Evolution of a Culture of Assessment: Developing a Mixed-Methods Approach for Evaluating Library Instruction

REFERENCES

• Beile, P.M. 2007. Assessing an institution-wide information fluency program: Commitment, plan, and purposes. Public Services Quarterly 3:127–46.
   Google Scholar
• Bowles-Terry, M. 2012. Library instruction and academic success: A mixed-methods assessment of a library instruction program. Evidence Based Library and Information Practice 7:82–95.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, C.P., and B. Kingsley-Wilson. 2010. Assessing organically: Turning an assignment into an assessment. Reference Services Review 38:536–56. doi:10.1108/00907321011090719.
   Google Scholar
• Carter, E.W. 2002. “Doing the best you can with what you have”: Lessons learned from outcomes assessment. The Journal of Academic Librarianship 28:36–41. doi:10.1016/S0099-1333(01)00282-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colborn, N.W., and R.M. Cordell. 1998. Moving from subjective to objective assessments of your instruction program. Reference Services Review 26:125–29.
   Google Scholar
• Diller, K.R., and S.F. Phelps. 2008. Learning outcomes, portfolios, and rubrics, oh my! Authentic assessment of an information literacy program. portal: Libraries and the Academy 8:75–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilchrist, D., and M. Oakleaf. 2012. An essential partner: The librarian's role in student learning assessment. NILOA Occasional Paper No.14. Urbana, IL: University for Illinois and Indiana University, National Institute for Learning Outcomes Assessment. http://www.learningoutcomeassessment.org/documents/LibraryLO_000.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• ———, and A. Zald. 2008. Instruction & program design through assessment. In Information literacy instruction handbook, ed. C.N. Cox and E.B. Lindsay, 164–92. Chicago: Association of College & Research Libraries.
   Google Scholar
• Gustavson, A. 2012. Using ILIAC to systematically plan and implement a library information literacy assessment program for freshman classes. Public Services Quarterly 8:97–113.
   Google Scholar
• Hernon, P., and R.E. Dugan. 2004. Outcomes assessment in higher education: Views and perspectives. Westport, CT: Libraries Unlimited.
   Google Scholar
• Hufford, J.R. 2013. A review of the literature on assessment in academic and research libraries. portal: Libraries and the Academy 13:5–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knight, L.A. 2006. Using rubrics to assess information literacy. Reference Services Review 34:43–55.
   Google Scholar
• Matthews, J.R. 2007. Library assessment in higher education. Westport, CT: Libraries Unlimited.
   Google Scholar
• Mercer University. 2013a. About Mercer. Mission statement. http://www2.mercer.edu/about_mercer/mission.htm.
   Google Scholar
• ———. 2013b. Mission statement. http://about.mercer.edu/mission/.
   Google Scholar
• Middleton, C. 2002. Evolution of peer evaluation of library instruction at Oregon State University Libraries. portal: Libraries and the Academy 2:69–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munde, G., and K. Marks. 2009. Surviving the future: Academic libraries, quality, and assessment. Oxford: Chandos.
   Google Scholar
• Oakleaf, M.J. 2010. The value of academic libraries: A comprehensive research review and report. Chicago: Association of College and Research Libraries, American Library Association.
   Google Scholar
• OIE (Office of Institutional Effectiveness). 2013a. Assessment. http://oie.mercer.edu/assessment/.
   Google Scholar
• ———. 2013b. Terminology. http://oie.mercer.edu/assessment/terms/.
   Google Scholar
• ———. 2013c. Principles of good practice. http://oie.mercer.edu/assessment/principles/.
   Google Scholar
• ———. 2013d. Assessment record. http://apps.mercer.edu/assessment/cfpages/assess.cfm?m_id_outcome=237006/.
   Google Scholar
• Radcliff, C.J., M.L. Jensen, J.A. Salem, K.J. Burhanna, and J.A. Gedeon. 2007. A practical guide to information literacy assessment for academic librarians. Westport, CT: Libraries Unlimited.
   Google Scholar
• Samson, S., and M. McLure. 2007. Library instruction assessment through 360°. Public Services Quarterly 3:9–28.
   Google Scholar
• Saunders, L. 2011. Information literacy as a student learning outcome the perspective of institutional accreditation. Santa Barbara, CA: Libraries Unlimited.
   Google Scholar
• Scharf, D., N. Elliot, H.A. Huey, V. Briller, and K. Joshi. 2007. Direct assessment of information literacy using writing portfolios. The Journal of Academic Librarianship 33:462–77. doi:10.1016/j.acalib.2007.03.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schilling, K., and R. Applegate. 2012. Best methods for evaluating educational impact: A comparison of the efficacy of commonly used measures of library instruction. Journal of the Medical Library Association 100:258–69.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sobel, K., and K. Wolf. 2011. Updating your tool belt: Redesigning assessments of learning in the library. Reference & User Services Quarterly 50:245–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tancheva, K., C. Andrews, and G. Steinhart. 2007. Library instruction assessment in academic libraries. Public Services Quarterly 3:29–56.
   Google Scholar
• Wakimoto, D.K. 2010. Information literacy instruction assessment and improvement through evidence based practice: A mixed method study. Evidence Based Library and Information Practice 5:82–92.
   Google Scholar