522
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Nonlinear Growth Mixture Models With Fractional Polynomials: An Illustration With Early Childhood Mathematics Ability

ORCID Icon, , , &

REFERENCES

  • Agranov, M., Caplin, A., & Tergiman, C. (2015). Naïve play and the process of choice in guessing games. Journal of the Economic Science Association, 1(2), 1–146. doi:10.1007/s40881-015-0003-5
  • Andersson, M. A. (2017). An odd ladder to climb: Socioeconomic differences across levels of subjective social status. Social Indicators Research. Advance online publication. doi:10.1007/s11205-017-1559-7
  • Asparouhov, T., & Muthén, B. (2009). Exploratory structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling, 16, 397–438.
  • Asparouhov, T., & Muthén, B. (2014). Auxiliary variables in mixture modeling: Three-step approaches using Mplus. Structural Equation Modeling, 21, 329–341. doi:10.1080/10705511.2014.915181
  • Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using {lme4}. Journal of Statistical Software, 67, 1–48. doi:10.18637/jss.v067.i01
  • Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238–246.
  • Bollen, K., & Curran, P. (2006). Latent curve models: A structural equation approach. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
  • Box, G. E. P., & Tidwell, P. W. (1962). Transformation of the independent variables. Technometrics, 4, 531–550.
  • Browne, M. W. (1993). Structured latent curve models. In C. M. Cuadras & C. R. Rao (Eds.), Multivariate analysis: Future directions 2 (pp. 171–198). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: North-Holland.
  • Browne, M. W., & Du Toit, S. H. C. (1991). Models for learning data. In L. Collins & J. L. Horn (Eds.), Best methods for the analysis of change (pp. 47–68). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
  • Burchinal, M., & Appelbaum, M. (1991). Estimating individual developmental functions: Methods and their assumptions. Child Development, 62, 23–43.
  • Burnham, K. P., & Anderson, D. R. (2004). Multimodel inference: Understanding AIC and BIC in model selection. Sociological Methods and Research, 33, 261–304.
  • Clements, D., & Sarama, J. (2009). Learning and teaching early math: The learning trajectories approach. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Codd, C. L., & Cudeck, R. (2014). Nonlinear random-effects mixture models for repeated measures. Psychometrika, 79, 60–83. doi:10.1007/s11336-013-9358-9
  • Cudeck, R. (1996). Mixed-effects models in the study of individual differences with repeated measures data. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 31, 371–403.
  • Cudeck, R., & Klebe, K. J. (2002). Multiphase mixed-effects models for repeated measures data. Psychological Methods, 7, 41–63.
  • Ding, C. (2006). Using regression mixture analysis in educational research. Practical Assessment Research & Evaluation, 11(11). Retrieved from www.http://pareonline.net/getvn.asp?v=11&n=11
  • Ginsburg, H. P., & Baroody, A. J. (2003). Test of early mathematics ability–Third edition. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
  • Goodman, L. A. (2002). Latent class cluster analysis: The empirical study of latent types, latent variables, and latent structures. In J. A. Hagenaars & A. L. McCutcheon (Eds.), Applied latent class analysis (pp. 3–55). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
  • Grimm, K. J., Ram, N., & Estabrook, R. (2010). Nonlinear structured growth mixture models in Mplus and OpenMx. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 45, 887–909.
  • Grimm, K. J., Steele, J. S., Ram, N., & Nesselroade, J. R. (2013). Exploratory latent growth models in the structural equation modeling framework. Structural Equation Modeling, 20, 568–591. doi:10.1080/10705511.2013.824775
  • Hallquist, M., & Wiley, J. (2016). MplusAutomation: Automating Mplus model estimation and interpretation. R package version 0.6-4. Retrieved from https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=MplusAutomation.
  • Harring, J. R. (2005). Nonlinear mixed effects mixture model: A model for clustering nonlinear longitudinal profiles ( Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN.
  • Harring, J. R. (2012). Finite mixtures of nonlinear mixed effects models. In J. R. Harring & G. R. Hancock (Eds.), Advances in longitudinal methods in the social and behavioral sciences (pp. 159–192). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
  • Jedidi, K., Jagpal, H. S., & DeSarbo, W. S. (1997). Finite-mixture structural equation models for response-based segmentation and unobserved heterogeneity. Marketing Science, 16(1), 39–59.
  • Kelley, K. (2005). Estimating nonlinear change models in heterogeneous populations when class membership is unknown: Defining and developing the latent classification differential change model ( Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Notre Dame, South Bend, IN.
  • Kelley, K. (2008). Nonlinear change models in populations with unobserved heterogeneity. Methodology, 4, 97–112.
  • Kim, S.-Y. (2014). Determining the number of latent classes in single- and multiphase growth mixture models. Structural Equation Modeling, 21, 263–279. doi:10.1080/10705511.2014.882690
  • Laird, N. M., & Ware, J. H. (1982). Random-effects models for longitudinal data. Biometrics, 38, 963–974.
  • Lanza, S. T., & Collins, L. M. (2006). A mixture model of discontinuous development in heavy drinking from ages 18 to 30: The role of college enrollment. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 67, 552–561.
  • Li, L., & Hser, Y. (2011). On inclusion of covariates for class enumeration of growth mixture models. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 46(2):266–302.
  • Loken, E., & Molenaar, P. (2008). Categories or continua? The correspondence between mixture models and factor models. In G. R. Hancock & K. M. Samuelsen (Eds.), Advances in latent variable mixture models (pp. 277–297). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
  • Long, J. D., & Ryoo, J. (2010). Using fractional polynomials to model nonlinear trends in longitudinal data. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 63(1), 177–203.
  • Lubke, G. (2010). Latent variable mixture modeling. In G. R. Hancock & R. O. Mueller (Eds.), The reviewer’s guide to quantitative methods in the social sciences (pp. 209–219). New York, NY: Routledge.
  • McArdle, J. J., & Epstein, D. B. (1987). Latent growth curves within developmental structural equation models. Child Development, 58, 110–133.
  • McArdle, J. J., & Nesselroade, J. R. (2003). Growth curve analysis in contemporary psychological research. In J. Shinka & W. Velicer (Eds.), Comprehensive handbook of psychology: Vol. 2. Research methods in psychology (pp. 447–480). New York, NY: Wiley.
  • McLachlan, G. J., & Peel, D. (2000). Finite mixture models. New York, NY: Wiley.
  • Meehl, P. E. (1992). Factors and taxa, traits and types, differences of degree and differences in kind. Journal of Personality, 60, 117–174.
  • Meredith,W., & Tisak, J. (1984, July). “Tuckerizing” curves. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychometric Society, Santa Barbara, CA.
  • Meredith, W., & Tisak, J. (1990). Latent curve analysis. Psychometrika, 55, 107–122.
  • Muthén, B. O., & Muthén, L. K. (2000a). Integrating person-centered and variable-centered analysis: Growth mixture modeling with latent trajectory classes. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 24, 882–891.
  • Muthén, B. O., & Muthén, L. K. (2000b). The development of heavy drinking from age 18 to 37 in a U.S. national sample. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 61, 290–300.
  • Muthén, B. O., & Shedden, K. (1999). Finite mixture modeling with mixture outcomes using the EM algorithm. Biometrics, 55, 463–469.
  • Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998–2015). Mplus user’s guide (7th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Author.
  • National Association for the Education of Young Children & National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (2002). Early childhood mathematics: Promoting good beginnings. Retrieved from http://www.naeyc.org/positionstatements/mathematics
  • National Association for the Education of Young Children & National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2010). Early childhood mathematics: Promoting good beginnings. A joint position statement. Washington, DC: NAEYC.
  • Nikolaeva, R., Bhatnagar, A., & Ghose, S. (2015). Exploring curvilinearity through fractional polynomials in management research. Organizational Research Methods, 18, 738–760. doi:10.1177/1094428115584006
  • Nylund, K. L., Asparouhov, T., & Muthén, B. O. (2007). Deciding on the number of classes in latent class analysis and growth mixture modeling: A Monte Carlo simulation study. Structural Equation Modeling, 14, 535–569. doi:10.1080/10705510701575396
  • Peugh, J., & Fan, X. (2013). Modeling unobserved heterogeneity using latent profile analysis: A Monte Carlo simulation. Structural Equation Modeling, 20, 616–639. doi:10.1080/10705511.2013.824780
  • Pinheiro, J. C., & Bates, D. M. (2000). Mixed-effects models in S and S-plus. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
  • R Core Team. (2017). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.. Retrieved from https://www.R-project.org/
  • Raftery, A. E. (1993). Bayesian model selection in structural equation models. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 163–180). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • Raftery, A. E. (1995). Bayesian model selection in social research. Sociological Methodology, 25, 111–163.
  • Ram, N., & Grimm, K. J. (2007). Using simple and complex growth models to articulate developmental change: Matching method to theory. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 31, 303–316.
  • Ram, N., & Grimm, K. J. (2009). Growth mixture modeling: A method for identifying differences in longitudinal change among unobserved groups. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 33, 565–576.
  • Ramaswamy, V., DeSarbo, W. S., Reibstein, D. J., & Robinson, W. T. (1993). An empirical pooling approach for estimating marketing mix elasticities with PIMS data. Marketing Science, 12, 103–124.
  • Reise, S. P. (2012). The rediscovery of bifactor measurement models. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 45, 667–696. doi:10.1080/00273171.2012.715555
  • Royston, P., & Altman, D. G. (1994). Regression using fractional polynomials of continuous covariates: Parsimonious parametric modeling. Applied Statistics, 43, 429–467.
  • Ruscio, J., Haslam, N., & Ruscio, A. M. (2006). Introduction to the taxometric method: A practical guide. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Ruscio, J., & Ruscio, A. M. (2008). Advancing psychological science through the study of latent structure. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 17, 203–207.
  • Ryoo, J. H., Molfese, V., Brown, E. T., Karp, K. S., Welch, G., & Bovaird, J. A. (2015). Examining factor structures on the Test of Early Mathematics Ability–3: A longitudinal approach. Learning and Individual Differences, 41, 21–29. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2015.06.003
  • Ryoo, J. H., Molfese, V., Heaton, R., Zhou, X., Brown, E. T., Prokasky, A., & Davis, E. (2014). Early mathematics skills from prekindergarten to first grade: Score changes and ability group differences in Kentucky, Nebraska, and Shanghai samples. Journal of Advanced Academics, 25, 162–188. doi:10.1177/1932202X14538975
  • Schlattmann, P. (2009). Medical applications of finite mixture models. Berlin, Germany: Springer.
  • Schwarz, G. (1978). Estimating the dimension of a model. Annals of Statistics, 6, 461–464.
  • Serang, S., Zhang, Z., Helm, J., Steele, J. S., & Grimm, K. J. (2015). Evaluation of a Bayesian approach to estimating nonlinear mixed effects mixture models. Structural Equation Modeling, 22, 202–215. doi:10.1080/10705511.2014.937322
  • Skrondal, A., & Rabe-Hesketh, S. (2004). Generalized latent variable modeling: Multilevel, longitudinal, and structural equation models. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall/CRC.
  • Steiger, J. H. (1989). EzPATH: Causal modeling. Evanston, IL: SYSTAT.
  • Sturge-Apple, M. L., Davies, P. T., & Cummings, E. M. (2010). Typologies of family functioning and children’s adjustment during the early school years. Child Development, 81, 1320–1335. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01471.x
  • Tekle, F. B., Gudicha, D. W., & Vermunt, J. K. (2016). Power analysis for the bootstrap likelihood ratio test for the number of classes in latent class models. Advances in Classification and Data Analysis, 10, 209–224. doi:10.1007/s11634-016-0251-0
  • Vermunt, J. K. (2010). Latent class modeling with covariates: Two improved three-step approaches. Political Analysis, 18, 450–469. doi:10.1093/pan/mpq025
  • Westerfeld, W. W. (1956). Biological response curves. Science, 123, 1017–1019.
  • Willett, J. B., & Sayer, A. G. (1994). Using covariance structure analysis to detect correlates and predictors of individual change over time. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 363–381.
  • Winsor, C. P. (1932). The Gompertz curve as a growth curve. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 18, 1–8.
  • Zhang, H., & Huang, Y. (2015). Finite mixture models and their applications: A review. Austin Biometrics and Biostatatistics, 2(1), 1–6.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.