Neoliberalism With a Community Face? A Critical Analysis of Asset-Based Community Development in Scotland

REFERENCES

• ABCD Institute. (n.d.). Cormac Russell. Retrieved from http://www.abcdinstitute.org/faculty/russell/
   Google Scholar
• Ackerly, B., & True, J. (2010). Doing feminist research in political and social science. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Alinsky, S. D. (1971). Rules for radicals: A pragmatic primer for realistic radicals. New York, NY: Vintage.
   Google Scholar
• Alinsky, S. D. (1989). Reveille for radicals. New York: Vintage. (Original work published 1946)
   Google Scholar
• Amin, A. ( Ed.). (1994). Post-Fordism: A reader. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Bechhofer, F., & Paterson, L. (2000). Principles of research design in the social sciences. London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Block, F., Cloward, R. A., & Ehrenreich, B. (1987). The mean season: The attack on the welfare state. New York, NY: Pantheon.
   Google Scholar
• Boyte, H. (1980). The backyard revolution. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cameron, D. (2012, June 25). Welfare speech. Retrieved from http://www.number10.gov.uk/news/welfare-speech/
   Google Scholar
• Canovan, M. (1999). Trust the people! Populism and the two faces of democracy. Political Studies, 47(1), 2–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke, J., & Newman, J. (2012). The alchemy of austerity. Critical Social Policy, 32(3), 299–319.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craig, C. (2003). The Scots’ crisis of confidence. Edinburgh, UK: Big Thinking.
   Google Scholar
• Cresswell, J. W., & Miller, D. L. (2000). Determining validity in qualitative inquiry. Theory into Practice, 39, 124–130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crowther, J., & Shaw, M. (2011). Education for resilience and resistance in the “Big Society”. In D. Cole ( Ed.), Surviving economic crises through education. Franfurt Am Main, Germany: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Ehrenreich, B. (2010). Smile or die: How positive thinking fooled America and the world. London, England: Granta.
   Google Scholar
• Emejulu, A. (2011). Can “the people” be feminists? Analysing the fate of feminist justice claims in populist grassroots movements in the United States. Interface: Special Issue on Feminism, Women’s Movements and Women in Movements, 3(2), 123–151.
   Google Scholar
• Emejulu, A. (2013). Searching for the state and the market in American community development: Reflections on editing Community Development in the Steel City. Community Development Journal, 48(1), 158–162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emejulu, A. (forthcoming). Community development as micropolitics: Comparing theories, policies and politics in America and Britain. Bristol, UK: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ferguson, I. (2010). An attitude problem? Confidence and well-being in Scotland. In N. Davidson, P. McCafferty, & D. Miller ( Eds.), Neoliberal Scotland: Class and society in a stateless nation ( pp. 295–314). Newcastle upon Tyne, England: Cambridge Scholars.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, R. (1994). Let the people decide: Neighbourhood organizing in America. Boston. MA: Twayne.
   Google Scholar
• Fontana, A., & Frey, J. H. (2008). The interview: From neutral stance to political involvement. In N. K. Denzin, & Y. S. Lincoln ( Eds.), Collecting and interpreting qualitative materials (pp. 47–78). London, England: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Foot, J. (2012). What makes us healthy? The asset approach in action: Evidence, action, evaluation. Retrieved from http://www.scdc.org.uk/media/resources/assets-alliance/What%20makes%20us%20healthy.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Foot, J., & Hopkins, T. (2010). A glass half full: How an asset approach can improve community health and wellbeing. London, UK: Improvement and Development Agency.
   Google Scholar
• Friedli, L. (2011). Always look on the bright side of life: The rise of asset approaches in Scotland. Scottish Anti-Poverty Review. Glasgow, Scotland: The Poverty Alliance. Retrieved from http://povertyalliance.org/news_pubs/sapr/sapr_winter2011_2012
   Google Scholar
• Hammersley, M. (2000). Taking sides in social research: Essays on partisanship and bias. Milton Keynes, UK: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hanlon, P., Walsh D., & Whyte B. (2006). Let Glasgow flourish: A comprehensive report on health and its determinants in Glasgow and West Central Scotland. Glasgow, Scotland: Glasgow Centre for Population Health.
   Google Scholar
• Harding, S. ( Ed.). (1987). Feminism and methodology. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harding, S. ( Ed.). (2004). The feminist standpoint theory reader: Intellectual and political controversies. London, England: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, K. (2011, June 23). Isn’t all community development asset-based? Guardian Online. Retrieved from http://www.guardian.co.uk/voluntary-sector-network/2011/jun/23/community-development-comes-age
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, D. (2006). A brief history of neoliberalism. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Holstein, J. A., & Gubrium, J. F. (2004). Active interviewing. In D. Silverman ( Ed.), Qualitative research: Theory, method and practice ( pp. 140–61). London, England: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• International Association of Community Development. (2011). Appreciating assets. Dunfermline, UK: Carnegie Trust.
   Google Scholar
• International Association of Community Development. (2012). Shaking our assets: Conference report. Retrieved from http://www.iacdglobal.org/files/Shaking_Our_Assets_report_FINAL.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Katz, M. (2008). The price of citizenship: Redefining the American welfare state. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kazin, M. (1998). The populist persuasion: An American history. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kretzmann, J. (n.d.). Community organising in the eighties: Towards a post-Alinsky agenda. Retrieved from http://www.citizenhandbook.org/postalinsky.html
   Google Scholar
• Kretzmann, J. (1995). Building communities from the inside out. Shelterforce Online (September/October). Retrieved from http://www.nhi.org/online/issues/83/buildcomm.html
   Google Scholar
• Kretzmann, J., & McKnight, J. (1993). Building communities from the inside out: A path toward finding and mobilizing a community’s assets. Skokie, IL: ACTA Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Kretzmann, J., & McKnight, J. (1997). A guide to capacity inventories: Mobilising the community skills of local residents. Evanston, IL: ABCD Institute.
   Google Scholar
• May, T. (2001). Social research. Issues, methods and process. Buckingham, England: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marmot, M. (2010). Fair society, healthy lives: The Marmot review. London, England: Marmot Review.
   Google Scholar
• Mathie, A., & Cunningham, G. (2003). From clients to citizens: Asset-based community development as a strategy for community-driven development. Development in Practice, 13(5), 474–486.
   Google Scholar
• McKnight, J. (1995). The careless society. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• McKnight, J. (2010). Asset mapping in communities. In A. Morgan, E. Ziglio, & M. Davies ( Eds.), Health assets in a global context (pp. 59–76). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• McKnight, J., & Block, P. (2010). The abundant community. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler.
   Google Scholar
• McLean, J. (2011). Asset based approaches for health improvement: Redressing the balance. Briefing Paper 9. Glasgow Scotland: Glasgow Centre for Population Health. Retrieved from http://www.gcph.co.uk/assets/0000/2627/GCPH_Briefing_Paper_CS9web.pdf
   Google Scholar
• McQuarrie, M. (2013). Community organizations in the foreclosure crisis: The failure of neoliberal civil society. Politics & Society, 41(1), 73–101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NHS North West. (2011). Development of a method for asset based working. Manchester, UK NHS North West and Department of Health.
   Google Scholar
• Mills, C. W. (1959). The sociological imagination. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Paterson, L., & Bechofer, F. (2000). Principles of research design in the social sciences. London, England: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Peirce, W. R., & Steinbach, C. F. (1987). Corrective capitalism: The rise of America’s community development corporations. New York, NY: Ford Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Piven, F. F. & Cloward, R. (1979). Poor people’s movements: Why they succeed and how they fail. New York, NY: Pantheon.
   Google Scholar
• Russell, C. (2011). The 12 domains of people powered change. Retrieved from http://issuu.com/cormac_russell/docs/12_domains_of_people_powered_change
   Google Scholar
• Saldaña, J. (2011). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. London, England: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Scottish Community Development Centre. (2011). Assets in action: A case study of asset-based community development in North Glasgow. Glasgow, Scotland: SCDC. Retrieved from http://www.scdc.org.uk/media/resources/what-we-do/policy-and-practice/Assets%20in%20Action.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Scottish Government. (2010). Annual report of the Chief Medical Officer, health in Scotland 2009 time for change. Edinburgh, Scotland: NHS Scotland and Scottish Government.
   Google Scholar
• Smock, K. (1997). Comprehensive community initiatives: A new generation of urban revitalization strategies. Retrieved from http://comm-org.wisc.edu/papers97/smock/cciweb2.htm
   Google Scholar
• Sommerlad, H., & Sanderson, P. (2013). Social justice on the margins: The future of the not for profit sector as providers of legal advice in England and Wales. Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law, 35, 305–327.
   Google Scholar
• Sosenko, F., Netto, G., Emejulu, A., & Bassel, L. (2013). Init together? Ethnicity, austerity and recession in three Glasgow communities. Glasgow, Scotland: Coalition for Racial Equality and Rights.
   Google Scholar
• Stoecker, R. (2001). Community development and community organizing: Apples and oranges? Chicken and egg? In R. Hayduk, B. & Shepard ( Eds.), From ACT UP to the WTO: Urban protest and community building in the era of globalization (pp. 378–388). New York, NY: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor-Gooby, P. (2011). Root and branch restructuring to achieve major cuts: The social policy programme of the 2010 UK coalition government. Social Policy and Administration, 46(1), 1–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor-Gooby, P., & Stoeker, G. (2010). The coalition programme: A new vision for Britain or politics as usual? Political Quarterly, 82(1), 4–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiggan, J. (2012). Telling stories of 21st century welfare: The UK coalition government and the neoliberal discourse of worklessness and dependency. Critical Social Policy. 32(3), 1–23.
   Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, R., & Pickett, K. (2010). The spirit level: Why equality is better for everyone. London, England: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Yeates N., Haux, T., Jawad, R., & Kilkey, M. ( Eds.). (2011). In defence of welfare The impact of the spending review. Social Policy Association. Retrieved from http://www.social-policy.org.uk/downloads/idow.pdf
   Google Scholar