026. doi: 10.1108/IJLSS-06-2015-0026.
  • Arlbjørn, J. S., and P. V. Freytag. 2013. Evidence of lean: A review of international peer-reviewed journal articles. European Business Review 25 (2): 174–205. http://www.emeraldinsight.com/10.1108/09555341311302675.
  • Bennetts, C. K., and M. B. Charles. 2016. Between protection and pragmatism: Passenger transport security and public value trade-offs. International Journal of Public Administration 39 (1):26–39. http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/01900692.2015.1028638. doi: 10.1080/01900692.2015.1028638.
  • Bhat, S., E. V. Gijo, and N. A. Jnanesh. 2016. Productivity and performance improvement in the medical records department of a hospital. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management 65 (1):98–125. http://www.emeraldinsight.com/doi/10.1108/IJPPM-04-2014-0063. doi: 10.1108/IJPPM-04-2014-0063.
  • Binder, M., and J. S. Edwards. 2010. Using grounded theory method for theory building in operations management research. International Journal of Operations & Production Management 30 (3):232–59. http://www.emeraldinsight.com/doi/10.1108/01443571011024610. doi: 10.1108/01443571011024610.
  • Bodemann, M., and M. Olaru. 2014. Responsibility to customers in the context of public value management - A German case study. Amfiteatru Economic 16 (35):171–86.
  • Bracci, E., L. Papi, M. Bigoni, E. Deidda Gagliardo, and H.-J. Bruns. 2019. Public value and public sector accounting research: A structured literature review. Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management 31 (1):103–36. doi: 10.1108/JPBAFM-07-2018-0077.
  • Bruns, H.-J. 2014. Accounting change and value creation in public services—Do relational archetypes make a difference in improving public service performance? Critical Perspectives on Accounting 25 (4–5):339–67. http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1045235413000610. doi: 10.1016/j.cpa.2013.05.005.
  • Bryson, J. M., B. C. Crosby, and L. Bloomberg. 2014. Public value governance: Moving beyond traditional public administration and the new public management. Public Administration Review 74 (4):445–56. http://doi.wiley.com/10.1111/puar.12238. doi: 10.1111/puar.12238.
  • Budd, J. W. 2014. Implicit public values and the creation of publicly valuable outcomes: The importance of work and the contested role of labor unions. Public Administration Review 74 (4):506–16. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com.pitt.idm.oclc.org/doi/10.1111/puar.12134/abstract%5Cnhttp://onlinelibrary.wiley.com.pitt.idm.oclc.org/store/10.1111/puar.12134/asset/puar12134.pdf?v=1&t=hxxovytd&s=cffd0db4686e72e515c07c9b6cf3ef04e7f5236b. doi: 10.1111/puar.12134.
  • Cai, S., and M. Jun. 2018. A qualitative study of the internalization of ISO 9000 standards: The linkages among firms’ motivations, internalization processes, and performance. International Journal of Production Economics 196:248–60. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2017.12.001.
  • Cheng, C.-Y., and P.-Y. Chang. 2012. Implementation of the lean six sigma framework in non-profit organisations: A case study. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence 23 (3–4):431–47. http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-84860204589&partnerID=tZOtx3y1. doi: 10.1080/14783363.2012.663880.
  • Cherrafi, A., S. Elfezazi, K. Govindan, J. A. Garza-Reyes, K. Benhida, and A. Mokhlis. 2017. A framework for the integration of green and lean six sigma for superior sustainability performance. International Journal of Production Research 55 (15):4481–515. doi: 10.1080/00207543.2016.1266406.
  • Chiarini, A. 2012. Risk management and cost reduction of cancer drugs using lean six sigma tools. Leadership in Health Services 25 (4):318–30. doi: 10.1108/17511871211268982.
  • Coats, D., and E. Passmore. 2008. Public value: The next steps in public service reform: 1–65. www.theworkfoundation.com.
  • Cohen, N. 2016. Forgoing new public management and adopting post-new public management principles: The on-going civil service reform in Israel. Public Administration and Development 36 (1):20–34. http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/pad.1751. doi: 10.1002/pad.1751.
  • Connolly, J. 2016. Contribution analysis as an approach to enable public managers to demonstrate public value: The Scottish context. International Journal of Public Sector Management 29 (7):690–707. doi: 10.1108/IJPSM-12-2015-0225.
  • Cordella, A., and L. Willcocks. 2010. Outsourcing, bureaucracy and public value: Reappraising the notion of the “contract state. Government Information Quarterly 27 (1):82–8. doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2009.08.004.
  • Crosby, B. C., P. ‘t Hart, and J. Torfing. 2017. Public value creation through collaborative innovation. Public Management Review 19 (5):655–69. doi: 10.1080/14719037.2016.1192165.
  • Danese, P., V. Manfè, and P. Romano. 2018. A systematic literature review on recent lean research: State-of-the-art and future directions. International Journal of Management Reviews 20 (2):579–605. doi: 10.1111/ijmr.12156.
  • Dave, D. K., R. Murugesh, and S. R. Devadasan. 2015. Origin, principles and applications of lean six sigma concept: Extractions from literature arena. International Journal of Services and Operations Management 22 (2):123–42. doi: 10.1504/IJSOM.2015.071526.
  • de Jong, J., S. Douglas, M. Sicilia, Z. Radnor, M. Noordegraaf, and P. Debus. 2017. Instruments of value: Using the analytic tools of public value theory in teaching and practice. Public Management Review 19 (5):605–20. doi: 10.1080/14719037.2016.1192162.
  • De Tuya, M., M. Cook, M. K. Sutherland, and L. F. Luna-Reyes. 2017. Information requirements to create public value: Sharing and opening data to address urban blight. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy 11 (1):79–98. http://www.emeraldinsight.com/doi/10.1108/TG-12-2015-0054. doi: 10.1108/TG-12-2015-0054.
  • Delgado, C., M. Ferreira, and M. C. Branco. 2010. The implementation of lean six sigma in financial services organizations. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management 21 (4):512–23. http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-77952601383&partnerID=tZOtx3y1. doi: 10.1108/17410381011046616.
  • Di Meglio, G., M. Stare, A. Maroto, and L. Rubalcaba. 2015. Public services performance: An extended framework and empirical assessment across the enlarged EU. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 33 (2):321–41. doi: 10.1068/c12264r.
  • Endres, S., and J. Weibler. 2017. Towards a three-component model of relational social constructionist leadership: A systematic review and critical interpretive synthesis. International Journal of Management Reviews 19 (2):214–36. doi: 10.1111/ijmr.12095.
  • Fisher, T. 2014. Public value and the integrative mind: How multiple sectors can collaborate in city building. Public Administration Review 74 (4):457–64. doi: 10.1111/puar.12133.
  • Fletcher, J. 2018. Opportunities for lean six sigma in public sector municipalities. International Journal of Lean Six Sigma 9 (2):256–67. doi: 10.1108/IJLSS-07-2017-0086.
  • Freitas, J. G. d., and H. G. Costa. 2017. Impacts of lean six sigma over organizational sustainability: A systematic literature review on scopus base. International Journal of Lean Six Sigma 8 (1):89–108. doi: 10.1108/IJLSS-10-2015-0039.
  • Furterer, S. L. 2018. Applying lean six sigma methods to reduce length of stay in a hospital’s emergency department. Quality Engineering 30 (3):389–404. doi: 10.1080/08982112.2018.1464657.
  • Galli, B. J. 2018. What risks does lean six sigma introduce? IEEE Engineering Management Review 46 (1):80–90. doi: 10.1109/EMR.2018.2810082.
  • Ghosh, S. S. 2017. Financial incentives – a potent weapon for higher productivity. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management 66 (4):554–71. doi: 10.1108/IJPPM-02-2016-0040.
  • Godley, M., and J. B. Jenkins. 2019. Decreasing wait times and increasing patient satisfaction. Journal of Nursing Care Quality 34 (1):61–5. http://insights.ovid.com/crossref?an=00001786-201901000-00011. doi: 10.1097/NCQ.0000000000000332.
  • Gupta, S. K., J. Antony, F. Lacher, and J. Douglas. 2020. Lean six sigma for reducing student dropouts in higher education–an exploratory study. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence 31 (1–2):178–93. nodoi: 10.1080/14783363.2017.1422710.
  • Haidar, A., and K. Spooner. 2017. Neutral – Neither trustees nor hired guns: The experiences and preferences of local government councillors of NSW Australia. Australian Journal of Public Administration 76 (4):495–510. doi: 10.1111/1467-8500.12240.
  • Harry, M., and R. Schroeder. 2000. Six Sigma – The breakthrough management strategy revolutionizing the world’s top corporations. Currency Book, 5th ed. Doubleday, New York.
  • Hartley, J., J. Alford, E. Knies, and S. Douglas. 2017. Towards an empirical research agenda for public value theory. Public Management Review 19 (5):670–85. doi: 10.1080/14719037.2016.1192166.
  • Hartley, J., J. Alford, O. Hughes, and S. Yates. 2015. Public value and political astuteness in the work of public managers: The art of the possible. Public Administration 93 (1):195–211. doi: 10.1111/padm.12125.
  • Henrique, D. B., and M. Godinho Filho. 2020. A systematic literature review of empirical research in lean and six sigma in healthcare. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence 31 (3–4):429–49. nodoi: 10.1080/14783363.2018.1429259.
  • Hess, J. D., and B. A. Benjamin. 2015. Applying lean six sigma within the university: Opportunities for process improvement and cultural change. International Journal of Lean Six Sigma 6 (3):249–62. http://www.emeraldinsight.com/doi/10.1108/IJLSS-12-2014-0036. doi: 10.1108/IJLSS-12-2014-0036.
  • Heyer, G. d. 2011. New public management: A strategy for democratic police reform in transitioning and developing countries. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management 34 (3):419–33. http://www.emeraldinsight.com/10.1108/13639511111157492.
  • Hughes, A., E. Morrison, and K. N. Ruwanpura. 2019. Public sector procurement and ethical trade: Governance and social responsibility in some hidden global supply chains. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 44 (2):242–55. doi: 10.1111/tran.12274.
  • Huws, U. 2019. Commodification of public services. In Labour in contemporary capitalism, 107–20. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK. http://link.springer.com/10.1057/978-1-137-52042-5_6.
  • Improta, G., G. Balato, M. Romano, A. M. Ponsiglione, E. Raiola, M. A. Russo, P. Cuccaro, L. C. Santillo, and M. Cesarelli. 2017. Improving performances of the knee replacement surgery process by applying DMAIC principles. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 23 (6):1401–7. doi: 10.1111/jep.12810.
  • Improta, G., M. Cesarelli, P. Montuori, L. C. Santillo, and M. Triassi. 2018. Reducing the risk of healthcare-associated infections through lean six sigma: The case of the medicine areas at the Federico II University Hospital in Naples (Italy). Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 24 (2):338–46. doi: 10.1111/jep.12844.
  • Ismyrlis, V., and O. Moschidis. 2013. Six sigma's critical success factors and toolbox. International Journal of Lean Six Sigma 4 (2):108–17. doi: 10.1108/20401461311319310.
  • ISO (International Organization for Standardization). 2014. Quality Management Systems — Guidelines for the Application of ISO 9001:2008 in Local Government. ISO 18091. Geneva.
  • Jewson, N., A. Felstead, and F. Green. 2014. Training in the public sector in a period of Austerity: The case of the UK. Journal of Education and Work 28 (3):1–22. http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13639080.2014.900169.
  • Jeyaraman, K., and L. K. Teo. 2010. A conceptual framework for critical success factors of lean six sigma: Implementation on the performance of electronic manufacturing service industry. International Journal of Lean Six Sigma 1 (3):191–215. http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-84859054613&partnerID=40&md5=362d81552fa466410e1432992d82487e. doi: 10.1108/20401461011075008.
  • Johnson, B. J. 2017. Codes of ethics, public values, and what public servants offer the bureaucratic compact. International Journal of Organization Theory & Behavior 17 (4):459–97. doi: 10.1108/IJOTB-17-04-2014-B004.
  • Jokić, M., A. Mervar, and S. Mateljan. 2018. Scientific potential of European fully open access journals. Scientometrics 114 (3):1373–94. doi: 10.1007/s11192-017-2629-y.
  • Juliani, F., and O. J. de Oliveira. 2020. Linking practices to results: An analysis toward lean six sigma deployment in the public sector. International Journal of Lean Six Sigma ahead-of-print (June 6). https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/IJLSS-02-2020-0017/full/html. doi: 10.1108/IJLSS-02-2020-0017.
  • Juliani, F., and O. J. Oliveira. 2016. State of research on public service management: Identifying scientific gaps from a bibliometric study. International Journal of Information Management 36 (6):1033–41. doi: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2016.07.003.
  • Juliani, F., and O. J. Oliveira. 2019. Lean six sigma principles and practices under a management perspective. Production Planning & Control. doi: 10.1080/09537287.2019.1702225..
  • Jupp, V. 2006. The SAGE dictionary of social research methods London: SAGE Publications, Ltd, 40–41.
  • Kannan, D. 2018. Role of multiple stakeholders and the critical success factor theory for the sustainable supplier selection process. International Journal of Production Economics 195:391–418. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2017.02.020.
  • Kieran, M., M. Cleary, A. de Brún, and A. Igoe. 2017. Supply and demand: Application of lean six sigma methods to improve drug round efficiency and release nursing time. International Journal for Quality in Health Care: Journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care 29 (6):803–9. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzx106.
  • Knies, E., P. Boselie, J. Gould-Williams, and W. Vandenabeele. 2018. Strategic human resource management and public sector performance: Context matters. The International Journal of Human Resource Management 5192:1–13. doi: 10.1080/09585192.2017.1407088.
  • Kregel, I., and A. Coners. 2018. Introducing lean six sigma to a german municipality: An action research report. International Journal of Lean Six Sigma 9 (2):221–37. doi: 10.1108/IJLSS-02-2017-0019.
  • Lameijer, B. A., J. De Mast, and R. J. M. M. Does. 2017. Lean six sigma deployment and maturity models: A critical review. Quality Management Journal 24 (4):6–20. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85031114296&partnerID=40&md5=8afe34ddd55907df60b9d1afe30dee02. doi: 10.1080/10686967.2017.12088376.
  • Larat, F., and C. Chauvigné. 2017. Overcoming the tensions between values: A challenge for French public service managers and their training schools. International Review of Administrative Sciences 83 (3):463–80. doi: 10.1177/0020852315594478.
  • Laureani, A., and J. Antony. 2017a. Leadership and lean six sigma: A systematic literature review. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence 0 (0):1–29. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/14783363.2017.1288565.
  • Laureani, A., and J. Antony. 2017b. Leadership characteristics for lean six sigma. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence 28 (3–4):1–22. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/17410401211188560.
  • Leland, S., and K. Thurmaier. 2014. Political and functional local government consolidation: The challenges for core public administration values and regional reform. American Review of Public Administration 44 (4):29–46.
  • Lindholst, A. C., C. C. Konijnendijk van den Bosch, C. P. Kjøller, S. Sullivan, A. Kristoffersson, H. Fors, and K. Nilsson. 2016. Urban green space qualities reframed toward a public value management paradigm: The case of the Nordic Green Space Award. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 17:166–76. doi: 10.1016/j.ufug.2016.04.007.
  • Lokkerbol, J., M. F. A. Molenaar, and R. J. M. M. Does. 2012. Quality quandaries*: An efficient public sector. Quality Engineering 24 (3):431–5. doi: 10.1080/08982112.2012.680226.
  • Lukrafka, T. O., D. S. Silva, and M. Echeveste. 2020. A geographic picture of lean adoption in the public sector: Cases, approaches, and a refreshed agenda. European Management Journal 38 (3):506–17. doi: 10.1016/j.emj.2020.02.004.
  • Maleyeff, J. 2014. Sustaining public sector lean six sigma: Perspectives from North America. Management and Organizational Studies 1 (2):92–9. http://www.sciedu.ca/journal/index.php/mos/article/view/4801. doi: 10.5430/mos.v1n2p92.
  • Marie, T. T. 2016. Public values as essential criteria for public entrepreneurship: Water management in France. Utilities Policy 40:162–9. doi: 10.1016/j.jup.2016.02.005.
  • Meynhardt, T. 2009. Public value inside: What is public value creation? International Journal of Public Administration 32 (3–4):192–219. http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/01900690902732632. doi: 10.1080/01900690902732632.
  • Meynhardt, T., and J. Metelmann. 2009. Pushing the envelope: Creating public value in the labor market: An empirical study on the role of middle managers. International Journal of Public Administration 32 (3–4):274–312. doi: 10.1080/01900690902732806.
  • Meza, D., and K.-Y. Jeong. 2013. Measuring efficiency of lean six sigma project implementation using data envelopment analysis at NASA. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management 6 (2):401–22. doi: 10.3926/jiem.582.
  • Montella, E., M. V. Di Cicco, A. Ferraro, P. Centobelli, E. Raiola, M. Triassi, and G. Improta. 2017. The application of lean six sigma methodology to reduce the risk of healthcare–Associated infections in surgery departments. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 23 (3):530–9. doi: 10.1111/jep.12662.
  • Moore, M. H. 1995. Creating public value: Strategic management in government. Cambridge,MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Moore, M. H. 2014. Public value accounting: Establishing the philosophical basis. Public Administration Review 74 (4):465–77. http://doi.wiley.com/10.1111/puar.12198. doi: 10.1111/puar.12198.
  • Muraliraj, J., S. Zailani, S. Kuppusamy, and C. Santha. 2018. Annotated methodological review of lean six sigma. International Journal of Lean Six Sigma 9 (1):2–49. doi: 10.1108/IJLSS-04-2017-0028.
  • Mussari, R., and P. Ruggiero. 2010. Public managers’ performance evaluation systems and public value creation: Behavioral and economic aspects. International Journal of Public Administration 33 (11):541–8. http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/01900692.2010.507115. doi: 10.1080/01900692.2010.507115.
  • Nederhand, J., E. H. Klijn, M. van der Steen, and M. van Twist. 2019. The governance of self-organization: Which governance strategy do policy officials and citizens prefer? Policy Sciences 52 (2):233–53. doi: 10.1007/s11077-018-9342-4.
  • O’Leary, R., and N. Vij. 2012. Collaborative public management: Where have we been and where are we going? The American Review of Public Administration 42 (5):507–22. http://arp.sagepub.com/cgi/doi/10.1177/0275074012445780.
  • O’Reilly, S., J. Healy, and R. O’Dubhghaill. 2018. Continuous improvement in a university – the first steps: A reflective case study. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management 67 (2):260–77. doi: 10.1108/IJPPM-08-2016-0179.
  • Oliveira, D. A. 2018. The teaching profession in the context of new public management. In Education Policies and the Restructuring of the Educational Profession, 205–19. http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-981-10-8279-5_14.
  • Oxford. 2018. Oxford dictionary. Oxford University Press. https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/principle.
  • Page, S. B., M. M. Stone, J. M. Bryson, and B. C. Crosby. 2015. Public value creation by cross-sector collaborations: A framework and challenges of assessment. Public Administration 93 (3):715–32. doi: 10.1111/padm.12161.
  • Pandey, S. K., R. S. Davis, S. Pandey, and S. Peng. 2016. Transformational leadership and the use of normative public values: Can employees be inspired to serve larger public purposes? Public Administration 94 (1):204–22. doi: 10.1111/padm.12214.
  • Papi, L., M. Bigoni, E. Bracci, and E. D. Gagliardo. 2018. Measuring public value: A conceptual and applied contribution to the debate. Public Money & Management 38 (7):503–10. doi: 10.1080/09540962.2018.1439154.
  • Parker, D., K. Waller, and H. Xu. 2013. Private and public services: Productivity and performance migration. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management 62 (6):652–64. http://www.emeraldinsight.com/doi/abs/10.1108/IJPPM-10-2012-0119. doi: 10.1108/IJPPM-10-2012-0119.
  • Pepper, M. P. J., and T. a. Spedding. 2010. The evolution of lean six sigma. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management 27 (2):138–55. http://www.emeraldinsight.com/10.1108/02656711011014276. doi: 10.1108/02656711011014276.
  • Pereira, G. V., M. A. Macadar, E. M. Luciano, and M. G. Testa. 2017. Delivering public value through open government data initiatives in a smart city context. Information Systems Frontiers 19 (2):213–7. doi: 10.1007/s10796-016-9673-7.
  • Persson, A., and G. Goldkuhl. 2010. Government value paradigms—Bureaucracy, new public management, and E-government. Communications of the Association for Information Systems 27:45–62. https://aisel.aisnet.org/cais/vol27/iss1/4. doi: 10.17705/1CAIS.02704.
  • Price, O. M., M. Pepper, and M. Stewart. 2018. Lean six sigma and the Australian business excellence framework: An exploratory case within local government. International Journal of Lean Six Sigma 9 (2):185–98. doi: 10.1108/IJLSS-01-2017-0010.
  • Radnor, Z., and S. P. Osborne. 2013. Lean: A failed theory for public services? Public Management Review 15 (2):265–87. doi: 10.1080/14719037.2012.748820.
  • Raharjo, H., and H. Eriksson. 2017. Exploring differences between private and public organizations in business excellence models. International Journal of Operations & Production Management 37 (12):1795–816. doi: 10.1108/IJOPM-09-2015-0593.
  • Raval, S. J., and R. Kant. 2017. Study on lean six sigma frameworks: A critical literature review. International Journal of Lean Six Sigma 8 (3):275–334. doi: 10.1108/IJLSS-02-2016-0003.
  • Raval, S. J., R. Kant, and R. Shankar. 2018a. Revealing research trends and themes in lean six sigma: From 2000 to 2016. International Journal of Lean Six Sigma 9 (3):399–443. doi: 10.1108/IJLSS-03-2017-0021.
  • Raval, S. J., R. Kant, and R. Shankar. 2018b. Lean six sigma implementation: Modelling the interaction among the enablers. Production Planning & Control 29 (12):1010–29. doi: 10.1080/09537287.2018.1495773.
  • Ravasi, D., and A. Canato. 2013. How do I know who you think you are? A review of research methods on organizational identity. International Journal of Management Reviews 15 (2):185–204. doi: 10.1111/ijmr.12008.
  • Reis, J., M. Amorim, and N. Melão. 2019. Multichannel service failure and recovery in a O2O Era: A qualitative multi-method research in the banking services industry. International Journal of Production Economics 215:24–33. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2018.07.001.
  • Reynaers, A.-M. 2014. Public values in public–private partnerships. Public Administration Review 74 (1):41–50. doi: 10.1111/puar.12137.
  • Rhodes, R. A. W., and J. Wanna. 2009. Bringing the politics back in: Public value in Westminster parliamentary government. Public Administration 87 (2):161–83. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9299.2009.01763.x.
  • Ritz, A., D. Giauque, F. Varone, and S. Anderfuhren-Biget. 2014. From leadership to citizenship behavior in public organizations: When values matter. Review of Public Personnel Administration 34 (2):128–52. http://rop.sagepub.com/cgi/doi/10.1177/0734371X14521456. doi: 10.1177/0734371X14521456.
  • Rodgers, B., and J. Antony. 2019. Lean and six sigma practices in the public sector: A review. International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management 36 (3):437–455.
  • Rodríguez Bolívar, M. P. 2018. Governance models and outcomes to foster public value creation in smart cities. Scienze Regionali 17 (1):57–80.
  • Rose, K. H. 2013. A guide to the project management body of knowledge (PMBOK® Guide)-Fifth Edition. Project Management Journal 44 (3):e1–e1. doi: 10.1002/pmj.21345.
  • Ruben, B., S. Vinodh, and P. Asokan. 2018. ISM and fuzzy MICMAC application for analysis of lean six sigma barriers with environmental considerations. International Journal of Lean Six Sigma 9 (1):64–90.
  • Runfola, A., A. Perna, E. Baraldi, and G. L. Gregori. 2017. The use of qualitative case studies in top business and management journals: A quantitative analysis of recent patterns. European Management Journal 35 (1):116–27. doi: 10.1016/j.emj.2016.04.001.
  • Samaratunge, R., and N. Wijewardena. 2009. The changing nature of public values in developing countries. International Journal of Public Administration 32 (3–4):313–27. http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/01900690902732947. doi: 10.1080/01900690902732947.
  • Schoenherr, T., D. Hilpert, A. K. Soni, M. A. Venkataramanan, and V. A. Mabert. 2010. Enterprise systems complexity and its antecedents: A grounded‐theory approach. International Journal of Operations & Production Management 30 (6):639–68. http://www.emeraldinsight.com/doi/10.1108/01443571011046058. doi: 10.1108/01443571011046058.
  • Shamsuzzaman, M., M. Alzeraif, I. Alsyouf, and M. B. C. Khoo. 2018. Using lean six sigma to improve mobile order fulfilment process in a telecom service sector. Production Planning & Control 29 (4):301–14. doi: 10.1080/09537287.2018.1426132.
  • Shokri, A. 2017. Quantitative analysis of six sigma, lean and lean six sigma research publications in last two decades. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management 34 (5):598–625. doi: 10.1108/IJQRM-07-2015-0096.
  • Shokri, A., T. S. Waring, and F. Nabhani. 2016. Investigating the readiness of people in manufacturing SMEs to embark on lean six sigma projects. International Journal of Operations & Production Management 36 (8):850–78. http://www.emeraldinsight.com/doi/10.1108/IJOPM-11-2014-0530. doi: 10.1108/IJOPM-11-2014-0530.
  • Singh, M., and R. Rathi. 2019. A structured review of lean six sigma in various industrial sectors. International Journal of Lean Six Sigma 10 (2):622–64. doi: 10.1108/IJLSS-03-2018-0018.
  • Sjödin, D. R., V. Parida, M. Leksell, and A. Petrovic. 2018. Smart factory implementation and process innovation: A preliminary maturity model for leveraging digitalization in manufacturing moving to smart factories presents specific challenges that can be addressed through a structured approach focused on people, P. Research-Technology Management 61 (5):22–31. doi: 10.1080/08956308.2018.1471277.
  • Speklé, R. F., and F. H. M. Verbeeten. 2014. The use of performance measurement systems in the public sector: Effects on performance. Management Accounting Research 25 (2):131–46. http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1044500513000693. doi: 10.1016/j.mar.2013.07.004.
  • Sreedharan, V. R., and R. Raju. 2016. A systematic literature review of lean six sigma in different industries. International Journal of Lean Six Sigma 7 (4):430–66. http://www.emeraldinsight.com/doi/10.1108/IJLSS-10-2015-0040. doi: 10.1108/IJLSS-12-2015-0050.
  • Sreedharan, V. R., R. Raju, and S. Srivatsa Srinivas. 2017. A review of the quality evolution in various organisations. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence 28 (3–4):351–65. doi: 10.1080/14783363.2015.1082421.
  • Sreedharan, V., G. Sandhya, and R. Raju. 2018. Development of a green lean six sigma model for public sectors. International Journal of Lean Six Sigma 9 (2):238–55. doi: 10.1108/IJLSS-02-2017-0020.
  • Stankalla, R., O. Koval, and F. Chromjakova. 2018. A review of critical success factors for the successful implementation of lean six sigma and six sigma in manufacturing small and medium sized enterprises. Quality Engineering 30 (3):453–68. doi: 10.1080/08982112.2018.1448933.
  • Sunder, V., and J. Antony. 2018. A conceptual lean six sigma framework for quality excellence in higher education institutions. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management 35 (4):857–74. doi: 10.1108/IJQRM-01-2017-0002.
  • Sunder, V., L. S. Ganesh, and R. R. Marathe. 2018. A morphological analysis of research literature on lean six sigma for services. International Journal of Operations & Production Management 38 (1):149–182. http://www.emeraldinsight.com/doi/10.1108/IJOPM-05-2016-0273. doi: 10.1108/IJOPM-05-2016-0273.
  • Svensson, C., J. Antony, M. Ba-Essa, M. Bakhsh, and S. Albliwi. 2015. A lean six sigma program in higher education. Ed. Professor Jiju Antony. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management 32 (9):951–69. http://www.emeraldinsight.com/doi/10.1108/IJQRM-09-2014-0141. doi: 10.1108/IJQRM-09-2014-0141.
  • Tanner-Smith, E. E., and J. R. Polanin. 2016. Brief alcohol intervention trials conducted by higher prestige authors and published in higher impact factor journals are cited more frequently. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 75:119–25. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.01.028.
  • Thomas, A., J. Antony, C. Haven-Tang, M. Francis, and R. Fisher. 2017. Implementing lean six sigma into curriculum design and delivery – a case study in higher education. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management 66 (5):577–97. http://www.emeraldinsight.com/doi/10.1108/IJPPM-08-2016-0176. doi: 10.1108/IJPPM-08-2016-0176.
  • Thompson, F., and P. Rizova. 2015. Understanding and creating public value: business is the engine, government…: University of Liverpool Library. Public Management Review 17 (4):565–86. http://eds.b.ebscohost.com.liverpool.idm.oclc.org/eds/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?vid=1&sid=c0b444d7-edae-40ab-9644-c97684ccaa83%40sessionmgr102. doi: 10.1080/14719037.2013.841982.
  • Twizeyimana, J. D., and A. Andersson. 2019. The public value of E-government – A literature review. Government Information Quarterly 36 (2):167–78. doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2019.01.001.
  • Vakalopoulou, M. A., G. Tsiotras, and K. Gotzamani. 2013. Implementing CAF in public administration. Benchmarking: An International Journal 20 (6):744–64. http://www.emeraldinsight.com/doi/abs/10.1108/BIJ-10-2011-0080. doi: 10.1108/BIJ-10-2011-0080.
  • Valle-Cruz, D. 2019. Public value of E-government services through emerging technologies. International Journal of Public Sector Management 32 (5):530–45. doi: 10.1108/IJPSM-03-2018-0072.
  • van der Steen, M., M. J. W. van Twist, and D. Bressers. 2018. The sedimentation of public values: How a variety of governance perspectives guide the practical actions of civil servants. Review of Public Personnel Administration 38 (4):387–414. doi: 10.1177/0734371X16671369.
  • Vandenabeele, W. 2014. Explaining public service motivation: The role of leadership and basic needs satisfaction. Review of Public Personnel Administration 34 (2):153–73. http://rop.sagepub.com/cgi/doi/10.1177/0734371X14521458. doi: 10.1177/0734371X14521458.
  • Vilke, J. B., and M. Vilkas. 2018. Discussing municipal performance alternatives: Public perceptions of municipal services delivery in Lithuania. International Journal of Public Sector Management 31 (4):525–42. doi: 10.1108/IJPSM-01-2017-0011.
  • Waldt, G. v. d. 2016. From policy to projects: A public service value-chain network model. Journal of Social Sciences 49 (1–2):145–57. nodoi: 10.1080/09718923.2016.11893607.
  • Walker, H., and S. Brammer. 2012. The relationship between sustainable procurement and e-procurement in the public sector. International Journal of Production Economics 140 (1):256–68. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2012.01.008.
  • Walroth, T. A., S. Smallwood, K. Arthur, B. Vance, A. Washington, T. Staublin, T. Haslar, J. G. Reddan, and J. Fuller. 2018. Development of a standardized, citywide process for managing smart-pump drug libraries. American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy: AJHP: Official Journal of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists 75 (12):893–900. https://academic.oup.com/ajhp/article/75/12/893/5102043. doi: 10.2146/ajhp170262.
  • Wang, X., and Z. Wang. 2019. Beyond efficiency or justice: The structure and measurement of public servants’ public values preferences. Administration and Society 52 (4):499–527.
  • Weber, K. M., B. Heller-Schuh, H. Godoe, and R. Roeste. 2014. ICT-enabled system innovations in public services: Experiences from intelligent transport systems. Telecommunications Policy 38 (5–6):539–57. http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0308596113002036. doi: 10.1016/j.telpol.2013.12.004.
  • Welch, C., E. Plakoyiannaki, R. Piekkari, and E. Paavilainen-Mäntymäki. 2013. Legitimizing diverse uses for qualitative research: A rhetorical analysis of two management journals. International Journal of Management Reviews 15 (2):245–64. doi: 10.1111/ijmr.12001.
  • West, K., and P. Davis. 2011. What is the public value of government action? Towards a (new) pragmatic approach to values questions in public endeavours. Public Administration 89 (2):226–41. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9299.2010.01847.x.
  • Witesman, E., and L. Walters. 2014. Public service values: A new approach to the study of motivation in the public sphere. Public Administration 92 (2):375–405. doi: 10.1111/padm.12000.
  • Womack, J. P., D. T. Jones, and D. Roos. 1990. The machine that changed the world: The story of lean production. Ed. null. Vol. null. Null.
  • Yadav, G., and T. N. Desai. 2016. Lean six sigma: A categorized review of the literature. International Journal of Lean Six Sigma 7 (1):2–24. doi: 10.1108/IJLSS-05-2015-0015.
  • Yadav, G., D. Seth, and T. N. Desai. 2018. Application of hybrid framework to facilitate lean six sigma implementation: A manufacturing company case experience. Production Planning & Control 29 (3):185–201. doi: 10.1080/09537287.2017.1402134.
  • Yang, F., L. Yao, S. Wang, Y. Guo, Z. Xu, C.-H. Zhang, K. Zhang, Y. Fang, and Y. Liu. 2019. Current tracking on effectiveness and mechanisms of acupuncture therapy: A literature review of high-quality studies. Chinese Journal of Integrative Medicine 26:310–320. http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11655-019-3150-3.
  • Zwetsloot, I. M., A. Kuiper, T. S. Akkerhuis, and H. de Koning. 2018. Lean six sigma meets data science: Integrating two approaches based on three case studies. Quality Engineering 30 (3):419–3. doi: 10.1080/08982112.2018.1434892.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.