Introduction to the Special Issue: Marketing of High-Technology Products and Innovations

References

• Aaker, David A. and Robert Jacobson (2001), “The Value Relevance of Brand Attitude in High-Technology Markets,” Journal of Marketing Research, 38 (4) (November), 485–493.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albert, Terri and Charles Colby (2003), “The Technology Readiness of Vulnerable or Impacted Groups and Public Policy Considerations: A Cross-Cultural Research Program” presented at the American Marketing Association, Public Policy Conference, Washington, D.C., May.
   Google Scholar
• Athaide, Gerard A., Rodney L. Stump, and Ashwin Joshi (2003), “Understanding New Product Co-Development Relationships in Technology-Based, Industrial Markets,” special issue, Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice.
   Google Scholar
• Barlow Hills, Stacey and Sarin, Shikhar (2003), “From Market Driven to Market Driving: An Alternate Paradigm for Marketing High Technology Product and Innovations,” special issue, Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice.
   Google Scholar
• Bitner, Mary Jo, Amy L. Ostrom, and Matthew L. Meuter (2002), “Implementing Successful Self-Service Technologies,” The Academy of Management Executive, 16 (November), 96–109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, S. and K. Eisenhardt (1998), “Competing on the Edge”. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press
   Google Scholar
• Business Week, (2003), “The Top 100 Brands,” Special Report, August 4, 72–78.
   Google Scholar
• Chandy, Rajesh K., Jaideep C. Prabhu, & Kersi D. Antia (2003), “What Will the Future Bring? Dominance, Technology Expectations, and Radical Innovation,” Journal of Marketing, 61 (July), 1–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chandy, Rajesh and Gerard Tellis (2000), “The Incumbent’s Curse? Incumbency, Size, and Radical Product Innovation,” Journal of Marketing, 64 (July), pp. 1–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chandy, Rajesh and Gerard Tellis (1998), “Organizing for Radical Product Innovation: The Overlooked Role of Willingness to Cannibalize,” Journal of Marketing Research, 35 (November), pp. 474–487.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danov, Michael, A, J. Brock Smith, and Ronald K. Mitchell (2003), “Relationship Prioritization for Technology Commercialization,” special issue, Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice.
   Google Scholar
• Dickson, Peter R. and Philippa K. Wells (2001), “The Dubious Origins of the Sherman Antitrust Act: The Mouse That Roared,” Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 20 (Spring), 3–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frels, Judy K., Tasadduq Shervani, and Rajendra K. Srivastava (2003), “The Integrated Networks Model: Explaining Resource Allocations in Network Markets,” Journal of Marketing, 67 (January), 29–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ganeson, Shankar, Aric Rindfleisch, and Alan Malter (2002), “Does Distance Still Matter? The Role of Geographic Proximity and Relational Ties in New Product Development” working paper, University of Arizona, Eller College of Business and Public Administration.
   Google Scholar
• Goldenberg, Jacob, Barak Libai, and Eitan Muller (2002), “Riding the Saddle: How Cross-Market Communications Can Create a Major Slump in Sales,” Journal of Marketing, 66 (April), 1–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grenadier, S. and Allen Weiss (1997), “Investments in Technological Innovations: An Options Pricing Approach,” Journal of Financial Economics, 44, pp. 397–416.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grewal, Rajdeep (2001), “An Investigation into the Antecedents of Organizational Participation in Business-to-Business Electronic Markets,” Journal of Marketing, 65 (July), 17–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaworski, Bernard, Ajay Kohli, and Arvind Sahay (2000), “Market-Driven Versus Driving Markets,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 28 (Winter), 45–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• John, George, Allen M. Weiss, and Shantanu Dutta (1999), “Marketing in Technology-Intensive Markets: Toward a Conceptual Framework,” Journal of Marketing, 63 (Special Issue), 78–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, Yikuan and Gina Colarelli O’Connor (2003), “New Product Launch Strategy for Network Effects Products,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 31 (Summer), 241–255.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leifer, Richard, Christopher McDermott, Gina Colarelli O’Connor, Lois Peters, Mark Rice and Robert Veryzer (2000), Radical Innovation: How Mature Companies Can Outsmart Upstarts, Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lukas, B. and O.C. Ferrell (2000), “The Effect of Market Orientation on Product Innovation,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 28 (2), 239–247.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonald, Heath, David Corkindale, and Byron Sharp (2003), “Behavioral Versus Demographic Predictors of Early Adoption: A Critical Analysis and Comparative Test,” special issue, Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice.
   Google Scholar
• Meuter, Matthew L., Amy L. Ostrom, Robert I. Roundtree, and Mary Jo Bitner (2000), “Self-Service Technologies: Understanding Customer Satisfaction with Technology-Based Service Encounters,” Journal of Marketing, 64 (July), 50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohr, J. (2001), Marketing of High-Technology Products and Innovations, Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Mohr, Jakki, Sanjit Sengupta and Stanley Slater (2004), Marketing of High-Technology Products and Innovations, Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall (forthcoming).
   Google Scholar
• Moore, G. (1991), Crossing the Chasm, New York, NY: HarperBusiness.
   Google Scholar
• Moorman, C. and A Miner (1997), “The Impact of Organizational Memory on New Product Performance and Creativity”, Journal of Marketing Research, 34 (1), 91–106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pae, Jae H. and Donald R. Lehmann (2003), “Multigeneration Innovation Diffusion: The Impact of Intergeneration Time,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 31 (Winter), 36–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porter, Michael (1998), “Clusters and the New Economics of Competition,” Harvard Business Review, November-December, 77–90.
   Google Scholar
• Sappington, David and Alvin J. Silk (2003), “Overview of the Special Issue – Marketing’s Information Technology Revolution: Implications for Consumer Welfare and Economic Performance,” Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 22 (Spring), 3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarin, Shikhar, Trina A. Sego, and Nataporn Chanvarasuth (2003), “Strategic Use of Bundling for Reducing Consumers’ Perceived Risk Associated with the Purchase of New High-Tech Products,” special issue, Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice.
   Google Scholar
• Schilling, Melissa A. (2003), “Technological Leapfrogging: Lessons from the U.S. Video Game Console Industry,” California Management Review: Spring 2003, Vol. 45 Issue 3, p6, 27p.).
   Google Scholar
• Schilling, Melissa A. (2002), “Technology Success and Failure in Winner-Take-All Markets: The Impact of Learning Orientation, Timing, and Network Externalities,” Academy of Management Journal, 45 (April), 387–397.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shankar, Venkatesh and Barry L. Bayus (2003), “Network Effects and Competition: An Empirical Analysis of the Home Video Game Industry,” Strategic Management Journal, 24 (November), 375–384.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sorescu, Alina B., Rajesh K. Chandy, & Jaideep C. Prabhu (2003), “Sources and Financial Consequences of Radical Innovation: Insights from Pharmaceuticals,” Journal of Marketing, 67 (October), 82–102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Speier, Cheri and Viswanath Venkatesh (2002), “The Hidden Minefields in the Adoption of Sales Force Automation Technologies,” Journal of Marketing, 66 (July), 98–111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Srinivasan, Raji, Gary L. Lilien, and Arvind Rangaswamy (2002), “Technological Opportunism and Radical Technology Adoption: An Application to E-Business,” Journal of Marketing, 66 (July), 47–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stremersch, Stefan, Allen M. Weiss, Benedict G.C. Dellaert, and Ruud T. Frambach (2003), “Buying Modular Systems in Technology-Intensive Markets,” Journal of Marketing Research, XL (August), 335–350.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart, Anne, Guy W. Mullarkey, and John L. Craig (2003), “Innovation or Multiple Copies of the Same Lottery Ticket: The Effect of Widely Shared Knowledge on Organizational Adaptability,” special issue, Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice.
   Google Scholar
• Weiss, Allen (1994), “The Effects of Expectations on Technology Adoption: Some Empirical Evidence,” Journal of Industrial Economics, 42 (December), pp. 1–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, Fang, Vijay Mahajan, and Sridhar Balasubramanian (2003), “An Analysis of E-Business Adoption and Its Impact on Business Performance,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 31 (Fall), 425–447.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar