First Courses in Statistical Science: The Status of Educational Reform Efforts

References

• Aliaga, M. (1998), “Re-thinking Stat 101,” Paper presented at the Fifth International Conference on Teaching Statistics, Singapore.
   Google Scholar
• Bluman, A. G. (1997), Elementary Statistics: A Step by Step Approach (3rd ed), Boston: WCB/McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, R. S. (1998), “On the failure of the widespread use of statistics,” Amstat News, No. 251, 84.
   Google Scholar
• Cobb, G. (1992), “Teaching Statistics,” in Heeding the Call for Change, ed. L. Steen, MAA Notes No. 22, Washington: Mathematical Association of American, 3–34.
   Google Scholar
• Cobb, G. (1993), “Reconsidering Statistics Education: A National Science Foundation Conference,” Journal of Statistics Education [Online], 1(1). (ww2.amstat.org/publications/jse/v1n1/cobb.html)
   Google Scholar
• Cobb, G. (1994), Workshops for Mathematicians Who Teach Statistics, paper presented at the Fourth International conference on Teaching Statistics, Marrakech, Morocco.
   Google Scholar
• The Consortium for Mathematics and Its Applications (1989), Against All Odds (Video), South Burlington, VT: The Annenberg/CPB Collection.
   Google Scholar
• delMas, R., Garfield, J., and Chance, B. (1999), “A model of classroom research in action: Developing simulation activities to improve students' statistical reasoning,” Journal of Statistics Education [Online], 7(3). (ww2.amstat.org/publications/jse/secure/v7n3/delmas.cfm)
   Google Scholar
• Freedman, D., Pisani, R., and Purves, R. (1998), Statistics (3rd ed), New York: W. W. Norton and Co.
   Google Scholar
• Garfield, J. (1995), “How students learn statistics,” International Statistical Review, 63, 25–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garfield, J. (2000), “An Evaluation of the Impact of Statistics Reform,” Final Report for National Science Foundation project REC-9732404.
   Google Scholar
• Garfield, J., delMas, R., and Chance B. (2002), “The Web-based ARTIST: Assessment Resource Tools for Improving Statistical Thinking” Project, pending National Science Foundation Grant.
   Google Scholar
• Giraud, G. (1997), “Cooperative Learning and Statistics Instruction,” Journal of Statistics Education [Online], 5(3). (ww2.amstat.org/publications/jse/v5n3/giraud.html)
   Google Scholar
• Hoaglin, D. C., and Moore, D. S., (eds.) (1992), Perspectives on Contemporary Statistics, MAA Notes No. 21, Washington, DC: Mathematical Association of America.
   Google Scholar
• Hogg, R. (1992), “Report of Workshop on Statistics Education,” in Heeding the Call for Change, ed. L. Steen, MAA NotesNo. 22, Washington: Mathematical Association of American, 34–43.
   Google Scholar
• Keeler, C. M., and Steinhorst, R. K. (1995), “Using Small Groups to Promote Active Learning in the Introductory Statistics Course: A Report from the Field,” Journal of Statistics Education [Online], 3(2).(ww2.amstat.org/publications/jse/v3n2/keeler.html)
   Google Scholar
• Lock, R. (2000), “A Sampler of WWW Resources for Teaching Statistics,” in Teaching Statistics: Resources for Undergraduate Instructors, ed. T. Moore, MAA NotesNo. 52, Washington: Mathematical Association of American, 191–197.
   Google Scholar
• Loftsgaarden, D. O., and Watkins, A. E. (1998), “Statistics teaching in colleges and universities: Courses, instructors, and degrees in fall 1995,” The American Statistician, 52, 308–314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McClave, J. T., Dietrich, F. H., and Sincich, T. (1997), Statistics (7th ed), Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, D. S. (1992), Teaching Statistics as a Respectable Subject, in F.S. Gordon (eds.), Statistics for the Twenty-First Century, MAA Notes, Number 26, The Mathematical Association of America, Washington DC., 14–25.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, D. S. (1995), The Basic Practice of Statistics, New York: W. H. Freeman and Co.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, D. S. (1997a), “New pedagogy and new content: The case of statistics,” International Statistical Review, 65, 123–137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, D. S. (1997b), “Response,” International Statistical Review, 65, 162–165.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, D. S., and McCabe, G. P. (1999), The Introduction to the Practice of Statistics (3rd ed.), New York: W. H. Freeman and Company.
   Google Scholar
• Rockmore, D., and Snell, J. L. (1999), “To Teach, per Chance To Dream,” Notices of the American Mathematical Society, 46, 874–877.
   Google Scholar
• Scheaffer, R. L. (1997). Discussion. International Statistical Review, 65, 156–158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snee, R. (1990), “Statistical thinking and its contribution to quality,” The American Statistician, 44, 116–121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snee, R. (1999), “Discussion: Development and use of statistical thinking: A new era,” International Statistical Review, 67, 255–258.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stigler, J., and Hiebert, J. (1999), The Teaching Gap, New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Triola, M. F. (1998), Elementary Statistics (7th ed), Boston: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Velleman, P. F., and Moore, D. S. (1996), “Multimedia for teaching statistics: Promises and pitfalls,” The American Statistician, 50, 217–225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiss, N. A. (1999), Introductory Statistics (5th ed), Boston: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Wild, C. J., and Pfannkuch, M. (1999), “Statistical thinking in empirical enquiry,” International Statistical Review, 67, 221–248.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zahn, D. A., and Davis, N. A. (1996), “Toward creating a learning community in large-section, introductory statistics courses,” Poster presented at the Joint Statistical Meetings, Chicago.
   Google Scholar