Reducing Patron Information Overload in Academic Libraries

REFERENCES

• Association of College & Research Libraries. 2012. “Information Literacy Competency Standards for Higher Education.” http://www.ala.org/acrl/standards/informationliteracycompetency.
   Google Scholar
• Ballard, Terry, and Anna Blaine. 2011. “User Search-Limiting Behavior in Online Catalogs: Comparing Classic Catalog Use to Search Behavior in Next-Generation Catalogs.” New Library World 111:261–73.
   Google Scholar
• Barry, C.A., and David Squires. 1995. “Why the Move from the Traditional Information-Seeking to the Electronic Library Is Not Straightforward for Academic Users: Some Surprising Findings.” In Online Information 95 Proceedings of the 19th International Online Information Meeting, edited by DavidI. Raitt and Ben Jeapes, 177–87. Oxford: Learned Information Europe.
   Google Scholar
• Battleson, Brenda, Austin Booth, and Jane Weintrop. 2001. “Usability Testing of an Academic Library Web Site: A Case Study.” Journal of Academic Librarianship 27:188–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bawden, David, Clive Holtham, and Nigel Courtney. 1999. “Perspectives on Information Overload.” Aslib Proceedings 51:249–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ———, and Lyn Robinson. 2009. The Dark Side of Information: Overload, Anxiety and Other Paradoxes and Pathologies.” Journal of Information Science 35:180–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brand-Gruwel, Saskia, Iwan Wopereis, and Yvonne Vermetten. 2005. Information Problem Solving by Experts and Novices: Analysis of a Complex Cognitive Skill.” Computers in Human Behavior 21:487–508.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ciccone, Karen. 2005. “MyLibrary @ NCState: A Library Portal after Five Years.” Journal of Library Administration 43:19–35.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, Suzanne, John Fereira, Angela Horne, Bob Kibbee, Holly Mistlebauer, and Adam Smith. 2000. “MyLibrary: Personalized Electronic Services in the Cornell University Library.” D-Lib Magazine 6 (4). http://www.dlib.org/dlib/april00/mistlebauer/04mistlebauer.html
   Google Scholar
• Derlin, Roberta L., and Edward Erazo. 1997. “Distance Learning and the Digital Library: Transforming the Library into an Information Center.” New Directions for Teaching and Learning 71:103–09.
   Google Scholar
• Elsegood, Sarah. 2011. “Focusing on Student Discovery Tool Preferences.” SCONUL Focus 53:24–28.
   Google Scholar
• Ezzo, Anita, and Julia Pérez. 2000. “The Information Explosion: Continuing Implications for Reference Services to Adult Learners in the Academic Library.” Reference Librarian 33:5–17.
   Google Scholar
• Gardner, Susan, and Susanna Eng. 2005. “What Students Want: Generation Y and the Changing Function of the Academic Library.” portal: Libraries and the Academy 5:405–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Godwin, Peter. 2009. “Information Literacy and Web 2.0: Is It Just Hype?” Program: Electronic Library and Information Systems 43:264–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gold, Naomi. 2011. “Less Is More: Essential Web Resources That Eliminate Clutter and Enhance Service.” Reference Reviews 25:4–11.
   Google Scholar
• Goulding, Anne. 2001. “Information Poverty or Overload?” Journal of Librarianship & Information Science 33:109–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grafstein, Ann. 2007. “Information Literacy and Technology: An Examination of Some Issues.” portal: Libraries and the Academy 7:51–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanka, Rudolf, and Karel Fuka. 2000. “Information Overload and ‘Just in Time’ Knowledge.” The Electronic Library 4:279–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Head, Alison J. 2008. “Information Literacy from the Trenches: How Do Humanities and Social Science Majors Conduct Academic Research.” College & Research Libraries 69(5):427–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• . ———, and Michael Eisenberg. 2009. “What Today's College Students Say about Conducting Research in the Digital Age. Project Information Literacy Progress Report.” Seattle, WA: Information School, University of Washington. http://projectinfolit.org/pdfs/PIL_ProgressReport_2_2009.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Hensiak, Kathryn. 2003. “Too Much of a Good Thing: Information Overload and Law Librarians.” Legal Reference Services Quarterly 22:85–98.
   Google Scholar
• Hopkins, RichardL. 1995. “Countering Information Overload: The Role of the Librarian.” Reference Librarian 23:305–33.
   Google Scholar
• Israel, IfijehGoodluck. 2010. “Information Explosion and University Libraries: Current Trends and Strategies for Intervention.” Chinese Librarianship 30: 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Jankowska, MariaA. 2004. “Identifying University Professors’ Information Needs in the Challenging Environment of Information and Communication Technologies.” Journal of Library Administration 30:51–66.
   Google Scholar
• Jeevan, V.K. J. 2008. “Library Personalization Systems: An Indian Experience.” IFLA Journal 34:72–83.
   Google Scholar
• Klapp, OrrinE. 1986. Overload and Boredom : Essays on the Quality of Life in the Information Society. Westport, CT: Greenwood.
   Google Scholar
• Loesch, MarthaF. 2010. “Librarian as Professor: A Dynamic New Role Model.” Education Libraries 33:31–37.
   Google Scholar
• Marshall, Peg, Shawn Herman, and Sri Rajan. 2006. “In Search of More Meaningful Search.” Serials Review 32:172–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McHale, Nina. 2008. “Toward a User-Centered Academic Library Home Page.” Journal of Web Librarianship 2:139–76.
   Google Scholar
• Melgoza, Pauline, PamelaA. Mennel, and SuzanneD. Gyeszly. 2002. “Information Overload.” Collection Building 21:32–42.
   Google Scholar
• Mendelsohn, Jennifer. 1994. “Human Help at OPAC Terminals Is User Friendly: A Preliminary Study.” RQ 34:173–90.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, JamesGrier. 1978. Living Systems. New York: McGraw Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Morville, Peter, and Paula Sullenger. 2010. “Ambient Findability: Libraries, Serials, and the Internet of Things.” The Serials Librarian 58:33–38.
   Google Scholar
• Naude, Filistea, Chris Resleigh, and Adeline du Toit. 2010. “Using the Open Web as an Information Resource and Scholarly Web Search Engines as Retrieval Tools for Academic and Research Purposes.” South African Journal of Information Management 12:49–54.
   Google Scholar
• Nazim, Mohammad. 2008. “Information Searching Behavior in the Internet Age: A Users’ Study of Aligarh Muslim University.” International Information & Library Review 40:73–81.
   Google Scholar
• Ortiz-Repiso, Virginia, Virginia Bazán, Agnès Ponsati, and Mario Cottereau. 2006. “How Researchers Are Using the OPAC of the Spanish Council for Scientific Research Library Network.” The Electronic Library 24:190–211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parise, Pierina. 1998. “Information Power Goes Online: Teaching Information Literacy to Distance Learners.” Reference Services Review 26(3–4):5160.
   Google Scholar
• Reichardt, Randy, and Christopher Cox. 2006. “Digital Reference Overload: Thoughts on How to Deal.” Internet Reference Services Quarterly 11:105–12.
   Google Scholar
• Rinaldo, Constance, and Karen Odato. 1998. “Keeping Current, Keeping Sane!” College & Research Libraries News 59:248–49.
   Google Scholar
• Rudd, Joel, and MaryJo Rudd. 1986. “Coping with Information Load: User Strategies and Implications for Libraries.” College & Research Libraries 47:315–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz, Barry. 2004. The Paradox of Choice: Why More Is Less. New York: Harper-Collins.
   Google Scholar
• Society of College, National, and University Libraries (SCONUL). n.d. “Seven Pillars Diagrams for Download and Use: Core Model Table of Skills and Attributes.” . http://www.sconul.ac.uk/sites/default/files/documents/coremodel.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Sullivan, Patrick. 2004. “Information Overload: Keeping Current without Being Overwhelmed.” Science & Technology Libraries 25:109–25.
   Google Scholar
• Sweetland, JamesH. 1993. “Information Poverty—Let Me Count the Ways.” Information Today 16(4):8–11.
   Google Scholar
• Taha, Ahmed. 2005. “Knowledge Maps for E-Literacy in ICT-Rich Learning Environments.” Journal of Library & Information Services in Distance Learning 2:67–78.
   Google Scholar
• Tenopir, Carol. 1990. “Online Information Anxiety.”Library Journal 115(13):62–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, Christen. 2003. “Information Illiterate or Lazy: How College Students Use the Web for Research.” portal: Libraries and the Academy 3:259–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varalakshmi, R.S. R. 2007. “Information Literacy Models: An Indian Perspective.” Journal of Library & Information Science 32:41–60.
   Google Scholar
• Walraven, Amber, Saskia Brand-Gruwel, and Henny Boshuizen. 2008. “Information-Problem Solving: A Review of Problems Students Encounter and Instructional Solutions.” Computers in Human Behavior 24:623–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ———. 2009. “How Students Evaluate Information and Sources When Searching the World Wide Web for Information.” Computers & Education 52:234–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitson, DonnaL., and DonnaD. Armstutz. 1997. Accessing Information in a Technological Age. Malabar, FL: Krieger.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, Patrick. 1996. “Interdisciplinary Research and Information Overload.” Library Trends 45:192–203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zia, MuhammadAnwar. 2007. “Understanding the Needs of Users: Tools for Research Using Web-Based Information Resources.” Pakistan Library & Information Science Journal 38:19–29.
   Google Scholar