Teaching critical thinking skills through commonly used resources in course-embedded online modules

References

• Allen, M. 2008. “Promoting Critical Thinking Skills in Online Information Literacy Instruction Using a Constructivist Approach.” College & Undergraduate Libraries 15(1/2): 21–38.
   Google Scholar
• Aydelott, Katherine. 2007. “Using the ACRL Information Literacy Competency Standards for Science and Engineering/Technology to Develop a Modular Critical-Thinking-Based Information Literacy Tutorial.” Science & Technology Libraries 27(4): 19–42.
   Google Scholar
• Bell, Steven J., and John D. Shank. 2007. Academic Librarianship by Design: A Blended Librarian's Guide to the Tools and Techniques. Chicago: American Library Association.
   Google Scholar
• Bodi, Sonia. 1988. “Critical Thinking and Bibliographic Instruction: The Relationship.” Journal of Academic Librarianship 14(3): 150–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, N. 2011. “Trust Me! Wikipedia's Credibility among College Students.” International Journal of Instructional Media 38(1): 27–36.
   Google Scholar
• The Colbert Report. 2006. “The Word—Wikiality.” Comedy Central video, posted July 30. http://thecolbertreport.cc.com/videos/z1aahs/the-word—wikiality.
   Google Scholar
• Colón-Aguirre, Monica, and Rachel A. Fleming-May. 2012. “ʻYou Just Type in What You Are Looking Forʼ: Undergraduates’ Use of Library Resources vs. Wikipedia.” Journal of Academic Librarianship 38(6): 391–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Detmering, Robert, and Anna Marie Johnson. 2011. “Focusing on the Thinking, Not the Tools: Incorporating Critical Thinking into an Information Literacy Module for an Introduction to Business Course.” Journal of Business & Finance Librarianship 16(2): 101–07.
   Google Scholar
• Ebrary. “2008 Global Student E-book Survey.” http://www.ebrary.com/corp/collateral/en/Survey/ebrary_student_survey_2008.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Emmons, Mark, and Wanda Martin. 2002. “Engaging Conversation: Evaluating the Contribution of Library Instruction to the Quality of Student Research.” College & Research Libraries 63(6): 545–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engeldinger, Eugene A. 1992. “Frustration Management in a Course-Integration Bibliographic Instruction Program.” Reference Quarterly 32(1): 20–24.
   Google Scholar
• Fister, Barbara. 1993. “Teaching the Rhetorical Dimensions of Research.” Research Strategies 11(4): 211–19.
   Google Scholar
• Foundation for Critical Thinking. n.d.a “Institutions Using Our Approach to Critical Thinking.” http://www.criticalthinking.org/pages/institutions-using-our-approach-to-critical-thinking/865.
   Google Scholar
• Foundation for Critical Thinking. n.d.b “Our Mission.” http://www.criticalthinking.org/pages/our-mission/599.
   Google Scholar
• Fowler, Clara S., and Elizabeth A. Dupuis. 2000. “What Have We Done? TILT's Impact on Our Instruction Program.” Reference Services Review 28(4): 343–49.
   Google Scholar
• Getty, Nancy K., Barbara. Burd, Sarah K. Burns, and Linda Piele. 2000. “Using Courseware to Deliver Library Instruction via the Web: Four Examples.” Reference Services Review 28(4): 349–59.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, Craig. 1995. “Critical Thinking: Implications for Instruction.” Reference Quarterly 35(1): 27–35.
   Google Scholar
• Gomes, Alexandra W., Anne Linton, and Laura Abate. 2013. “Strengthening Our Collaborations: Building an Electronic Health Record Educational Module.” Journal of Electronic Resources in Medical Libraries 10(1): 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Griffiths, Jillian R., and Peter Brophy. 2005. “Student Searching Behavior and the Web: Use of Academic Resources and Google.” Library Trends 53(4): 539–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gross, Doug. 2013. “Wiki Wars: The 10 Most Controversial Wikipedia Pages.” http://www.cnn.com/2013/07/24/tech/web/controversial-wikipedia-pages/.
   Google Scholar
• Hayes-Bohanan, Pamela, and Elizabeth Spievak. 2008. “You Can Lead Students to Sources, but Can You Make Them Think?” College & Undergraduate Libraries 15(1/2): 173–210.
   Google Scholar
• Hoffman, Paul S. 2002. “The Development and Evolution of a University-Based Online Library Instruction Course.” Reference Services Review 30(3): 198–211.
   Google Scholar
• Jennings, Eric. 2008. “Using Wikipedia to Teach Information Literacy.” College & Undergraduate Libraries 15(4): 432–37.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, Corey M., Elizabeth B. Lindsay, and Scott Walter. 2008. “Learning More about How They Think: Information Literacy Instruction in a Campus-Wide Critical Thinking Project.” College & Undergraduate Libraries 15(1/2): 231–54.
   Google Scholar
• Knecht, Mike, and Kevin Reid. 2009. “Modularizing Information Literacy Training via the Blackboard Community.” Journal of Library Administration 49:1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Kyung-Sun, Kim, and Sei-Ching Joanna Sin. 2011. “Selecting Quality Sources: Bridging the Gap between the Perception and Use of Information Sources.” Journal of Information Science 37(2): 178–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maehre, Jeff. 2009. “What It Means to Ban Wikipedia.” College Teaching 57(4): 229–36.
   Google Scholar
• Matei, Sorin A., and Caius Dobrescu. 2011. “Wikipedia's ‘Neutral Point of View’: Settling Conflict through Ambiguity.” Information Society 27(1): 40–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mutula, Stephen, Trywell Kalusopa, Kgomotso H. Moahi, and Justus Wamukoya. 2006. “Design and Implementation of an Online Information Literacy Module.” Online Information Review 30(2): 168–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noe, Nancy W., and Barbara A. Bishop. 2005. “Assessing Auburn University Library's Tiger Information Literacy Tutorial (TILT).” Reference Services Review 33(2): 173–87.
   Google Scholar
• Nosich, Gerald M. 2009. Learning to Think Things Through: A Guide to Critical Thinking across the Curriculum. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Nowicki, Stacy. 1999. “Information Literacy and Critical Thinking in the Electronic Environment.” Journal of Instruction Delivery Systems 13(1): 25–28.
   Google Scholar
• Orphanides, Andreas. 2009. “Anatomy of a Scholarly Article.” http://www.lib.ncsu.edu/tutorials/scholarly-articles
   Google Scholar
• Paul, Richard, and Linda Elder. 2008. The Miniature Guide to Critical Thinking: Concepts and Tools (5th ed.). Tomales, CA: Foundation for Critical Thinking Press.
   Google Scholar
• Phillips, Laurence, and Jamie Kearley 2003. “TIP: Tutorial for Information Power and Campus-Wide Information Literacy.” Reference Services Review 31(4): 351–58.
   Google Scholar
• Shank, John D., and Nancy H. Dewald. 2003. “Establishing our Presence in Courseware: Adding Library Services to the Virtual Classroom.” Information Technology and Libraries 22:38–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shell, Leslee, Steven Crawford, and Patricia Harris. 2013. “Aided and Embedded: The Team Approach to Instructional Design.” Journal of Library & Information Services 7:143–155.
   Google Scholar
• SoftChalk. 2014. “SoftChalk Create.” http://softchalk.com/products/softchalk.
   Google Scholar
• Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Commission on Colleges (SACSCOC). 2012. “The Principles of Accreditation: Foundations for Quality Enhancement.” http://www.sacscoc.org/pdf/2012PrinciplesOfAcreditation.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• University of Louisville (UofL) Delphi Center. n.d.a “About i2a.” http://louisville.edu/ideastoaction/about.
   Google Scholar
• University of Louisville (UofL) Delphi Center. n.d.b “SACS & QEP.” http://louisville.edu/ideastoaction/about/accreditation.
   Google Scholar
• Wikipedia. n.d.a “Wikipedia: Identifying Reliable Sources.” https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Identifying_reliable_sources.
   Google Scholar
• Wikipedia. n.d.b “Wikipedia: List of Policies and Guidelines.” http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:List_of_policies_and_guidelines.
   Google Scholar
• Wikipedia. n.d.c “Wikipedia: Neutral Point of View.” http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Neutral_point_of_view.
   Google Scholar