Individual Logit Models for Consumer Preferences

References

• Ben-Akiva, M. and S.R. Lerman, (1985), Discrete Choice Analysis: Theory and Applications to Travel Demand, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carmone, F.J., Green. P.E. and A.K. Jain (1978), “Robustness of Conjoint Analysis: Some Monte Carlo Results,” Journal of Marketing Research, 15, 300–303.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carpenter, G.S. and D.R. Lehmann (1985), “A Model of Marketing Mix, Brand-Switching, and Competition,” Journal of Marketing Research, 22, 318–329.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cattin, P. and D.R. Wittink (1976), “Further Beyond Conjoint Measurement: Toward a Comparison of Methods,” Advances in Consumer Research, 41–45.
   Google Scholar
• Cattin, P., and F. Bliemel (1978), “Metric vs. Nonmetric Procedures for Multiattribute Modeling: Some Simulation Results,” Decision Sciences, 9, 472–480.
   Google Scholar
• Cattin, P., and D.R. Wittink (1982), “Commercial Use of Conjoint Analysis: A Survey,” Journal of Marketing, 46, 44–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chapman, R.G. and R. Staelin (1982), “Exploiting Rank Ordered Choice Set Data Within the Stochastic Utility Model,” Journal of Marketing Research, 19, 288–301.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Currim, I.S. (1982), “Predictive Testing of Consumer Choice Models Not Subject to Independence of Irrelevant Alternatives,” Journal of Marketing Research, 19, 208–222.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, P.E.V. and Srinivasan (1978), “Conjoint Analysis in Consumer Research: Issues and Outlook,” Journal of Consumer Research, 5, 103–123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Mathematical and Statistical Libraries, Inc. (1982), IMSL Library Reference Manual, Houston, Texas.
   Google Scholar
• Jain, A.K, Acito, F., Malhotra, N.K. and V. Mahajan (1979), “A Comparison of the Internal Validity of Alternative Parameter Estimation Methods in Decompositional Multiattribute Preference Models,” Journal of Marketing Research, 16, 313–322.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, R.M. (1987), Adaptive Conjoint Analysis, Ketchum, Idaho: Sawtooth Software, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, R.M., (1987), “Accuracy of Utility Estimation in ACA,” Ketchum, Idaho: Sawtooth Software, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Kruskal, J.B. (1965), “Analysis of Factorial Experiments by Estimating Monotone Transformations of the Data,” Journal of Royal Statistical Society, 27, 251–263.
   Google Scholar
• Kruskal, J.B., and F.J. Carmone (1968), MONANOVA: A FORTRAN IV Program for Monotone Analysis of Variance, Murray Hill, NJ: Bell Telephone Laboratories.
   Google Scholar
• Liebman, J., Lasdon, L., Schrage, L. and A. Waren (1986), Modeling and Optimization with GINO, Palo Alto, CA: Scientific Press.
   Google Scholar
• Louviere, J.J. and D.A. Hensher (1983), “Using Discrete Choice Models with Experimental Design Data to Forecast Consumer Demand for a Unique Cultural Event,” Journal of Consumer Research, 10, 348–361.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luce, R.D. (1959), Individual Choice Behavior, New York, NY: John Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Luce, R.D., and P. Suppes (1965), “Preference, Utility and Subjective Probability,” in Handbook of Mathematical Psychology, New York, NY: John Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• McFadden, D. (1974), “Conditional Logit Analysis of Qualitative Choice Behavior,” Frontiers in Econometrics, New York, NY: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• McFadden, D., (1976), “Quantal Choice Analysis: A Survey,” Annals of Economic and Social Measurement, 5, 363–390.
   Google Scholar
• Punj, G.N. and R. Staelin (1978), “The Choice Process for Graduate Business Schools,” Journal of Marketing, 15, 588–598.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Srinivasan, V. and A.D. Shocker (1973), “Linear Programming Techniques for Multi-dimensional Analysis of Preferences,” Psychometrika, 38, 337–369.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wittink, D.R. and P. Cattin (1981), “Alternative Estimation Methods for Conjoint Analysis: A Monte Carlo Study,” Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 101–106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wittink, D.R., and P. Cattin (1989), “Commercial Use of Conjoint Analysis: An Update,” Journal of Marketing, 53, 91–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zufryden, F.S. (1984), “A General Model for Assessing New Product Marketing Decisions and Market Performance,” The Institute of Management Science Studies in the Management Sciences, 18, 63–83.
   Google Scholar
• Zufryden, F.S., (1986), “Multibrand Transition Probabilities as a Function of Explanatory Variables: Estimation by a Least-Squares-Based Approach,” Journal of Marketing 23, 177–183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar