REFERENCES
- Asparouhov, T., & Muthén, B. (2014a). Auxiliary variables in mixture modeling: Three-step approaches using Mplus. Structural Equation Modeling, 21, 329–341.
- Asparouhov, T., & Muthén, B. (2014b). Auxiliary variables in mixture modeling: Using the BCH method in Mplus to estimate a distal outcome model and an arbitrary secondary model. Mplus Web Notes, 21, 1–22.
- Bakk, Z., Oberski, D. L., & Vermunt, J. K. (2014). Relating latent class assignments to external variables: Standard errors for correct inference. Political Analysis, 22, 520–540.
- Bakk, Z., Oberski, D. L., & Vermunt, J. K. (2016). Relating latent class membership to continuous distal outcomes: Improving the LTB approach and a modified three-step implementation. Structural Equation Modeling, 23, 278–289.
- Bakk, Z., Tekle, F. B., & Vermunt, J. K. (2013). Estimating the association between latent class membership and external variables using bias-adjusted three-step approaches.Sociological Methodology, 43, 272–311.
- Bakk, Z., & Vermunt, J. K. (2016). Robustness of stepwise latent class modeling with continuous distal outcomes. Structural Equation Modeling, 23, 20–31.
- Bauer, D. J. (2007). Observations on the use of growth mixture models in psychological research. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 42, 757–786.
- Bauldry, S., Shanahan, M. J., Russo, R., Roberts, B. W., & Damian, R. (2016). Attractiveness compensates for low status background in the prediction of educational attainment. PLoS ONE, 11 (6), e0155313.
- Bolck, A., Croon, M., & Hagenaars, J. (2004). Estimating latent structure models with categorical variables: One-step versus three-step estimators. Political Analysis, 12, 3–27.
- Chandola, T., Clarke, P., Morris, J., & Blane, D. (2006). Pathways between education and health: A causal modelling approach. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (Statistics in Society), 169, 337–359.
- Clark, S. L., & Muthén, B. (2009). Relating latent class analysis results to variables not included in the analysis. Retrieved from www.statmodel.com/download/relatinglca.pdf
- Hobcraft, J. (1998). Intergenerational and life-course transmission of social exclusion: Influences and childhood poverty, family disruption and contact with the police. CASEpaper 15, Centre for Analysis of Social Exclusion.
- Lanza, S. T., Tan, X., & Bray, B. C. (2013). Latent class analysis with distal outcomes: A flexible model-based approach. Structural Equation Modeling, 20, 1–26.
- Muthén, B. (2001). Latent variable mixture modeling. In New developments and techniques in structural equation modeling, pp. 1–33.
- Muthén, L., & Muthén, B. (2015). Mplus. In Statistical analysis with latent variables. ( Version 7.31, 3)
- Nylund, K. L., Asparouhov, T., & Muthén, B. (2007). Deciding on the number of classes in latent class analysis and growth mixture modeling: A Monte Carlo simulation study. Structural Equation Modeling, 14, 535–569.
- Ploubidis, G. B., Silverwood, R. J., DeStavola, B., & Grundy, E. (2015). Life-course partnership status and biomarkers in midlife: Evidence from the 1958 British birth cohort. American Journal of Public Health, 105, 1596–1603.
- Power, C., & Elliott, J. (2006). Cohort profile: 1958 British birth cohort (National Child Development Study). International Journal of Epidemiology, 35(1), 34–41.
- Schoon, I., Sacker, A., & Bartley, M. (2003). Socio-economic adversity and psychosocial adjustment: A developmental-contextual perspective. Social Science & Medicine, 57, 1001–1015.
- Vermunt, J. K. (2010). Latent class modeling with covariates: Two improved three-step approaches. Political Analysis, 18, 450–469.
- Vermunt, J. K., & Magidson, J. (2013). LG-Syntax user’s guide: Manual for Latent GOLD 5.0 syntax module. Belmont, MA: Statistical Innovations Inc.