References
- ASTM. 1951. STP15C: ASTM manual on quality control of materials (8th Printing, December 1962), ASTM Committee E-11. Philadelphia, PA: American Society for Testing Materials.
- Badri, M. A., M. Abdulla, M. A. Kamali, and H. Dodeen. 2006. Identifying potential biasing variables in student evaluation of teaching in a newly accredited business program in the UAE. International Journal of Educational Management 20 (1):43–59. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/09513540610639585.
- Bak, H.-J., and D. H. Kim. 2015. Too much emphasis on research? An empirical examination of the relationship between research and teaching in multitasking environments. Research in Higher Education 56 (8):843–60. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-015-9372-0.
- Bassett, J., A. Cleveland, D. Acorn, M. Nix, and T. Snyder. 2017. Are they paying attention? Students’ lack of motivation and attention potentially threaten the utility of course evaluations. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 42 (3):431–42. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2015.1119801.
- Bi, H. H. 2015. A note on the factor values of three common Shewhart variables control charts. Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods 44 (13):2655–73. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/03610926.2014.968732.
- Bi, H. H. 2018. A robust interpretation of teaching evaluation ratings. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 43 (1):79–93. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2017.1295301.
- Bi, H. H. 2020. A robust approach for assessing teaching performance during regular reviews. Studies in Higher Education 45 (11):2217–30. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2019.1599850.
- Bie, D., and F. Meng. 2009. On student evaluation of teaching and improvement of the teaching quality assurance system at higher education institutions. Chinese Education & Society 42 (2):100–15. doi: https://doi.org/10.2753/CED1061-1932420212.
- Cadez, S., V. Dimovski, and M. Z. Groff. 2017. Research, teaching and performance evaluation in academia: The salience of quality. Studies in Higher Education 42 (8):1455–73. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2015.1104659.
- Deming, W. E. 1982. Out of the crisis. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
- Edström, K. 2008. Doing course evaluation as if learning matters most. Higher Education Research & Development 27 (2):95–106. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360701805234.
- Feistauer, D., and T. Richter. 2017. How reliable are students’ evaluations of teaching quality? A variance components approach. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 42 (8):1263–79. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2016.1261083.
- Feldman, K. A. 1983. Seniority and experience of college teachers as related to evaluations they receive from students. Research in Higher Education 18 (1):3–124. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00992080.
- Feldman, K. A. 1984. Class size and college students' evaluations of teachers and courses: A closer look. Research in Higher Education 21 (1):45–116. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00975035.
- Gamliel, E., and L. Davidovitz. 2005. Online versus traditional teaching evaluation: Mode can matter. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 30 (6):581–92. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930500260647.
- Garvin, D. A. 2007. Teaching executives and teaching MBAs: Reflections on the case method. Academy of Management Learning & Education 6 (3):364–74. doi: https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2007.26361626.
- Green, B. P., T. G. Calderon, and P. R. Barbara. 1998. A content analysis of teaching evaluation instruments used in accounting departments. Issues in Accounting Education 13 (1):15–30.
- Harley, B. 2019. Confronting the crisis of confidence in management studies: Why senior scholars need to stop setting a bad example. Academy of Management Learning & Education 18 (2):286–97. doi: https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2018.0107.
- Harrison, P. D., D. K. Douglas, and C. A. Burdsal. 2004. The relative merits of different types of overall evaluations of teaching effectiveness. Research in Higher Education 45 (3):311–23. doi: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:RIHE.0000019592.78752.da.
- He, J., and L. A. Freeman. 2021. Can we trust teaching evaluations when response rates are not high? Implications from a Monte Carlo simulation. Studies in Higher Education 46 (9):1934–48. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2019.1711046.
- Husbands, C. T. 1996. Variations in students' evaluations of teachers' lecturing and small-group teaching: A study at the London School of Economics and Political Science. Studies in Higher Education 21 (2):187–206. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079612331381358.
- Kember, D., and D. Y. P. Leung. 2011. Disciplinary differences in student ratings of teaching quality. Research in Higher Education 52 (3):278–99. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-010-9194-z.
- Kidder, D. L., and L. Bowes-Sperry. 2012. Examining the influence of team project design decisions on student perceptions and evaluations of instructors. Academy of Management Learning & Education 11 (1):69–81. doi: https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2010.0040.
- Kolitch, E., and A. V. Dean. 1999. Student ratings of instruction in the USA: Hidden assumptions and missing conceptions about ‘good’ teaching. Studies in Higher Education 24 (1):27–42. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079912331380128.
- Marsh, H. W., and J. Hattie. 2002. The relation between research productivity and teaching effectiveness. The Journal of Higher Education 73 (5):603–41. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2002.11777170.
- McNatt, D. B. 2010. Negative reputation and biased student evaluations of teaching: Longitudinal results from a naturally occurring experiment. Academy of Management Learning & Education 9 (2):225–42. doi: https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.9.2.zqr225.
- Montgomery, D. C. 2012. Introduction to statistical quality control. 7th ed. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
- Mulay, R. V., and V. T. Khanna. 2021. An empirical study on quality improvement in higher education institutions with reference to selected processes. Quality Management Journal 28 (1):41–56. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/10686967.2020.1848367.
- Murray, H. G. 1984. The impact of formative and summative evaluation of teaching in North American universities. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 9 (2):117–32. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/0260293840090204.
- Nowell, C., L. R. Gale, and B. Handley. 2010. Assessing faculty performance using student evaluations of teaching in an uncontrolled setting. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 35 (4):463–75. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930902862875.
- Palmer, S. 2012. Student evaluation of teaching: Keeping in touch with reality. Quality in Higher Education 18 (3):297–311. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/13538322.2012.730336.
- Park, H.-S., and Y. F. Cheong. 2018. Correlates of monotonic response patterns in online ratings of a university course. Higher Education 76 (1):101–13. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-017-0199-9.
- Park, J. Y. 2014. Course evaluation: Reconfigurations for learning with learning management systems. Higher Education Research & Development 33 (5):992–1006. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2014.890564.
- Patrick, C. L. 2011. Student evaluations of teaching: Effects of the Big Five personality traits, grades and the validity hypothesis. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 36 (2):239–49. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930903308258.
- Pudelko, M., and H. Tenzer. 2019. Boundaryless careers or career boundaries? The impact of language barriers on academic careers in international business schools. Academy of Management Learning & Education 18 (2):213–40. doi: https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2017.0236.
- Santhanam, E., and O. Hicks. 2002. Disciplinary, gender and course year influences on student perceptions of teaching: Explorations and implications. Teaching in Higher Education 7 (1):17–31. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/13562510120100364.
- Shewhart, W. A. 1931. Economic control of quality of manufactured product. New York, NY: Van Nostrand.
- Steinhardt, I., C. Schneijderberg, N. Götze, J. Baumann, and G. Krücken. 2017. Mapping the quality assurance of teaching and learning in higher education: The emergence of a specialty? Higher Education 74 (2):221–37. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-016-0045-5.
- Umble, E. J., and M. M. Umble. 2000. Focus on the classroom: Developing control charts and illustrating type I and type II errors. Quality Management Journal 7 (4):23–31. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/10686967.2000.11918918.
- Wheeler, D. J. 2004. Advanced topics in statistical process control: The power of Shewhart's charts. 2nd ed. Knoxville, TN: SPC Press.
- Winocur, S., L. G. Schoen, and A. H. Sirowatka. 1989. Perceptions of male and female academics within a teaching context. Research in Higher Education 30 (3):317–29. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00992607.
- Wolbring, T., and E. Treischl. 2016. Selection bias in students’ evaluation of teaching. Research in Higher Education 57 (1):51–71. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-015-9378-7.
- Woodall, W. H. 2000. Controversies and contradictions in statistical process control. Journal of Quality Technology 32 (4):341–50. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00224065.2000.11980013.
- Zabaleta, F. 2007. The use and misuse of student evaluations of teaching. Teaching in Higher Education 12 (1):55–76. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/13562510601102131.