The Best of Both Worlds: A Hybrid Statistics Course

References

• Ashkeboussi, R. (2001), “A Comparative Analysis of Learning Experience in a Traditional vs. Virtual Classroom Setting”, Academic Exchange Quarterly, 5 (4), 133–138.
   Google Scholar
• Brace-Govan, J., and Clulow, V. (2001), “Comparing Face-to-Face With Online: Learners' Perspective,” Academic Exchange Quarterly, 5(4), 112–117.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, D. G. (2001), “Hybrid Courses Are Best”, Syllabus Magazine, 15(3), 22.
   Google Scholar
• Carnevale, D. (2002), “Online Students Don't Fare as Well as Classroom Counterparts, Study Finds”, The Chronicle of Higher Education, 48 (27), 38.
   Google Scholar
• Dutton, J., Dutton, M., and Perry, J. (1999), “Do Online Students Perform as Well as Lecture Students?”, North Carolina State University [Online]. (www4.ncsu.edu/unity/users/d/dutton/public/research/online.pdf)
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, K. (2000), “A Model Class (Concord University Online Law School)”, Training, 37 (12), 50.
   Google Scholar
• Gagne, M. and Shepherd M. (2001), “A Comparison Between a Distance and a Traditional Graduate Accounting Class”, T. H. E. Journal [Online], 28(9), 58–65. (www.thejournal.com/magazine/vault/A3433.cfm)
   Google Scholar
• Halsne, A. M., and Gatta, L. A. (2002), “Online Versus Traditionally-delivered Instruction: A Descriptive Study of Learner Characteristics in a Community College Setting”, Journal of Distance Learning Administration [Online], 5(1). (www.westga.edu/%7Edistance/ojdla/spring51/halsne51.html)
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, M. (2002), “Introductory Biology Online: Assessing Outcomes of Two Student Populations,” Journal of College Science Teaching, 31(5), 312–317.
   Google Scholar
• Levine, L. (2002), “Using Technology to Enhance the Classroom Environment”, T. H. E. Journal [Online], 29(6), 16–19. (www.thejournal.com/magazine/vault/A3819.cfm)
   Google Scholar
• MacGregor, C. (2001), “A Comparison of Student Perceptions in Traditional and Online Classes,” Academic Exchange Quarterly, 5(4), 143–148.
   Google Scholar
• Merisotis, J. P., and Phipps, R. A. (1999), “What's the Difference? A Review of Contemporary Research on the Effectiveness of Distance Learning in Higher Education,” Washington, D. C.: The Institute for Higher Education Policy, 31.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, B., Cohen, N. L., and Beffa-Negrini, P. (2001), “Factors for Success in Online and Face-to-Face Instruction,” Academic Exchange Quarterly, 5(4), 4–10.
   Google Scholar
• Navarro P. and Shoemaker, J. (2000), “Performance and Perceptions of Distance Learners in Cyberspace,” American Journal of Distance Education, 14(2), 15–35.
   Google Scholar
• The National Education Association and Abacus Associates (2000), A Survey of Traditional and Distance Learning Higher Education Members, Washington, D. C.: The National Education Association.
   Google Scholar
• Oblender, T. E. (2002), “A Hybrid Course Model: One Solution to the High Online Drop-Out Rate,” Learning & Leading with Technology, 29(6), 42–46.
   Google Scholar
• Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute (2001), Press Release, The Pew Grant Program in CourseRedesign at the Center for Academic Transformation, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute [Online]. (www.rpi.edu/web/News/press_releases/2001/cat.html)
   Google Scholar
• Russell, T. L. (1999a), No Significant Difference Phenomenon [Online]. (www.nosignificantdifference.org/nosignificantdifference/)
   Google Scholar
• Russell, T. L. (1999b), Significant Difference Phenomenon [Online]. (www.nosignificantdifference.org/significantdifference/)
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, R. C. (2000), “Student Assessment Comparison of Lecture and Online Construction Equipment and Methods Classes,” T. H. E. Journal [Online], 27(6), 78. (www.thejournal.com/magazine/vault/A2596.cfm)
   Google Scholar
• Schulman, A. H., and Sims R. L. (1999), “Learning in an Online Format versus an In-Class Format: An Experimental Study”, T. H. E. Journal [Online], 26(11), 54-56. (www.thejournal.com/magazine/vault/A2090B.cfm)
   Google Scholar
• Stephenson, W. R. (2001), “Statistics at a Distance”, Journal of Statistics Education [Online], 9(3).(ww2.amstat.org/publications/jse/v9n3/stephenson.html)
   Google Scholar
• Tucker, S. (2001), “Distance Education: Better, Worse, Or As Good As Traditional Education?”, Journal of Distance Learning Administration [Online], 4(4).(http://www.westga.edu/~distance/ojdla/winter44/tucker44.html)
   Google Scholar
• Utts, J., Sommer, B., Acredolo, C., Maher, M. W., and Matthews, H. R. (2003), “A Study Comparing Traditional and Hybrid Internet-Based Instruction in Introductory Statistics Classes”, Journal of Statistics Education [Online], 11(3). (ww2.amstat.org/publications/jse/v11n3/utts.html)
   Google Scholar
• Yablon, Y. B., and Katz, Y. J. (2001), “Statistics Through the Medium of the Internet: What Students Think and Achieve,” Academic Exchange Quarterly, 5(4), 17–22.
   Google Scholar
• Young, J. R. (2002), “’Hybrid’ Teaching Seeks to End the Divide Between Traditional and Online Instruction”, The Chronicle of Higher Education, 48(28), A33–A34.
   Google Scholar