I’m Proud of It: Consumer Technology Appropriation and Psychological Ownership

REFERENCES

• Aaker, Jennifer, and Patti Williams (1998), “Empathy Versus Pride: The Influence of Emotional Appeals Across Cultures,” Journal of Consumer Research, 25 (December), 241–261.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alexandrov, Aliosha, Bryan Lilly, and Emin Babakus (2013), “The Effects of Social- and Self-Motives on the Intentions to Share Positive and Negative Word of Mouth,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 41 (5), 531–546.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Argo, Jennifer J., Darren W. Dahl, and Rajesh V. Manchanda (2005), “The Influence of a Mere Social Presence in a Retail Context,” Journal of Consumer Research, 32 (2), 207–212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ——, Katherine White, and Darren W. Dahl (2006), “Social Comparison Theory and Deception in the Interpersonal Exchange of Consumption Information,” Journal of Consumer Research, 33 (1), 99–108.
   Google Scholar
• Ashton-James, Claire E., and Jessica L. Tracy (2012), “Pride and Prejudice: How Feelings About the Self Influence Judgments of Others,” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38 (4), 466–476.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Babin, Barry J., William R. Darden, and Mitch Griffin (1994), “Work and/or Fun: Measuring Hedonic and Utilitarian Shopping Value,” Journal of Consumer Research, 20 (4), 644–656.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bacile, Todd J., Christine Ye, and Esther Swilley (2014), “From Firm-Controlled to Consumer-Contributed: Consumer Co-Production of Personal Media Marketing Communication,” Journal of Interactive Marketing, 28 (2), 117–133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumeister, Roy F. (1982), “A Self-Presentational View of Social Phenomena,” Psychological Bulletin, 91 (1), 3–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belk, Russell (1988), “Possessions and the Extended Self,” Journal of Consumer Research, 15 (2), 139–168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• —— (2013), “Extended Self in a Digital World,” Journal of Consumer Research, 40 (3), 477–500.
   Google Scholar
• Berg, Justin M., Adam M. Grant, and Victoria Johnson (2010), “When Callings Are Calling: Crafting Work and Leisure in Pursuit of Unanswered Occupational Callings,” Organization Science, 21 (5), 973–994.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berger, Jonah, and Raghuram Iyengar (2013), “Communication Channels and Word of Mouth: How the Medium Shapes the Message,” Journal of Consumer Research, 40 (3), 567–579.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berlyne, D. E. (1960), Conflict, Arousal, and Curiosity, New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Botti, Simona, and Sheena S. Iyengar (2006), “The Dark Side of Choice: When Choice Impairs Social Welfare,” Journal of Public Policy and Marketing, 25 (1), 24–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brasel, S. Adam, and James Gips (2013), “Tablets, Touchscreens, and Touchpads: How Varying Touch Interfaces Trigger Psychological Ownership and Endowment,” Journal of Consumer Psychology, 24 (2), 226–233.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, Graham, Jon L. Pierce, and Craig Crossley (2013), “Toward an Understanding of the Development of Ownership Feelings,” Journal of Organizational Behavior, 35 (3), 318–338.
   Google Scholar
• Bruce, Margaret, and Michael R. Solomon (2013), “Managing for Media Anarchy: A Corporate Marketing Perspective,” Journal of Marketing Theory & Practice, 21 (3), 307–318.
   Google Scholar
• Buechel, Eva C., and Chris Janiszewski (2014), “A Lot of Work or a Work of Art: How the Structure of a Customized Assembly Task Determines the Utility Derived from Assembly Effort,” Journal of Consumer Research, 40 (5), 960–972.
   Google Scholar
• Carroll, Jennie, Steve Howard, Jane Peck, and John Murphy (2002), “A Field Study of Perceptions and Use of Mobile Telephones by 16 to 22 Year Olds,” Journal of Information Technology Theory and Application, 4 (2), 6.
   Google Scholar
• ——, ——, Frank Vetere, Jane Peck, and John Murphy (2002), “Just What Do the Youth of Today Want? Technology Appropriation by Young People,” paper presented at the 35th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, January, Waikoloa, HI.
   Google Scholar
• Carver, Charles S., Sungchoon Sinclair, and Sheri L. Johnson (2010), “Authentic and Hubristic Pride: Differential Relations to Aspects of Goal Regulation, Affect, and Self-Control,” Journal of Research in Personality, 44 (6), 698–703.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chatterjee, Promothesh, Caglar Irmak, and Randall L. Rose (2013), “The Endowment Effect as Self-Enhancement in Response to Threat,” Journal of Consumer Research, 40 (3), 460–476.
   Google Scholar
• Chaudhuri, Arjun, Khaled Aboulnasr, and Mark Ligas (2010), “Emotional Responses on Initial Exposure to a Hedonic or Utilitarian Description of a Radical Innovation,” Journal of Marketing Theory & Practice, 18 (4), 339–359.
   Google Scholar
• Chin, Wynne W., Abhijit Gopal, and W. David Salisbury (1997), “Advancing the Theory of Adaptive Structuration: The Development of a Scale to Measure Faithfulness of Appropriation,” Information Systems Research, 8 (4), 342–367.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dabholkar, Pratibha A. (2006), “Factors Influencing Consumer Choice of a ‘Rating Web Site:’ An Experimental Investigation of an Online Interactive Decision Aid,” Journal of Marketing Theory & Practice, 14 (4), 259–273.
   Google Scholar
• Dahl, Darren W., Rajesh V. Manchanda, and Jennifer J. Argo (2001), “Embarrassment in Consumer Purchase: The Roles of Social Presence and Purchase Familiarity,” Journal of Consumer Research, 28 (3), 473–481.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ——, and C. Page Moreau (2007), “Thinking Inside the Box: Why Consumers Enjoy Constrained Creative Experiences,” Journal of Marketing Research, 44 (3), 357–369.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, Fred D. (1989), “Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology,” MIS Quarterly, 13 (3), 319–340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ——, Richard P. Bagozzi, and Paul R. Warshaw (1989), “User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models,” Management Science, 35 (8), 982–1003.
   Google Scholar
• Dawson, Scott, Peter H. Bloch, and Nancy M. Ridgway (1990), “Shopping Motives, Emotional States, and Retail Outcomes,” Journal of Retailing, 66 (4), 408–428.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Decrop, Alain, and Christian Derbaix (2010), “Pride in Contemporary Sport Consumption: A Marketing Perspective,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 38 (5), 586–603.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deng, Xiaoyan, and Wes Hutchinson (2008), “A Three-Factor Model of Consumer Preference for Self-Designed Products,” Advances in Consumer Research, 35, 1024–1025.
   Google Scholar
• Di Muro, Fabrizio, and Theodore J. Noseworthy (2013), “Money Isn’t Everything, but It Helps if It Doesn’t Look Used: How the Physical Appearance of Money Influences Spending,” Journal of Consumer Research, 39 (6), 1330–1342.
   Google Scholar
• Dommer, Sara Loughran, and Vanitha Swaminathan (2013), “Explaining the Endowment Effect Through Ownership: The Role of Identity, Gender, and Self-Threat,” Journal of Consumer Research, 39 (5), 1034–1050.
   Google Scholar
• Dourish, Paul (2003), “The Appropriation of Interactive Technologies: Some Lessons from Placeless Documents,” Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 12 (4), 465–490.
   Google Scholar
• Ekman, Paul, Robert W. Levenson, and Wallace V. Friesen (1983), “Autonomic Nervous System Activity Distinguishes Among Emotions,” Science, 221 (4616), 1208–1210.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Festinger, Leon (1954), “A Theory of Social Comparison Processes,” Human Relations, 7 (2), 117–140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiore, Ann Marie, Seung-Eun Lee, and Grace Kunz (2004), “Individual Differences, Motivations, and Willingness to Use a Mass Customization Option for Fashion Products,” European Journal of Marketing, 38 (7), 835–849.
   Google Scholar
• Franke, Nikolaus, Peter Keinz, and Christoph J. Steger (2009), “Testing the Value of Customization: When Do Customers Really Prefer Products Tailored to Their Preferences?” Journal of Marketing, 73 (5), 103–121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ——, and Frank Piller (2004), “Value Creation by Toolkits for User Innovation and Design: The Case of the Watch Market,” Journal of Product Innovation Management, 21 (6), 401–415.
   Google Scholar
• ——, and Martin Schreier (2010), “Why Customers Value Self-Designed Products: The Importance of Process Effort and Enjoyment,” Journal of Product Innovation Management, 27 (7), 1020–1031.
   Google Scholar
• ——, ——, and Ulrike Kaiser (2010), “The ‘I Designed It Myself’ Effect in Mass Customization,” Management Science, 56 (1), 125–140.
   Google Scholar
• Friedman, Ori, and Karen R. Neary (2008), “Determining Who Owns What: Do Children Infer Ownership from First Possession?” Cognition, 107 (3), 829–849.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuchs, Christoph, Emanuela Prandelli, and Martin Schreier (2010), “The Psychological Effects of Empowerment Strategies on Consumers’ Product Demand,” Journal of Marketing, 74 (1), 65–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furby, Lita (1978), “Possession in Humans: An Exploratory Study of Its Meaning and Motivation,” Social Behavior and Personality, 6 (1), 49–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaskin, James, and Kalle Lyytinen (2012), “Psychological Ownership and the Individual Appropriation of Technology,” in Information Systems Theory, Yogesh K. Dwivedi, Michael R. Wade, and Scott L. Schneberger, eds., New York: Springer, 25–39.
   Google Scholar
• Gouthier, Matthias H. J., and Miriam Rhein (2011), “Organizational Pride and Its Positive Effects on Employee Behavior,” Journal of Service Management, 22 (5), 633–649.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griskevicius, Vladas, Michelle N. Shiota, and Stephen M. Nowlis (2010), “The Many Shades of Rose-Colored Glasses: An Evolutionary Approach to the Influence of Different Positive Emotions,” Journal of Consumer Research, 37 (2), 238–250.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herd, Kelly, and C. Page Moreau (2011), “Identity Representation in Customization,” Advances in Consumer Research, 39, 599–600.
   Google Scholar
• Higgins, E. Tory (2006), “Value from Hedonic Experience and Engagement,” Psychological Review, 113 (3), 439.
   Google Scholar
• ——, Ronald S. Friedman, Robert E. Harlow, Lorraine Chen Idson, Ozlem N. Ayduk, and Amy Taylor (2001), “Achievement Orientations from Subjective Histories of Success: Promotion Pride Versus Prevention Pride,” European Journal of Social Psychology, 31 (1), 3–23.
   Google Scholar
• Hillenbrand, Carola, and Kevin Guy Money (2015), “Unpacking the Mechanism by Which Psychological Ownership Manifests at the Level of the Individual: A Dynamic Model of Identity and Self,” Journal of Marketing Theory & Practice, 23 (2), 148–165.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffman, Donna L., and Thomas P. Novak (1996), “Marketing in Hypermedia Computer-Mediated Environments: Conceptual Foundations,” Journal of Marketing, 60 (3), 50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holbrook, Colin, Jared Piazza, and Daniel M. T. Fessler (2013), “Conceptual and Empirical Challenges to the ‘Authentic’ Versus ‘Hubristic’ Model of Pride,” Emotion, 14 (1), 17–32.
   Google Scholar
• Horberg, E. J., Michael W. Kraus, and Dacher Keltner (2013), “Pride Displays Communicate Self-Interest and Support for Meritocracy,” Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 105 (1), 24–37.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hulland, John, Scott Thompson, and Keith Smith (2015), “Exploring Uncharted Waters: Use of Psychological Ownership Theory in Marketing,” Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 23 (2), 140–147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iyengar, Sheena S., and Mark R. Lepper (2000), “When Choice Is Demotivating: Can One Desire Too Much of a Good Thing?” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79 (6), 995–1006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jussila, Iiro, Anssi Tarkiainen, Marko Sarstedt, and Joseph E. Hair (2015), “Individual Psychological Ownership: Concepts, Evidence and Implications for Research in Marketing,” Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 23 (2), 121–139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahneman, Daniel, and Amos Tversky (1979), “Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision Under Risk,” Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 47 (2), 263–291 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaltcheva, Velitchka D., and Barton A. Weitz (2006), “When Should a Retailer Create an Exciting Store Environment?” Journal of Marketing, 70 (1), 107–118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalyanaraman, Shiyam, and Sriram Sundar (2006), “The Psychological Appeal of Personalized Content in Web Portals: Does Customization Affect Attitudes and Behavior?” Journal of Communication, 56 (1), 110–132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamleitner, Bernadette, and Berna Erki (2013), “Payment Method and Perceptions of Ownership,” Marketing Letters, 24 (1), 57–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ——, and Silvia Feuchtl (2015), “‘As If It Were Mine’: Imagery Works by Inducing Psychological Ownership,” Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 23 (2), 208–223.
   Google Scholar
• Karahanna, Elena, Sean Xin Xu, and Nan (Andy) Zhang (2015), “Psychological Ownership Motivation and the Use of Social Media,” Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 23 (2), 185–207.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirk, Colleen P., and Scott D. Swain (2013), “Touching the Intangible: Perceptions of Interactivity and Ownership in New Media,” AMA Winter Educators’ Conference Proceedings, vol. 24, Aric Rindfleisch and Jim Burroughs, eds., Chicago, IL: American Marketing Association, 464–465.
   Google Scholar
• ——, ——, and Richard C. Hanna (2014), “Owning the Intangible: The Roles of Motivational Orientation and Perceived Two-Way Communication in the Emergence of Psychological Ownership,” American Marketing Association Winter Educators’ Conference Proceedings, Gary Hunter and Tom Steenburgh, eds., vol. 25, Chicago, IL: American Marketing Association.
   Google Scholar
• Kozinets, Robert V., Kristine de Valck, Andrea C. Wojnicki, and Sarah J. S. Wilner (2010), “Networked Narratives: Understanding Word-of-Mouth Marketing in Online Communities,” Journal of Marketing, 74 (2), 71–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leary, Mark R. (2007), “Motivational and Emotional Aspects of the Self,” Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 317–344.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, Younghwa, and Andrew Chen (2011), “Usability Design and Psychological Ownership of a Virtual World,” Journal of Management Information Systems, 28 (3), 269–308.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leeuwen, Esther van, Wilco van Dijk, and Umit Kaynak (2013), “Of Saints and Sinners: How Appeals to Collective Pride and Guilt Affect Outgroup Helping,” Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 16 (6), 781–796.
   Google Scholar
• Lessard-Bonaventure, Simon, and Jean-Charles Chebat (2015), “Psychological Ownership, Touch and Willingness to Pay for an Extended Warranty,” Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 23 (2), 224–235.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, Yong (2006), “Word of Mouth for Movies: Its Dynamics and Impact on Box Office Revenue,” Journal of Marketing, 70 (3), 74–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, Yuping, and L. J. Shrum (2002), “What Is Interactivity and Is It Always Such a Good Thing? Implications of Definition, Person, and Situation for the Influence of Interactivity on Advertising Effectiveness,” Journal of Advertising, 31 (4), 53–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Louro, Maria J., Rik Pieters, and Marcel Zeelenberg (2005), “Negative Returns on Positive Emotions: The Influence of Pride and Self-Regulatory Goals on Repurchase Decisions,” Journal of Consumer Research, 31 (4), 833–840.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowry, Paul Benjamin, James Eric Gaskin, Nathan Twyman, Bryan Hammer, and Tom L. Roberts (2013), “Taking ‘Fun and Games’ Seriously: Proposing the Hedonic-Motivation System Adoption Model (Hmsam),” Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 14 (11), 617–671.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maddux, William W., Haiyang Yang, Carl Falk, Hajo Adam, Wendi Adair, Yumi Endo, Ziv Carmon, et al. (2010), “For Whom Is Parting with Possessions More Painful? Cultural Differences in the Endowment Effect,” Psychological Science, 21 (12), 1910–1917.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Majchrzak, Ann, Ronald E. Rice, Arvind Malhotra, Nelson King, and Sulin Ba (2000), “Technology Adaptation: The Case of a Computer-Supported Inter-Organizational Virtual Team,” MIS Quarterly, 24 (4), 569–600.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathwick, Charla, Janet Wagner, and Ramaprasad Unni (2010), “Computer-Mediated Customization Tendency (Cmct) and the Adaptive E-Service Experience,” Journal of Retailing, 86 (1), 11–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McFerran, Brent, Karl Aquino, and Jessica L. Tracy (2014), “Evidence for Two Facets of Pride in Consumption: Findings from Luxury Brands,” Journal of Consumer Psychology, 24 (4), 455–471.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehrabian, Albert, and James Russell (1974), An Approach to Environmental Psychology, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mischel, Walter (1973), “Toward a Cognitive Social Learning Reconceptualization of Personality,” Psychological Review, 80 (4), 252.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mochon, Daniel, Michael I. Norton, and Dan Ariely (2012), “Bolstering and Restoring Feelings of Competence Via the Ikea Effect,” International Journal of Research in Marketing, 29 (4), 363–369.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moreau, C. Page (2011), “Inviting the Amateurs into the Studio: Understanding How Consumer Engagement in Product Design Creates Value,” Journal of Product Innovation Management, 28 (3), 409–410.
   Google Scholar
• ——, and Kelly B. Herd (2010), “To Each His Own? How Comparisons with Others Influence Consumers’ Evaluations of Their Self-Designed Products,” Journal of Consumer Research, 36 (5), 806–819.
   Google Scholar
• Morewedge, Carey K., Lisa L. Shu, Daniel T. Gilbert, and Timothy D. Wilson (2009), “Bad Riddance or Good Rubbish? Ownership and Not Loss Aversion Causes the Endowment Effect,” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45 (4), 947–951.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Motyka, Scott, Dhruv Grewal, Nancy M. Puccinelli, Anne L. Roggeveen, Tamar Avnet, Ahmad Daryanto, Ko de Ruyter, et al. (2013), “Regulatory Fit: A Meta-Analytic Synthesis,” Journal of Consumer Psychology, 24 (3), 394–410.
   Google Scholar
• Mukhopadhyay, Anirban, and Gita Venkataramani Johar (2007), “Tempted or Not? The Effect of Recent Purchase History on Responses to Affective Advertising,” Journal of Consumer Research, 33 (4), 445–453.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Onyemah, Vincent, Scott D. Swain, and Richard C. Hannah (2010), “A Social Learning Perspective on Sales Technology Adoption and Sales Performance: Preliminary Evidence from an Emerging Economy,” Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, 30 (2), 131–142.
   Google Scholar
• Orlikowski, Wanda J. (1992), “The Duality of Technology: Rethinking the Concept of Technology in Organizations,” Organization Science, 3 (3), 398–427.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• —— (2000), “Using Technology and Constituting Structures: A Practice Lens for Studying Technology in Organizations,” Organization Science, 11 (4), 404–428.
   Google Scholar
• Orth, Ulrich R., Richard W. Robins, and Christopher J. Soto (2010), “Tracking the Trajectory of Shame, Guilt, and Pride Across the Life Span,” Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 99 (6), 1061–1071.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peck, Joann, and Suzanne B. Shu (2009), “The Effect of Mere Touch on Perceived Ownership,” Journal of Consumer Research, 36 (3), 434–447.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pierce, Jon L., and Iiro Jussila (2010), “Collective Psychological Ownership Within the Work and Organizational Context: Construct Introduction and Elaboration,” Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31 (6), 810–834.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ——, and —— (2011), Psychological Ownership and the Organizational Context: Theory, Research Evidence and Application, Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• ——, Tatiana Kostova, and Kurt T. Dirks (2001), “Toward a Theory of Psychological Ownership in Organizations,” Academy of Management Review, 26 (2), 298–310.
   Google Scholar
• ——, ——, and —— (2003), “The State of Psychological Ownership: Integrating and Extending a Century of Research,” Review of General Psychology, 7 (1), 84.
   Google Scholar
• Raju, P. S. (1980), “Optimum Stimulation Level: Its Relationship to Personality, Demographics and Exploratory Behavior,” Journal of Consumer Research, 7 (3), 272–282.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers, Everett M. (1962), Diffusion of Innovations, New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• —— (2003), Diffusion of Innovations, New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rudmin, Floyd W. (1991), “‘To Own Is to Be Perceived to Own’: A Social Cognitive Look at the Ownership of Property,” Journal of Social Behavior & Personality, 6 (6), 85–104.
   Google Scholar
• Shu, Suzanne B., and Joann Peck (2011), “Psychological Ownership and Affective Reaction: Emotional Attachment Process Variables and the Endowment Effect,” Journal of Consumer Psychology, 21 (4), 439–452.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sredl, Katherine Christina (2009), “Consumer Pride and Consumption-Based Family Rituals: A Field Study in Zagreb, Croatia,” unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign.
   Google Scholar
• —— (2010), “Consumer Pride: Emotion as a Social Phenomenon,” Advances in Consumer Research, 37, 907–909.
   Google Scholar
• Srinivasan, Raji, Gary L. Lilien, and Arvind Rangaswamy (2002), “Technological Opportunism and Radical Technology Adoption: An Application to E-Business,” Journal of Marketing, 66 (3), 47–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steenkamp, Jan-Benedict E. M., and Hans Baumgartner (1992), “The Role of Optimum Stimulation Level in Exploratory Consumer Behavior,” Journal of Consumer Research, 19 (3), 434–448.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Storni, Cristiano (2010), “Multiple Forms of Appropriation in Self-Monitoring Technology: Reflections on the Role of Valuation in Future Self-Care,” International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 26 (5), 537.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sundaram, D. S., Kaushik Mitra, and Cynthia Webster (1998), “Word-of-Mouth Communications: A Motivational Analysis,” Advances in Consumer Research, 25 (1), 527–531.
   Google Scholar
• Süssmuth, Bernd, Malte Heyne, and Wolfgang Maennig (2010), “Induced Civic Pride and Integration,” Oxford Bulletin of Economics & Statistics, 72 (2), 202–220.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tesser, Abraham, and James E. Collins (1988), “Emotion in Social Reflection and Comparison Situations: Intuitive, Systematic, and Exploratory Approaches,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55 (5), 695.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ——, and Del Paulhus (1983), “The Definition of Self: Private and Public Self-Evaluation Management Strategies,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44 (4), 672.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, Debora V., and Michael I. Norton (2011), “The Social Utility of Feature Creep,” Journal of Marketing Research (JMR), 48 (3), 555–565.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Townsend, Claudia, and Suzanne B. Shu (2010), “When and How Aesthetics Influences Financial Decisions,” Journal of Consumer Psychology, 20 (4), 452–458.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tracy, Jessica L., and Alec T. Beall (2011), “Happy Guys Finish Last: The Impact of Emotion Expressions on Sexual Attraction,” Emotion, 11 (6), 1379.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ——, and Richard W. Robins (2004a), “Putting the Self Into Self-Conscious Emotions: A Theoretical Model,” Psychological Inquiry, 15 (2), 103–125.
   Google Scholar
• ——, and —— (2004b), “Show Your Pride Evidence for a Discrete Emotion Expression,” Psychological Science, 15 (3), 194–197.
   Google Scholar
• ——, and —— (2007a), “Emerging Insights Into the Nature and Function of Pride,” Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16 (3), 147–150.
   Google Scholar
• ——, and —— (2007b), “The Psychological Structure of Pride: A Tale of Two Facets,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92 (3), 506.
   Google Scholar
• ——, ——, and June Price Tangney (2007), The Self-Conscious Emotions, New York: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Van Ittersum, Koert, and Fred M. Feinberg (2010), “Cumulative Timed Intent: A New Predictive Tool for Technology Adoption,” Journal of Marketing Research, 47 (5), 808–822.
   Google Scholar
• Vargo, Stephen L., and Robert F. Lusch (2004), “Evolving to a New Dominant Logic for Marketing,” Journal of Marketing, 68 (1), 1–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkatesh, Viswanath (2000), “Determinants of Perceived Ease of Use: Integrating Control, Intrinsic Motivation, and Emotion Into the Technology Acceptance Model,” Information Systems Research, 11 (4), 342.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ——, M. G. Morris, Gordon B. Davis, and Fred D. Davis (2003), “User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View,” MIS Quarterly, 27 (3), 425–478.
   Google Scholar
• Verbeke, Willem, Frank Belschak, and Richard P. Bagozzi (2004), “The Adaptive Consequences of Pride in Personal Selling,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 32 (4), 386–402.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webster, J. Matthew, Jamieson Duval, Leslie M. Gaines, and Richard H. Smith (2003), “The Roles of Praise and Social Comparison Information in the Experience of Pride,” Journal of Social Psychology, 143 (2), 209–232.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiss, Liad, and Gita Johar (2013), “Egocentric Categorization and Product Judgment: Seeing Your Traits in What You Own (and Their Opposite in What You Don’t),” Journal of Consumer Research, 40 (June), 185–201.
   Google Scholar
• White, Robert W. (1959), “Motivation Reconsidered: The Concept of Competence,” Psychological Review, 66 (5), 297–333.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wien, Anders Hauge, and Svein Ottar Olsen (2014), “Understanding the Relationship Between Individualism and Word of Mouth: A Self-Enhancement Explanation,” Psychology & Marketing, 31 (6), 416–425.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilcox, Keith, Thomas Kramer, and Sankar Sen (2011), “Indulgence or Self-Control: A Dual Process Model of the Effect of Incidental Pride on Indulgent Choice,” Journal of Consumer Research, 38 (1), 151–163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, Lisa A., and David DeSteno (2008), “Pride and Perseverance: The Motivational Role of Pride,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94 (6), 1007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ——, and —— (2009), “Pride: Adaptive Social Emotion or Seventh Sin?” Psychological Science, 20 (3), 284–288.
   Google Scholar
• Wills, Thomas A. (1981), “Downward Comparison Principles in Social Psychology,” Psychological Bulletin, 90 (2), 245.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolf, Marco, and Shaun McQuitty (2011), “Understanding the Do-It-Yourself Consumer: Diy Motivations and Outcomes,” AMS Review, 1 (3/4), 154–170.
   Google Scholar
• Wubben, Maarten J. J., David De Cremer, and Eric van Dijk (2012), “Is Pride a Prosocial Emotion? Interpersonal Effects of Authentic and Hubristic Pride,” Cognition & Emotion, 26 (6), 1084–1097.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ziamou, Paschalina Lilia, Stephen Gould, and Alladi Venkatesh (2012), “‘Am I Getting It or Not?’ The Practices Involved in ‘Trying to Consume’ a New Technology,” Journal of Product Innovation Management, 29 (2), 216–228.
   Google Scholar
• Zuckerman, Marvin, Elizabeth A. Kolin, Leah Price, and Ina Zoob (1964), “Development of a Sensation-Seeking Scale,” Journal of Consulting Psychology, 28 (6), 477.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar