What's Brewing? A Statistics Education Discovery Project

References

• Bailey, B., Spence, D. J., and Sinn, R. (2013), “Implementation of Discovery Projects in Statistics,” Journal of Statistics Education, 21.
   Google Scholar
• Ben-Zvi, D., and Garfield, J. (2004), “Statistical Literacy, Reasoning, and Thinking: Goals, Definitions, and Challenges,” in The Challenge of Developing Statistical Literacy, Reasoning, and Thinking, eds. D. Ben-Zvi, and J. Garfield, Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 3–15.
   Google Scholar
• Carver, R., Everson, M., Gabrosek, J., Horton, N., Lock, R., Mocko, M., Rossman, A., Holmes, Rowell, G., Velleman, P., Witmer, J., and Wood, B. (2016), Guidelines for Assessment and Instruction in Statistics Education: College Report, Alexandria, VA: American Statistical Association. Available at http://www.amstat.org/asa/files/pdfs/GAISE/GaiseCollege_Full.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Chance, B. L. (2002), “Components of Statistical Thinking and Implications for Instruction and Assessment,” Journal of Statistics Education, 10.
   Google Scholar
• Cifarelli, V. V., and Cai, J. (2005), “The Evolution of Mathematical Explorations in Open-Ended Problem-Solving Situations,” The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 24, 302–324.
   Google Scholar
• Cline, K. S. (2005), “Numerical Methods through Open-Ended Projects,” PRIMUS: Problems, Resources, and Issues in Mathematics Undergraduate Studies, 15, 274–288.
   Google Scholar
• Fillebrown, S. (1994), “Using Projects in an Elementary Statistics Course for Non-Science Majors,” Journal of Statistics Education, 2.
   Google Scholar
• Franklin, C., Kader, G., Mewborn, D., Moreno, J., Peck, R., Perry, M., and Scheaffer, R. (2007), Guidelines for Assessment and Instruction in Statistics Education (GAISE) Report: A Pre-k-12 Curriculum Framework, Alexandria, VA: American Statistical Association. Available at http://www.amstat.org/asa/files/pdfs/GAISE/GAISEPreK-12_Full.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Fukawa-Connelly, T., and Buck, S. (2010), “Using Portfolio Assignments to Assess Students' Mathematical Thinking,” Mathematics Teacher, 103, 649–654. Available at http://www.jstor.org/stable/20876732
   Google Scholar
• Gambino, L. M. (2014), “Putting E-Portfolios at the Center of Our Learning,” Peer Review, 16, 31–34. Available at https://www.aacu.org/publications-research/periodicals/putting-e-portfolios-center-our-learning
   Google Scholar
• Garfield, J. (1995), “How Students Learn Statistics,” International Statistical Review/Revue Internationale de Statistique, 63, 25–34. Available at http://www.jstor.org/stable/1403775
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ——— (2013), “Cooperative Learning Revisited: From an Instructional Method to a Way of Life,” Journal of Statistics Education, 21.
   Google Scholar
• Garfield, J., and Ben-Zvi, D. (2008), Developing Students' Statistical Reasoning: Connecting Research and Teaching Practice (1st ed.), Netherlands: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Gravetter, F. J., and Wallnau, L. B. (2016), Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences (10th ed.), Boston, MA: Cengage Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Hmelo-Silver, C. E., Duncan, R. G., and Chinn, C. A. (2007), “Scaffolding and Achievement in Problem-Based and Inquiry Learning: A Response to Kirschner, Sweller, and Clark (2006),” Educational Psychologist, 42, 99–107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hogg, R. V. (1991), “Statistical Education: Improvements are Badly Needed,” The American Statistician, 45, 342–343. Available at http://www.jstor.org/stable/2684473
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kadet, A. (2014), “With Coffee, Icy Means Pricey,” The Wall Street Journal, A16.
   Google Scholar
• Libman, Z. (2010), “Integrating Real-Life Data Analysis in Teaching Descriptive Statistics: A Constructivist Approach,” Journal of Statistics Education, 18.
   Google Scholar
• Logue, A. W., Watanabe-Rose, M., and Douglas, D. (2016), “Should Students Assessed as Needing Remedial Mathematics Take College-Level Quantitative Courses Instead? A Randomized Controlled Trial,” Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 38, 578–598. Available at http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.3102/0162373716649056
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madison, B. L. (2004), “Two Mathematics: Ever the Twain Shall Meet?,” Peer Review, 6, 9–12.
   Google Scholar
• Meyers, J. (2015), “Statistics: Fastest-Growing Undergraduate STEM Degree,” [ online]. Available at http://magazine.amstat.org/blog/2015/03/01/statistics-fastest-growing-undergraduate-stem-degree/
   Google Scholar
• Miller, R., and Morgaine, W. (2009), “The Benefits of E-Portfolios for Students and Faculty in Their Own Words,” Peer Review, 11, 8–12. Available at https://www.aacu.org/publications-research/periodicals/benefits-e-portfolios-students-and-faculty-their-own-words
   Google Scholar
• National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM). (2000), Principles and Standards for School Mathematics, Reston, VA: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Neumann, D. L., Hood, M., and Neumann, M. M. (2013), “Using Real-Life Data When Teaching Statistics: Student Perception of this Strategy in an Introductory Statistics Course,” Statistics Education Research Journal, 12, 59–70.
   Google Scholar
• Roseth, C. J., Garfield, J. B., and Ben-Zvi, D. (2008), “Collaboration in Learning and Teaching Statistics,” Journal of Statistics Education, 16, 1–15.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Silver, E. A. (1997), “Fostering Creativity through Instruction Rich in Mathematical Problem Solving and Problem Posing,” ZDM Mathematics Education, 29, 75–80.
   Google Scholar
• Singer, J. B., and Willett, J. D. (1990), “Improving the Teaching of Applied Statistics: Putting the Data Back into Data Analysis,” The American Statistician, 44, 223–230.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, G. (1998), “Learning Statistics By Doing Statistics,” Journal of Statistics Education, 6.
   Google Scholar
• Sole, M. A. (2012), “The Mathematics Portfolio: An Alternative Tool to Evaluate Students' Progress,” Journal of Mathematics Education at Teachers College, 3, 66–70. Available at http://journals.tc-library.org/index.php/matheducation/article/view/798
   Google Scholar
• ——— (2015), “Engaging Students in Survey Design and Data Collection,” Mathematics Teacher, 109, 334–340. Available at http://www.nctm.org/Publications/Mathematics-Teacher/2015/Vol109/Issue5/Engaging-Students-in-Survey-Design-and-Data-Collection/
   Google Scholar
• ——— (2016a), “Statistical Literacy: Data Tell a Story,” Mathematics Teacher, 110, 26–32. Available at http://www.nctm.org/Publications/Mathematics-Teacher/2016/Vol110/Issue1/Statistical-Literacy_-Data-Tell-a-Story/
   Google Scholar
• ——— (2016b), “Multiple Problem-Solving Strategies Provide Insight into Students' Understanding of Open-Ended Linear Programming Problems,” PRIMUS: Problems, Resources, and Issues in Mathematics Undergraduate Studies, 26, 922–937. Available at http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/10511970.2016.1199621?journalCode=upri20
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, P. W. (2013), “Constructivism in Mathematics Education,” in Encyclopedia of Mathematics Education, ed. S. Lerman, Berlin: Springer, pp. 96–102. Available at http://cepa.info/2952
   Google Scholar
• Triola, M. F. (2014), Elementary Statistics (12th ed.), Reading, MA: Pearson/Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Twomey Fosnot, C. (2005), Constructivism: Theory, Perspectives, and Practice (2nd ed.), New York, NY: Teachers College Columbia University.
   Google Scholar
• Weinberg, S. L., and Abramowitz, S. (2016a), Statistics Using Stata: An Integrative Approach, London: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• ——— (2016b), Statistics Using IBM SPSS: An Integrative Approach (3rd ed.), London: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wild, C. J., and Pfannkuch, M. (1999), “Statistical Thinking in Empirical Enquiry,” International Statistical Review, 67, 223–248. Available at http://www.mty.itesm.mx/dtie/deptos/m/ma00-835/Articulos-otros/Wild-y-Pfannkuch-1999-Stadistical-Thinking.pdf
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woodard, R., and McGowan, H. (2012), “Redesigning a Large Introductory Course to Incorporate the GAISE Guidelines,” Journal of Statistics Education, 20.
   Google Scholar