“PLS-SEM: indeed a silver bullet” – retrospective observations and recent advances

References

• Aguirre-Urreta, M. I., & Rönkkö, M. (2015). Sample size determination and statistical power analysis in PLS using R: An annotated tutorial. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 36(3), 33–51. https://doi.org/10.17705/1CAIS.03603
   Google Scholar
• Aguirre-Urreta, M. I., & Rönkkö, M. (2018). Statistical inference with PLSc using bootstrap confidence intervals. MIS Quarterly, 42(3), 1001–1020. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2018/13587
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basco, R., Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2021). Advancing family business research through modeling nonlinear relationships: Comparing PLS-SEM and multiple regression. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 100457. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfbs.2021.100457
   Google Scholar
• Becker, J.-M., & Ismail, I. R. (2016). Accounting for sampling weights in PLS path modeling: Simulations and empirical examples. European Management Journal, 34(6), 606–617.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker, J.-M., Proksch, D., & Ringle, C. M. (2022). Revisiting Gaussian copulas to handle endogenous regressors. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 50(1), 46–66. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-021-00805-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker, J.-M., Rai, A., & Rigdon, E. E. (2013a). Predictive validity and formative measurement in structural equation modeling: Embracing practical relevance. Paper presented at the 2013 Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Systems, Milan.
   Google Scholar
• Becker, J.-M., Rai, A., Ringle, C. M., & Völckner, F. (2013b). Discovering unobserved heterogeneity in structural equation models to avert validity threats. MIS Quarterly, 37(3), 665–694. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2013/37.3.01
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bentler, P. M., & Huang, W. (2014). On components, latent variables, PLS and simple methods: Reactions to Rigdon’s rethinking of PLS. Long Range Planning, 47(3), 138–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2014.02.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bollen, K. A., & Bauldry, S. (2011). Three Cs in measurement models: Causal indicators, composite indicators, and covariates. Psychological Methods, 16(3), 265–284. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024448
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bollen, K. A., & Ting, K.-F. (2000). A tetrad test for causal indicators. Psychological Methods, 5(1), 3–22. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.5.1.3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cepeda Carrión, G., Cegarra, J. G., & Cillo, V. (2019). Tips to use partial least squares structural equation modelling (PLS-SEM) in knowledge management. Journal of Knowledge Management, 23(1), 67–89. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-05-2018-0322
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheah, J. H., Nitzl, C., Roldán, J. L., Cepeda Carrión, G., & Gudergan, S. P. (2021). A primer on the conditional mediation analysis in PLS-SEM. ACM SIGMIS DATABASE: The DATABASE for Advances in Information Systems, 52(SI), 43–100. https://doi.org/10.1145/3505639.3505645
   Google Scholar
• Cheah, J.-H., Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., Ramayah, T., & Ting, H. (2018). Convergent validity assessment of formatively measured constructs in PLS-SEM: On using single-item versus multi-item measures in redundancy analyses. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 30(11), 3192–3210. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-10-2017-0649
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chin, W. W. (1998). The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling. In G. A. Marcoulides (Ed.), Modern methods for business research (pp. 295–358). Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Chin, W. W. (2010). How to write up and report PLS analyses. In V. Esposito Vinzi, W. W. Chin, J. Henseler, & H. Wang (Eds.), Handbook of partial least squares: Concepts, methods and applications (Springer Handbooks of computational statistics series (Vol. II, pp. 655–690). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Chin, W., Cheah, J.-H., Liu, Y., Ting, H., Lim, X.-J., & Cham, T. H. (2020). Demystifying the role of causal-predictive modeling using partial least squares structural equation modeling in information systems research. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 120(12), 2161–2209. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-10-2019-0529
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chin, W. W., & Dibbern, J. (2010). A permutation based procedure for multi-group PLS analysis: Results of tests of differences on simulated data and a cross cultural analysis of the sourcing of information system services between Germany and the USA. In V. Esposito Vinzi, W. W. Chin, J. Henseler, & H. Wang (Eds.), Handbook of partial least squares: Concepts, methods and applications (Springer Handbooks of Computational Statistics Series (Vol. II, pp. 171–193). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Chin, W. W., Thatcher, J. B., & Wright, R. T. (2012). Assessing common method bias: Problems with the ULMC technique. MIS Quarterly, 36(3), 1003–1019. https://doi.org/10.2307/41703491
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chin, W. W., Thatcher, J. B., Wright, R. T., & Steel, D. (2013). Controlling for common method variance in PLS analysis: The measured latent marker variable approach. In H. Abdi, W. W. Chin, V. Esposito Vinzi, G. Russolillo, & L. Trinchera (Eds.), New perspectives in partial least squares and related methods (pp. 231–239). Springer New York.
   Google Scholar
• Cho, G., Hwang, H., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2020). Cutoff criteria for overall model fit indexes in generalized structured component analysis. Journal of Marketing Analytics, 8(4), 189–202. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41270-020-00089-1
   Google Scholar
• Cho, G., Lee, J., Hwang, H., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2021a). A comparative study of the predictive power of component-based approaches to structural equation modeling. European Journal of Marketing. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJM-07-2020-0542
   Google Scholar
• Cho, G., Sarstedt, M., & Hwang, H. (2021b). A comparative evaluation of factor- and component-based structural equation modelling approaches under (in)correct construct representations. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1111/bmsp.12255
   Google Scholar
• Cho, G., Schlägel, C., Hwang, H., Choi, Y., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (in press). Integrated generalized structured component analysis: On the use of model fit criteria in international management research. Management International Review.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook, R. D., & Forzani, L. (2020). Fundamentals of path analysis in the social sciences. arXiv(2011.06436). https://arxiv.org/abs/2011.06436
   Google Scholar
• Danks, N. (2021). The piggy in the middle: The role of mediators in PLS-SEM-based prediction. ACM SIGMIS DATABASE: The DATABASE for Advances in Information Systems, 52(SI), 24–42. https://doi.org/10.1145/3505639.3505644
   Google Scholar
• Danks, N. P., Sharma, P. N., & Sarstedt, M. (2020). Model selection uncertainty and multimodel inference in partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Journal of Business Research, 113, 13–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.03.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dijkstra, T. K. (2014). PLS’ Janus face – Response to Professor Rigdon’s ‘Rethinking partial least squares modeling: In praise of simple methods.’ Long Range Planning, 47(3), 146–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2014.02.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dijkstra, T. K., & Henseler, J. (2015). Consistent partial least squares path modeling. MIS Quarterly, 39(2), 297–316. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2015/39.2.02
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evermann, J., & Rönkkö, M. (in press). Recent developments in PLS. Communications of Association for Information Systems.
   Google Scholar
• Fornell, C. G., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franke, G. R., & Sarstedt, M. (2019). Heuristics versus statistics in discriminant validity Testing: A comparison of four procedures. Internet Research, 29(3), 430–447. https://doi.org/10.1108/IntR-12-2017-0515
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geweke, J., & Meese, R. (1981). Estimating regression models of finite but unknown order. Journal of Econometrics, 16(1), 162. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(81)90091-9
   Google Scholar
• Gudergan, S. P., Ringle, C. M., Wende, S., & Will, A. (2008). Confirmatory tetrad analysis in PLS path modeling. Journal of Business Research, 61(12), 1238–1249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2008.01.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hahn, C., Johnson, M. D., Herrmann, A., & Huber, F. (2002). Capturing customer heterogeneity using a finite mixture PLS approach. Schmalenbach Business Review, 54(3), 243–269. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03396655
   Google Scholar
• Hair, J. F. (2021). Reflections on SEM: An introspective, idiosyncratic journey to composite-based structural equation modeling. ACM SIGMIS DATABASE: The DATABASE for Advances in Information Systems, 52(SI), 101–113. https://doi.org/10.1145/3505639.3505646
   Google Scholar
• Hair, J. F., Binz Astrachan, C., Moisescu, O. I., Radomir, L., Sarstedt, M., Vaithilingam, S., & Ringle, C. M. (2020a). Executing and interpreting applications of PLS-SEM: Updates for family business researchers. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 12(3), 100392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfbs.2020.100392
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2019a). Multivariate data analysis (8 ed.). Cengage Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Hair, J. F., Howard, M. C., & Nitzl, C. (2020b). Assessing measurement model quality in PLS-SEM using confirmatory composite analysis. Journal of Business Research, 109, 101–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.11.069
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2022). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) (3 ed.). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M., Danks, N. P., & Ray, S. (2021). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) Using R. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M., & Thiele, K. O. (2017a). Mirror, mirror on the wall: A comparative evaluation of composite-based structural equation modeling methods. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 45(5), 616–632. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-017-0517-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hair Jr., J. F., Matthews, L. M., Matthews, R. L., & Sarstedt, M. (2017b). PLS-SEM or CB-SEM: Updated guidelines on which method to use. International Journal of Multivariate Data Analysis, 1(2), 107–123. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMDA.2017.10008574
   Google Scholar
• Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2011). PLS-SEM: Indeed a silver bullet. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 19(2), 139–151. https://doi.org/10.2753/MTP1069-6679190202
   Google Scholar
• Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019b). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2–24. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hair, J. F., & Sarstedt, M. (2019). Factors versus composites: Guidelines for choosing the right structural equation modeling method. Project Management Journal, 50(6), 619–624. https://doi.org/10.1177/8756972819882132
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hair, J. F., & Sarstedt, M. (2021a). Data, measurement, and causal inferences in machine learning: Opportunities and challenges for marketing. Journal of Marketing Theory & Practice, 29(1), 65–77. https://doi.org/10.1080/10696679.2020.1860683
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hair, J. F., & Sarstedt, M. (2021b). Explanation plus prediction: The logical focus of project management research. Project Management Journal, 52(4), 319–322. https://doi.org/10.1177/8756972821999945
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hair, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Pieper, T. M., & Ringle, C. M. (2012a). The use of partial least squares structural equation modeling in strategic management research: A review of past practices and recommendations for future applications. Long Range Planning, 45(5–6), 320–340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2012.09.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hair, J. F., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019c). Rethinking some of the rethinking of partial least squares. European Journal of Marketing, 53(4), 566–584. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJM-10-2018-0665
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hair, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., & Mena, J. A. (2012b). An assessment of the use of partial least squares structural equation modeling in marketing research. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 40(3), 414–433. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-011-0261-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henseler, J., Dijkstra, T. K., Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., Diamantopoulos, A., Straub, D. W., Ketchen, D. J., Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., & Calantone, R. J. (2014). Common beliefs and reality about partial least squares: Comments on Rönkkö & Evermann (2013). Organizational Research Methods, 17(2), 182–209. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428114526928
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing Discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2016). Testing measurement invariance of composites using partial least squares. International Marketing Review, 33(3), 405–431. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMR-09-2014-0304
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, W. (2013). PLSe: Efficient estimators and tests for partial least square (Dissertation). University of California.
   Google Scholar
• Hubona, G. S., Schuberth, F., & Henseler, J. (2021). A clarification of confirmatory composite analysis (CCA). International Journal of Information Management, 61(December), 102399. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2021.102399
   Google Scholar
• Hult, G. T. M., Hair, J. F., Proksch, D., Sarstedt, M., Pinkwart, A., & Ringle, C. M. (2018). Addressing endogeneity in international marketing applications of partial least squares structural equation modeling. Journal of International Marketing, 26(3), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1509/jim.17.0151
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hwang, H., Takane, Y., & Malhotra, N. K. (2007). Multilevel generalized structured component analysis. Behaviormetrika, 34(2), 95–109. https://doi.org/10.2333/bhmk.34.95
   Google Scholar
• Jarvis, C. B., MacKenzie, S. B., & Podsakoff, P. M. (2003). A critical review of construct indicators and measurement model misspecification in marketing and consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 30(2), 199–218. https://doi.org/10.1086/376806
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jöreskog, K. G., & Wold, H. (1982). The ML and PLS techniques for modeling with latent variables: Historical and comparative aspects. In K. G. Jöreskog & H. Wold (Eds.), Systems under indirect observation, Part I (pp. 263–270). North-Holland.
   Google Scholar
• Jung, K., Takane, Y., Hwang, H., & Woodward, T. S. (2012). Dynamic GSCA (generalized structured component analysis) with applications to the analysis of effective connectivity in functional neuroimaging data. Psychometrika, 77(4), 827–848. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-012-9284-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klesel, M., Schuberth, F., Henseler, J., & Niehaves, B. (2019). A test for multigroup comparison using partial least squares path modeling. Internet Research, 29(3), 464–477. https://doi.org/10.1108/IntR-11-2017-0418
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kock, N., & Hadaya, P. (2018). Minimum sample size estimation in PLS-SEM: The inverse square root and gamma-exponential methods. Information Systems Journal, 28(1), 227–261. https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12131
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreamer, L. M., Albritton, B. H., Tonidandel, S., & Rogelberg, S. G. (2021). The use and misuse of organizational research methods ‘best practice’ articles. Organizational Research Methods, 109442812110607. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/10944281211060706
   Google Scholar
• Lee, L., Petter, S., Fayard, D., & Robinson, S. (2011). On the use of partial least squares path modeling in accounting research. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 12(4), 305–328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accinf.2011.05.002
   Google Scholar
• Legate, A. E., Hair, J. F., Chretien, J. L., & Risher, J. J. (2022). PLS-SEM: Prediction-oriented solutions for HRD researchers. Human Resource Development Quarterly. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrdq.21466
   Google Scholar
• Liengaard, B. D., Sharma, P. N., Hult, G. T. M., Jensen, M. B., Sarstedt, M., Hair, J. F., & Ringle, C. M. (2021). Prediction: Coveted, yet forsaken? Introducing a cross-validated predictive ability test in partial least squares path modeling. Decision Sciences, 52(2), 362–392. https://doi.org/10.1111/deci.12445
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lohmöller, J.-B. (1989). Latent variable path modeling with partial least squares. Physica.
   Google Scholar
• Manley, S. C., Hair, J. F., Williams, R. I., & McDowell, W. C. (2021). Essential new PLS-SEM analysis methods for your entrepreneurship analytical toolbox. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 17(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-020-00687-6
   Google Scholar
• Marcoulides, G. A., Chin, W. W., & Saunders, C. (2012). When imprecise statistical statements become problematic: A response to Goodhue, Lewis, and Thompson. MIS Quarterly, 36(3), 717–728. https://doi.org/10.2307/41703477
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marcoulides, G. A., & Saunders, C. (2006). PLS: A silver bullet? MIS Quarterly, 30(2), III–IX. https://doi.org/10.2307/25148727
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mason, C. H., & Perreault, W. D. (1991). Collinearity, power, and interpretation of multiple regression analysis. Journal of Marketing Research, 28(3), 268–280. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224379102800302
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matthews, L. (2017). Applying multi-group analysis in PLS-SEM: A step-by-step process. In H. Latan & R. Noonan (Eds.), Partial least squares structural equation modeling: Basic concepts, methodological issues and applications (pp. 219–243). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Memon, M. A., Cheah, J.-H., Ramayah, T., Ting, H., & Chuah, F. (2018). Mediation analysis: Issues and recommendations. Journal of Applied Structural Equation Modeling, 2(1), i–ix. https://doi.org/10.47263/JASEM.2(1)01
   Google Scholar
• Memon, M. A., Cheah, J.-H., Ramayah, T., Ting, H., Chuah, F., & Cham, T. H. (2019). Moderation analysis: Issues and guidelines. Journal of Applied Structural Equation Modeling, 3(1), i–ix. https://doi.org/10.47263/JASEM.3(1)01
   Google Scholar
• Nitzl, C. (2016). The use of partial least squares structural equation modelling (PLS-SEM) in management accounting research: Directions for future theory development. Journal of Accounting Literature, 37(December), 19–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acclit.2016.09.003
   Google Scholar
• Nuzzo, R. (2015). How scientists fool themselves – And how they can stop. Nature, 526(7572), 182–185. https://doi.org/10.1038/526182a
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, S., & Gupta, S. (2012). Handling endogenous regressors by joint estimation using copulas. Marketing Science, 31(4), 567–586. https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.1120.0718
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petter, S. (2018). “Haters gonna hate”: PLS and information systems research. ACM SIGMIS DATABASE: The DATABASE for Advances in Information Systems, 49(2), 10–13.
   Google Scholar
• Petter, S., & Hadavi, Y. (2021). With great power comes great responsibility: The use of partial least squares in information systems research. ACM SIGMIS DATABASE: The DATABASE for Advances in Information Systems, 52(SI), 10–23. https://doi.org/10.1145/3505639.3505643
   Google Scholar
• Radomir, L., & Moisescu, O. I. (2020). Discriminant validity of the customer-based corporate reputation scale: Some causes for concern. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 29(4), 457–469. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPBM-11-2018-2115
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramayah, T., Cheah, J.-H., Chuah, F., Ting, H., & Memon, M. A. (2016). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) using SmartPLS 3.0: An updated and practical guide to statistical analysis. Pearson Malaysia.
   Google Scholar
• Reinartz, W., Haenlein, M., & Henseler, J. (2009). An empirical comparison of the efficacy of covariance-based and variance-based SEM. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 26(4), 332–344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2009.08.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rhemtulla, M., van Bork, R., & Borsboom, D. (2020). Worse than measurement error: Consequences of inappropriate latent variable measurement models. Psychological Methods, 25(1), 30–45. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000220
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richter, N. F., Cepeda Carrión, G., Roldán, J. L., & Ringle, C. M. (2016). European management research using partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM): editorial. European Management Journal, 34(6), 589–597. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2016.08.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richter, N. F., Schubring, S., Hauff, S., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2020). When predictors of outcomes are necessary: Guidelines for the combined use of PLS-SEM and NCA. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 120(12), 2243–2267. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-11-2019-0638
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richter, N. F., Sinkovics, R. R., Ringle, C. M., & Schlägel, C. (2016). A critical look at the use of SEM in international business research. International Marketing Review, 33(3), 376–404. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMR-04-2014-0148
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rigdon, E. E. (2012). Rethinking partial least squares path modeling: In praise of simple methods. Long Range Planning, 45(5–6), 341–358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2012.09.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rigdon, E. E. (2016). Choosing PLS path modeling as analytical method in European management research: A realist perspective. European Management Journal, 34(6), 598–605. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2016.05.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rigdon, E. E., Becker, J.-M., Rai, A., Ringle, C. M., Diamantopoulos, A., Karahanna, E., Straub, D., & Dijkstra, T. K. (2014). Conflating antecedents and formative indicators: A comment on Aguirre-Urreta and Marakas. Information Systems Research, 25(4), 780–784. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2014.0543
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rigdon, E. E., Becker, J.-M., & Sarstedt, M. (2019). Parceling cannot reduce factor indeterminacy in factor analysis: A research note. Psychometrika, 84(3), 772–780. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-019-09677-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rigdon, E. E., & Sarstedt, M. (in press). Accounting for uncertainty in the measurement of unobservable marketing phenomena. In H. Baumgartner & B. Weijters (Eds.) Review of marketing research. Emerald.
   Google Scholar
• Rigdon, E. E., Sarstedt, M., & Becker, J.-M. (2020). Quantify uncertainty in behavioral research. Nature Human Behaviour, 4(4), 329–331. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-019-0806-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rigdon, E. E., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2017). On comparing results from CB-SEM and PLS-SEM. Five perspectives and five recommendations. Marketing ZFP, 39(3), 4–16. https://doi.org/10.15358/0344-1369-2017-3-4
   Google Scholar
• Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M., & Schlittgen, R. (2014). Genetic algorithm segmentation in partial least squares structural equation modeling. OR Spectrum, 36(1), 251–276. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00291-013-0320-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roemer, E. (2016). A tutorial on the use of PLS path modeling in longitudinal studies. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 116(9), 1901–1921. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-07-2015-0317
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rönkkö, M., Antonakis, J., McIntosh, C. N., & Edwards, J. R. (2016). Partial least squares path modeling: Time for some serious second thoughts. Journal of Operations Management, 47-48(November), 9–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2016.05.002
   Google Scholar
• Rönkkö, M., & Evermann, J. (2013). A critical examination of common beliefs about partial least squares path modeling. Organizational Research Methods, 16(3), 425–448. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428112474693
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rönkkö, M., Lee, N., Evermann, J., Antonakis, J., & McIntosh, C. N. (in press). Marketing or methodology? Exposing fallacies of PLS with simple demonstrations. European Journal of Marketing.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russo, D., & Stol, K.-J. (in press). Don’t throw the baby out with the bathwater: Comments on “Recent developments in PLS.” Communications of the Association for Information Systems.
   Google Scholar
• Ryoo, J. H., & Hwang, H. (2017). Model evaluation in generalized structured component analysis using confirmatory tetrad analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 916. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00916
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarstedt, M. (2019). Der Knacks and a Silver Bullet. In B. J. Babin & M. Sarstedt (Eds.), The great facilitator: Reflections on the contributions of Joseph F. Hair, Jr. to marketing and business research (pp. 155–164). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Sarstedt, M., Becker, J.-M., Ringle, C. M., & Schwaiger, M. (2011). Uncovering and treating unobserved heterogeneity with FIMIX-PLS: Which model selection criterion provides an appropriate number of segments? Schmalenbach Business Review, 63(1), 34–62. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03396886
   Google Scholar
• Sarstedt, M., & Danks, N. P. (2021). Prediction in HRM research: A gap between rhetoric and reality. Human Resource Management Journal. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1111/1748-8583.12400
   Google Scholar
• Sarstedt, M., Hair, J. F., Cheah, J.-H., Becker, J.-M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). How to specify, estimate, and validate higher-order constructs in PLS-SEM. Australasian Marketing Journal, 27(3), 197–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ausmj.2019.05.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarstedt, M., Hair, J. F., Nitzl, C., Ringle, C. M., & Howard, M. C. (2020a). Beyond a tandem analysis of SEM and PROCESS: Use of PLS-SEM for mediation analyses! International Journal of Market Research, 62(3), 288–299. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470785320915686
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarstedt, M., Hair, J. F., Pick, M., Liengaard, B. D., Radomir, L., & Ringle, C. M. (2022a). Progress in partial least squares structural equation modeling use in marketing research in the last decade. Psychology & Marketing. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.21640
   Google Scholar
• Sarstedt, M., Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., Thiele, K. O., & Gudergan, S. P. (2016). Estimation issues with PLS and CBSEM: Where the bias lies! Journal of Business Research, 69(10), 3998–4010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.06.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarstedt, M., Henseler, J., & Ringle, C. M. (2011). Multigroup analysis in partial least squares (PLS) path modeling: Alternative methods and empirical results. In M. Sarstedt, M. Schwaiger, & C. R. Taylor (Eds.), Advances in international marketing: Measurement and research methods in international marketing (pp. 195–218). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Sarstedt, M., Radomir, L., Moisescu, O. I., & Ringle, C. M. (2022b). Latent class analysis in PLS-SEM: A review and recommendations for future applications. Journal of Business Research, 138, 398–407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.08.051
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., Cheah, J.-H., Ting, H., Moisescu, O. I., & Radomir, L. (2020b). Structural model robustness checks in PLS-SEM. Tourism Economics, 26(4), 531–554. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354816618823921
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., & Hair, J. F. (2014). PLS-SEM: Looking back and moving forward. Long Range Planning, 47(3), 132–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2014.02.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., & Hair, J. F. (2021). Partial least squares structural equation modeling. In C. Homburg, M. Klarmann, & A. E. Vomberg (Eds.), Handbook of market research (pp. 1–47). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Schlittgen, R., Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M., & Becker, J.-M. (2016). Segmentation of PLS Path models by iterative reweighted regressions. Journal of Business Research, 69(10), 4583–4592. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.04.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneeweiß, H. (1991). Models with latent variables: LISREL versus PLS. Statistica Neerlandica, 45(2), 145–157. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9574.1991.tb01300.x
   Google Scholar
• Schönemann, P. H., & Haagen, K. (1987). On the use of factor scores for prediction. Biometrical Journal, 29(7), 835–847. https://doi.org/10.1002/bimj.4710290712
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuberth, F., & Henseler, J. (in press). Assessing the overall fit of composite models estimated by partial least squares path modeling. European Journal of Marketing.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuberth, F., Henseler, J., & Dijkstra, T. K. (2018). Confirmatory composite analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, article number 2541. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02541
   Google Scholar
• Schwarz, G. (1978). Estimating the dimensions of a model. Annals of Statistics, 6(2), 461–464. https://doi.org/10.1214/aos/1176344136
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma, P. N., Liengaard, B. D., Hair, J. F., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (in press-a). Predictive model assessment and selection in composite-based modeling using PLS-SEM: Extensions and guidelines for using CVPAT. European Journal of Marketing.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma, P. N., Liengaard, B. D., Sarstedt, M., Hair, J. F., & Ringle, C. M. (in press-b). Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence: A comment on “the Recent developments in PLS.” Communications of the Association for Information Systems.
   Google Scholar
• Sharma, P. N., Sarstedt, M., Shmueli, G., Kim, K. H., & Thiele, K. O. (2019). PLS-based model selection: The role of alternative explanations in information systems research. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 20(4), 346–397. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00538
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma, P. N., Shmueli, G., Sarstedt, M., Danks, N., & Ray, S. (2021). Prediction-oriented model selection in partial least squares path modeling. Decision Sciences, 52(3), 567–607. https://doi.org/10.1111/deci.12329
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shmueli, G. (2010). To explain or to predict? Statistical Science, 25(3), 289–310. https://doi.org/10.1214/10-STS330
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shmueli, G., & Koppius, O. R. (2011). Predictive analytics in information systems research. MIS Quarterly, 35(3), 553–572. https://doi.org/10.2307/23042796
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shmueli, G., Ray, S., Velasquez Estrada, J. M., & Chatla, S. B. (2016). The elephant in the room: Evaluating the predictive performance of PLS models. Journal of Business Research, 69(10), 4552–4564. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.03.049
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shmueli, G., Sarstedt, M., Hair, J. F., Cheah, J., Ting, H., Vaithilingam, S., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). Predictive model assessment in PLS-SEM: Guidelines for using PLSpredict. European Journal of Marketing, 53(11), 2322–2347. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJM-02-2019-0189
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sosik, J. J., Kahai, S. S., & Piovoso, M. J. (2009). Silver bullet or voodoo statistics? A primer for using the partial least squares data analytic technique in group and organization research. Group Organization Management, 34(1), 5–36. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601108329198
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Streukens, S., & Leroi-Werelds, S. (2016). Bootstrapping and PLS-SEM: A step-by-step guide to get more out of your bootstrap results. European Management Journal, 34(6), 618–632. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2016.06.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tenenhaus, M., Esposito Vinzi, V., Chatelin, Y.-M., & Lauro, C. (2005). PLS path modeling. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 48(1), 159–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csda.2004.03.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voorhees, C. M., Brady, M. K., Calantone, R., & Ramirez, E. (2016). Discriminant validity testing in marketing: An analysis, causes for concern and proposed remedies. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 44(1), 119–134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, H., Lu, S., & Liu, Y. (2022). Missing data imputation in PLS-SEM. Quality & Quantity. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-022-01338-4
   Google Scholar
• Wold, H. (1982). Soft modeling: The basic design and some extensions. In K. G. Jöreskog & H. Wold (Eds.), Systems under indirect observations: Part II (pp. 1–54). North-Holland.
   Google Scholar