Many Faces of the Correlation Coefficient

References

• Allan, L. G. (1980), “A Note on Measurement of Contingency Between Two Binary Variables in Judgment Tasks,” Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 15, 147–149.
   Google Scholar
• Bloom, B. S. (1964), Stability and Change in Human Characteristics, New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Cahan, S. (1987), “On the Interpretation of the Product Moment Correlation Coefficient as a Measure,” unpublished manuscript, The Hebrew University, School of Education, Jerusalem, Israel.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1965), “Some Statistical Issues in Psychological Research,” in Handbook of Clinical Psychology, ed. B. B. Wolman, New York: McGraw-Hill, pp. 95–121.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J., and Cohen, P. (1975), Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Crow, J. F., and Kimura, M. (1970), An Introduction to Population Genetics Theory, New York: Harper & Row.
   Google Scholar
• Eisenbach, R., and Falk, R. (1984), “Association Between Two Variables Measured as Proportion of Loss-Reduction,” Teaching Statistics, 6, 47–52.
   Google Scholar
• Falk, R. (1993), Understanding Probability and Statistics: A Book of Problems, Wellesley, MA: AK Peters.
   Google Scholar
• Falk, R., and Well, A. D. (1996), “Correlation as Probability of Common Descent,” Multivariate Behavioral Research, 31, 219–238.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedman, H. (1968), “Magnitude of Experimental Effect and a Table for Its Rapid Estimation,” Psychological Bulletin, 70, 245–251.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilovich, T., Vallone, R., and Tversky, A. (1985), “The Hot Hand in Basketball: On the Misperception of Random Sequences,” Cognitive Psychology, 17, 295–314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guilford, J. P. (1954), Psychometric Methods (2nd ed.), New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Hays, W. L., and Winkler, R. L. (1971), Statistics: Probability, Inference, and Decision, New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
   Google Scholar
• Jennings, D. L., Amabile, T. M., and Ross, L. (1982), “Informal Covariation Assessment: Data-Based versus Theory-Based Judgments,” in Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases, eds. D. Kahneman, P. Slovic, and A. Tversky, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 211–230.
   Google Scholar
• Kareev, Y. (1995), “Positive Bias in the Perception of Covariation,” Psychological Review, 102, 490–502.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levy, P. (1967), “Substantive Significance of Significant Differences Between Two Groups,” Psychological Bulletin, 67, 37–40.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myers, J. L., and Well, A. D. (1991), Research Design and Statistical Analysis, New York: HarperCollins.
   Google Scholar
• Ozer, D. J. (1985), “Correlation and the Coefficient of Determination,” Psychological Bulletin, 97, 307–315.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodgers, J. L., and Nicewander, W. A. (1988), “Thirteen Ways to Look at the Correlation Coefficient,” The American Statistician, 42, 59–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenthal, R. (1990), “How Are We Doing in Soft Psychology?” American Psychologist, 45, 775–777.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenthal, R., and Rubin, D. B. (1982), “A Simple, General Purpose Display of Magnitude of Experimental Effect,” Journal of Educational Psychology, 74, 166–169.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosnow, R. L., and Rosenthal, R. (1989), “Statistical Procedures and the Justification of Knowledge in Psychological Science,” American Psychologist, 44, 1276–1284.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roughgarden, J. (1979), Theory of Population Genetics and Evolutionary Ecology: An Introduction, New York: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Rovine, M. J., and von Eye, A. (1997), “A 14th Way to Look at a Correlation Coefficient: Correlation as the Proportion of Matches,” The American Statistician, 51, 42–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shweder, R. A. (1977), “Likeness and Likelihood in Everyday Thought: Magical Thinking in Judgments About Personality,” Current Anthropology, 18, 637–658.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siegel, S., and Castellan, N. J. (1988), Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.), New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Ward, W. C., and Jenkins, H. M. (1965), “The Display of Information and the Judgment of Contingency,” Canadian Journal of Psychology, 19, 231–241.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Welkowitz, J., Ewen, R. B., and Cohen, J. (1976), Introductory Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.), New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zwick, R. (1988), “Another Look at Interrater Agreement,” Psychological Bulletin, 103, 374–378.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar