Teaching the Use of Library of Congress Subject Headings as a Research Strategy for Undergraduate Students

REFERENCES

• Antell, Karen, and Jie Huang. 2008. “Subject Searching Success.” Reference & User Services Quarterly 48:68–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Association of College and Research Libraries. 2000. “Information Literacy Competency Standards for Higher Education.” Chicago, IL: ACRL. http://www.ala.org/ala/mgrps/divs/acrl/standards/standards.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Badke, WilliamB. 2011. Research Strategies: Finding Your Way through the Information Fog. Bloomington, IN: IUniverse, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Bates, MarciaJ. 1977. “Factors Affecting Subject Catalog Search Success.” Journal of the American Society for Information Science 28:161–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BeDell, Suzanne, and Libby Trudell. 2010. “Does Taxonomy Matter in a New World of Search and Discovery.” Online, 34(5). http://www.infotoday.com/online/sep10/BeDell-Trudell.shtml
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Centre for Information Behaviour and the Evaluation of Research (CIBER). 2008. Information Behaviour of the Researcher of the Future: A CIBER Briefing Paper. London: CIBER.
   Google Scholar
• Cirasella, Jill. 2008. “Google Sets, Google Suggest, and Google Search History: Three More Tools for the Reference Librarian's Bag of Tricks.” The Reference Librarian 48:57–65.
   Google Scholar
• Daugherty, AliceL., and MichaelF. Russo. 2011. “An Assessment of the Lasting Effects of a Stand-Alone Information Literacy Course: The Students’ Perspective.” The Journal of Academic Librarianship 37:319–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox, Vanessa. 2008. “The Promise of Natural Language Search.” Information Today . January:50.
   Google Scholar
• Gross, Tina, and ArleneG. Taylor. 2005. “What Have We Got to Lose? The Effect of Controlled Vocabulary on Keyword Searching Results.” College & Research Libraries 66:212–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoerman, HeidiL., and Kevin Furniss. 2000. “Turning Practice into Principles: A Comparison of the IFLA Principles Underlying Subject Heading Languages (SHLs) and the Principles Underlying the Library Of Congress Subject Headings System.” Cataloging & Classification Quarterly 29:31–52.
   Google Scholar
• Kornegay, Becky, Heidi Buchanan, and Hiddy Morgan. 2005. “Amazing, Magic Searches!” Library Journal . November:44–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Library of Congress. 2008. Subject Headings Manual. Washington, DC: Library of Congress, Cataloging Policy and Support Office.
   Google Scholar
• Mann, Thomas. 2000. “Teaching Library of Congress Subject Headings.” Cataloging & Classification Quarterly 29:117–26.
   Google Scholar
• ———. 2003. “Why LC Subject Headings Are More Important Than Ever: The Solution to Some of Researchers’ Biggest Problems Is Staring Us Right in Our Faces.” American Libraries . October:52–54.
   Google Scholar
• ———. 2005. The Oxford Guide to Library Research. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Markey, Karen. 1984. Subject Searching in Library Catalogs: Before and After the Introduction of Online Catalogs. Dublin, OH: OCLC Online Computer Library Center.
   Google Scholar
• Marshall, Linnea. 2003. “Specific and Generic Subject Headings: Increasing Subject Access to Library Materials.” Cataloging & Classification Quarterly 36:59–87.
   Google Scholar
• McCutcheon, Sevim. 2009. “Keyword vs Controlled Vocabulary Searching: The One with the Most Tools Wins.” The Indexer: Journal of the Society of Indexers 27:62–65.
   Google Scholar
• Nowick, ElaineA., Darryl Travnicek, Kent Eskridge, and Stephen Stein. 2010. “A Comparison of Term Clusters for Tokenized Words Collected from Controlled Vocabularies, User Keyword Searches, and Online Documents.” Library Philosophy and Practice. . November. Paper 493. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/493
   Google Scholar
• O’Kelly, MaryK., and Colleen Lyon. 2011. “Google Like a Librarian: Sharing Skills for Search Success.” College & Research Libraries News 72:330–32.
   Google Scholar
• Randeree, Ebrahim, and Lorri Mon. 2011. “Searching for Answers in a Google World.” The Reference Librarian 52:342–51.
   Google Scholar
• Schabes, Yves. 2006. “Search & Retrieval Using Natural Language Technology.” AIIM E-Doc. Magazine 20(6):18–20.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, ArleneG., and DavidP. Miller. 2006. Introduction to Cataloging and Classification. . 10th ed. Westport, CT: Libraries Unlimited.
   Google Scholar
• Villen-Rueda, Luis, JoseA. Senso, and Felixde Moya-Anegon. 2007. “The Use of OPAC in a Large Academic Library: A Transactional Log Analysis Study of Subject Searching.” Journal of Academic Librarianship 33:327–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wool, G. 2000. “Filing and Precoordination: How Subject Headings Are Displayed in Online Catalogs and Why It Matters.” Cataloging & Classification Quarterly 29:91–106.
   Google Scholar