3,410
Views
41
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Relating Latent Change Score and Continuous Time Models

&

REFERENCES

  • Arminger, G. (1986). Linear stochastic differential equations for panel data with unobserved variables. Sociological Methodology, 16, 187–212.
  • Asparouhov, T., Masyn, K., & Muthén, B. (2006). Continuous time survival in latent variable models. In 2006 Proceedings of the American Statistical Association, Biometrics Section (pp. 180–187). Alexandria, VA: American Statistical Association.
  • Baltes, P. B., & Nesselroade, J. R. (1979). History and rationale of longitudinal research. In J. R. Nesselroade & P. B. Baltes (Eds.), Longitudinal research in the study of behavior and development (pp. 1–39). New York, NY: Academic.
  • Bartlett, M. S. (1946). On the theoretical specification and sampling properties of autocorrelated time-series. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 7(Suppl.), 27–41.
  • Bergstrom, A. R. (1988). The history of continuous-time econometric models. Econometric Theory, 4, 365–383.
  • Bielak, A. A., Gerstorf, D., Kiely, K. M., Anstey, K. J., & Luszcz, M. (2011). Depressive symptoms predict decline in perceptual speed in older adulthood. Psychology and Aging, 26, 576–583.
  • Boker, S. M., Neale, M., Maes, H., Wilde, M., Spiegel, M., Brick, T., Spies, J., Estabrook, R., Kenny, S., Bates, T., Mehta, P., & Fox, J. (2011). OpenMx: An open source extended structural equation modeling framework. Psychometrika, 76, 306–317. doi:10.1007/S11336-010-9200-6
  • Boker, S. M., & Wenger, M. J. (Eds.). (2007). Data analytic techniques for dynamical systems. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York, NY: Wiley.
  • Bollen, K. A., & Curran, P. J. (2004). Autoregressive latent trajectory (ALT) models: A synthesis of two traditions. Sociological Methods & Research, 32, 336–383. doi:10.1177/0049124103260222
  • Bollen, K. A., & Curran, P. J. (2006). Latent curve models: A structural equation perspective. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
  • Bradway, K. P., & Thompson, C. W. (1962). Intelligence at adulthood: A twenty-five year follow-up. Journal of Educational Psychology, 53, 1–14. doi:10.1037/h0045764
  • Chow, S.-M., Ho, M.-h. R., Hamaker, E. L., & Dolan, C. V. (2010). Equivalence and differences between structural equation modeling and state-space modeling techniques. Structural Equation Modeling, 17, 303–332. doi:10.1080/10705511003661553
  • Coleman, J. S. (1968). The mathematical study of change. In H. M. Blalock & A. Blalock (Eds.), Methodology in social research (pp. 428–478). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
  • Duncan, T. E., Duncan, S. C., & Strycker, L. A. (2006). An introduction to latent variable growth curve modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Du Toit, S., & Browne, M. W. (2001). The covariance structure of a vector ARMA time series. In R. Cudeck, S. du Toit, & D. Sörbom (Eds.), Structural equation modeling: Present and future—A festschrift in honor of Karl Jöreskog (pp. 297–314). Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International.
  • Emery, C. F., Finkel, D., & Pedersen, N. L. (2012). Pulmonary function as a cause of cognitive aging. Psychological Science, 23, 1024–1032. doi:10.1177/0956797612439422
  • Gerstorf, D., Lövdén, M., Röcke, C., Smith, J., & Lindenberger, U. (2007). Well-being affects changes in perceptual speed in advanced old age: Longitudinal evidence for a dynamic link. Developmental Psychology, 43, 705–718. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.43.3.705
  • Ghisletta, P., & Lindenberger, U. (2003). Age-based structural dynamics between perceptual speed and knowledge in the Berlin Aging Study: Direct evidence for ability dedifferentiation in old age. Psychology and Aging, 18, 696–713.
  • Ghisletta, P., & Lindenberger, U. (2004). Static and dynamic longitudinal structural analyses of cognitive changes in old age. Gerontology, 50, 12–16.
  • Ghisletta, P., & Lindenberger, U. (2005). Exploring structural dynamics within and between sensory and intellectual functioning in old and very old age: Longitudinal evidence from the Berlin Aging Study. Intelligence, 33, 555–587. doi:10.1016/j.inte11.2005.07.002
  • Gulliksen, H. (1950). Theory of mental tests. New York, NY: Wiley.
  • Halaby, C. N. (2004). Panel models in sociological research: Theory into practice. Annual Review of Sociology, 30, 507–544.
  • Hamagami, F., & McArdle, J. J. (2001). Advanced studies of individual differences linear dynamic models for longitudinal data analysis. In G. A. Marcoulides & R. E. Schumacker (Eds.), New developments and techniques in structural equation modeling (pp. 203–246). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Hox, J. (2010). Multilevel analysis: Techniques and applications (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Jöreskog, K. G. (1970). Estimation and testing of simplex models. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 23, 121–145. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8317.1970.tb00439.x
  • Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1977). Statistical models and methods for analysis of longitudinal data. In D. J. Aigner & A. S. Goldberger (Eds.), Latent variables in socioeconomic models (pp. 285–325). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: North Holland.
  • Lord, F. M., & Novick, M. R. (1968). Statistical theories of mental test scores. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
  • McArdle, J. J. (1986). Latent variable growth within behavior genetic models. Behavior Genetics, 16, 163–200.
  • McArdle, J. J. (2001). A latent difference score approach to longitudinal dynamic structural analysis. In R. Cudeck, S. Du Toit, & D. Sörbom (Eds.), Structural equation modeling: Present and future (pp. 342–380). Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International.
  • McArdle, J. J. (2009). Latent variable modeling of differences and changes with longitudinal data. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 577–605. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163612
  • McArdle, J. J., & Hamagami, F. (2001). Latent difference score structural models for linear dynamic analyses with incomplete longitudinal data. In L. Collins & A. Sayer (Eds.), New methods for the analysis of change (pp. 139–175). Washington, DC: APA Press.
  • McArdle, J. J., & Hamagami, F. (2004). Methods for dynamic change hypotheses. In K. van Montfort, J. H. L. Oud, & A. Satorra (Eds.), Recent developments on structural equation models (pp. 295–335). Dorderecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
  • McArdle, J. J., Hamagami, F., Meredith, W., & Bradway, K. P. (2000). Modeling the dynamic hypotheses of Gf–Gc theory using longitudinal life-span data. Learning and Individual Differences, 12, 53–79. doi:10.1016/s1041-6080(00)00036-4
  • McArdle, J. J., & Woodcock, R. W. (1997). Expanding test–retest designs to include developmental time-lag components. Psychological Methods, 2, 403–435. doi:10.1037/1082-989x.2.4.403
  • Mehta, P. D., & Neale, M. C. (2005). People are variables too: Multilevel structural equation modeling. Psychological Methods, 10, 259–284.
  • Meredith, W., & Tisak, J. (1990). Latent curve analysis. Psychometrika, 55, 107–122.
  • Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998–2012). Mplus user’s guide (7th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
  • Neale, M. C., Boker, S. M., Xie, G., & Maes, H. H. (2003). Mx: Statistical modeling (6th ed.). Richmond, VA: Department of Psychiatry, Virginia Commonwealth University.
  • Oud, J. H. L. (2007a). Comparison of four procedures to estimate the damped linear differential oscillator for panel data. In K. van Montfort, J. H. L. Oud, & A. Satorra (Eds.), Longitudinal models in the behavioral and related sciences (pp. 19–39). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Oud, J. H. L. (2007b). Continuous time modeling of reciprocal relationships in the cross-lagged panel design. In S. M. Boker & M. J. Wenger (Eds.), Data analytic techniques for dynamical systems (pp. 87–129): Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Oud, J. H. L. (2010). Second-order stochastic differential equation model as an alternative for the ALT and CALT models. Advances in Statistical Analysis, 94, 203–215. doi:10.1007/s10182-010-0131-4
  • Oud, J. H. L., & Delsing, M. J. M. H. (2010). Continuous time modeling of panel data by means of SEM. In K. van Montfort, J. H. L. Oud, & A. Satorra (Eds.), Longitudinal research with latent variables (pp. 201–244). New York, NY: Springer.
  • Oud, J. H. L., & Folmer, H. (2011). Modeling oscillation: Approximately or exactly? Multivariate Behavioral Research, 46, 985–993.
  • Oud, J. H. L., & Jansen, R. A. R. G. (2000). Continuous time state space modeling of panel data by means of SEM. Psychometrika, 65, 199–215. doi:10.1007/BF02294374
  • Pinheiro, J. C., & Bates, D. M. (2000). Mixed-effects models in S and S-plus. New York, NY: Springer.
  • R Development Core Team. (2012). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
  • Rindskopf, D. (1984). Using phantom and imaginary latent variables to parameterize constraints in linear structural models. Psychometrika, 49, 37–47. doi:10.1007/bf02294204
  • Sargent-Cox, K. A., Anstey, K. J., & Luszcz, M. A. (2012). The relationship between change in self-perceptions of aging and physical functioning in older adults. Psychology and Aging, 27, 750–760. doi:10.1037/a0027578
  • Simon, H. A. (1952). A formal theory of interaction in social groups. American Sociological Review, 17, 202–211. doi:10.2307/2087661
  • Singer, H. (2012). SEM modeling with singular moment matrices. Part II: ML-estimation of sampled stochastic differential equations. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 36, 22–43. doi:10.1080/0022250x.2010.532259
  • Singer, J. D., & Willett, J. B. (2003). Applied longitudinal data analysis: Modeling change and event occurrence. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  • Tuma, N. B., & Hannan, M. T. (1984). Social dynamics: Models and methods. Orlando, FL: Academic.
  • Voelkle, M. C. (2008). Reconsidering the use of autoregressive latent trajectory (ALT) models. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 43, 564–591. doi:10.1080/00273170802490665
  • Voelkle, M. C., & Oud, J. H. L. (2013). Continuous time modelling with individually varying time intervals for oscillating and non-oscillating processes. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 103–126. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8317.2012.02043.x
  • Voelkle, M. C., Oud, J. H. L., Davidov, E., & Schmidt, P. (2012). An SEM approach to continuous time modeling of panel data: Relating authoritarianism and anomia. Psychological Methods, 17, 176–192. doi:10.1037/a0027543
  • Zadeh, L. A., & Desoer, C. A. (1963). Linear system theory: The state space approach. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.