The CATALST Curriculum: A Story of Change

References

• Beckman, M. (2015), “Assessment of Cognitive Transfer Outcomes for Students of Introductory Statistics,” Ph.D. dissertation, University of Minnesota, available at http://iase-web.org/Publications.php.
   Google Scholar
• Ben-Zvi, D., and Garfield, J. B. (2004), “Statistical Literacy, Reasoning, and Thinking: Goals, Definitions, and Challenges,” in The Challenge of Developing Statistical Literacy, Reasoning and Thinking, Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 3–15.
   Google Scholar
• Blair, R., Kirkman, E., and Maxwell, J. (2013), Statistical Abstract of Undergraduate Programs in the Mathematical Sciences in the United States: Fall 2010 CBMS Survey, Washington, DC: American Mathematical Society.
   Google Scholar
• Chance, B., Ben-Zvi, D., Garfield, J., and Medina, E. (2007), “The Role of Technology in Improving Student Learning of Statistics,” Technology Innovations in Statistics Education, 1, available at https://escholarship.org/uc/item/8sd2t4rr.
   Google Scholar
• Cobb, G. W. (2007), “The Introductory Statistics Course: A Ptolemaic Curriculum?,” Technology Innovations in Statistics Education, 1, available at https://escholarship.org/uc/item/6hb3k0nz.
   Google Scholar
• Cobb, P., and McClain, K. (2004), “Principles of Instructional Design for Supporting the Development of Students’ Statistical Reasoning,” in The Challenge of Developing Statistical Literacy, Reasoning, and Thinking, eds. D. Ben-Zvi and J. Garfield, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 375–395.
   Google Scholar
• delMas, R., Garfield, J., Ooms, A., and Chance, B. (2007), “Assessing Students’ Conceptual Understanding After a First Course in Statistics,” Statistics Education Research Journal, 6, 28–58, available at https://iase-web.org/documents/SERJ/SERJ6(2)_delMas.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Derry, S. J., Levin, J. R., Osana, H. P., Jones, M. S., and Peterson, M. (2000), “Fostering Students’ Statistical and Scientific Thinking: Lessons Learned From an Innovative College Course,” American Educational Research Journal, 37, 747–773, DOI: 10.3102/00028312037003747.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franklin, C., Bargagliotti, A., Case, C., Kader, G., Scheaffer, R., and Spangler, D. (2015), Statistical Education of Teachers, Alexandria, VA: American Statistical Association, available at http://www.amstat.org/education/SET/SET.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Fry, E. B. (2017), “Introductory Statistics Students’ Conceptual Understanding of Study Design and Conclusions,” Ph.D. dissertation, University of Minnesota, available at http://iase-web.org/Publications.php.
   Google Scholar
• Garfield, J., delMas, R., and Zieffler, A. (2012), “Developing Statistical Modelers and Thinkers in an Introductory, Tertiary-Level Statistics Course,” ZDM, 44, 883–898, DOI: 10.1007/s11858-012-0447-5.
   Google Scholar
• Garfield, J., Zieffler, A., Kaplan, D., Cobb, G. W., Chance, B. L., and Holcomb, J. P. (2011), “Rethinking Assessment of Student Learning in Statistics Courses,” The American Statistician, 65, 1–10, DOI: 10.1198/tast.2011.08241.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, J. L., and Blankenship, E. E. (2015), “Fostering Conceptual Understanding in Mathematical Statistics,” The American Statistician, 69, 315–325, DOI: 10.1080/00031305.2015.1069759.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hancock, S., and Rummerfield, W. (2020), “Simulation Methods for Teaching Sampling Distributions: Should Hands-On Activities Precede the Computer?,” Journal of Statistics Education, 28, 9–17, DOI: 10.1080/10691898.2020.1720551.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horton, N. J., Baumer, B. S., and Wickham, H. (2015), “Taking a Chance in the Classroom: Setting the Stage for Data Science: Integration of Data Management Skills in Introductory and Second Courses in Statistics,” CHANCE, 28, 40–50, DOI: 10.1080/09332480.2015.1042739.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, D. W., and Johnson, R. T. (1989), Cooperation and Competition: Theory and Research, Edina, MN: Interaction Book Co.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, D. W., and Johnson, R. T. (1999), “Making Cooperative Learning Work,” Theory Into Practice, 38, 67–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Justice, N., Huberty, M. D., Zieffler, A., and delMas, B. (2017), “Secondary Teachers’ Reasoning About Statistical Models,” Invited paper presented at the Tenth International Collaboration for Research on Statistical Reasoning, Thinking, and Literacy: Innovations in Statistical Modelling to Connect Data, Chance and Context, Rotorua, New Zealand, pp. 135–156.
   Google Scholar
• Justice, N., Zieffler, A., and Garfield, J. (2017), “Statistics Graduate Students’ Preparation for Teaching Statistics,” Statistics Education Research Journal, 16, available at https://iase-web.org/documents/SERJ/SERJ16(1)_Justice.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Justice, N., Zieffler, A., Huberty, M. D., and delMas, R. (2018), “Every Rose Has Its Thorn: Secondary Teachers’ Reasoning About Statistical Models,” ZDM, 50, 1253–1265, DOI: 10.1007/s11858-018-0953-1.
   Google Scholar
• Kember, D. (1997), “A Reconceptualisation of the Research Into University Academics’ Conceptions of Teaching,” Learning and Instruction, 7, 255–275, DOI: 10.1016/S0959-4752(96)00028-X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lave, J., and Wenger, E. (1991), Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation, Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Le, L. (2017), “Assessing the Development of Students’ Statistical Thinking: An Exploratory Study,” Ph.D. dissertation, University of Minnesota, available at http://iase-web.org/Publications.php.
   Google Scholar
• Lesh, R., Hoover, M., Hole, B., Kelly, A., and Post, T. (2000), “Principles for Developing Thought-Revealing Activities for Students and Teachers,” in Handbook of Research Design in Mathematics and Science Education, eds. A. Kelly and R. Lesh, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., pp. 591–646.
   Google Scholar
• Lock, R. H., Lock, P. F., Morgan, K. L., Lock, E. F., and Lock, D. F. (2013), Statistics: Unlocking the Power of Data, Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, D. S., McCabe, G. P., and Craig, B. A. (2017), Introduction to the Practice of Statistics New York: W.H. Freeman
   Google Scholar
• Noll, J. A. (2011), “Graduate Teaching Assistants’ Statistical Content Knowledge of Sampling,” Statistics Education Research Journal, 10, 48–74, available at https://iase-web.org/documents/SERJ/SERJ10(2)_Noll.pdf?1402525003.
   Google Scholar
• Noll, J. A., and Kirin, D. (2015), “Students’ Emerging Statistical Models Using TinkerPlotsTM,” in Proceedings of SRTL-9: Reasoning About Models and Modelling in the Context of Informal Statistical Inference, eds. D. Ben-Zvi and K. Makar, Paderborn, Germany: University of Paderborn, pp. 24–45.
   Google Scholar
• Roback, P., Chance, B., Legler, J., and Moore, T. (2006), “Applying Japanese Lesson Study Principles to an Upper-Level Undergraduate Statistics Course,” Journal of Statistics Education, 14, DOI: 10.1080/10691898.2006.11910580.
   Google Scholar
• Rossman, A. J., St. Laurent, R., and Tabor, J. (2015), “Advanced Placement Statistics: Expanding the Scope of Statistics Education,” The American Statistician, 69, 121–126, DOI: 10.1080/00031305.2015.1033985.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sabbag, A. G., Garfield, J., and Zieffler, A. (2018), “Assessing Statistical Literacy and Statistical Reasoning: The REALI Instrument,” Statistics Education Research Journal, 17, 141–160, available at https://iase-web.org/documents/SERJ/SERJ17(2)_Sabbag.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Sabbag, A. G., and Zieffler, A. (2015), “Assessing Learning Outcomes: An Analysis of the Goals-2 Instrument,” Statistics Education Research Journal, 14, available at http://iase-web.org/documents/SERJ/SERJ14(2)_Sabbag.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Schoenfeld, A. H. (1998), “Making Mathematics and Making Pasta: From Cookbook Procedures to Really Cooking,” in Thinking Practices in Mathematics and Science Learning, eds. J. G. Greeno and S. V. Goldman, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 299–319.
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz, D. L., Sears, D., and Chang, J. (2007), “Reconsidering Prior Knowledge,” in Thinking With Data, eds. M. C. Lovett and P. Shah, Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, pp. 319–344.
   Google Scholar
• Shaughnessy, J. M. (1977), “Misconceptions of Probability: An Experiment With a Small-Group Activity-Based, Model Building Approach to Introductory Probability at the College Level,” Education Studies in Mathematics, 8, 285–316.
   Google Scholar
• Tintle, N., Topliff, K., VanderStoep, J., Holmes, V. L., and Swanson, T. (2012), “Retention of Statistical Concepts in a Preliminary Randomization-Based Introductory Statistics Curriculum,” Statistics Education Research Journal, 11, 21–40, available at https://iase-web.org/documents/SERJ/SERJ11(1)_Tintle.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Wasserstein, R. L., and Lazar, N. A. (2016), “The ASA’s Statement on p-Values: Context, Process, and Purpose,” The American Statistician, 70, 129–133, DOI: 10.1080/00031305.2016.1154108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson, J. M. (2008), “Exploring Beginning Inference With Novice Grade 7 Students,” Statistics Education Research Journal, 7, available at https://iase-web.org/documents/SERJ/SERJ7(2)_Watson.pdf?1402525008.
   Google Scholar
• Zieffler, A., and Catalysts for Change (2017), Statistical Thinking: A Simulation Approach to Uncertainty (4th ed.), Minneapolis, MN: Catalyst Press, available at http://zief0002.github.io/statistical-thinking/.
   Google Scholar
• Zieffler, A., and Huberty, M. D. (2015), “A Catalyst for Change in the High School Math Curriculum,” CHANCE, 28, 44–49, DOI: 10.1080/09332480.2015.1099365.
   Google Scholar
• Ziegler, L., and Garfield, J. (2013), “Exploring Students’ Intuitive Ideas of Randomness Using an iPod Shuffle Activity,” Teaching Statistics, 35, 2–7, DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9639.2012.00531.x.
   Google Scholar
• Ziegler, L., and Garfield, J. (2018), “Developing a Statistical Literacy Assessment for the Modern Introductory Statistics Course,” Statistics Education Research Journal, 17, 161–178, available at https://iase-web.org/documents/SERJ/SERJ17(2)_Ziegler.pdf.
   Google Scholar