Mixture Simultaneous Factor Analysis for Capturing Differences in Latent Variables Between Higher Level Units of Multilevel Data

REFERENCES

• Archer, C. O., & Jennrich, R. I. (1973). Standard errors for orthogonally rotated factor loadings. Psychometrika, 38, 581–592. doi:10.1007/BF02291496
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asparouhov, T., & Muthén, B. (2014). Multiple-group factor analysis alignment. Structural Equation Modeling, 21, 495–508. doi:10.1080/10705511.2014.919210
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Battiti, R. (1992). First-and second-order methods for learning: Between steepest descent and Newton’s method. Neural Computation, 4, 141–166. doi:10.1162/neco.1992.4.2.141
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blafield, E. (1980). Clustering of observations from finite mixtures with structural information. Jyvaskyla, Finland: Jyvaskyla University.
   Google Scholar
• Borsboom, D., Mellenbergh, G. J., & van Heerden, J. (2003). The theoretical status of latent variables. Psychological Review, 110, 203–219. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.110.2.203
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brose, A., De Roover, K., Ceulemans, E., & Kuppens, P. (2015). Older adults’ affective experiences across 100 days are less variable and less complex than younger adults’. Psychology and Aging, 30, 194–208. doi:10.1037/a0038690
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bulteel, K., Wilderjans, T. F., Tuerlinckx, F., & Ceulemans, E. (2013). CHull as an alternative to AIC and BIC in the context of mixtures of factor analyzers. Behavior Research Methods, 45, 782–791. doi:10.3758/s13428-012-0293-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Raad, B., Barelds, D. P. H., Levert, E., Ostendorf, F., Mlačić, B., Di Blas, L., … Katigbak, M. S. (2010). Only three factors of personality description are fully replicable across languages: A comparison of 14 trait taxonomies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 160–173. doi:10.1037/a0017184
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Roover, K., Ceulemans, E., & Timmerman, M. E. (2012). How to perform multiblock component analysis in practice. Behavior Research Methods, 44, 41−56. doi:10.3758/s13428-011-0129-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Roover, K., Ceulemans, E., Timmerman, M. E., Nezlek, J. B., & Onghena, P. (2013). Modeling differences in the dimensionality of multiblock data by means of clusterwise simultaneous component analysis. Psychometrika, 78, 648–668. doi:10.1007/s11336-013-9318-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Roover, K., Ceulemans, E., Timmerman, M. E., & Onghena, P. (2013). A clusterwise simultaneous component method for capturing within-cluster differences in component variances and correlations. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 86, 81−102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Roover, K., Ceulemans, E., Timmerman, M. E., Vansteelandt, K., Stouten, J., & Onghena, P. (2012). Clusterwise simultaneous component analysis for analyzing structural differences in multivariate multiblock data. Psychological Methods, 17, 100−119. doi:10.1037/a0025385
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Winter, J. C. F., Dodou, D., & Wieringa, P. A. (2009). Exploratory factor analysis with small sample sizes. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 44, 147–181. doi:10.1080/00273170902794206
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dempster, A. P., Laird, N. M., & Rubin, D. B. (1977). Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological), 39, 1–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diener, E., Kim-Prieto, C., & Scollon, C., & Colleagues. (2001). [International College Survey 2001]. Unpublished raw data.
   Google Scholar
• Dolan, C. V., Oort, F. J., Stoel, R. D., & Wicherts, J. M. (2009). Testing measurement invariance in the target rotated multigroup exploratory factor model. Structural Equation Modeling, 16, 295–314. doi:10.1080/10705510902751416
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dziak, J. J., Coffman, D. L., Lanza, S. T., & Li, R. (2012). Sensitivity and specificity of information criteria. PeerJ PrePrints, 3, e1350.
   Google Scholar
• Eid, M., & Diener, E. (2001). Norms for experiencing emotions in different cultures: Inter- and intranational differences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 869–885. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.81.5.869
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ekman, P. (1999). Basic emotions. In T. Dalgleish & M. J. Power (Eds.), Handbook of cognition and emotion (pp. 45–60). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Fonseca, J. R., & Cardoso, M. G. (2007). Mixture-model cluster analysis using information theoretical criteria. Intelligent Data Analysis, 11, 155–173.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fontaine, J. R. J., Poortinga, Y. H., Setiadi, B., & Markam, S. S. (2002). Cognitive structure of emotion terms in Indonesia and the Netherlands. Cognition & Emotion, 16, 61–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fontaine, J. R. J., Scherer, K. R., Roesch, E. B., & Ellsworth, P. C. (2007). The world of emotions is not two-dimensional. Psychological Science, 18, 1050–1057. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.02024.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gorsuch, R. L. (1990). Common factor analysis versus component analysis: Some well and little known facts. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 25, 33–39. doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr2501_3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hessen, D. J., Dolan, C. V., & Wicherts, J. M. (2006). Multi-group exploratory factor analysis and the power to detect uniform bias. Applied Psychological Research, 30, 233–246.
   Google Scholar
• Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55. doi:10.1080/10705519909540118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hubert, L., & Arabie, P. (1985). Comparing partitions. Journal of Classification, 2, 193–218. doi:10.1007/BF01908075
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jak, S., Oort, F. J., & Dolan, C. V. (2013). A test for cluster bias: Detecting violations of measurement invariance across clusters in multilevel data. Structural Equation Modeling, 20, 265–282. doi:10.1080/10705511.2013.769392
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jennrich, R. I. (1973). Standard errors for obliquely rotated factor loadings. Psychometrika, 38, 593–604. doi:10.1007/BF02291497
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jennrich, R. I., & Sampson, P. F. (1976). Newton–Raphson and related algorithms for maximum likelihood variance component estimation. Technometrics, 18, 11–17. doi:10.2307/1267911
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jolliffe, I. T. (1986). Principal component analysis. New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Jöreskog, K. G. (1971). Simultaneous factor analysis in several populations. Psychometrika, 36, 409–426. doi:10.1007/BF02291366
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaiser, H. F. (1958). The Varimax criterion for analytic rotation in factor analysis. Psychometrika, 23, 187–200. doi:10.1007/BF02289233
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiers, H. A. (1997). Techniques for rotating two or more loading matrices to optimal agreement and simple structure: A comparison and some technical details. Psychometrika, 62, 545–568. doi:10.1007/BF02294642
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, E. S., Joo, S. H., Lee, P., Wang, Y., & Stark, S. (2016). Measurement invariance testing across between-level latent classes using multilevel factor mixture modeling. Structural Equation Modeling, 23, 870–887. doi:10.1080/10705511.2016.1196108
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krysinska, K., De Roover, K., Bouwens, J., Ceulemans, E., Corveleyn, J., Dezutter, J., … Pollefeyt, D. (2014). Measuring religious attitudes in secularized Western European context: A psychometric analysis of the Post-Critical Belief Scale. The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 24, 263–281. doi:10.1080/10508619.2013.879429
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuppens, P., Ceulemans, E., Timmerman, M. E., Diener, E., & Kim-Prieto, C. (2006). Universal intracultural and intercultural dimensions of the recalled frequency of emotional experience. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 37, 491–515. doi:10.1177/0022022106290474
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawley, D. N., & Maxwell, A. E. (1962). Factor analysis as a statistical method. The Statistician, 12, 209–229. doi:10.2307/2986915
   Google Scholar
• Lee, S. Y., & Jennrich, R. I. (1979). A study of algorithms for covariance structure analysis with specific comparisons using factor analysis. Psychometrika, 44, 99–113. doi:10.1007/BF02293789
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lorenzo‐Seva, U., Kiers, H. A., & Berge, J. M. (2002). Techniques for oblique factor rotation of two or more loading matrices to a mixture of simple structure and optimal agreement. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 55, 337–360. doi:10.1348/000711002760554624
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lubke, G. H., & Muthén, B. (2005). Investigating population heterogeneity with factor mixture models. Psychological Methods, 10, 21. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.10.1.21
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lukočienė, O., Varriale, R., & Vermunt, J. K. (2010). The simultaneous decision(s) about the number of lower‐ and higher‐level classes in multilevel latent class analysis. Sociological Methodology, 40, 247–283. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9531.2010.01231.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacKinnon, N. J., & Keating, L. J. (1989). The structure of emotions: Canada–United States comparisons. Social Psychology Quarterly, 52, 70–83. doi:10.2307/2786905
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magnus, J. R., & Neudecker, H. (2007). Matrix differential calculus with applications in statistics and econometrics (3rd ed.). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• McDonald, R. P. (1999). Test theory: A unified treatment. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• McDonald, R. P., & Krane, W. R. (1979). A Monte Carlo study of local identifiability and degrees of freedom in the asymptotic likelihood ratio test. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 32, 121–132. doi:10.1111/bmsp.1979.32.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLachlan, G. J., & Peel, D. (2000). Finite mixture models. New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Muthén, B., & Asparouhov, T. (2013). BSEM measurement invariance analysis. Mplus Web Notes, 17, 1–48.
   Google Scholar
• Muthén, B. O. (1989). Latent variable modeling in heterogeneous populations. Psychometrika, 54, 557–585. doi:10.1007/BF02296397
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muthén, B. O. (1991). Multilevel factor analysis of class and student achievement components. Journal of Educational Measurement, 28, 338–354. doi:10.1111/j.1745-3984.1991.tb00363.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2005). Mplus: Statistical analysis with latent variables. User’s guide. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
   Google Scholar
• Ogasawara, H. (2000). Some relationships between factors and components. Psychometrika, 65, 167–185. doi:10.1007/BF02294372
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearson, K. (1901). On lines and planes of closest fit to systems of points in space. Philosophical Magazine, 2, 559–572. doi:10.1080/14786440109462720
   Google Scholar
• Rindskopf, D. (1984). Structural equation models empirical identification, Heywood cases, and related problems. Sociological Methods & Research, 13, 109–119. doi:10.1177/0049124184013001004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodriguez, C., & Church, A. T. (2003). The structure and personality correlates of affect in Mexico: Evidence of cross-cultural comparability using the Spanish language. Journal of Cross Cultural Psychology, 34, 211–230. doi:10.1177/0022022102250247
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosseel, Y. (2012). Lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48, 1–36. doi:10.18637/jss.v048.i02
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubin, D. B., & Thayer, D. T. (1982). EM algorithms for ML factor analysis. Psychometrika, 47, 69–76. doi:10.1007/BF02293851
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russell, J. A., & Barrett, L. F. (1999). Core affect, prototypical emotional episodes, and other things called emotion: Dissecting the elephant. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 805–819. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.76.5.805
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz, S. H. (1994). Beyond individualism/collectivism: New cultural dimensions of values. In U. Kim, H. C. Triandis, C. Kagitcibasi, S. C. Choi, & G. Yoon (Eds.), Individualism and collectivism: Theory, methods, and applications (pp. 85–119). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Schwarz, G. (1978). Estimating the dimension of a model. The Annals of Statistics, 6, 461–464. doi:10.1214/aos/1176344136
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sörbom, D. (1974). A general method for studying differences in factor means and factor structure between groups. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 27, 229–239. doi:10.1111/bmsp.1974.27.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stearns, P. N. (1994). American cool: Constructing a twentieth-century emotional style. New York, NY: NYU Press.
   Google Scholar
• Steinley, D., & Brusco, M. J. (2011). Evaluating mixture modeling for clustering: Recommendations and cautions. Psychological Methods, 16, 63–79. doi:10.1037/a0022673
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Timmerman, M. E., & Kiers, H. A. L. (2003). Four simultaneous component models of multivariate time series from more than one subject to model intraindividual and interindividual differences. Psychometrika, 86, 105–122. doi:10.1007/BF02296656
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tucker, L. R. (1951). A method for synthesis of factor analysis studies (Personnel Research Section Report No. 984). Washington, DC: Department of the Army.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations Development Program. (2000). Human development report 2000. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Van Driel, O. P. (1978). On various causes of improper solutions in maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 43, 225–243. doi:10.1007/BF02293865
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varriale, R., & Vermunt, J. K. (2012). Multilevel mixture factor models. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 47, 247–275. doi:10.1080/00273171.2012.658337
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Velicer, W. F., & Fava, J. L. (1998). Affects of variable and subject sampling on factor pattern recovery. Psychological Methods, 3, 231. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.3.2.231
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Velicer, W. F., & Jackson, D. N. (1990). Component analysis versus common factor analysis: Some issues in selecting an appropriate procedure. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 25, 1–28. doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr2501_1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Velicer, W. F., Peacock, A. C., & Jackson, D. N. (1982). A comparison of component and factor patterns: A Monte Carlo approach. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 17, 371–388. doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr1703_5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vermunt, J. K., & Magidson, J. (2013). Technical guide for Latent GOLD 5.0: Basic, advanced, and syntax. Belmont, MA: Statistical Innovations.
   Google Scholar
• Widaman, K. F. (1993). Common factor analysis versus principal component analysis: Differential bias in representing model parameters? Multivariate Behavioral Research, 28, 263–311. doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr2803_1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yung, Y. F. (1997). Finite mixtures in confirmatory factor-analysis models. Psychometrika, 62, 297–330. doi:10.1007/BF02294554
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, J., Jin, L., & Shi, L. (2015). Mixture model selection via hierarchical BIC. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 88, 139–153. doi:10.1016/j.csda.2015.01.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, J., Yu, P. L., & Shi, L. (2013). Model selection for mixtures of factor analyzers via hierarchical BIC. Yunnan, China: School of Statistics and Mathematics, Yunnan University of Finance and Economics.
   Google Scholar