Packaging as Brand Communication: Effects of Product Pictures on Consumer Responses to the Package and Brand

References

• Alesandrini, K. L. (1982), “Strategies That Influence Memory for Advertising Communications,” in Information Processing Research in Advertising, R.J. Harris, ed., Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 65–81.
   Google Scholar
• Alesandrini, K. L., and A. Sheikh (1983), “Research on Imagery: Applications to Advertising,” in Imagery: Current Theory and Applications, Anees Sheikh, ed., New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons, Inc., pp. 535–556.
   Google Scholar
• American Marketing Association, American Marketing Association Special Report on Trends and Forces Shaping the Future of Marketing, (American Marketing Association: Chicago, Ill), (1998).
   Google Scholar
• Balu, Rekha (1998), “Shelf Life: How a Pasta Maker Used Its Noodle To Whip the Giants --- AIPC Reflects Power Shift Within Food Industry To Private-Label Firms --- Hit: Lemon-Pepper Penne,” Wall Street Journal; New York; Dec 9.
   Google Scholar
• Bertrand, Kate (2002), “Wake Up Your Product Category With ‘Shapely’ Packaging,” in BrandPackaging, (January/February).
   Google Scholar
• Bolen, W. H. (1984), Advertising, 2nd ed., New York. NY: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Bone, P.F. and R.J. Corey (1992), “Ethical Dilemmas in Packaging: Beliefs of Packaging Professionals,” in Journal of Macromarketing, 12 (1), 45–54.
   Google Scholar
• Bone, P.F., and R.J. Corey, (2002), “Packaging Ethics: Perceptual Differences Among Packaging Professionals, Brand Managers, and Ethically-Interested Consumers,” in Journal of Business Ethics, April, 199–213.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creusen, M.E.H. and J.P.L. Schoormans (1998), “The Influence of Observation Time on the Role of the Product Design in Consumer Preferences,” in Advances in Consumer Research, Josesph W. Alba and Wesley Hutchinson, eds., Iowa City: Association for Consumer Research, Vol. 25, (Provo: UT), pp. 551–556.
   Google Scholar
• Day, Kathleen (1985), “Packaging Emerges as a Key Selling Tool from Cigarettes to Candy, Designers Prove that Looks Rival Content,” Los Angeles Times, March 17, 1985.
   Google Scholar
• Doyle, Mona (1999), “What Consumers Want is Seamless Packaging,” in BrandPackaging, 3 (6), 32–36.
   Google Scholar
• Doyle, Mona, (2002), “Consumers Want ‘Packaging to Go’,” in BrandPackaging, (January/February).
   Google Scholar
• Feldman, J. and J. Lynch Jr. (1988), “Self-Generated Validity and Other Effects of Measurement on Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior,” Journal of Applied Psychology, 73 (3), pp. 421–435.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garber, Lawrence L., Raymond R. Burke, and J. Morgan Jones (2000), “The Role of Package Color in Consumer Purchase Consideration and Choice,” Working paper, Marketing Science Institute, Report No. 00–104.
   Google Scholar
• Groeber, Janet (2001), “Packaged Emotions,” Chain Store Age, April 1, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Harckham, A. (1989), “The Changing U.S. Consumer,” in Packaging Strategy, Arthur W. Harckham ed., PDC, Lancaster, PA: Technomic, pp. 1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Homer, P. and S. Gauntt (1992), “The Role of Imagery in the Processing of Visual and Verbal Package Information,” Journal of Mental Imagery, 16 (3 & 4), pp. 123–144.
   Google Scholar
• Hruby, William J., and James Sorensen (1999), “In P-O-P, Pictures Worth a Thousand Purchases,” Marketing News, 33 (November 22), p. 21–22.
   Google Scholar
• Kisielius, J. and B. Sternthal (1986), “Examining the Vividness Controversy: An Availability-Valence Interpretation,” Journal of Consumer Research, 12 (March), pp. 418–431.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loosschilder, Vriens M., E. Rosbergen, and D.R. Wittink (1998), “Verbal versus Realistic Pictoral Representations in Conjoint Analysis with Design Attributes,” Journal of Product Innnovation and Management, 15 (September), 455–467.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lutz, K.A. and R.J. Lutz (1978), “Imagery-Eliciting Strategies: Review and Implications of Research,” in Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 5, H. Keith Hunt ed., Association for Consumer Research, Ann Arbor, MI. 1978, pp. 611–620.
   Google Scholar
• MacInnis, D. J. and L.L. Price (1987), “The Role of Imagery in Information Processing: Review and Extensions,” Journal of Consumer Research, 13 (March): pp. 473–491.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacKenzie, S.B., and R.J. Lutz (1989), “An Empirical Examination of the Structural Antecedents of Attitude Toward the Ad in a Advertising Pretesting Context,” Journal of Marketing, 53 (April): pp. 48–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markgraf, Sue (1997), “Milk Moves to the Front Seat,” in Dairy Foods, 98, 9, 30–32.
   Google Scholar
• Olson, J.C. and J. Jacoby (1972), “Cue Utilization in the Quality Perception Process,” in Proceedings of the Third Annual Conference of the Association for Consumer Research, M. Venkatesan, ed., Iowa City: Association for Consumer Research, pp. 167–79.
   Google Scholar
• Pavio, A. (1986), Mental Representations. A Dual Coding Approach, Oxford University Press, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Pieters, Rik and Luk Warlop (1999), “Visual attention during brand choice: The impact of time pressure and task motivation,” International Journal of Research in Marketing, 16 (February), pp. 1–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plasschaert, J. (1995), “The Meaning of Colour on Packaging - A Methodology for Qualitative Research Using Semiotic Principles and Computer Image Manipulation,” in Decision Making and Research in Action. 48th ESOMAR Marketing Research Congress, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, pp. 217–232.
   Google Scholar
• Point of Purchase Advertising Institute (2001), P-O-P Measures Up. Learnings from the Supermarket Class of Trade.
   Google Scholar
• Polonsky, M.J., J. Bailey, H. Baker, and C. Basche (1998), “Communicating Environmental Information: Are Marketing Claims on Packaging Misleading,” in Journal of Business Ethics, 17 (3) pp. 281–294.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prone, M. (1993), “Package Design has Stronger ROI Potential Than Many Believe,” Marketing News, (October), 13.
   Google Scholar
• Purwar, P. (1982), The Role of Price Cue in Product Quality Perception: A Comprehensive Model and an Empirical Investigation, doctoral dissertation, SUNY at Buffalo.
   Google Scholar
• Richardson, P.S. (1994), “Cue Effects on Evaluations of National and Private-Label Brands,” in Marketing Theory and Applications, Vol. 5, C. Whan Park and Daniel C. Smith, eds. Chicago, IL., AMA, 1994, pp. 165–171.
   Google Scholar
• Schafer, Sarah (1995), “When It’s Time for a Makeover,” An Evaluation of Methods for Measuring Consumer Reactions to Retail Packages, unpublished doctoral dissertation, December 1, 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Schoormans, J. P. L. and H.S.J. Robben (1997), “The Effect of New Package Design on Product Attention, Categorization and Evaluation,” Journal of Economic Psychology, 18, no. 2 & 3, pp. 271–287.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scully, Carla Zanetos (2001), “Image Impacts Purchase Decisions,” Candy Industry, 116 (April 1), p. 25.
   Google Scholar
• Semenik, Richard J. (2002), Promotion and Integrated Marketing Communications, Cincinnati, OH: Southwestern, Thomson Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Spethmann, Betsy (1994), “The Mystique of the Brand: Jarred, Bagged, Boxed, Canned; A Brand’s Equity Protector is the Package Itself,” in Brandweek, 35, pp. 25–27.
   Google Scholar
• Swientek, Bob (2001) “Uncanny Developments,” Beverage Industry, 92 (December), pp. 38–39.
   Google Scholar
• Underwood, Robert L. (1993), “Packaging as an Extrinsic Product Attribute: An Examination of Package Utility and Its Effect on Total Product Utility in a Consumer Purchase Situation,” Marketing Theory and Applications, Vol. 4, R. Varadarajan and B. Jaworski, eds., Chicago, IL: American Marketing Association, pp. 212–217.
   Google Scholar
• Underwood, Robert L., (1999), “Construction of Identity Through Packaging: A Qualitative Inquiry,” in Marketing Theory and Applications, Vol. 10, Anil Menon and Arum Sharma, eds., Chicago, IL: 147.
   Google Scholar
• Underwood, Robert L., and J. Ozanne (1998), “Is Your Package an Effective Communicator? A Normative Framework for Increasing the Communicative Competence of Packaging,” in Journal of Marketing Communication, 4 (4) pp. 207–220.
   Google Scholar
• Underwood, Robert L., and J. Ozanne, Noreen Klein, and Ray Burke (2001), “Packaging Communication: Attentional Effects of Product Imagery,” in Journal of Product and Brand Management, (10) 7 pp. 403–422.
   Google Scholar
• Vartan, C. G. and J. Rosenfeld (1987), “Winning the Supermarket War: Packaging as a Weapon,” Marketing Communications, (August), 33.
   Google Scholar
• Wansink, B. (1996), “Can Package Size Accelerate Usage Volume?” Journal of Marketing, 60 (July), pp. 1–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeithaml, V. (1988), “Consumer Perceptions of Price, Quality, and Value: A Means-End Model and Synthesis of Evidence,” Journal of Marketing, 52 (July), pp. 2–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar