A Comparison of Diagonal Weighted Least Squares Robust Estimation Techniques for Ordinal Data

REFERENCES

• Asparouhov, T., & Muthén, B. (2010). Computing the strictly positive Satorra-Bentler chi-square test in Mplus. Retrieved from http://www.statmodel.com/download/webnotes/webnote12.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Bandalos, D. L. (2008). Is parceling really necessary? A comparison of results from item parceling and categorical variable methodology. Structural Equation Modeling, 15, 211–240.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandalos, D. L. (2011). Performance of the ML, MLMV, WLSMV, and WLS estimators under model misspecification, nonnormality, and coarse categorization. Unpublished manuscript.
   Google Scholar
• Bandalos, D. L., & Webb, M. (2005, April). Efficacy of the WLSMV estimator for coarsely categorized and nonnormally distributed data. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Beauducel, A., & Herzberg, P. Y. (2006). On the performance of maximum likelihood versus mean and variance adjusted weighted least squares estimation in CFA. Structural Equation Modeling, 13, 186–203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• DiStefano, C. (2002). The impact of categorization with confirmatory factor analysis. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 327–346.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DiStefano, C., & Hess, B. (2005). Using confirmatory factor analysis for construct validation: An empirical review. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 23, 225–241.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DiStefano, C., & Seaman, M. A. (2007, April). A comparison of three robust estimators using categorical data. Paper presented at the annual conference of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.
   Google Scholar
• Finney, S. J., & DiStefano, C. (2006). Nonnormal and categorical data in structural equation modeling. In G. R. Hancock & R. O. Mueller (Eds.), Structural equation modeling: A second course (pp. 269–314). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
   Google Scholar
• Flora, D. B., & Curran, P. J. (2004). An empirical evaluation of alternative methods of estimation for confirmatory factor analysis with ordinal data. Psychological Methods, 9, 466–491.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forero, C. G., Maydeu-Olivares, A., & Gallardo-Pujol, D. (2009). Factor analysis with ordinal indicators: A Monte Carlo study comparing DWLS and ULS estimation. Structural Equation Modeling, 16, 625–641.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foss, T., Jöreskog, K. G., & Olsson, U. H. (2011). Testing structural equation models: The effect of kurtosis. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis, 55, 2263–2275.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoogland, J. J., & Boomsma, A. (1998). Robustness studies in covariance structure modeling: An overview and a meta-analysis. Sociological Methods & Research, 26, 329–367.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutchinson, S. R., & Olmos, A. (1998). Behavior of descriptive fit indices in confirmatory factor analysis using ordered categorical data. Structural Equation Modeling, 5, 344–364.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, D. L., Gillaspy, J. A., & Purc-Stephenson, R. (2009). Reporting practices in confirmatory factor analysis: An overview and some recommendations. Psychological Methods, 14, 6–23.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jöreskog, K. G. (1994). On chi-squares for the independence model and fit measures in LISREL. Retrieved from http://www.ssicentral.com/lisrel/techdocs/ftb.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Jöreskog, K. G. (2004). On chi-squares for the independence model and fit measures in LISREL Retrieved from http://ssicentral.com/lisrel/techdocs/ordinal.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Jöreskog, K., & Sörbom, D. (1996). PRELIS 2: User’s reference guide. Chicago, IL: Scientific Software International.
   Google Scholar
• Jöreskog, K., Sörbom, D., du Toit, S., & du Toit, M. (2000). LISREL 8: New statistical features. Chicago: Scientific Software International.
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan, D. (2000). Structural equation modeling: Foundations and extensions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Lei, P. W. (2009). Evaluating estimation methods for ordinal data in structural equation modeling. Quality & Quantity, 43, 495–507.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maydeu-Olivares, A. (2006). Limited information estimation and testing of discretized multivariate normal structural models. Psychometrika, 71, 57–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muthén, B. O. (1993). Goodness of fit with categorical and other nonnormal variables. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 205–243). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Muthén, B. O. (1998–2004). Mplus technical appendices. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén. Retrieved from http://www.statmodel.com/download/techappen.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Muthén, B. O., du Toit, S., & Spisic, D. (1997). Robust inference using weighted least squares and quadratic estimating equations in latent variable modeling with categorical and continuous outcomes. Unpublished manuscript.
   Google Scholar
• Muthén, B. O., & Kaplan, D. (1985). A comparison of some methodologies for the factor analysis of nonnormal Likert variables. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 38, 171–189.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muthén, L. (2008). Baseline model in Mplus. Retrieved from http://www.statmodel.com/discussion/messages/11/3602.html?1223049639
   Google Scholar
• Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2006). Mplus user’s guide (4th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
   Google Scholar
• Olsson, U. H., Foss, T., Troye, S. V., & Howell, R. D. (2000). The performance of ML, GLS, and WLS estimation in structural equation modeling under conditions of misspecification and nonnormality. Structural Equation Modeling, 7, 557–595.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oranje, A. (2003, April). Comparison of estimation methods in factor analysis with categorized variables: Applications to NAEP data. Paper presented at the annual conference of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.
   Google Scholar
• Potthast, M. J. (1993). Confirmatory factor analysis of ordered categorical variables with large models. British Journal of Mathematical & Statistical Psychology, 46, 273–286.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rhemtulla, M., Brosseau-Liard, P., & Savalei, V. (2012). When can categorical variables be treated as continuous? A comparison of robust continuous and categorical SEM estimation methods under suboptimal conditions. Psychological Methods, 17, 354–373.
   Google Scholar
• Satorra, A., & Bentler, P. M. (1988). Scaling corrections for chi-square statistics in covariance structure analysis. Proceedings of the Business and Economic Statistics Section of the American Statistical Association, 308–313.
   Google Scholar
• Schreiber, J. B., Stage, F. K., King, J., Nora, A., & Barlow, E. A. (2006). Reporting structural equation modeling and confirmatory factor analysis results: A review. Journal of Educational Research, 99, 323–337.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• West, S. G., Finch, J. F., & Curran, P. J. (1995). Structural equation models with nonnormal variables: Problems and remedies. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications (pp. 56–75). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Wirth, R. J., & Edwards, M. C. (2007). Item factor analysis: Current approaches and future directions. Psychological Methods, 12(3), 58–79.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang-Wallentin, F., Jöreskog, K. G., & Luo, H. (2010). Confirmatory factor analysis of ordinal variables with misspecified models. Structural Equation Modeling, 17, 392–423.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, C.-Y., & Muthén, B. (2002, April). Evaluation of model fit indices for latent variable models with categorical and continuous outcomes. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
   Google Scholar