Enhancing a Flipped Statistics First Year Course by Using QT-Clickers

References

• American Statistical Association (2016), “Guidelines for Assessment and Instruction in Statistics Education: College Report. Report (August 2005),” pp. 1–61.
   Google Scholar
• Amstelveen, R. H. (2013), “The Effect of ‘Clickers’ on Attendance in an Introductory Statistics Course: An Action Research Study,” Capella University.
   Google Scholar
• Baltaci-Goktalay, S. (2016), “How Personal Response Systems Promote Active Learning in Science Education?,” Journal of Learning and Teaching in Digital Age, 1, 47–54.
   Google Scholar
• Barnett, J. (2006), “Implementation of Personal Response Units in Very Large Lecture Classes: Student Perceptions,” Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 22, 474–494. DOI: 10.14742/ajet.1281.
   Google Scholar
• Beatty, I. D. (2004), “Transforming Student Learning With Classroom Communication Systems,” Educause Center for Applied Research, 2004, 1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Beatty, I. D., Gerace, W. J., Leonard, W. J., and Dufresne, R. J. (2006), “Designing Effective Questions for Classroom Response System Teaching,” American Association of Physics Teachers, 74, 31–39, DOI: 10.1119/1.2121753.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bojinova, E., and Oigara, J. (2013), “Teaching and Learning With Clickers in Higher Education,” International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 25, 154–165.
   Google Scholar
• Brady, M., Seli, H., and Rosenthal, J. (2013), “‘Clickers’ and Metacognition: A Quasi-Experimental Comparative Study About Metacognitive Self-Regulation and Use of Electronic Feedback Devices,” Computers & Education, 65, 56–63, DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2013.02.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., and Cocking, R. R., eds. (2000), How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School: Expanded Edition. Developing Mindful Students, Skillful Thinkers, Thoughtful Schools, Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Büyükkurt, M., Li, Y., and Cassidy, R. (2012), “Using a Classroom Response System in an Introductory Business Statistics Course: Reflections and Lessons Learned,” in Proceedings of Informing Science & IT Education Conference (ISI), pp. 379–388.
   Google Scholar
• Caldwell, J. E. (2007), “Clickers in the Large Classroom: Current Research and Best-Practice Tips,” CBE—Life Sciences Education, 6, 9–20, DOI: 10.1187/cbe.06.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chen, J. C., Whittinghill, D. C., and Kadlowec, J.A. (2010), “Classes That Click: Fast, Rich Feedback to Enhance Student Learning and Satisfaction,” Journal of Engineering Education, 99, 159–168. DOI: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2010.tb01052.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chou, P., Chang, C., and Lin, C. (2017), “BYOD or Not: A Comparison of Two Assessment Strategies for Student Learning,” Computers in Human Behavior, 74, 63–71, DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2017.04.024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Credé, M., Roch, S. G., and Kieszczynka, U. M. (2010), “Class Attendance in College: A Meta-Analytic Review of the Relationship of Class Attendance With Grades and Student Characteristics,” Review of Educational Research, 80, 272–295, DOI: 10.3102/0034654310362998.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crews, T. B., Ducate, L., Rathel, J. M., Heid, K., and Bishoff, S. T. (2011), “Clickers in the Classroom: Transforming Students Into Active Learners,” ECAR Research Bulletin, 9, 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Draper, S. W., and Brown, M. I. (2004), “Increasing Interactivity in Lectures Using an Electronic Voting System,” Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 20, 81–94, DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2729.2004.00074.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dufresne, R. J., Gerace, W. J., Leonard, W. J., Mestre, J. P., and Wenk, L. (1996), “Classtalk: A Classroom Communication System for Active Learning,” Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 7, 3–47, DOI: 10.1007/BF02948592.
   Google Scholar
• Dunn, P. K., Richardson, A., McDonald, C., and Oprescu, F. (2012), “Instructor Perceptions of Using a Mobile-Phone-Based Free Classroom Response System in First-Year Statistics Undergraduate Courses,” International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 43, 1041–1056, DOI: 10.1080/0020739X.2012.678896.
   Google Scholar
• Forster, M. (2014), “Teaching Data Analysis in Large Classes Using Clicker Assessment,” in Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Teaching Statistics (IASE).
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, M., Blayney, P., and Ginns, P. (2006), “Anonymity and in Class Learning: The Case for Electronic Response Systems,” Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 22, 568–580. DOI: 10.14742/ajet.1286.
   Google Scholar
• Fullerton, J. A., and Umphrey, D. (2001), “An Analysis of Attitudes Toward Statistics: Gender Differences among Advertising Majors,” Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication, pp. 356–366.
   Google Scholar
• Gauci, S. A., Dantas, A. M., Williams, D. A., and Kemm, R. E. (2009), “Promoting Student-Centered Active Learning in Lectures With a Personal Response System,” Advances in Physiology Education, 33, 60–71, DOI: 10.1152/advan.00109.2007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han, J. H., and Finkelstein, A. (2013), “Understanding the Effects of Professors’ Pedagogical Development With Clicker Assessment and Feedback Technologies and the Impact on Students’ Engagement and Learning in Higher Education,” Computers and Education, 65, 64–76, DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2013.02.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hancock, T. M. (2010), “Use of Audience Response Systems for Summative Assessment in Large Classes,” Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 26, 226–237. DOI: 10.14742/ajet.1092.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hannafin, M. J., and Land, S. M. (2000), “Technology and Student-Centered Learning in Higher Education: Issues and Practices,” Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 12, 3–30, DOI: 10.1007/BF03032712.
   Google Scholar
• Hoekstra, A. (2008), “Vibrant Student Voices: Exploring Effects of the Use of Clickers in Large College Courses College Courses,” Learning, Media and Technology, 33, 329–341, DOI: 10.1080/17439880802497081.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hung, H. T. (2017), “Clickers in the Flipped Classroom: Bring Your Own Device (BYOD) to Promote Student Learning,” Interactive Learning Environments, 25, 983–995, DOI: 10.1080/10494820.2016.1240090.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hwang, J. H., and Wolfe, K. (2010), “Implications of Using the Electronic Response System in a Large Class,” Journal of Teaching in Travel & Tourism, 10, 265–279, DOI: 10.1080/15313220.2010.503536.
   Google Scholar
• Judson, E., and Sawada, D. (2002), “Learning From Past and Present: Electronic Response Systems in College Lecture Halls,” Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 21, 167–181.
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan, J. J. (2011), “Innovative Activities: How Clickers Can Facilitate the Use of Simulations in Large Lecture Classes,” Technology Innovations in Statistics Education, 5, 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Kay, R., and LeSage, A. (2009), “A Strategic Assessment of Audience Response Systems Used in Higher Education,” Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 25, 235–249, DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2009.05.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koenig, K. (2010), “Building Acceptance for Pedagogical Reform Through Wide-Scale Implementation of Clickers,” Journal of College Science Teaching, 39, 46–50.
   Google Scholar
• Koppel, N., and Berenson, M. (2009), “Ask the Audience—Using Clickers to Enhance Introductory Business Statistics Courses,” Information Systems Education Journal, 7, 1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Kyei-Blankson, L. (2009), “Enhancing Student Learning in a Graduate Research and Statistics Course With Clickers,” Educause Review Online, available at http://www.educause.edu/ero/article/enhancing-student-learning-graduate-research-and-statistics-course-clickers.
   Google Scholar
• Lantz, M. E., and Stawiski, A. (2014), “Computers in Human Behavior Effectiveness of Clickers: Effect of Feedback and the Timing of Questions on Learning,” Computers in Human Behavior, 31, 280–286, DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2013.10.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lasry, N. (2008), “Clickers or Flashcards: Is There Really a Difference?,” The Physics Teacher, 46, 242–244, DOI: 10.1119/1.2895678.
   Google Scholar
• Laxman, K. (2011), “A Study on the Adoption of Clickers in Higher Education,” Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 27, 1291–1303. DOI: 10.14742/ajet.894.
   Google Scholar
• Littauer, R. (1972), “Instructional Imp a Low-Cost Electronic Studȩnt Response System Technology Brings Instruction Home,” Educational Technology, 12, 69–71.
   Google Scholar
• Lutz, S. T., and Huitt, W. G. (2004), “Connecting Cognitive Development and Constructivism: Implications From Theory for Instruction and Assessment,” Constructivism in the Human Sciences, 1, 67–90.
   Google Scholar
• Majerich, D. M., Stull, J. C., Varnum, S. J., and Ducette, J. P. (2011), “Facilitation of Formative Assessments Using Clickers in a University Physics Course,” Interdisciplinary Journal of ELearning and Learning Objects, 7, 11–24.
   Google Scholar
• Mateo, Z. F. (2010), “Creating Active Learning in a Large Introductory Statistics Class Using Clicker Technology,” in Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Teaching Statistics (IASE).
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. E., Stull, A., Deleeuw, K., Almeroth, K., Bimber, B., Chun, D., Bulger, M., Campbell, J., Knight, A., and Zhang, H. (2009), “Clickers in College Classrooms: Fostering Learning With Questioning Methods in Large Lecture Classes,” Contemporary Educational Psychology, 34, 51–57, DOI: 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2008.04.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazur, E. (1997), Peer Instruction: A User’s Manual, Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• McGee, M., Stokes, L., and Nadolsky, P. (2016), “Just-in-Time Teaching in Statistics Classrooms,” Journal of Statistics Education, 24, 16–26, DOI: 10.1080/10691898.2016.1158023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKenna, P. (2019), “Multiple Choice Questions: Answering Correctly and Knowing the Answer,” Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 16, 59–73, DOI: 10.1108/ITSE-09-2018-0071.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mocko, M., and Jacobbe, T. (2010), “The Effects of an Audience Response System (ARS) on Achievement and Attitudes Towards Statistics in an Introductory Statistics Class,” in Eighth International Conference on Teaching Statistics (IASE).
   Google Scholar
• Premkumar, K. (2016), “Use of Student Response Systems for Summative Assessments,” Creative Education, 7, 1851–1860.
   Google Scholar
• Prensky, M. (2011), “A Huge Leap for the Classroom. True Peer-to-Peer Learning, Enhanced by Technology,” Educational Technology, 51, 63–64.
   Google Scholar
• Rana, N. P., and Dwivedi, Y. K. (2016), “Using Clickers in a Large Business Class: Examining Use Behavior and Satisfaction,” Journal of Marketing Education, 38, 47–64, DOI: 10.1177/0273475315590660.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reyneke, F., Fletcher, L., and Harding, A. (2018), “The Effect of Technology-based Interventions on the Performance of First Year University Statistics Students,” African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 7295, 231–242, DOI: 10.1080/18117295.2018.1477557.
   Google Scholar
• Schutz, P. A., Drogosz, L. M., White, V. E., and Distefano, C. (1998), “Prior Knowledge, Attitude, and Strategy Use in an Introduction to Statistics Course,” Learning and Individual Differences, 10, 291–308, DOI: 10.1016/S1041-6080(99)80124-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma, M. D., Khachan, J., Chan, B., and O’Byrne, J. (2005), “An Investigation of the Effectiveness of Electronic Classroom Communication Systems in Large Lecture Classes,” Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 21, 137–154. DOI: 10.14742/ajet.1330.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, M. K., Wood, W. B., Krauter, K., and Knight, J. K. (2011), “Combining Peer Discussion With Instructor Explanation Increases Student Learning From In-Class Concept Questions,” CBE—Life Sciences Education, 10, 55–63, DOI: 10.1187/cbe.10-08-0101.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stowell, J. R., and Nelson, J. M. (2007), “Benefits of Electronic Audience Response Systems on Student Participation, Learning, and Emotion,” Teaching of Psychology, 34, 253–258, DOI: 10.1080/00986280701700391.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Titman, A. C., and Lancaster, G. A. (2011), “Personal Response Systems For Teaching Postgraduate Statistics To Small Groups,” Journal of Statistics Education, 19, 1–20.
   Google Scholar
• Trees, A. R., and Jackson, M. H. (2007), “The Learning Environment in Clicker Classrooms: Student Processes of Learning and Involvement in Large University-Level Courses Using Student Response Systems,” Learning, Media and Technology, 32, 21–40, DOI: 10.1080/17439880601141179.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1978), “Interaction Between Learning and Development,” in Mind and Society, eds. M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, and E. Souberman, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, pp. 79–91.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, Y., Chung, C., and Yang, L. (2014), “Using Clickers to Enhance Student Learning in Mathematics,” International Education Studies, 7, 1–13, DOI: 10.5539/ies.v7n10p1.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, Z., and Englander, F. (2010), “A Cross-Disciplinary Perspective on Explaining Student Performance in Introductory Statistics—What Is the Relative Impact of Procrastination?,” College Student Journal, 44, 458–471.
   Google Scholar
• Wit, E. (2003), “Who Wants to Be … The Use of a Personal Response System in Statistics Teaching,” MSOR Connections, 3, 14–20. DOI: 10.11120/msor.2003.03020014.
   Google Scholar
• Wood, D., Bruner, J. S., and Ross, G. (1976), “The Role of Tutoring in Problem Solving,” Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17, 89–100, DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.1976.tb00381.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yourstone, S. A., Kraye, H. S., and Albaum, G. (2008), “Classroom Questioning With Immediate Electronic Response: Do Clickers Improve Learning?,” Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 6, 75–88, DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-4609.2007.00166.x.
   Google Scholar