Striking Demonstrations in Teaching Statistics

References

• Anscombe, F. J. (1973), “Graphs in Statistical Analysis,” American Statistician, 27, 17–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burch, P. R. (1978), “Smoking and Lung Cancer: The Problem of Inferring Cause,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Ser. A, 141, 437–477.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, S. K. (1974), Flaws and Fallacies in Statistical Thinking, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Draper, N. R. (1963), “Does Age Affect Master Chess?” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Ser. A, 126, 120–127.
   Google Scholar
• Efron, B., and Morris, C. (1977), “Stein's Paradox in Statistics,” Scientific American, 236, May, 119–127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Efron, B., and Thisted, R. (1976), “How Many Words Did Shakespeare Know?” Biometrika, 63, 435–447.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elliott, W., and Valenza, R. (1991), “Who Was Shakespeare?” Chance, 4(3), 8–14.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, W. D., and Wadycki, W. J. (1971), “Estimating a Structural Equation in a Large System,” Econometrica, 39, 461–465.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fomby, T. B., Hill, R. C., and Johnson, S. R. (1988), Advanced Econometric Methods, New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Gardner, M. (1982), Aha! Gotcha — Paradoxes to Puzzle and Delight, New York: Freeman.
   Google Scholar
• Geary, R. C., and Leser, C. E. (1968), “Significance Tests in Multiple Regression,” American Statistician, 22, 20–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldberger, A. S. (1964), Econometric Theory, New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Goldberger, A. S. (1991), A Course in Econometrics, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grove, M. A. (1991), “Survival on the Bestseller List,” Chance, 4(2), 39–45.
   Google Scholar
• Healy, M. J. R. (1968), “The Lengths of Surnames,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Ser. A, 131, 567–568.
   Google Scholar
• Hollander, M., and Proschan, F. (1984), The Statistical Exorcist — Dispelling Statistics Anxiety, New York: Dekker.
   Google Scholar
• Huff, D. (1954), How To Lie With Statistics, London: Gollancz.
   Google Scholar
• Isaac, R. E. (1995), The Pleasures of Probability, New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Jaffe, A. J., and Spirer, H. F. (1986), Misused Statistics: Straight Talk for Twisted Numbers, New York: Dekker.
   Google Scholar
• Jagers, P. (1973), “How Many People Pay Their Tram Fares?,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 68, 801–804.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnston, J. (1963), Econometric Methods (1st ed.), New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Klein, L. R. (1973), “The Treatment of Undersized Samples in Econometrics,” in Econometric Studies of Macro and Monetary Relations, eds. A. A. Powell and R. A. Williams, Amsterdam: North Holland, pp. 3–26.
   Google Scholar
• Kmenta, J. (1972), Elements of Econometrics (1st ed.), New York: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Kmenta, J. (1986), Elements of Econometrics (2nd ed.), New York: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Lachenbruch, P., and Brogan, D. (1971), “Some Distributions on the Positive Real Line Which Have No Moments,” American Statistician, 25, 46–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loosen, F. (1997), “A Concrete Strategy for Teaching Hypothesis Testing,” American Statistician, 51, 158–163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loyer, M. W. (1986), “Not-so-surprising Surprising Results,” in Proceedings of the Statistical Education Section, American Statistical Association, pp. 143–147.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, D. S. (1997), Statistics: Concepts and Controversies (4th ed.), New York: Freeman.
   Google Scholar
• Mosteller, F., Rourke, R. E., and Thomas, G. B. (1970), Probability with Statistical Applications (2nd ed.), Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Romano, J. P., and Siegel, A. F. (1986), Counterexamples in Probability and Statistics, Monterey, CA: Wadsworth.
   Google Scholar
• Sowey, E. R. (1995), “Teaching Statistics: Making It Memorable,” Journal of Statistics Education [Online], 3(2). (ww2.amstat.org/publications/jse/v3n2/sowey.html)
   Google Scholar
• Stigler, S. M. (1986), The History of Statistics, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stigler, S. M. (1990), “A Galtonian Perspective on Shrinkage Estimators,” Statistical Science, 5, 147–155.
   Google Scholar
• Stoyanov, J. M. (1987), Counterexamples in Probability, New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Stoyanov, J. M. (1988), “The Use of Counterexamples in Learning Probability and Statistics,” in Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Teaching Statistics, eds. R. Davidson and J. Swift, The Hague: International Statistical Institute, pp. 280–286.
   Google Scholar
• Szekely, G. J. (1986), Paradoxes in Probability Theory and Mathematical Statistics, Dordrecht: Reidel.
   Google Scholar
• Tanur, J. M., Mosteller, F., Kruskal, W. H., Lehmann, E. L., Link, R. F., Pieters, R. S., and Rising, G. R. (eds.) (1989), Statistics — A Guide to the Unknown (3rd ed.), Pacific Grove, CA: Wadsworth & Brooks/Cole Advanced Books & Software.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, C. A. (1988), The Art and Science of Lecture Demonstration, London: Adam Hilger.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, J. R. (1989), Empirical Model Building, New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Wagner, C. H. (1982), “Simpson's Paradox in Real Life,” American Statistician, 36, 46–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallis, W. A., and Roberts, H. V. (1956), Statistics — A New Approach, Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, C. (1993), Sense and Nonsense of Statistical Inference — Controversy, Misuse, Subtlety, New York: Dekker.
   Google Scholar
• West, R. W., and Ogden, R. T. (1998), “Interactive Demonstrations for Statistics Education on the World Wide Web,” Journal of Statistics Education [Online], 6(3). (ww2.amstat.org/publications/jse/v6n3/west.html)
   Google Scholar
• Wise, G. L., and Hall, E. B. (1993), Counterexamples in Probability and Real Analysis, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Youden, W. J. (1972), “Enduring Values,” Technometrics, 14, 1–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar