Strategies for Using a Spatial Method to Promote Active Learning of Probability Concepts

References

• Bar-Hillel, M. (1980), “The Base-Rate Fallacy in Probability Judgments,” Acta Psychologica, 44, 211–233. DOI: 10.1016/0001-6918(80)90046-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Binder, K., Krauss, S., and Bruckmaier, G. (2015), “Effects of Visualizing Statistical Information—An Empirical Study on Tree Diagrams and 2 × 2 Tables,” Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Böcherer-Linder, K., and Eichler, A. (2017), “The Impact of Visualizing Nested Sets. An Empirical Study on Tree Diagrams and Unit Squares,” Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 2026. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.02026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Böcherer-Linder, K., and Eichler, A. (2019), “How to Improve Performance in Bayesian Inference Tasks: A Comparison of Five Visualizations,” Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 267.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brase, G. L. (2009), “Pictorial Representations in Statistical Reasoning,” Applied Cognitive Psychology, 23, 369–381. DOI: 10.1002/acp.1460.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brase, G. L. (2014), “The Power of Representation and Interpretation: Doubling Statistical Reasoning Performance With Icons and Frequentist Interpretations of Ambiguous Numbers,” Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 26, 81–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, A. L., Sidlowski, S., and Staub, A. (2017), “Beliefs and Bayesian Reasoning,” Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 24, 972–978.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, A. L., and Staub, A. (2015), “Within-Subject Consistency and Between-Subject Variability in Bayesian Reasoning Strategies,” Cognitive Psychology, 81, 26–47. DOI: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2015.08.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cosmides, L., and Tooby, J. (1996), “Are Humans Good Intuitive Statisticians After All? Rethinking Some Conclusions From the Literature on Judgment Under Uncertainty,” Cognition, 58, 1–73. DOI: 10.1016/0010-0277(95)00664-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diaconis, P., and Freedman, D. (1981), “The Persistence of Cognitive Illusions,” The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 4, 333–334. DOI: 10.1017/S0140525X00009122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., and Wenderof, M. P. (2014), “Active Learning Increases Student Performance in Science, Engineering, and Mathematics,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 111, 8410–8415. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1319030111.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gigerenzer, G., and Hoffrage, U. (1995), “How to Improve Bayesian Reasoning Without Instruction: Frequency Formats,” Psychological Review, 102, 684–704. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295X.102.4.684.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Givven, K. B., Moroz, V., Loftus, W., and Stigler, J. W. (2019), “Removing Opportunities to Calculate Improves Students’ Performance on Subsequent Word Problems,” Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 4, 24. DOI: 10.1186/s41235-019-0175-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koski, T., and Noble, J. M. (2009), Bayesian Networks: An Introduction, West Sussex, UK: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Kruschke, J. K. (2011), Doing Bayesian Data Analysis: A Tutorial With R and BUGS, Burlington, MA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kurzenhäuser, S., and Hoffrage, U. (2002), “Teaching Bayesian Reasoning: An Evaluation of a Classroom Tutorial for Medical Students,” Medical Teacher, 24, 516–521. DOI: 10.1080/0142159021000012540.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martinez, E. Z., and Achar, J. A. (2014), “Trends in Epidemiology in the 21st Century: Time to Adopt Bayesian Methods,” Methodological Issues, 30, 703–714. DOI: 10.1590/0102-311x00144013.
   Google Scholar
• McDowell, M. and Jacobs, P. (2017), “Meta-Analysis of the Effect of Natural Frequencies on Bayesian Reasoning,” Psychological Bulletin, 143, 1273–1312. DOI: 10.1037/bul0000126.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Micallef, L., Dragicevic, P., and Fekete, J. (2012), “Assessing the Effect of Visualizations on Bayesian Reasoning Through Crowdsourcing,” IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 18, 2536–2545. DOI: 10.1109/TVCG.2012.199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reani, M., Davies, A., Peek, N., and Jay, C. (2018), “How Do People Use Information Presentation to Make Decisions in Bayesian Reasoning Tasks?,” International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 111, 62–77. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2017.11.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Satake, E., and Vashlishan Murray, A. (2015), “An Alternative Teaching Method of Conditional Probabilities and Bayes’ Rule: An Application of the Truth Table,” Teaching Statistics, 37, 89–95. DOI: 10.1111/test.12080.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sedlmeier, P., and Gigerenzer, G. (2001), “Teaching Bayesian Reasoning in Less Than Two Hours,” Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130, 380–400. DOI: 10.1037/0096-3445.130.3.380.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sirota, M., Kostovièová, L., and Juanchich, M. (2014), “The Effect of Iconicity of Visual Displays on Statistical Reasoning: Evidence in Favor of the Null Hypothesis,” Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 21, 961–968.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slamecka, N. J., and Graf, P. (1978), “The Generation Effect: Delineation of a Phenomenon,” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 4, 592–604.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sloman, S. A., Over, D., Slovak, L., and Stibel, J. M. (2003), “Frequency Illusions and Other Fallacies,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 91, 296–309. DOI: 10.1016/S0749-5978(03)00021-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Starns, J. J., Cohen, A. L., Bosco, C., and Hirst, J. (2018), “A Visualization Technique for Bayesian Reasoning,” Applied Cognitive Psychology, 33, 234–251. DOI: 10.1002/acp.3470.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, W. C., and Shumann, E. L. (1987), “Interpretation of Statistical Evidence in Criminal Trials: The Prosecutor’s Fallacy and the Defense Attorney’s Fallacy,” Law and Human Behavior, 2, 167–187. DOI: 10.1007/BF01044641.
   Google Scholar
• Tversky, A., and Kahneman, D. (1983), “Extensional Versus Intuitive Reasoning: The Conjunction Fallacy in Probability Judgment,” Psychological Review, 90, 293–315. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295X.90.4.293.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiggins, G. (1998), Educative Assessment, San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Wu, C. M., Meder, B., Filimon, F., and Nelson, J. D. (2017), “Asking Better Questions: How Presentation Formats Influence Information Search,” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 43, 1274–1297.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamagishi, K. (2003), “Facilitating Normative Judgments of Conditional Probability: Frequency or Nested Sets?,” Experimental Psychology, 50, 97–106. DOI: 10.1026//1618-3169.50.2.97.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar