An Empirical Assessment of the Sensitivity of Mixture Models to Changes in Measurement

REFERENCES

• Akaike, H. (1998). Information theory and an extension of the maximum likelihood principle. In Parzen, E., Tanabe, K., Kitagawa, G.(Eds.) Selected papers of Hirotugu Akaike (pp. 199–213). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed., text rev.). Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Bauer, D. J., & Curran, P. J. (2003). Distributional assumptions of growth mixture models: Implications for overextraction of latent trajectory classes. Psychological Methods, 8, 338–363. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.8.3.338
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauer, D. J., & Curran, P. J. (2004). The integration of continuous and discrete latent variable models: Potential problems and promising opportunities. Psychological Methods, 9, 3–29. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.9.1.3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beseler, C. L., Taylor, L. A., Kraemer, D. T., & Leeman, R. F. (2012). A latent class analysis of DSM–IV alcohol use disorder criteria and binge drinking in undergraduates. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 36, 153–161. doi:10.1111/acer.2011.36.issue-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bucholz, K. K., Cadoret, R., Cloninger, C., Dinwiddie, S. H., Hesselbrock, V. M., Nurnberger, J. I., … Schuckit, M. A. (1994). A new, semi-structured psychiatric interview for use in genetic linkage studies: A report on the reliability of the SSAGA. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 55, 149–158. doi:10.15288/jsa.1994.55.149
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chung, T., & Martin, C. S. (2001). Classification and course of alcohol problems among adolescents in addictions treatment programs. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 25, 1734–1742. doi:10.1111/acer.2001.25.issue-12
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, S. L., Muthén, B., Kaprio, J., D’Onofrio, B. M., Viken, R., & Rose, R. J. (2013). Models and strategies for factor mixture analysis: An example concerning the structure underlying psychological disorders. Structural Equation Modeling, 20, 681–703. doi:10.1080/10705511.2013.824786
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clogg, C. C., & Goodman, L. A. (1984). Latent structure analysis of a set of multidimensional contingency tables. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 79, 762–771. doi:10.1080/01621459.1984.10477093
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crow, S. J., Swanson, S. A., Peterson, C. B., Crosby, R. D., Wonderlich, S. A., & Mitchell, J. E. (2012). Latent class analysis of eating disorders: Relationship to mortality. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 121, 225–231. doi:10.1037/a0024455
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eggleston, E. P., Laub, J. H., & Sampson, R. J. (2004). Methodological sensitivities to latent class analysis of long-term criminal trajectories. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 20(1), 1–26. doi:10.1023/B:JOQC.0000016696.02763.ce
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fraley, C., & Raftery, A. E. (2002). Model-based clustering, discriminant analysis, and density estimation. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 97, 611–631. doi:10.1198/016214502760047131
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fromme, K., Stroot, E. A., & Kaplan, D. (1993). Comprehensive effects of alcohol: Development and psychometric assessment of a new expectancy questionnaire. Psychological Assessment, 5(1), 19–26. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.5.1.19
   Google Scholar
• Hill, C. D., Edwards, M. C., Thissen, D., Langer, M. M., Wirth, R. J., Burwinkle, T. M., & Varni, J. W. (2007). Practical issues in the application of item response theory: A demonstration using items from the pediatric quality of life inventory (PedsQL) 4.0 generic core scales. Medical Care, 45, S39–S47. doi:10.1097/01.mlr.0000259879.05499.eb
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, G. H., & Bandeen-Roche, K. (2004). Building an identifiable latent class model with covariate effects on underlying and measured variables. Psychometrika, 69, 5–32. doi:10.1007/BF02295837
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hubert, L., & Arabie, P. (1985). Comparing partitions. Journal of Classification, 2, 193–218. doi:10.1007/BF01908075
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hussong, A. M., Curran, P. J., & Bauer, D. J. (2013). Integrative data analysis in clinical psychology research. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 9, 61–89. doi:10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-050212-185522
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, K. M., Bucholz, K. K., Wood, P. K., Steinley, D., Grant, J. D., & Sher, K. J. (2014). Towards the characterization and validation of alcohol use disorder subtypes: Integrating consumption and symptom data. Psychological Medicine, 44(1), 143–159.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, K. M., & Sher, K. J. (2005). Similarities and differences of longitudinal phenotypes across alternate indices of alcohol involvement: A methodologic comparison of trajectory approaches. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 19, 339–351. doi:10.1037/0893-164X.19.4.339
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, K. M., & Sher, K. J. (2006). Comparison of longitudinal phenotypes based on number and timing of assessments: A systematic comparison of trajectory approaches II. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 20, 373–384. doi:10.1037/0893-164X.20.4.373
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, K. M., & Sher, K. J. (2008). Comparison of longitudinal phenotypes based on alternate heavy drinking cut scores: A systematic comparison of trajectory approaches III. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 22, 198–209. doi:10.1037/0893-164X.22.2.198
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, N., Denny, S., Sheridan, J., Fleming, T., Clark, T., Teevale, T., & Ameratunga, S. (2014). Predictors of drinking patterns in adolescence: A latent class analysis. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 135, 133–139. doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2013.11.021
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kushner, M. G., Sher, K. J., Wood, M. D., & Wood, P. K. (1994). Anxiety and drinking behavior: Moderating effects of tension-reduction alcohol outcome expectancies. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 18, 852–860. doi:10.1111/acer.1994.18.issue-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• La Flair, L. N., Bradshaw, C. P., Storr, C. L., Green, K. M., Alvanzo, A. A., & Crum, R. M. (2012). Intimate partner violence and patterns of alcohol abuse and dependence criteria among women: A latent class analysis. Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, 73, 351–360. doi:10.15288/jsad.2012.73.351
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• La Flair, L. N., Reboussin, B. A., Storr, C. L., Letourneau, E., Green, K. M., Mojtabai, R., … Crum, R. M. (2013). Childhood abuse and neglect and transitions in stages of alcohol involvement among women: A latent transition analysis approach. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 132, 491–498. doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2013.03.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lazarsfeld, P. F., & Henry, N. W. (1968). Latent structure analysis. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
   Google Scholar
• Lo, Y., Mendell, N. R., & Rubin, D. B. (2001). Testing the number of components in a normal mixture. Biometrika, 88, 767–778. doi:10.1093/biomet/88.3.767
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lubke, G. H., & Miller, P. J. (2015). Does nature have joints worth carving? A discussion of taxometrics, model-based clustering and latent variable mixture modeling. Psychological Medicine, 45, 705–715. doi:10.1017/S003329171400169X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lubke, G. H., & Muthén, B. (2005). Investigating population heterogeneity with factor mixture models. Psychological Methods, 10, 21–39. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.10.1.21
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lubke, G., & Muthén, B. O. (2007). Performance of factor mixture models as a function of model size, covariate effects, and class-specific parameters. Structural Equation Modeling, 14, 26–47. doi:10.1080/10705510709336735
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lubke, G., & Neale, M. C. (2006). Distinguishing between latent classes and continuous factors: Resolution by maximum likelihood?. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 41(4), 499–532.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lubke, G., & Neale, M. (2008). Distinguishing between latent classes and continuous factors with categorical outcomes: Class invariance of parameters of factor mixture models. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 43, 592–620. doi:10.1080/00273170802490673
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynskey, M. T., Nelson, E. C., Neuman, R. J., Bucholz, K. K., Madden, P. A., Knopik, V. S., … Heath, A. C. (2005). Limitations of DSM–IV operationalizations of alcohol abuse and dependence in a sample of Australian twins. Twin Research and Human Genetics, 8, 574–584. doi:10.1375/twin.8.6.574
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mancha, B. E., Hulbert, A., & Latimer, W. W. (2012). A latent class analysis of alcohol abuse and dependence symptoms among Puerto Rican youth. Substance Use & Misuse, 47, 429–441. doi:10.3109/10826084.2011.643525
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLachlan, G., & Peel, D. (2000). Finite mixture models. New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Meehl, P. E. (1995). Bootstraps taxometrics: Solving the classification problem in psychopathology. American Psychologist, 50, 266–275. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.50.4.266
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mellenbergh, G. J. (1989). Item bias and item response theory. International Journal of Educational Research, 13, 127–143. doi:10.1016/0883-0355(89)90002-5
   Google Scholar
• Meredith, W. (1993). Measurement invariance, factor analysis and factorial invariance. Psychometrika, 58, 525–543. doi:10.1007/BF02294825
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, E. T., Neal, D. J., Roberts, L. J., Baer, J. S., Cressler, S. O., Metrik, J., & Marlatt, G. A. (2002). Test–retest reliability of alcohol measures: Is there a difference between Internet-based assessment and traditional methods? Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 16(1), 56–63. doi:10.1037/0893-164X.16.1.56
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muthén, B. (2001). Latent variable mixture modeling. In Marcoulides, G. A. & Schumacker, R. E. (Eds.), New Developments and Techniques in Structural Equation Modeling. (pp. 1–33). Mahwah, NJ: Larwence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Muthén, B. (2006). Should substance use disorders be considered as categorical or dimensional? Addiction, 101(Suppl. 1), 6–16. doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.2006.01583.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muthén, B., & Shedden, K. (1999). Finite mixture modeling with mixture outcomes using the EM algorithm. Biometrics, 55, 463–469. doi:10.1111/j.0006-341X.1999.00463.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2015). Mplus user’s guide (7th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
   Google Scholar
• Nagin, D. S. (1999). Analyzing developmental trajectories: A semiparametric, group-based approach. Psychological Methods, 4, 139–157. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.4.2.139
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagin, D. S., & Tremblay, R. E. (2001). Analyzing developmental trajectories of distinct but related behaviors: A group-based method. Psychological Methods, 6, 18–34. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.6.1.18
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neal, D. J., Corbin, W. R., & Fromme, K. (2006). Measurement of alcohol-related consequences among high school and college students: Application of item response models to the Rutgers Alcohol Problem Index. Psychological Assessment, 18, 402–414. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.18.4.402
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nylund, K. L., Asparouhov, T., & Muthén, B. O. (2007). Deciding on the number of classes in latent class analysis and growth mixture modeling: A Monte Carlo simulation study. Structural Equation Modeling, 14, 535–569. doi:10.1080/10705510701575396
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oshima, T., Kushubar, S., Scott, J., & Raju, N. (2009). DFIT8 for Windows user’s manual: Differential functioning of items and tests. St. Paul, MN: Assessment Systems Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Presley, C. A., Meilman, P. W., & Lyerla, R. (1994). Development of the core alcohol and drug survey: Initial findings and future directions. Journal of American College Health, 42, 248–255. doi:10.1080/07448481.1994.9936356
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Raju, N. S., Van der Linden, W. J., & Fleer, P. F. (1995). IRT-based internal measures of differential functioning of items and tests. Applied Psychological Measurement, 19, 353–368. doi:10.1177/014662169501900405
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reboussin, B. A., Ip, E. H., & Wolfson, M. (2008). Locally dependent latent class models with covariates: An application to under‐age drinking in the USA. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (Statistics in Society), 171, 877–897. doi:10.1111/rssa.2008.171.issue-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rinker, D. V., & Neighbors, C. (2015). Latent class analysis of DSM–5 alcohol use disorder criteria among heavy-drinking college students. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 57, 81–88. doi:10.1016/j.jsat.2015.05.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sampson, R. J., Laub, J. H., & Eggleston, E. P. (2004). On the robustness and validity of groups. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 20, 37–42. doi:10.1023/B:JOQC.0000016698.36239.91
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwarz, G. (1978). Estimating the dimension of a model. The Annals of Statistics, 6, 461–464. doi:10.1214/aos/1176344136
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steinley, D. (2004). Properties of the Hubert-Arable adjusted Rand index. Psychological Methods, 9, 386. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.9.3.386
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thissen, D. (2001). IRTLRDIF v2.0b: Software for the computation of the statistics involved in item response theory likelihood-ratio tests for differential item functioning. [Documentation for computer program]. Chapel Hill, NC: L. L. Thurstone Psychometric Laboratory, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Tofighi, D., & Enders, C. K. (2008). Identifying the correct number of classes in growth mixture models. In Hancock, G. R. (Ed.), Advances in latent variable mixture models (pp. 317–341). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
   Google Scholar
• Tsai, J., & Rosenheck, R. A. (2013). Conduct disorder behaviors, childhood family instability, and childhood abuse as predictors of severity of adult homelessness among American veterans. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 48, 477–486. doi:10.1007/s00127-012-0551-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tueller, S., & Lubke, G. (2010). Evaluation of structural equation mixture models: Parameter estimates and correct class assignment. Structural Equation Modeling, 17(2), 165–192.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vandenberg, R. J., & Lance, C. E. (2000). A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 3(1), 4–70. doi:10.1177/109442810031002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Horn, M. L., Smith, J., Fagan, A. A., Jaki, T., Feaster, D. J., Masyn, K., … Howe, G. (2012). Not quite normal: Consequences of violating the assumption of normality in regression mixture models. Structural Equation Modeling, 19, 227–249. doi:10.1080/10705511.2012.659622
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vuong, Q. H. (1989). Likelihood ratio tests for model selection and non-nested hypotheses. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 57, 307–333. doi:10.2307/1912557
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wells, J. E., Horwood, L. J., & Fergusson, D. M. (2004). Drinking patterns in mid-adolescence and psychosocial outcomes in late adolescence and early adulthood. Addiction, 99, 1529–1541. doi:10.1111/add.2004.99.issue-12
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, H. R., & Labouvie, E. W. (1989). Towards the assessment of adolescent problem drinking. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 50(1), 30–37. doi:10.15288/jsa.1989.50.30
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar